🧵Here’re 3 crucial lessons that reveal Putin's strategic collapse (1/15)
(2/15) The Kremlin’s propagandists claimed the Syria intervention was a geopolitical triumph—a bold move to counter Western influence and return Russia to the big table on the world stage after the annexation of Crimea.
(3/15) Instead of proving Russia’s strength, Syria became a fiasco on par with America’s disaster in Afghanistan—only without any advance warning.
(4/15) Putin’s obsessive focus on the illegal war in Ukraine drained resources from Syria. This left Assad wide open and revealed Moscow’s inability to maintain influence on multiple fronts.
(5/15) Lesson 1️⃣ To Putin, Allies Are Expendable
Diplomatically, Assad’s collapse proves Putin is a fair-weather ally. He might help at first, but his own interests always come first, as Armenia and others have learned the hard way.
(6/15) This setback dents Russian influence across the Global South. After this public humiliation, Putin’s promises to “guarantee security” will be harder to take seriously.
(7/15) It also sends shockwaves through Central Asia. Moscow’s position, unquestioned for decades, now looks fragile—especially as China courts these countries.
(8/15) In the Middle East, Putin’s credibility is shattered. Syria once helped bring Moscow and Tehran closer and made Russia a regional player. All of that is now in doubt.
(9/15) Lesson 2️⃣ Superpower Myth Busted
The future of the Russia’s Mediterranean bases is unclear. Russian ships may have to crowd into the Black Sea—under Erdogan’s watchful eye—or move to the Baltic, now surrounded by NATO.
(10/15) At home, the Syria gamble was supposed to boost pride and faith in Russia’s military. Instead, paired with the Ukraine quagmire, it reveals that Putin’s “superpower” claim is a sham.
(11/15) Lesson 3️⃣ Russia under Putin Lacks Resources to Be Global Power.
The failure exposes a core weakness in Putin’s strategy: brute force alone doesn’t guarantee true stability. There’s no sustainable economic or political framework behind his moves.
(12/15) For years, Putin demanded equal treatment from world powers and insisted on a “multipolar” order. But now we see he can’t effectively project power even when given the chance.
(13/15) Recent events prove that Putin’s global ambitions collapse when he chases them at the expense of everything else. His Ukraine fixation cost him influence abroad.
(14/15) Billions of dollars and countless lives were wasted in Syria. This should wake up anyone who still views Putin as a master strategist. He’s willing to abandon allies if it suits him.
Photo 2 - Syrian diaspora members raise opposition flag at Moscow embassy, Dec. 9
(15/15) For more on how Assad’s fall affects Putin, see @baunov’s analysis for @meduza_en:
The Russian Anti-War Committee demands an immediate, unconditional ceasefire in Ukraine to stop the senseless bloodshed.
But let's be clear: stopping the fighting doesn't end the war. The war comes from the very nature of Putin's regime.
🧵Russian opposition's warning to the world (1/9)
2/ Stopping the fighting in Ukraine will end the senseless deaths on both sides of the frontline. But a ceasefire does not mean the war is over. The war stems from the very nature of Putin's regime and will continue as long as that regime exists.
3/ Putin's regime was designed from the start to crush civil liberties, destroy democratic institutions, and concentrate power in the hands of one man. Internal violence against civil society and external aggression against neighbors are two sides of the same totalitarian coin.
A Moscow court sentenced Anastasia Burakova to 7.5 years in prison in absentia.
@KovchegLive (The Ark) — the organization she runs — housed 4,000+ Russians fleeing mobilization and helped 160,000 navigate emigration since 2022.
Russia wanted her on Interpol's list. Interpol said no. (Read on)
Burakova was convicted for a speech at an anti-war rally in Tbilisi where she said Russian forces were "destroying Ukrainian cities, torturing people in occupied territories, killing civilians."
During Putin's mobilization in September 2022, Ark's capacity surged from 28 to 220 beds. They opened emergency shelters in Kazakhstan as hundreds of thousands fled conscription to the neighboring visa-free country. koerber-stiftung.de/en/projects/uk…
Europe's military budgets are set to reach 5% of GDP. Smart leaders know — Putin will start new wars within 3 years.
🧵Yet, they lose sight of another threat: Russia's irreversible drift into China's orbit (Read on)
From today's session of the Russian Anti-War Committee on European Security and Peacemaking
We've returned to the 1970s, and this is exemplified by the escalation already built into Western military budgets: Europe finally awakens to this uncomfortable reality of a Cold War-style military threat at its doorstep and increases military spending.
This is a logical, slightly belated but necessary step because Putin operates on a predictable cycle. He starts conflicts whenever his domestic position weakens — this is his modus operandi, war serves as a political tool rather than a last resort.
Soviet Union lost 27 million people fighting Nazis in WWII. Now Putin exploits their sacrifice to justify bombing Ukrainian children.
He tries to equate the Great Patriotic War and his fascist aggression. But the comparison fails on every level — here are the facts:
The Great Patriotic War began when Germany invaded the Soviet Union without warning. Hitler's goal was clear: destroy the Soviet state and its people.
In 2022, at 4 AM on February 24th, Kyiv was bombed - but Russia was doing the bombing. No one attacked Russia. Putin ordered his troops to invade a neighboring country without provocation.
In 1941, Soviet people knew exactly why they fought: "We were treacherously attacked, we will fight because our cause is just."
The Ukraine invasion began with incoherent objectives. "Denazification" as a goal was quickly abandoned. Now the Kremlin avoids specifics but keeps saying that "all objectives will be achieved."
Putin's spies are building a hit list of journalists, politicians, and public figures across Europe.
GRU agents are ordered to collect home addresses of Kremlin critics for potential "active measures," @dossier_center reveals
🧵Here’s why they’re doing it — and please RT
According to Dossier Center sources, Russian military intelligence agents received urgent orders in early 2025 to gather information on critics who influence public opinion against the Kremlin.
Beyond funding sources and potential sponsors, intelligence officers are demanding personal data, including both work and home addresses of targets, creating what amounts to a hitlist for future operations.