🧵Here’re 3 crucial lessons that reveal Putin's strategic collapse (1/15)
(2/15) The Kremlin’s propagandists claimed the Syria intervention was a geopolitical triumph—a bold move to counter Western influence and return Russia to the big table on the world stage after the annexation of Crimea.
(3/15) Instead of proving Russia’s strength, Syria became a fiasco on par with America’s disaster in Afghanistan—only without any advance warning.
(4/15) Putin’s obsessive focus on the illegal war in Ukraine drained resources from Syria. This left Assad wide open and revealed Moscow’s inability to maintain influence on multiple fronts.
(5/15) Lesson 1️⃣ To Putin, Allies Are Expendable
Diplomatically, Assad’s collapse proves Putin is a fair-weather ally. He might help at first, but his own interests always come first, as Armenia and others have learned the hard way.
(6/15) This setback dents Russian influence across the Global South. After this public humiliation, Putin’s promises to “guarantee security” will be harder to take seriously.
(7/15) It also sends shockwaves through Central Asia. Moscow’s position, unquestioned for decades, now looks fragile—especially as China courts these countries.
(8/15) In the Middle East, Putin’s credibility is shattered. Syria once helped bring Moscow and Tehran closer and made Russia a regional player. All of that is now in doubt.
(9/15) Lesson 2️⃣ Superpower Myth Busted
The future of the Russia’s Mediterranean bases is unclear. Russian ships may have to crowd into the Black Sea—under Erdogan’s watchful eye—or move to the Baltic, now surrounded by NATO.
(10/15) At home, the Syria gamble was supposed to boost pride and faith in Russia’s military. Instead, paired with the Ukraine quagmire, it reveals that Putin’s “superpower” claim is a sham.
(11/15) Lesson 3️⃣ Russia under Putin Lacks Resources to Be Global Power.
The failure exposes a core weakness in Putin’s strategy: brute force alone doesn’t guarantee true stability. There’s no sustainable economic or political framework behind his moves.
(12/15) For years, Putin demanded equal treatment from world powers and insisted on a “multipolar” order. But now we see he can’t effectively project power even when given the chance.
(13/15) Recent events prove that Putin’s global ambitions collapse when he chases them at the expense of everything else. His Ukraine fixation cost him influence abroad.
(14/15) Billions of dollars and countless lives were wasted in Syria. This should wake up anyone who still views Putin as a master strategist. He’s willing to abandon allies if it suits him.
Photo 2 - Syrian diaspora members raise opposition flag at Moscow embassy, Dec. 9
(15/15) For more on how Assad’s fall affects Putin, see @baunov’s analysis for @meduza_en:
Unpopular opinion: Putin is no longer the absolute ruler of Russia.
He is a hostage to his own security apparatus.
(🧵Read on — 1/13)
Putin came out of the KGB — and the KGB's heir is the FSB. Four years of war later, the FSB has seized control of Russian life: not as a spy service, but as a political police with emergency powers that now substitutes for the state itself.
[2/13]
Start with communications. A law Putin signed in February 2025 lets the FSB order any carrier to cut any connection at its own discretion, with no explanation and no liability to the customer.
Putin's regime has a quiet way to punish the Russians who fled it. It cancels their passports, freezes their accounts, and turns Interpol against them.
🧵Last week the EU named this for what it is [1/12]
The Kremlin does not only jail people inside Russia but reaches across borders to punish the Russians who left.
For those who settled in Europe, the punishment is bureaucratic: cancelled passports, frozen bank accounts, and the misuse of Interpol against them (I personally have been declared a terrorist!)
[2/12]
These are deliberate instruments of political persecution. Without valid documents a person cannot sign a lease, hold a legal job, open bank account, travel, or study.
This week the FSB arrested Ilya Traber, a St. Petersburg businessman from the same world Putin came from. Before Putin ran the largest country on earth, he carried his boss's suitcase in that city.
🧵Here is the origin story. [1/15]
Putin owed his start to St. Petersburg Mayor Anatoly Sobchak, often seen in photos as the subordinate carrying his boss’s suitcase.
[2/15]
In that role, he managed the city’s international trade—a position I have always described as the 'chief seller of the motherland.
The man who set fire to the family home of the British PM was promised a few thousand dollars. The sole condition: it had to make national news. 🧵[1/12]
Roman Lavrynovych, a 22-year-old Ukrainian construction worker in London, was convicted at the Old Bailey this week over three fires:
1️⃣ A car Keir Starmer once owned
2️⃣ A flat he used to live in
3️⃣ And his family home
Starmer called it "an attack on democracy." [2/12]
The arsonist didn't feel strongly about the British government and he didn't pick the targets. Guided via Telegram in Ukrainian and Russian, he just wanted to make quick cash.
The FT traced this handler to Russia and to NoName057(16), a pro-Kremlin hacktivist group the US calls a "state-sanctioned project." [3/12]
“They’ve lost their fear.” A spy who inspired “The Americans” uses “Putin’s Davos” to suggest blowing up LNG tankers bound for Europe.
(🧵Here’s what else he said)
His name is Andrei Bezrukov. For two decades he lived in the U.S. under a stolen Canadian identity, residing in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as Harvard-educated consultant “Donald Heathfield.”
He worked with his wife Elena Vavilova, who was posing as real estate agent “Tracey Foley.” At the time of the arrest, they had two sons, 20 and 16, who had no idea their parents were spies for a foreign country.
Imagine this: terrorists take 900 people hostage. They have political demands, offer to release 10 people a day. They name the opposition MP they're ready to talk to.
The MP agrees—but the president stops him, afraid the MP's rating might rise... 🧵[1/7]
That president was Vladimir Putin, and the opposition MP was Boris Nemtsov. The 2002 Nord-Ost theater siege was one of the moments that came to define Putin's presidency.
He chose to use a fentanyl-based gas to knock out the terrorists and then sent in special forces to kill them off.
[2/7]
The problem: the gas didn't selectively work on terrorists only—it also affected hostages. The medics who went in didn't know how to revive them because they weren't given an antidote.
130 people ended up dying, and we don't know how many more could've been saved had Nemtsov been allowed to negotiate.