Too many foreign elements ended up designing a one-sided survey to show India as a land of wife-beaters. Amazing, right?
Now, what do we do?
1. Cultivate healthy skepticism about any stats about domestic violence in India from NFHS, as it is one-sided 2. Urge the current government to include the domestic violence related questions in men's questionnaire.
How will we know about domestic violence on men when we don't measure it?
Change can start from here.
#JusiceForAtulSubhash #JusticeIsDue #AtulSubhash
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
You must have seen feminists (smugly) quoting a @ThePrintIndia article titled "Atul Subhash death is a weapon for men’s rights activists. They don’t care about men’s lives"
Did you know that this piece is a foreign #toolkit attack targeting Indian population?
In fact, this article is a brilliant example of wolf acting like it cares for the lamb, only to devour it later.
Let us dive into the main claims of this article and see if the wolf REALLY cares for the lamb.
They claim "According to the UN report on femicides (2024), the home is the most dangerous place for women globally as 60% of women who were killed by men died at the hands of a partner or family member."
They claim "According to NCRB data from six years (2017 to 2022), more women (25,197) than men (21,579) have died by suicide due to marriage-related issues"
Response:
Where do I start? 😅
a. The data is imagined. Note the interchanged digits in the numbers?
c. One should not just see "Marriage-related" causes when dealing with men. Family problems also probably have something to do with the wife. [We are not in joint families anymore, right?]
d. Even if we graciously imagine their data point to be true, 21579 men have died due to marriage-related issues. What has the system done to reduce it?
e. By claiming more women die than men, the authors have created **deeply reductionist ‘men vs women’ debates** themselves, which they seem to hate.
Hypocrisy, much?