It is now 8 months since the Cass Review was published and still there is no formal statement from the @libdems about whether the Party accepts the findings of the Cass Review. For those who are still wondering why, the events of this week help exemplify. 🧵
On the 11th Dec the Secretary of State for Health, @wesstreeting, announced an indefinite ban on puberty blockers for treating children with gender dysphoria. He cited an unsafe prescribing environment and lack of safety and efficacy data in this cohort. See 👇
He also called the historic situation of prescribing puberty blockers to children with gender dysphoria without a proper evidence base a ‘scandal.’ Strong words indeed from a Secretary of State. Observers may assume the @LibDems would finally come off the fence re Cass Review
Three Lib Dem MPs spoke inc. the Health spx @HelenMorganMP and Equalities spx @cajardineMP - neither stated they accepted Cass. Instead they chose to speak about long waiting lists and toxic debate. A new MP @VikkiSlade72 then spoke see 😢
The LGBT+ Lib Dems then released the following statement about the indefinite ban.
Without a formal statement on Cass or Streeting’s latest decision, some people think this is the Lib Dem position. Hard to know where to start with the hyperbole and false equivalency, e.g. calling a 4-yr review with 7 peer-reviewed studies equivalent to ‘anti-vax research’
There are activists in the Party with the ear of senior leaders. One of them wrote in Bylines Times with echoes of the LGBT+ statement. TL:DR Belcher agrees with MP Sobel - it’s discriminatory not to give these drugs to gender distressed children because they’re used elsewhere.
So, onto why the Party has stayed quiet. Institutional capture? Yes. Not wanting to upset the vocal trans lobby in the Party? Yes, definitely that. Divided opinion in the Party? Yes. Not just Slade but others, including the 4 Lib Dem Cambridgeshire MPs
Just this week Dr Cass was asked about the non-response of the Lib Dems to her Review in an interview. In the Politics Home interview they describe her as having a ‘defeated look.’ politicshome.com/thehouse/artic…
However strong leaders and those with integrity know the right thing is rarely the easy thing. When a Secretary of State for Health is calling the historic medical treatment of children a scandal, the @LibDems need to take note, they need to break their silence. #CourageCalls
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The LD president Mark Pack did a recent blog about a you gov poll, from which he concluded that ‘women were more supportive of trans rights than men’ citing statistics saying e.g. women supported males who identify as women in their toilets. However, this isn’t the whole story…
In the poll, quite rightly, the British public were supportive of people identifying as they wished. The issue is when people think their gender identity means they can have the rights of the opposite sex e.g. should males have the right to compete in female sport?
Single-sex exceptions to policies occur when there is a need for privacy, dignity and safety (for women) and fairness (competitions inc. sport) e.g. when women are vulnerable, including in prisons and hospital wards, many women want single-sex spaces.
Thanks to the magnificent efforts of @LabWomenDec, the courage and foresight of MPs and Peers, and aided by apparent dawning awareness of the existence of something called public opinion, Labour appears to be finally taking steps towards sanity on women’s rights 🧵
The @libdems Federal Board has finally revised the party's Definition of Transphobia after 2 years of controversy, criticism and legal uncertainty. beta.libdems.org.uk/code-of-conduc…
The change comes after the party received legal advice from two KCs, of which Karon Monaghan's can be viewed here liberalvoiceforwomen.org/s/Karon-Monagh… The second legal opinion has not yet been published.
We welcome the new Definition, which takes into account the @MForstater ruling and emphasises the need for "robust, passionate debate". This is a great improvement on the last version.
Key improvements are:
V encouraging performance by @EdwardJDavey on @BBCAnyQuestions Acknowledged:
✅ Importance of safeguards in GRA to prevent abuse
✅ Need for mature, open debate
✅ Importance of level playing field for women and girls' sports
✅ Gender ID is question of BELIEF #RespectMySex
"The GRA allows people to change their gender, but it puts safeguards in to avoid abuse."
This is such an important acknowledgement @EdwardJDavey
Please have an urgent word with @agcolehamilton before these crucial safeguards are abandoned in Scotland. #RespectMySex
"We have to listen and have an open, mature debate. Let us listen to each other, and let us show some kindness."
We couldn't agree more @EdwardJDavey
Let's work together to make sure this happens at Lib Dem Autumn Conference. #RespectMySex
The interim report for the Cass Review of gender identity services for children and young people, out today, is VERY good news for everyone who wants to see evidence-based care for children and young people. cass.independent-review.uk/publications/i…
Here are the key points in tweet form 👇
"The rapid increase in the number of children requiring support and the complex case-mix means that the current clinical model, with a single national provider, is not sustainable in the longer term."
"We need to know more about the population being referred and outcomes. There has not been routine and consistent data collection, which means it is not possible to accurately track the outcomes and pathways that children and young people take through the service."
Ever wondered why our party appears to have such a blind spot when it comes to the impact of our trans policies on women, LGB people, children, the wider social fabric?
Here is your answer: libdemvoice.org/the-funny-thin…
The people who would ordinarily interrogate policies and flag up problems are literally frozen out of the channels that normally host debate, because people who are fundamentally opposed to discussion of the subject get to control the groups!
We take no pleasure in criticising our party's policies to an unlimited audience here on Twitter. Our preference would be to have these discussions with our colleagues on private Lib Dem members’ Facebook groups, at conference, etc.