Thread on the multinational origins & fall of the interwar 2nd Polish state.
Excerpts from Lukowski's "Brief History of 🇵🇱" - nothing specialist. but discussion of widely divergent strategies to recreate 🇵🇱, each with very different envisioned alliances were most interesting.🧵
The biggest movement for 🇵🇱 independence, the National Democrats, had very different ideas from Piłsudski's faction that won out after WW1.
The ND founder, Dmowski 1st aimed at autonomy under 🇷🇺. He saw 🇩🇪as the real threat to Polish culture. He was a hard-right Social Darwinist.
Dmowski believed if he could prove Polish loyalty to the Tsars, they would eventually use the promise of a united Polish vassal as a weapon against Germany.
Disappointments in 1905 & harshening of Russification policies lost him much support. Antisemitism became his crutch.
Situation of Poles in Prussia. Of the 3 post-partition Empires, They were simultaneously the most educated & discriminated against. The anti-Germanism of Dmowski's NDs found firmest support here, with the strongest Polish intellectual backing.
A common joke comparing government standards between the Austrians, Germans & Russians, whose borders all met in majority Polish territory:
A Jewish merchant complaining that German custom-officials never took bribes, the Russians always did, & with Austrians one was never sure.
Outbreak of WW1. At first, the majority of Polish sentiment was pro-Russian. The Tsar publicly announced as a war-goal for a reunified autonomous Poland under 1 monarch, something like Austria-Hungary.
Nobody expected all 3 Empires to collapse by the war's end.
Not to be outdone, Germany & Austria promised the same united Poland under their monarchs as Russia did. But they finally agreed on a small Polish vassal state to be used as a cannon fodder.
Dmowski's NDs got full allied blessing for a 🇵🇱-in-exile "Blue Army" to fight in 🇫🇷.
Unlike Dmowski's troops in France, Piłsudski' ordered his "Polish Legions" to refuse to take any loyalty oath to Germany. Piłsudski went to prison for this.
Overthrow of Russian Tsar in 1917 had 🇬🇧🇫🇷 declare Polish state as a war-goal. Piłsudski's 30k army kept fighting 🇷🇺anyway.
Dmowski's strategy became totally discredited by a second revolution in Russia, this time against the Provisional Government by the Bolsheviks.
On collapse of Austria-Hungary, its Poles declared a (non-Soviet) Socialist Republic, supported by Piłsudski.
End of WW1 & new 🇵🇱.
WW1 was over, but war with Russia (now the USSR) continued uninterrupted for Poland. Piłsudski's legions also destroyed & annexed the just declared West-🇺🇦Republic.
Russian Civil War. Dmowski wanted to intervene to support the Whites, but Piłsudski saw Soviets as the lesser evil.
In newly independent Poland, Dmowski's NDs demanded an aggressively ethnonationalist state, whilst Piłsudski tried to draw on traditions of the old 1700s tolerantly multinational Commonwealth.
Dmowski began losing control of his own radicals, who began assassinating politicians.
Piłsudski resigned leadership after beating the USSR to a stalemate in the Polish-Soviet War.
I skipped that section here as I feel that war is already well-known by my followers. Recommend book pictured for anyone wanting to explore it in depth.
Polish successes in early 20s.
Piłsudski returned to de facto return to rule Poland after getting fed up with politicians' squabbling.
By the 30s both USSR & Germany were recovering. Piłsudski signed treaties with both, knowing they would merely buy time. NDs (the most popular 🇵🇱 party) spent time Jewbaiting.
Polish GDP per capita roughly matched Spain on outbreak of WW2 (🇪🇸 now ranks 20 places above 🇵🇱).
Poland's post-Piłsudski foreign policy under Beck. He was deeply skeptical of Franco-British ability or commitment to protect Poland.
He was correct, but neither was he pro-German.
German plans for Poland in WW2. Hitler originally intended to turn into a minor dependent Slavic ally, on the model of 🇸🇰🇭🇷🇧🇬.
Poland's most popular party (the NDs) were also little different from National Socialists. Phoney guarantees from 🇫🇷🇬🇧 ensured quixotic 🇵🇱 obstinacy.
Hitler's Blitzkrieg on Poland. German casualties in the invasion were actually higher than those suffered in France in 1940! French uselessness in the phoney war.
End /🧵
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here's my reading list on Iran by era. Limiting to 53 titles, excluding most adjacent-topic books, which cover Iran but aren't the focus, marked by *. Interests are more geared towards pre-Islamic Persia, including the ~500 years it was under foreign Macedonian/Parthian rule.🧵
Not yet read a dedicated monograph on the pre-IE Elamites of Iran, but Roux's book gives a broad overview of that civilisation in the Mesopotamian cultural world it was in. Drew's book has a vivid chapter on the static siege-based pre-chariot warfare of the Ancient Near-East.
Works on the Achaemenids. Briant's is a huge tome which bravely tries to minimise Greeks & focus on how the empire was run day-to-day. Olmstead suggests Greek written history began due to Persian supression of Ionian oral epic histories. Last illustrated army reconstructions.
Excerpt thread🧵 of Parsi's (2007) "Treacherous Alliance: Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran & the US". Book dismantles many pernicious myths, like that the Shah was ever an Israeli ally, or that the Islamic Republic is blindly driven by ideology, rather than national self-interest.
Poor US understanding of past and present Iran-Israel relations, reasons for conflict is "conveniently ignored at great cost to US national interests". You don't say!
In the 80s, Israel lobbied the US *not* to take Iranian rhetoric at its word (it was then selling Iran weapons).
Both Iran & Israel have strong PR reasons to pretend their conflict is ideological (to appeal to wider Western or Islamic worlds), but real rivalry goes much deeper. Even if the Iran had a different government, little reason to believe those underlying causes would change.
🧵Thread of excerpt Threads directory.
From books on Aborigines, Israel & Judaism, Indonesia, Ancient History, Poland, Nigeria, Oligarchs, South Africa, Hindutva, Russian literature etc.
Thread on how Sparta under Agis III led Greek resistance against Alexander the Great.
Prudently, Spartan plotting only led to war once Alexander had left for Asia. Due to clever leadership, a much-weakened Sparta could still pose a serious threat for much of Alexander's life.🧵
This thread will be excerping Ernst Badian's academic paper "Agis III". Assume my followers are familiar enough with the basics of Classical Antiquity and are reading for actual new information not commonly known. I don't bother with 'history 101' wiki type summaries.
To start, needs to be emphasised from that our popular narrative of Alexander leading a "Greek crusade against Persia" is based on Macedonian propaganda & centuries later historians who swallowed it. In Alex's life, Macedonians were hated barbarians.
A common pattern in Muslim states worldwide: strict suppression of all political speech turned Mosques into a refuge of activism & dissent. Indonesia's secular military government reflected in the secret police chief being a devout Catholic with a deep aversion to Islamism.
Giving up on open repression & hoping to avoid making more martyrs, Suharto's attempted coopt & contain political Islamic in the gov-sponsored Icmi, also backfiring. The 3 dominant figures emerged as Abdurahman Wahid (traditional syncretism), Habibie (modernist) & Rais (radical).
PPP ('United Development Party') an amalgamation of 4 Islamic parties emerged as the dominant opposition to Suharto by 1997. Even non-Muslims supported PPP as the only other anti-Suharto/Golkar party, led by Sukarno's daughter had chosen a deeply unpopular running mate.
Thread w/excerpts from Gaza: A History (2014) by Filiu. Was curious how pre-1967 Egyptian rule compared to Jordan's West-Bank (spoiler: far worse) or how it fared under Israel before the cordon sanitaire after Hamas took over. Author clearly pro-🇵🇸 but his tone is dispassionate.
Antique points of interest. Soft local soil always lent to siege tunnels. Post-Alexander Gaza was totally Hellenised, with negligible✡️, so☦️came quite late. Saint Porphyry deviously had persecution of pagans authorised by "petitioning" the tolerant Emperor Arcadius' infant son.
Skipping ☪️/🇬🇧 eras & the 1948 War (read B. Morris). Author notes Gaza became a backwater in the Ottoman period, as it became strategically redundant as last city before the Sinai desert. Unlike 🇱🇧, lacked timber so it declined as a port. Renewed importance when Turks lost Egypt.