I have made contact with the alleged boyfriend of the Wisconsin shooter.
He has very graciously provided me the full manifesto, which I verified by having him screen record himself opening it from a direct link the shooter sent to him via WhatsApp.
I told him I would do my best to dispel some of the misinformation and present things as truthfully as I was given them, and I will hold myself to that.
- Her boyfriend knew her as Samantha Rupnow.
- She also went by a different name (one which was also feminine), but adopted the name "Samantha" and this was the name her boyfriend says she had on her school identification card.
- She was a student at Abundant Life.
- She was born on November 7, 2009.
- She was born female and was not transgender. Her boyfriend was born male and is not transgender.
- Her manifesto was titled "War Against Humanity."
- Her manifesto is 6 pages long.
- In her manifesto, she spoke about having extremely difficult relationship with her parents, who she referred to as "scum."
- She also claims her family didn't love her or want her, and expresses feeling like the "wrong child" of her family.
- She says she had planned to commit suicide a long time ago, but felt committing a shooting was “better for evolution rather than just one stupid boring suicide.”
- She expresses deep admiration for Pekka Eric Auvinen, Arda Küçükyetim, and Vladislav Roslyakov.
- She offered particular praise for Küçükyetim, who was a Turkish neo-nazi who committed a mass attack in Eskişehir earlier this year, and stated he was an inspiration to her. She calls him “an ultimate saint.”
- She expressed that she got the weapons to commit the attack through "lies, manipulation, and my father's stupidity.”
More to come shortly. I will make some screenshots of the manifesto.
In the interim….
Her boyfriend says the photo that is making the rounds is not how he remembers her, and believes it was somewhat edited “to make her look worse.”
He provided me a photo of her in the same t-shirt and room.
Here I will include some screenshots of the manifesto.
I am very hesitate to post the whole thing not because the content is graphic in any way but I am worried it will violate the terms of service, and am not intending to do that.
This is page one and page two in full.
Some more Wisconsin shooter info, and the third page of her "manifesto."
- Her boyfriend had known her for two years. They were in a long-distance relationship and had never met in person. They met on social media.
- He says she never previously expressed any desire to commit a shooting, and only sent him her manifesto the day of the shooting.
- Timestamps of their messages shown to me demonstrate she sent it to him via WhatsApp at approximately 10:30 am (eastern). She posted it to Twitter at 11:50 am (eastern). The shooting occurred around 11:57 am (eastern).
- He did not see her message until 1:12 pm (eastern), at which point the act had been committed and she was already deceased.
- He describes her as being kind, generous towards him, and cheerful. He describes her as always making him gifts and never expecting anything in return.
On page four of her manifesto, Samantha says that she acquired the weapons to commit the shooting through “lies, manipulation, and my father’s stupidity.”
Her boyfriend says he was aware that there was a gun safe in her house, but does not know how she got access to it.
NOTE:
Some news sources (ABC and AP) have incorrectly stated that Rupnow is 17 years of age.
Confirming it against her own parent’s Facebook: she was born November 7, 2009, exactly as she stated in her manifesto, making her 15 years old.
Here is a photo of her as a newborn:
Police have now corrected the record live and confirmed the shooter was 15, as stated in the manifesto I posted here earlier.
Previous mainstream media reports claiming the shooter was 17 were incorrect.
Okay, now that I have gotten some assurance that I will not be suspended for posting the final pages, here are pages five and six, the final two pages, of the manifesto.
Rupnow talks about her extremely difficult relationship with her father, notes that her parents had divorced multiple times, and that her mother struggled with drug addiction. She also implies her father was an alcoholic.
She expresses that she had been bullied at school, something her boyfriend emphasized to me as being a big factor in her pessimism about her life and anger towards other people.
Court records I have seen show she is telling the truth about the repeat divorces in her family and ongoing legal battles between her mother and father.
As a note, to address the dumbass comments I keep getting:
1.I watermarked them so journalists can’t steal them. Journalists don’t do any of their actual own work anymore, they just scrape social media accounts and steal whatever they can find. Watermarking things forces them to reach out to the poster. I spent 4-5 hours talking to the bf. Not them (or you). I think I deserve that much.
2.I released the information in sections a) to be clear and sequential, and b) to ensure I was not violating any rules. Posting this in one go with no commentary may have been perceived as incitement. I had to wait for confirmation that would not be the case.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Almost every judge I’ve identified as being involved in the rapid prosecution and incarceration of individuals who participated in the Southport riots has a history of letting convicted pedophiles walk free with no jail time. 🌞
A short thread on "two-tier" justice:
JUDGE ANDREW MENARY
Sentenced William Nelson Morgan, 69, to 32 months in prison for refusing to move out of the way of police officers.
Menary previously let a pedophile who collected baby rape videos walk with no jail time because his lawyer said he had "good character."
JUDGE JOHN TEMPERLEY
Sentenced Billy Thompson, 31, to 12 weeks in prison for emojis which incited racial violence.
Temperley previously let a pedophile who had been stashing child abuse images walk free because he had "displayed remorse."
I absolutely despise essay-posting but as the co-owner of the outlet (@ReduxxMag) that broke the news about Khelif and Lin and started this wildfire, I feel compelled to put to bed some of the bullshit surrounding this story.
A rapid-fire FAQ:
1. "L & K are just women with high testosterone!"
Khelif and Lin were never tested for their testosterone levels.
The claims that they were disqualified from the 2023 Women's World Boxing Championship due to simple testosterone abnormalities were made by their respective national sporting bodies, who, obviously, have some motivation to lie here.
2. "L & K have female ID!"
Khelif and Lin are not believed to be transgender, and @ReduxxMag made that VERY clear in our July 28 article.
They are believed to be impacted by a Difference of Sexual Development, in which there is a developmental abnormality in secondary sex characteristics. This is a medical condition which can manifest with children being born with ambiguous or disfigured genitalia. Male children impacted by DSDs are often "assigned female at birth" due to these genital defects, as there is a genuine assumption they are girls.
Thus, their identification documents would be completely irrelevant in this case. As is the fact they were "raised as girls." That's entirely expected for male children with DSDs.
Even more so for male children with DSDs in socially conservative countries.
Is a boy without a penis more likely to be raised as a boy or a girl? Exactly.
3. "The IBA never said they had XY chromosomes!"
On March 25, 2023, IBA President Umar Kremlev said that the boxers disqualified at the championships had XY chromosomes. He said this in a statement to TASS News.
There were only two boxers disqualified at the championships: Lin and Khelif.
4. "But Kremlev could be lying!"
Over the last 72 hours, the IBA has released two separate statements confirming that Khelif and Lin were not subject to testosterone testing, but had instead been subjected to a separate test validated by two independent laboratories.
That test confirmed they were not eligible to compete in women's boxing as per the IBA guidelines.
Crucially, the IBA defines "woman" as "an individual with XX chromosomes." In their guidelines, they also indicate that the gender tests they use to determine if a person is eligible to compete with women is a chromosomal test, not a hormone test.
In their second statement, the IBA condemned the IOC for allowing Khelif and Lin to proceed as they believed it was putting female boxers at risk and that they did not support "boxing between the genders."
5. "Why doesn't the IBA release the test!"
They cannot. It is protected medical information. They would be sued.
Khelif and Lin, however, can agree to have the laboratories release those tests themselves... Why haven't they?
6. "The IBA didn't let L & K appeal their disqualification!"
Yes they did. They have no choice in the matter. The Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) is a fully independent tribunal which oversees all disputes in elite athletics. Every athlete has a right to bring a case to the CAS.
Lin did not challenge the disqualification.
Khelif challenged the disqualification but withdrew the appeal before it could proceed through the court.
Please ask yourself why. If they were genuinely female, why would they have chosen to refuse their opportunity to establish that in an irrefutable and legally binding way at a fully independent venue? Literally none of this would have happened had they simply submitted their tests to the CAS.
Buuuut... Consider that all decisions at the CAS are public information. It was through a CAS challenge that the world became aware that Caster Semenya had XY chromosomes, for example.
If Khelif and Lin had proceeded through the CAS, there would have been irrefutable evidence, documented by an independent body, that they were either male or female.
So why? Why did they not want the CAS to examine their tests? Why did they not want this information to be public? I think the reason is obvious.
7. "But the IOC approved their eligibility for 2024!"
The IOC stopped sex testing athletes in 1999. Since then, they have deferred to individual sporting bodies to ensure athletes were eligible.
HOWEVER, for the purposes of the 2024 Paris Olympics, there is no formal oversight body for boxing. This is the first time this ever happened.
As a result, the IOC created an ad-hoc boxing unit to temporarily oversee the boxing competitions in Paris. This unit has no guidelines for gender eligibility, and has apparently just been allowing boxers to compete "as females" if they have female gender markers on their passports/legal documents.
8. "The IBA is corrupt and cannot be trusted!"
The IOC has long had an issue with the IBA because the IBA has refused to disqualify Russian athletes on the basis of their national identity.
Claims of the IBA's "corruption" can basically be summarized to "Russia bad, Russians evil." The IBA has literally no history of bullshitting about the sex of boxers involved and it doesn't benefit them in any kind of way to do so.
9. "The IBA only disqualified L & K because they beat Russian boxers at the 2023 championships!"
No they did not. I started seeing this weird, completely false claim circulating over the last 24 hours.
Khelif beat Thailand's Janjaem Suwannapheng and was set to compete against China's Yang Liu for gold in the Welterweight category.
Lin beat Bulgaria's Svetlana Kamenova Staneva for bronze in the Featherweight category.
They were scheduled to fight no Russian boxers in either one of their categories, and only one Russian boxer won a gold medal in the entire championship (Anastasiia Demurchian, Light Middleweight).
India won the most gold medals (4) at the 2023 Women's Championship. China won the most medals overall (7). Kazakhstan won the second most medals overall (6). Russia only won 3 medals at the championship.
Also worth noting that another Taiwanese boxer, Huang Hsiao-wen, won gold in the Bantamweight category. So for all the Taiwanese mouthpieces claiming Lin's disqualification was just "discrimination against Taiwan"... lol no.
10. "L & K were only singled out because they don't look feminine!"
This idea that Lin and Khelif were singled out for not meeting some "western feminine beauty standard" is atrocious and quite easily refutable when you look at literally any of their competitors, most of whom do not meet that arbitrary standard themselves because boxing is a physically demanding sport for robust people, male or female.
Below is Khadija El-Mardi of Morocco, for example, who likely would be accused of failing to meet this supposed "western feminine beauty standard." El-Mardi won gold in the Heavyweight category at the 2023 World Championships. She is advancing to the quarter-finals in Paris as we speak. She's one of the best female boxers out there.
She is a woman. Her features and tall stature literally do not matter. She is biologically female. Sex testing would return an XX.
Women are adult human females. This is true regardless of their external appearance.
Likewise, men are adult human males. This is true regardless of abnormalities or defects in their secondary sex characteristics.
To return to point #10 in this post, this appears to now be the narrative that is being manufactured in real time - that Khelif was somehow simply being “punished” for beating a Russian boxer in the 2023 championships.
Note how the AP frames this. They make it seem as though Khelif was disqualified after beating Amineva.
In reality, the AP had to go back TWO MATCHES to find where Khelif had fought a Russian. After besting Amineva, Khelif went on to beat Uzbekistan’s Navbakhor Khamidova, and then Thailand’s Janjaem Suwannapheng. Khelif was disqualified just before facing off against China’s Yang Liu.
No Russian advanced to the finals of this match. The Russian boxer didn’t even came close to it. Disqualifying Khelif wouldn’t have advanced the Russian boxer to a favourable position.
Further, multiple other boxers very easily beat Russian opponents and advanced to win gold without any such problems. Such as Morocco’s Khadija El-Mardi in the heavyweight, who directly beat Russia’s Diana Pyatak for a spot in the gold match that she would ultimately win.
Other Russian boxers were left in the dust in other categories where they didn’t even end up placing at all. Yet no other boxers were “punished” for directly beating these Russian competitors.
It also doesn’t mesh for Lin Yu-Ting, who never matched against a single Russian boxer.
This new narrative they’re inventing is borderline schizophrenic.
On a profound level, men are deeply ashamed of their own sexuality. Why? Because they feel like they are slaves to it in a way women are not.
This is why men have constructed grand theories, philosophies, and even religions dedicated to blaming women for their boners.
Men projected whorishness onto women out of shame. Men are whores by their very biological construction.
A woman can only get pregnant by one man at a time. She only ovulates and is fertile during a small window during a monthly cycle. Women’s arousal is FAR harder to prompt than men’s, who can literally get aroused by looking at this light fixture:
uh oh stinky I’m detecting some obvious and brutally unchangeable anatomical dimorphism
and there’s a reason she wanted to gloss right over this, the most important skeletal difference between men and women… Not because it’s so obvious so would quickly render her thread useless, but because of what it represents.
Two years ago I provided Twitter comms with a hashtag that was being used to trade child porn on this app.
Despite all the Elon fanfare… it’s as active as ever.
There’s even a photo of a little girl promoting the abuse material she’s “starring” in. It’s been up for 8 days.
As of *13 minutes ago* there is someone offering pics/vids of babies up to 5 years old, as well as material of mentally handicapped children.
Twitter has had what they needed for years to solve this problem. It wasn’t solved then. It hasn’t yet been solved now.
Proofs.
All Twitter was focused on at the time was trying to get me to amend an article I’d written on it to include comment on their STRONG commitment to blah blah blah blah 🤪