1/ In 1903, during his excavations at Knossos, and specifically in a palatial area to the south of the Throne Room, Arthur Evans brought to light two elaborate Minoan figurines of a clearly ceremonial nature. He named the site of the figurines' discovery "Temple Repositories".
2/ Evans believed that he had discovered a Minoan palatial sanctuary with the two figurines, being made of faience, the larger of which represented a "Snake Goddess" and the smaller a priestess (he called her "Snake Priestess"), considering them to be votive objects.
3/ However, the discovered figurines were found to be largely incomplete. From the "Snake Goddess" lacked the body below the waist, one arm and part of the crown, while from the "Snake Priestess" lacked the head and the proper left arm was missing below the elbow. 👉
👉Various figurine fragments were found in at least two adjacent deposits, together with scraps of gold, fragments of worked ivory and rock crystal, bronze and stone implements, numerous bones and shells, clay impressions of sealstones,and fragments of faience inlays and plaques.
4/ Thus Evans, following his tactic, decided to reconstruct the figurines as he believed they were in their original form. With the assistance of artists (!) he proceeded to an imaginative reconstruction of them using the various fragments found in the "Temple Repositories".
5/ Evans's aspiration was to establish the existence of a great chthonic goddess, associated with the cult of snakes that played a central role in Minoan religion. The modern research has shown that the reconstruction of the two figurines distorted their original form.
6/ For example, in "Snake Priestess", together with a Danish artist, Evans added the missing head and completely reconstructed the face along with the headdress. Also, he added to the diadem he believed the priestess was wearing a tiny feline, coming from one of the depositories.
7/ Despite Evans' amateurish actions, the prominence of the reconstructed figurines in combination with his narrative about Minoan snake worship found particular resonance in the global public opinion of the time, resulting in museums desiring to possess such popular objects.
8/ This led to the creation of fake Minoan objects, such as the ivory snake goddesses of Boston and Baltimore. Similarities between the fake figurines and the figurines that Evans discovered led him to support their authenticity despite strong opposing views.
9/ Here it would be necessary to emphasize that ivory figurines are rare in Minoan Crete and mainly concern various poorly preserved parts of these objects, as they were joined together with perishable materials in order to constitute the final form of a figurine. Fragments of 👉
👉ivory figurines have been found at Knossos (male acrobat), at Palaikastro (ivory boys) and at Archanes. The famous Kouros, a 50 cm tall figurine of a young deity made from hippopotamus tusks,was found at Palaikastro. Evidence indicates the existence of a Neopalatial tradition👉
👉of working ivory and creating elaborate figurines over 40 cm tall. Parts of such figurines representing hands and feet of human figures have been found, where particular importance is given to the depiction of the muscles and veins, a fact that conceals specialized techniques.
10/Returning to the topic of fake figurines, we note that they all have a common pattern of appearance: an imprecise archaeological locations of discovery, an indefinite history of acquisition, a similarity to genuine Minoan artifacts,but also substantial differences with them,👉
👉and most importantly,all of them appeared after the prominence of Evans' discoveries at Knossos. It is widely believed that fake Minoan artifacts were manufactured by Evans' associates based on genuine prototypes and promoted to museums through antiquities trafficking networks.
11/For example, the gold and ivory snake goddess acquired by the Museum of Fine Arts in Boston in 1914. The figurine arrived in the US in many fragments in a small tin, and was restored using wax and plaster because the right arm and part of the skirt were missing. The restored👉
👉figurine bears great similarities to the corresponding figurines discovered by Evans at Knossos,but in some places non-Minoan making techniques were used and the face bears modern features. The radiocarbon dating of the ivory gave a chronological range between 1420 and 1635 AD.
12/ Other fake artefacts appear to have been the Baltimore snake goddess, the Seattle Boy God and the Ashmolean Boy God, and the steatite goddess in the Walters, Baltimore. Some of these are labeled by the museums where they are exhibited as dubious dating.
13/ In conclusion, Evans, with his excavations at Knossos, brought to light a brilliant Aegean prehistoric civilization that had been lost for centuries. But his narrative about the Minoan Cretans and his reconstructions of monuments and artifacts to support this was a disaster.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/Sicily has been a major trade crossroads since the Neolithic era,through which sea routes passed, connecting the peoples of the Eastern Mediterranean with the West and vice versa. The result of this event was the long-term habitation of the Sicilian land by a mosaic of peoples.
2/ Thus, when the Greek colonists arrived on the island after the mid-8th century BC, they found three population groups: the Sicilians in the E, the Sicanians in the C-W, and the Elymians in the NW. The origin of these peoples has been a subject of controversy since antiquity.
3/ The literary tradition has handed down to us several contradictory narratives, referring to mass migrations, often in the form of mythical tales. The best-known mythological tale is Minos' pursuit of the fugitive Daedalus in Sicily and the founding of Cretan cities there.
1/ Athens has been associated since antiquity with the city's patron goddess, Athena. However, although most people believe that the city was named after the goddess, perhaps the opposite was actually the case. The two words have a common root that is likely of pre-Greek origin.
2/ But let's start from the beginning. Long before the city of Athens became the dominant center of the region, its name was Actaea and it belonged to a wider community, Att(h)is < Attica. The inhabitants of Attica at that time were not Greek-speaking (pre-Greek substrate).
3/ Several scholars argue that both the word Actaea and Attica, and the word Athéne (Ἀθήνη), derive from the word Atthis through corruption. Athéne is the common root from which the word Ἀθῆναι and the word Ἀθηνᾶ came. So both the city and the goddess have pre-Greek origins.
1/ During the same period (1250/40 BC) that the major fortification works were taking place in Mycenae and Tiryns, and the hill of Midea was being rebuilt with new palatial buildings and Cyclopean fortifications, a new fortified palatial settlement was founded on the Acropolis.
2/ But who were the ones who built the new Mycenaean citadel Athens? The answer lies in the question of what purpose its building served. In my opinion, the Athenian elites had neither the financial means nor the know-how to construct such a project.
3/ So the project was designed and financed by a powerful Mycenaean actor outside Attica and he - according to the available evidence - was in Mycenae. The stakes were the limitation of Thebes' influence in Attica and in particular the exploitation of the mines of Lavrion.
1/ The Citadel of Dymaean Wall at the NW end of the Peloponnese has a special place in Aegean prehistoric studies, as it was previously believed to be proof (along with the Isthmus Wall) of the existence of a northern threat (Dorians) to the core of the Mycenaean palatial world.
2/ Recent field study has placed its presence on a more realistic basis. First of all, the human presence on the Hill of Kalogria where the Citadel is built bears evidence of human presence, residential remains and pottery, dating back to the end of the 4th millennium BC.
3/ The choice of location is due to its great strategic importance, at the intersection of the land and the sea, constituting a significant defensive stronghold and an ideal point of surveillance of the sea routes of the Ionian Sea, already since the end of the 3rd millennium BC.
1/ The Trojan War, as presented to us by the Homeric Iliad, is nothing more than a literary text with an epic-mythological character that captures in a single narrative various memories of events of the Mycenaean past, altered by time.
#Ahhiyawa #Homer #Troy
2/The main body of the myth of Trojan War - the gathering of the Achaean warlords under the leadership of the strongest of them, the king of Mycenae, and the naval campaign in the Troad - constitutes the only connection between the historical background and the Homeric narrative.
3/ During the palatial period, the Mycenaean world was structured into powerful local houses that recognized the supremacy of the Great King of the Achaeans, who had his throne in Mycenae and was equal to the powerful rulers of the Eastern Mediterranean (Hatti, Egypt etc).
1/ One of the biggest questions of Minoan archaeology is the existence of two scripts, which accur simultaneously in the same palatial centers (Old Palaces) or even in the same rooms: Cretan Hieroglyphics (2100-1700 BC) and Linear A' (1800-1450 BC).
#Minoan_Scripts
2/ This fact is not an unusual occurrence for the Eastern Mediterranean, as in Egypt and Anatolia two or more languages were used to serve different purposes. However, in Minoan Crete the coexistence of the two scripts for a period of about a century served the same purpose: 👉
👉 the recording of administrative texts, mainly of a financial - accounting nature. What is the reason for this simultaneous presence of two different scripts in Crete? Does this fact conceal some linguistic differentiation between groups of the local population?