1/ Congress gave The National Endowment for the Arts *207,000,000*, and then told the NEA to fund projects focused on "the history of Systemic Racism"
Let's look at what the NEA did with your money.
A thread🧵
2/ Congress has the power to fund agencies and tell them how to spend their funding, and Congress told the NEA to "Continue prioritizing diversity" and to prioritize increasing diversity among "NEA staff, the National Council of the Arts, Discipline Directors, and Peer Panelists"
3/ In 2021 the NEA said they were "centering equity and justice along the lines of race, ethnicity, gender, disability, religion, gender identity and sexual orientation, geography, poverty, and the infinite ways these intersect in everything we do"
So this isn't something new.
4/ The NEA funds wokeness several ways, one of which is the artsHERE program.
artsHERE provides support and grants to "organizations that have demonstrated a commitment to equity within their practices and programming."
So this is funding for explicitly woke organizations.
5/ artsHERE handed out 112 grant totaling*12.3 Million Dollars* to organizations who "demonstrated commitment to equity within their practices and programming."
This means the NEA handed out grants to organizations that adhered to the Social Justice politics of the left.
6/ So, why is this happening?
In 2021 the NEA created a new strategic plan which stated that the NEA was going to "model diversity, equity, inclusion, and accessibility in the arts through all its activities and operations."
So DEI is quite literally part of the plan.
7/ According to this plan, one of the goals is to "Invest in the Capacity of Arts Organizations and Artists to Serve a Broader Public through Digital or Emergent Technology."
The reason for this is because tech artists engage with "climate change and racial justice."
8/ To be clear, I don't oppose artists who make political art, I'm in favor of free speech. But this is different. The NEA is only funding art that agrees with leftist Social Justice politics. So in effect they are advancing their politics using taxpayer money.
9/ The NEA also says that it is going to implement racial quotas in selecting panelists.
This is basically intersectional bean counting. IT is to hire people are select them for roles because of their race or ethnicity, rather then their qualifications.
This is tokenism.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The left painted Christianity as a cringy, outdated, stuffy, religion of oppressors, so now leftist women looking for faith are picking the only religion they're allowed to like (Islam codes as brown so it can't be criticized), even though it makes the handmaids tale look tame.
Women on the left outnumber men on the left by a HUGE majority, and refuse to date right wing men. So a huge number of leftist women are therefore competing for a tiny number of leftist men. So Leftist women have almost no leverage when negotiating the terms of a relationship...
And because leftist women have adopted feminist liberation and consent morality, they have no morally consistent way to demand that men commit to them or settle down; as long as everything is consensual, leftist women have no moral grounds to demand men stop "dating around"...
2/ There is a difference between a recession and stagflation. A recession is just when an economy shrinks, and you usually get high unemployment and low productivity.
Recessions are bad, (no one likes unemployment) but they're nothing compared to the monster known as STAFLATION
3/ Stagflation is when you get a combinations of high inflation, high unemployment, stagnant growth, and lower productivity. And that combination of inflation, low productivity/growth and unemployment leaves the government with no good policy options for solving it because...
This kind of joke is becoming popular on the left, and I think it's because on a subconscious level they know they're all just using social justice as an excuse to create theories they can tactically deploy to grab the upper hand in social situations.
Whenever they don't get what they want they invoke social justice discourses (feminism, Critical Race Theory, BLM, decolonization, etc) as a way to get the moral leverage they need to get the upper hand in whatever interaction they are having
And they do this constantly in interpersonal interactions and personal relationships, where they invoke social justice jargon in order to grab moral authority within the conversation so they can get what they want.
The biggest problem with letting illegal immigrants stay is that it is unjust. Why does nobody make this simple point?
It is unjust to ask immigrants who come legally to work for years to become citizens while letting those who enter illegally to be rewarded with citizenship.
When there is a set clear of fair rules for how immigration is to be done in a in orderly fashion, it is unjust to allow illegal immigrants to break the rules, skip to the front of the line, and then be rewarded with visas or citizenship just because left wing activists demand it
It is unjust to allow illegal immigrants to be rewarded for breaking the law and skipping to the front of the line. It doesn't matter if you feel empathy for the person doing the law breaking and the line skipping - it is unjust to reward that person with residency in the country
Leftists are having a tough time with Venezuelans celebtrating Maduro's arrest and the persians overthrowing Irans Islamic regime, because it means the people are rejecting both the communist and islamic halves of the leftists new islamo-communist/third world marxist coalition.
The left wanted to harnass the energy around the palestinian issue and use it to advance western marxism. So, they created an alliance between western marxist activists and Islamic fundamentalists/Hamas supporters using third-world marxism and postcolonial theory as the bridge.
They thought by getting the popular support of global south "subaltern" third-world groups, along with the support of the Islamic world, they would have a coalition big enough the challenge the United States, and which they would control by virtue of having organized it.
1/ The National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) created a DEI program focused on:
-Power, privilege, and oppression
-Understanding microaggressions
-Centering Native Voices in Atmospheric Sciences
-Knowledge that "does not come from science"
2/ The NCAR had two programs. The first was called UNIEON (which stands for "UCAR/NCAR Equity and Inclusion program"), and the second was a program they funded called "rising voices," which was about bringing "indigenous knowledge" into science.
And it's funded by tax dollars.
3/ The goal of the DEI program (UNIEON) was to bring DEI into the NCAR, and then get the participants to start implementing the DEI ideology via "Bystander intervention." That is, it invites people to insert themselves into other peoples social interactions in order to spread DEI