1/10 Europe just got a brutal wake-up call about green energy math. When wind & sun disappeared in December, electricity prices shot up 20X. Our current plans for batteries and storage won't solve this for decades. Here's the real numbers 🧵
2/10 Case in point: December 2023's "dunkelflaute" in Europe. No wind, no sun. Result? Electricity prices spiked 20x in Norway, hit record highs in Netherlands, and led Spain's authorities to cut power to factories 🌑
Link to the post by @pietergaricano
3/10 People confuse power (GW) with energy (GWh). A 1GW battery might sound as good as a 1GW nuclear plant. But batteries run for hours, nuclear runs forever. During a 4-day "dark doldrums," that nuclear plant makes 96GWh - while your battery is long dead.
4/10 Lithium batteries are built for 2-4 hours of storage. Perfect for day/night solar cycling. Terrible for multi-day wind/solar outages. It's like bringing a water bottle to fight a forest fire. We need different tools for different timescales.
5/10 Germany needs 2,800 GWh of batteries for 48h backup - that's 40% of ALL 2030 global battery production. Their actual 2030 plan? 52 GWh (1hr of winter power). Hydrogen? Even worse: have 2 GWh, need 16,300 GWh. The storage math simply doesn't work.
6/10 Europe's Plan B? Grid connections! If Germany's dark, maybe Spain has sun. But cost: $500B in new transmission by 2030. One German project alone needs 13,500 permits. Meanwhile, Norway's already saying "no more" to new connections 🇪🇺
6' (Although as @JohnHCochrane argued in an answer one has to wonder why Norway does not like exporting cheap to produce energy at high prices!)
7/10 Germany could restart 2 nuclear plants (2.7 GW) in just 3 years for €2B. Scale up to 7 plants (9.4 GW) in 8 years. That's reliable, clean power for millions - available rain or shine, day or night. Sometimes the best solution is the one we already built.
8/10 Instead, Europe's keeping fossil fuels as backup. Germany's pushing coal phase-out from 2030 to 2038. Maintaining a second grid of gas/coal plants for backup is massively expensive - and terrible for climate goals.
9/10 Yes, solar is revolutionary - "panes of glass that print wealth." But here's a simple truth: if you're rationing power or breaking price records, your energy policy has failed.
10/10 The math is clear: without massive storage breakthrough or nuclear power, Europe faces an ugly choice - accept blackouts and price spikes, or keep burning fossil fuels as backup. Physics doesn't care about politics. siliconcontinent.com/p/intermittenc…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The ECB is handicapping its digital euro project (strict holding limits, no interest payments, and mandatory bank account links) in order to protect the current broken, inefficient, subsidized banking system.
Do we need banks?
My post today in Silicon Continent
🧵
The ECB wants to give Europeans direct central bank accounts for payments. Their goal? Compete with Bitcoin and lower transaction costs by cutting out Visa/Mastercard fees. Sounds great... until you see the restrictions.
2/10 siliconcontinent.com/p/do-we-need-b…
They impose these restrictions to avoid financial instability (warning: usually this expression means a banker wants to pick your pocket).
Why protect banks when they're becoming obsolete? Non-bank players now handle mortgages, payments, corporate credit, etc.
3/10
Europe had an effective tool for climate action: the Emissions Trading System (ETS). Instead of expanding this market-based solution, we've built a byzantine regulatory framework that goes far beyond emissions reduction.
THREAD on my post today on the "Compliance Doom Loop"
1/10
Costs are staggering: Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD) requires 42,000 companies report 1,052 data points (783 mandatory). Cost: €150K-1M per company annually.
CSRD compliance costs of 12.5% of investment of mid sized firms (EIB).
Danish firms face 63% more regulations in 2023 vs 2001. Chemical industry SME compliance costs nearly doubled: €332.5K (2014) to €577K (2023). Add GDPR: €500K-10M more. 3/
Wake-up Europe! Enough of the de-growth agenda!
There is no strategic autonomy while we spend our every waking hour erecting barriers to growth!
THREAD on the post today in Silicon Continent by @pietergaricano.
1/8
Today's Trump victory makes Europe's strategic autonomy urgent. But Europe has lived beyond its means through "luxury rules" - virtuous but growth-hurting policies that were only possible due to US protection and innovation. 2/ siliconcontinent.com/p/the-end-of-l…
Luxury rules are laws that make our privileged societies feel good but harm competitiveness. Like Germany closing nuclear plants in 2011, increasing reliance on imported gas, or the EU's GDPR hurting tech innovation.
3/
The EU AI Act seems designed to allow AI only for routine tasks while hindering its use in high-level problem-solving.
This will endanger European AI startups and significantly damage EU productivity.
THREAD on our post today in Silicon Continent. 1/9
An AI bank teller in the EU would need two humans to oversee it. A startup building an AI tutor faces countless hurdles before launching. The is the reality under the EU AI Act—a well-meaning but flawed attempt to regulate AI. 2/ siliconcontinent.com/p/the-strange-…
The Act classifies AI systems by risk: unacceptable, high, limited, and minimal. Unacceptable systems, like social scoring or workplace emotion recognition, are banned.
Fines can reach €15 million or 3% of global revenue.
3/
We keep hearing how solving Europe’s innovation stagnation requires more public spending. But the numbers show otherwise: the EU falls behind in private R&D investment, not public.
A thread based on this week’s blog.
1/10 siliconcontinent.com/p/the-problem-…
As a share of GDP, Europe spends 0.74% on public sector R&D, compared to the U.S. 0.69%.
The actual R&D gap is in private sector spending, where Europe spends 1.3% of GDP compared to the United States' 2.4%!
That gap is worth 341 billion in R&D spending in 2021. /2
Take the story of DeepMind. It is a contemporary of EU's AI flagship, the Human Brain Project, launched in 2013 with €600M in public funding, aimed to simulate a human brain in 10 years. It's now widely regarded as a failure, while DeepMind leads in AI. /3
New data shows that the EU Commission has blown the chance the NextGen gave it to get the EU on a growth path. Two key elements. 1. Pensions in Spain. 2. Reforms in italy.
The new data is from the ageing report of the EU Commission on the budgetary impact of the pension "reforms"- more below
( h/t @rdomenechv @fernandosols with official data from the Spanish government.)
The EU NextGen plans gave an unprecedented and powerful stick to the EU Commission to demand reforms and investments in exchange of money. Never has the Commission had the chance to get states to get some reforms going.
In Spain, the EU Commission has been complicit (in spite of numerous warnings) in setting Spain on an unsustainable Fiscal path
(2/7)
Under cover (!!!) of the "reforms" required by the European NextGen plan, the Spanish government abrogated the 2012 reforms of pensions (the single reform done by the Rajoy government), based on an automatic adjustment mechanism, without putting anything else meaningful in place.
The cost is 3.3 points of GDP higher than before the reform.