Post

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1733583317092421906

More from @SenseReceptor

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 20

Why *21 days* between mRNA jabs? To maximize the probability of anaphylactic reactions!

"The reason the manufacturers wanted the 21 days...is because they wanted to document [the rate of reactions]...They knew they were gonna set off...massive death and injury." (1/4)

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Iron Will (@IronWillRpt) how the manufacturers of the mRNA COVID injections chose the 21-day-long period between jabs in order to maximize the probability of eliciting anaphylactic reactions in recipients. Citing the work of Nobel Prize winner (and eugenicist) Charles Richet, Latypova notes that this period of time—approximately three weeks—is ideal for causing a severe anaphylactic reaction in a person.

"Charles Richet discovered that interval," Latypova says. "It's not always 21 days, but 21 days happens to be, like, a most likely period of time. But...it's several weeks usually—from first injection to the second injection of the same toxin or protein."

Describing the work of Richet, a French physiologist who won the Nobel Prize in 1913 for his work on what he dubbed "anaphylaxis," Latypova says the following:

"[Richet] did these experiments extensively, and he was injecting different types of toxins and observing [recipients]. So observing when that really severe anaphylaxis [reaction occurs]. [And] he said, first, he would inject some kind of a protein, and then the animal [who received] the first injection may have a mild reaction or not even react at all. So they may have nothing. And then after 21 days, typically, if he injected in some of the animals—but not all, in some, it's usually a percentage, something like 10 to to 15%—some of them would develop extreme severe reactions even to a very, very minute dose of the same protein.

So, like, in the first reaction, it was a larger dose. The second reaction, even a tiny, tiny, minute dose would set off this huge, huge anaphylactic shock or illness, and some of them would die. And this was found with all vaccinations at that time. He also even writes about other attempts at vaccinations, for anthrax in animals. He reported the same issues. So about 10, 15% of them died because of the anaphylactic reactions. He even reported that at the same time, different researchers were attempting this on themselves, and some of them killed themselves, with this method."

Latypova then goes on to describe on oddity with "vaccine" researchers: They don't mind poisoning themselves and their loved ones (sometimes fatally) for their research.

"[With] a lot of these vaccine crazy obsessed scientists, in fact, there are documented examples where they killed their children, grandchildren, and still did not recant and continued to do the same [thing]. Peter Hotez...he poisoned his daughter. She has autism from vaccines, and he's super pro-vax. So that's a very typical attitude amongst these people. They're insane. Unfortunately, they have a lot of power and money, and so they act on their insanity. But we need to understand exactly what's going on here."

Latypova goes on to describe why the mRNA injections are so much more dangerous than traditional "vaccines."

"I'd say they are much more dangerous than traditional vaccines because they also contain all kinds of novel technologies. And, as I said before, the reason the manufacturers want the 21 days between two injections is because they want to document this. And the mRNA platform was new in humans. It wasn't used in humans before. And so...they knew they were gonna set off death and injury, massive death and injury. They knew, absolutely knew. There was no question about it. All they wanted to do is document how much anaphylaxis they're causing...so that then they would, you know, try to dial it back, dilute, do whatever.

So later on, we find that not as many anaphylactic reactions are recorded as the for the initial wave. So they just needed to document how many people are having this reaction. That's all...They knew that this is going to happen."

(2/4) "Through studies involving dogs... Richet demonstrated...[that after] an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction."

"In 1913, [Richet] was awarded the Nobel Prize for his researches on anaphylaxis. He invented this word to designate the sensitivity developed by an organism after it had been given a parenteral injection of a colloid or protein substance or a toxin (1902)." (Parenteral drug administration is drug administration by intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous injection.)

Source: nobelprize.org/prizes/medicin…

Source: nobelprize.org/prizes/medicin…

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1676689094397636615

(3/4) To Latypova's final point in the clip, note that she showed us in 2022 that the mRNA jab manufacturers had initially started with far deadlier injections and then, over time, dialed back their deadliness:

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1676689094397636615

Read 4 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 20

HOW NATO/THE IC CONTROLLED THE GLOBAL COVID RESPONSE. FREAKIN' MIND BLOWING🤯🤯🤯

"The President was absolutely 100% not in charge of anything...the whole response...[was] NATO... Why... NATO?... They treated [COVID] as if it was a bioweapons attack. A global war." (1/5)

Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (@brownstoneinst) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (@Honest_Medicine) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (@KLVeritas) how NATO and the Intelligence Communities from countries like the U.S. were in charge of the global COVID "pandemic" response. Lerman, who has done extensive research into the matter, notes that President Trump was "absolutely 100% not in charge," and says he even pegged Coronavirus Task Force member Deborah Birx as "the [real] problem" because "Birx was representing the national security state within the Trump administration and within the task force."

"The President was absolutely 100% not in charge of anything," Lerman tells Lindley. "As we know, Trump switched from saying 'it [COVID] was nothing' to saying that 'it was terrible,' you know, that we had to lock down. Then a month later, he said, 'We have to stop locking down.' The way he was talking was—or the way he was tweeting was—very interesting because he would tweet things...in all caps, [like] WE MUST OPEN UP. Right?

"[But] he's the President of the United States. You don't have to tweet, 'We must open up.' You tell everybody in your administration, 'We're gonna open up now.' If he can't do that, something's wrong. Right? He was not in charge."

Lerman goes on to say that "in Scott Atlas's book...he wrote about his time on the [COVID] task force, which was not at the beginning, so he wasn't there for the how it started, but he was there in about August [of 2020]. He did say[, however] that when he talked to Trump, Trump said to him, 'We all know who is actually the problem, and it's not Fauci. The problem is Deborah Birx.' [And that was] because Deborah Birx was representing the National Security State within the Trump administration and within the task force."

Lerman goes on to discuss the role that NATO—the intergovernmental military alliance of 30 North American and European countries, established to ensure a collective defense, where an attack on one member is considered an attack on all—played in orchestrating the "pandemic" response.

"How can NATO be responding to a naturally occurring virus? Right? Why...NATO? NATO is a military alliance. The only way I believe they could have invoked NATO is because they treated it [COVID] as if it was a bioweapons attack. [A] global war."

Lerman explains:

"They treated it that way. Whether it was...a lab leak or not, whether it was an engineered virus or not—I believe it was both of those things—but even if you don't believe that, it doesn't matter because that's what they use[d]. They said [that's what it was], and then they use[d] all the laws, all the treaties, all the agreements. There's memoranda of understanding in terms of bioweapons amongst various countries—they can invoke all of that in order to enforce a uniform response. And [that's the] uniform response...I'm now discovering in other European countries. So we now have the Dutch minister of health coming out and saying that we were actually following NATO orders during COVID. She literally said those words. And the intelligence agencies of Holland were in charge of the response. So it was exactly the same."

Furthermore, Lerman says that "we have the German RKI [Robert Koch Institute] leak, which [is] the public health institute, like HHS, that was supposed to be in charge. We also have leaked documents that show that they were also following orders from some NATO connected people, as opposed to public health officials. The public health officials, again, were just sort of the liaison between the national security apparatus and the public."

"And when you asked about the US military," Lerman adds, "[the] military industrial complex, because the U.S. is now the global superpower...in the West and as far as in Europe, and the anglosphere in the Americas, we're it. And so our military industrial complex is the military industrial complex of the West, pretty much. And so we are what fuels NATO. And so we have demilitarized Europe in a sense...so that we could be, you know, the military power in the West."

Lerman goes on to say:

"The COVID response...really crystallized how much the national has now been subsumed into the global governance structures [and] military industrial complex, which is now kind of on a global scale. So it's an interesting paradox for the military industrial complex because what did it used to do? The U.S...the military industrial complex...[used to] gain strength, gain money, gain power by doing regime changes. Which they're still doing. I mean, we see Syria. Right? And we see the Ukraine. They're doing it. But [before,] they had the whole Communist Bloc to justify their existence. Right? We have a threat. It's a mortal threat. It's an existential threat. We don't really have existential threats like that anymore. So they have to define other existential threats.

"So a virus, which we all knew was not a threat to almost anyone, all of the sudden becomes an existential threat because they decide that it is—or they define it as a bioweapon or a bio-terror attack. So actually the solution, which is the existence of this giant global biodefense industrial complex, the solution defines the problem. Like...[the way I] describe it is COVID was gonna happen whether it was SARS CoV-2 or something else. Another virus."

(2/5) Note that what Lerman describes perfectly aligns with what German journalist Paul Schreyer described in his seminal presentation showing how the COVID response had been planned by key globalist players for 20 years.

Link to full presentation: sensereceptornews.com/?p=12976

(3/5) Schreyer notes the exercises began after former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell said in '91: "I'm running out of demons. I’m running out of villains. I'm down to Castro and Kim Il Sung."

The military industrial complex needed a new enemy: a "virus."

Link: cato.org/commentary/res…

Read 5 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 20

"We are dealing with an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans...the hospitals are killing zones...I can't tell you how many subscribers told me about loved ones...who were literally killed by the hospitals." (1/5)

Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the @ChildrensHD series Financial Rebellion how there is "an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans." Fitts notes that she traveled to 26 states in 2024 and had her subscribers tell her about "loved ones...who were literally killed by the hospitals."

"We are dealing with an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans," Fitts says. "I just think, you know, that the hospitals are killing zones. People are being intentionally killed. And, you know, we saw that great video from Jacqui Deevoy about how it's happening in the UK[, too]."

Fitts goes on to say:

"But out on the [Children's Health Defense] bus, [you got] stories...about people being killed, and when we were doing our Financial Transaction Freedom Tour—I was in 26 states, you know, driving all over the place. I can't tell you how many subscribers told me about loved ones or, you know, friends and family, who were literally killed by the hospitals. It's frightening."

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1799551323848773818

(2/5) Here's a thread describing how doctors and nurses are slaughtering Americans in the hospitals using the remdesivir+ventilator murder protocol.

Based on death certs, John Beaudoin estimates 500K+ Americans have been killed this way.

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1799551323848773818

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1794587729377825081

(3/5) We also have this terrifying phenomenon (in the U.S. and U.K.!) where unidentified individuals are showing up as supposed medical professionals (sometimes wearing all black) and slaughtering hospital patients with murder protocols:

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1794587729377825081

Read 5 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 15

March 5, 2020—THE PENTAGON—**not Moderna or Pfizer**—talks about the "vaccines" it's developing for COVID & how "terrible things" can happen; "you may end up doing mass vaccination campaigns with a vaccine that could cause a significant amount of problems." (1/5)

Dr. Nelson Michael, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, describes during a March 5, 2020 press conference at The Pentagon how "the science" behind making a "vaccine" can "go very quickly," but there are "vaccines" that can "cause harm."

"Just recognize that part of [our] hesitation I mean, the science can go very quickly. But you at first don't wanna do harm. Right?" Michael tells the press. "And, you know... obviously... vaccines can can cause harm, and they provide benefits. So that mixture is something you always have to look at. And so part of the hesitation to say, 'Oh, we can get a vaccine quickly,' is you need to make sure that it's really safe."

Michael goes on to say: "If you test the vaccine in 1,000 people, but one in 10,000 people is gonna have something terrible that happens. Until you get to those numbers, you may end up doing mass vaccination campaigns with a vaccine that could cause significant amount of problems. So...this needs to be a constant reassessment of the risk and the benefit."

Michael goes on to draw a ridiculous parallel between the "vaccines" for COVID and the "vaccines" for Ebola deployed in the Democratic Republic of Congo:

"The other thing I would tell you, and this is sort of a really good benchmark, we were the first people that tested the vaccine that eventually got licensed by Merck... for for Ebola. Okay? That vaccine was first tested by the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research. Five years later, it was approved by the US FDA. In the meantime, half a million souls were vaccinated with it largely in Africa during especially during the outbreak in the Democratic Republic of Congo.

"So, you know, again, that was a risk–benefit assessment. The leadership in the DRC said, 'Okay. We know it's not approved yet by European medicines, um, uh, or by the US FDA, but we have a terrible outbreak of Ebola, which is highly fatal.' And so decisions were made to use that under, um, emergency use authorizations. And so, you know, there's always that kind of debate, but I think that's a good benchmark for vaccines."

(2/5) Recall that Army General Gus Perna was THE CHIEF OPERATIONS OFFICER FOR OPERATION WARP SPEED.

In this video, Perna describes how "OWS [was] a partnership between HHS, DOD, and the other federal organizations to develop and deliver COVID-19 vaccines and therapeutics."

"Science is driving all of our decisions, we are not cutting any corners with respect to safety and efficacy. We need to do this the right way," Perna says. He notes that the supposed COVID "vaccines" were set to go "through the same rigorous trials that [are done] for every pharmaceutical."

"We have worked with the manufacturers to help them scale up operations in order to produce vaccines and therapeutics. WE HAVE PURCHASED AND SECURED THE SUPPLIES NEEDED TO DELIVER AND ADMINISTER THE DRUG," Perna adds. (Emphasis added.)

"Everything from the vials that hold the vaccine, to the syringes and needles that will be used to put shots into arms." Perna notes that OWS would utilize the DOD's "planning and logistics expertise" and that the department would function "across the supply chains, FROM MANUFACTURING TO DELIVERY." (Emphasis added.)

"But commercial industry, not the military, will physically ship and distribute the vaccines to your local areas," Perna adds, highlighting a "whole-of-America" approach.

(3/5) Recall that in the COVID-jab contract between the DOD and Pfizer, the former paid the latter $1.95 billion for a "large scale vaccine manufacturing demonstration" of a "prototype." (1)

When Pfizer whistleblower Brook Jackson sued Pfizer over its fraudulent clinical trials, Pfizer itself confirmed that it was only responsible for producing a "demonstration" of a COVID countermeasure that imposed "no requirements related to Good Clinical Practices" ('CGP') or related FDA regulations." (2)

Source 1: documentcloud.org/documents/2202…

Source 2: iambrookjackson.com/_files/ugd/9df…

Read 5 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 13

This is the REAL STORY of how COVID started in the U.S.—Don't let Deep State shills like Kash Patel gaslight you (1/17 - supporting evidence in thread)

"[COVID wasn't] a pandemic. It [was] a military attack. It [was] a deployment of chemical [and] maybe radiological weapons."

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Mic Meow (@MicMeowed) how the COVID "pandemic" was actually pulled off in the U.S., highlighting the U.S. military's involvement in the release of a biological (and potentially radiological) weapon, the lack of evidence supporting the existence of a patient zero in the U.S. (or even China), and the rollout of "hospital murder protocols," which were used to generate the deaths needed to make it look like there was a "pandemic" occurring.

"The Department of Defense quickly took over the response to the supposed public health event [i.e., the COVID-19 'pandemic']," Latypova notes at the beginning of the clip, before delving into the timeline of events—which is strongly supported by the available evidence. "The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th, 2020, ostensibly from a Chinese patient[, for whom there is no evidence supporting their existence]." (See tweet 5/17 for supporting evidence of Latypova's claim here.)

"The [supposed SARS-CoV-2 'virus'] sequence was posted into GenBank on January 9th [2020]. On January 30th [2020], the CDC claimed that we have a first person in the United States, in Washington State, who was, again, infected with this virus. Again, [there was no] evidence of this person ever existing." (See tweet 4/17 for supporting evidence of this claim.)

(For reference, GenBank is a comprehensive public database that contains annotated collections of all publicly available nucleotide and DNA sequences.)

"On February 4th, there's a phone call—and this is...leaked audio from AstraZeneca executives. There was a phone call placed from the Department of Defense. I believe the person making the phone call was Colonel Matt Hepburn from DARPA," Latypova says. "And he called the consortium of pharmaceutical companies telling them to switch from previously funded pan-influenza ['vaccine'] models to COVID ['vaccine'] models because, and I'm quoting him, 'COVID was declared a national security threat.'" (See tweet 16/17 for supporting evidence.)

"So my question is," Latypova says, "[from] January 30th [2020] to February 4th [2020], we only have one ostensible patient having COVID. [But it's not] clear. Are they ill? Did they die? What happened?"

Latypova goes on to ask rhetorically: "We have maybe 11 cases—PCR cases—of COVID in the United States [but] somehow, Colonel Matt Hepburn decides to...to say to the entire pharmaceutical consortium, which is over 300 companies, to start working on COVID products because it's a national security threat. Based on what? That's my question: How do you know that?"

Latypova goes on to note:

"What's more interesting...we have a whole series—hours—of Department of Defense press conferences at the Pentagon with media, over the 2020/2021 timeframe, when they were working on Operation Warp Speed. And so they would do these periodic press updates, and they're hilarious and very interesting....I don't recall the date exactly right now, but it was somewhere [in] February, early March, there [was] a press event where, there's Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson and a few others. So there's General [Michael J.] Talley, who leads the presentation from the DOD, and there are two or three [other] participants from Fort Detrick, the biolab and, the US Army infectious disease research. And they're all discussing this stuff. And so she [Sammons-Jackson] says specifically, 'Oh, we've received...the pathogen, meaning the COVID virus... and we [meaning the DOD] are growing the stocks of it." (See tweet 2/17 for supporting evidence.)

"At that time...I remind you," Latypova adds, "we only had maybe one case; maybe 10 cases or 20 [PCR] cases of this, meaning there was no COVID virus in the US. Yet Colonel Wendy Sammons-Jackson is growing stocks of it. And guess what happens after she's growing stocks of it? We have an explosion of cases and illness in the United States. So how is this a pandemic when nothing happens before they announce it, after they announce it, and tell you we're growing stocks of it, we have a pandemic?"

Latypova concludes:

"So it's [COVID] not a pandemic. It's a military attack. It's a deployment of chemical, maybe radiological weapons. I don't know what they deployed, but they deployed something. There was some weird illness that was going around. [But] it's a deployment. And a majority of the deaths...were caused by, we know, hospital murder protocols—killing people in the hospitals with the protocol that I can walk you through because they tried it on my on my mother-in-law, unsuccessfully. We rescued her." (See tweets 9/17 and 10/17 for supporting evidence of the "hospital murder protocols.")

"And, so I can walk you through that protocol....[I've been] with people testifying [as to] how their loved ones were killed in the exact same manner...[with] remdesivir and with ventilators and, dehydration, starvation, cruelty...Isolation...So those are the deaths. That's how they caused the deaths. They simulated illness with something [else]—some chemical weapon or something. And, the main point of this was to deploy these biological weapons, which are the shots [the COVID injections]."

(2/17) "There has been receipt of the [SARS-CoV-2] virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with." — Army Col. Wendy Sammons-Jackson, March 5, 2020

Here is the conference to which Latypova refers in the clip from her Mic Meow interview. A transcription of Sammons-Jackson's remarks regarding "growing" the SARS-CoV-2 "virus" to have "stocks available" is below:

"There has been receipt of the virus, um, in one of our laboratories, and they're currently culturing, um, growing that virus so that we can have stocks available for a number of things to test products with. That's, um, they're also doing, um, characterization of the virus to try to understand, learn more of what we know about the virus and how the virus, um, impacts, um, our the host and our immune response to that virus. The scientists in our other subordinate laboratories are, yes, test tubes, pipettes. They're dealing with mice. They're they're running, um, cell cultures, and and I can let the scientists here that are doing the hands on work talk a little bit."

Also note that Army Brig. Gen. Michael J. Talley, commander of the U.S. Army Medical Research and Development Command, who led the March 5, 2020 conference, references the film Outbreak. (I note this because that film was clearly used as propaganda in order to prime people for the COVID scamdemic.)

(3/17) Note that when one reporter asks at the March 5, 2020 DOD conference, "Where did the [SARS-CoV-2] sample come from?"—that is, the one Sammons-Jackson says was being used for the "stocks"—Sammons-Jackson replies "the CDC."

Then, in a series of hugely mealy-mouthed responses:

Dr. Kayvon Modjarrad, director of Emerging Infectious Diseases at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, says, "It came from a U.S. patient."

Dr. Nelson Michael, director of the Center for Infectious Disease Research at the Walter Reed Army Institute of Research, adds, "I think [the patient was from] Washington State."

Sammons-Jackson and Michael then fumble all over themselves as they desperately move the conversation onto the next topic without providing a clear answer, nor a name for the patient.

Read 17 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 11

DON'T LET MAHA GASLIGHT YOU: It's not the food, water, or air: the chronic disease epidemic is due to the bloody "vaccines" (1/9)

"['Vaccines' are] ticking time bombs...you inject something that turns the immune system against your own body, and it's progressive."

Inventor, scientist, and author of the seminal "Control Group study" Joy Garner describes during an interview with Vaccine Choice Canada (@VaccineChoiceCA) how "vaccines" are responsible for the chronic disease epidemic in the U.S. In this clip, Garner highlights the association of "vaccines" with a wide range of diseases and conditions, including autism, diabetes, heart disease, arthritis, etc.

Critically, Garner notes that these diseases occur at a rate of less than 1% in "unvaccinated" Americans, despite the fact they still partake in unhealthy habits, including eating junk food, using cell phones, and consuming alcohol.

Firstly in the clip, Garner notes that babies who receive the "Vitamin K shot"——an injection **supposedly** given to newborns to prevent a rare but serious bleeding disorder by aiding in blood clotting—are associated with a rate of autism of 2%; when babies receive both the K shot and "pregnancy vaccines" via their mother, however, that rate shoots up to "over 5%."

Garner notes that in adults (aged 18 and over) is where she and her colleagues "saw [a] really extreme variation in long-term health outcomes, because ['vaccines'] are like ticking time bombs." She notes that when a person receives a "vaccine," they "inject something that turns [their] immune system against [their] own body, and it's progressive."

"It can get very aggressive if you continue to vaccinate, and you can suddenly end up with something that's gonna kill you right away or that disables you right away," Garner adds. She notes, for example, that she and her colleagues "could not find a single arthritic person over the age of 18 who was entirely unvaccinated."

"This means...that cancer, arthritis, diabetes, things like this, severe diseases, are non-existent [in the 'unvaccinated'] because we just couldn't find them in our sample."

Garner notes, "We had a very robust sample of that population of interest [the 'unvaccinated']...[And] the risk of any of these diseases could not possibly be more than...well under 1%. [For diseases like] heart disease, cancer, diabetes, arthritis."

"That's the baseline what our natural health is supposed to look like, even if we're eating bad food, even if we're drinking and smoking," Garner adds. She goes on to say:

"I got to know these entirely unvaccinated families. Just because they knew that vaccines in particular were a bad idea, and they didn't trust their doctors, they didn't trust the government, they didn't trust the FDA or the CDC, doesn't mean they weren't enjoying themselves. They're having a beer. Their kids are running around with sugary popsicles and candy bars and cell phones. And I'm like, they're so healthy, and the explanation was, you know, 'I don't worry about their diet. I don't worry [because] they don't have allergies...I'm not worried about whether or not there might be few fumes coming out of my new flooring or, you know, the wrong clothing or whatever. They're not fragile. They're so robust. They never get sick. Or when they do, it lasts for 24 hours and they're all better.'"

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1862187401755730398

(2/9) Pharma insider Sasha Latypova has found the explanation for why "vaccines" are so detrimental: they work exactly IN THE OPPOSITE WAY we're told they do.

Instead of priming our immune systems to protect us, they prime our bodies for disease:

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1862187401755730398

(3/9) Latypova highlights the work of Nobel Prize–winner Charles Richet, who found that when you inject things into the bloodstream—even benign proteins—you prime the body to have severe reactions to whatever was injected:

Source: nobelprize.org/prizes/medicin…

"Our immune system protects us from attacks by microorganisms and poisonous substances. After experiencing an attack, the immune system learns to defend itself against new attacks—we become immune. One of the ways this is used is with vaccinations, when a low dosage of an infectious substance provides immunity. Through studies involving dogs, Charles Richet demonstrated an opposite effect in 1902. After an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction. He called the phenomenon anaphylaxis. The result had important implications for our understanding of allergies."

Read 9 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Sense Receptor

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @SenseReceptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!