Ok, here we go: some thoughts on the 2024 DoD China Military Power report, or CMPR, which was released yesterday (finally!).
I'll focus on updates I thought were interesting/consequential - areas new or different from last year's report.
(part 1)
In general, I'd say the report has few surprises this year (but one significant one, detailed in the next installment).
The PLA continues on its trajectory of significant improvements in reach and capability, with no signs of slowing down.
For comparisons between the 2024 and 2023 reports, this year's report will be on the left, last year's on the right.
First up: total numbers. The PLA remains the largest active-duty military in the world, though some numbers dropped a bit due to a change in counting methods.
On to the details: first up, the PLA Army. In 2023, it transferred 3 brigades to the PLAN Marine Corps, improving the PLANMC's power projection capability.
The PLA Navy's total warship numbers remain unchanged from last year, but has up to 10 Type 052D destroyers under construction. It's also building both Type 054A and 054B frigates, as well as two types of LHAs (the 075 and 076).
The report highlights the PRC's double standard on military operations in EEZs - how the PRC interferes with operation in its EEZ, but feels free to operate in other nations'.
Same as last year, the report predicts a PLAN battle force of 395 ships in 2025 (a 25-ship jump in 1 year?) and 430 in 2030.
Here's how that hull count compares to the numbers predicted in the FY25 USN shipbuilding plan:
This year's report has more details on the under-construction Type 076 LHA, confirming hybrid electric propulsion and electric catapults for operating large UAVs for strike and ISR missions.
In this year's report, each service gets a paragraph discussing its readiness. The PLAN's discusses improvements in both surface and submarine force training systems and processes.
For the first time, we get some details on the PLA forces stationed at its base in Djibouti: a battalion of about 400 marines.
In the section on PLANMC readiness, the report discussed civil-military integration training, practicing with civilian RO/ROs for both amphibious and non-amphibious operations.
Moving on to the PLAAF, the report discussed the transfer of much of the land-based PLAN aviation force to the PLAAF, allowing the PLAN to focus more on carrier aviation and enabling better air defense coordination.
One change from last year: the report says the PLAAF's tech is rapidly catching up to US standards, where last year's said the PLAAF is catching up to "western air forces". Not sure why the difference, or how much it means - but it was changed.
One detail added to this year's report: the PLAAF's J-16 "4+ gen" fighter inventory: apparently they had 225 in 2023, with more on the way. I'd be interested to know how this compares with other folks' open source estimates.
Similar to the PLAN, the PLAAF appears to be making improvements to its training and exercises, improving its potential real-world combat effectiveness.
In the next installment, we'll start with the PLA Rocket Force.
Ok, a few more thoughts on some of the things we saw in this week’s PLA parade. I’ll start in the undersea domain, with this large UUV.
Going back and looking at the footage, you can see in this shot that it appears to have a couple of sonar arrays.
My guess is that those are a flank array and a bow array.
We can also see 4 masts/antennas: 3 appear to be retractable with a closure panel and one fixed on a short mast near the stern (see above).
Based on the number of sensors - sonar for acoustic detection, masts perhaps for EW/ESM, video, perhaps a snorkel for a diesel, I’m guessing this is an ISR UUV.
From this shot, it appears it has a 9-bladed propulsor.
China’s parade is about to get started. Xi is making a speech where he says China is a force for peace, development, etc. Anyway…time to roll those new missiles, UxVs, armored vehicles, etc.
(I’ll be posting any stuff that I see that’s particularly interesting. Here we go…)
Right now it’s just Xi driving by - wondering now if they’re going to roll this stuff past like in the past or if this is it?
Looks like some unmanned undersea and surface vessels (UUVs and USVs).
hooboy, that's a lot of doing things the wrong way...😬
I recall time there being significance attached to the "dropped two wts" message in the reporting at the time, as an indication they had a problem & needed to come up. Apparently completely normal.
In contrast, I recall no word that THEY HEARD A BANG FROM THE OCEAN SURFACE. 😬
In the "you can't make this stuff up" category, in this 16 Apr image of COMEC's Longxue shipyard in Guangzhou you can see 5 of China's new Shuiqiao-class "invasion barges", whose only apparent purpose is to invade Taiwan, as well as...
...based on AIS data, what also appears to be a container ship under construction for a TAIWANESE Company, Evergreen Lines.
(and a couple of Zubr-class assault hovercraft, PLA Navy auxiliaries, and more.)
A few interesting tidbits from INDOPACOM Commander Admiral Paparo's recent testimony. First, he puts China's warship production at a ratio of "6-to-1.8" to ours, or about 3.3 to 1.
This exceeds any of my estimates, which usually run a bit over 2-to-1 in hull count, and about 1.5-1 in tonnage.
Makes me wonder if there are PLAN ships I missed, or perhaps he's counting only surface combatants? Not sure.
On the topic of SLCM-N, he gives a full-throated endorsement. Of note, this is not the STRATCOM commander, but the theater commander that might actually need to use something like this (or have it to deter the other side's use of something similar).
Hot off the presses: I'm pleased to announce the release of this @ChinaMaritime Note covering China's new Shuiqiao landing barges, which I co-authored with Michael Dahm. I hope that folks find it a useful source of info on this important new development. digital-commons.usnwc.edu/cmsi-notes/14/
@ChinaMaritime Some highlights: first, our key takeaways.
@ChinaMaritime Next, we found patents for these or similar barges in filings from several years ago. In other words, this project has been in the works for a while now - not a reaction to the 2022 Pelosi visit, or the DPP's election win, etc. (not that I ever thought it was).