Ok, here we go: some thoughts on the 2024 DoD China Military Power report, or CMPR, which was released yesterday (finally!).
I'll focus on updates I thought were interesting/consequential - areas new or different from last year's report.
(part 1)
In general, I'd say the report has few surprises this year (but one significant one, detailed in the next installment).
The PLA continues on its trajectory of significant improvements in reach and capability, with no signs of slowing down.
For comparisons between the 2024 and 2023 reports, this year's report will be on the left, last year's on the right.
First up: total numbers. The PLA remains the largest active-duty military in the world, though some numbers dropped a bit due to a change in counting methods.
On to the details: first up, the PLA Army. In 2023, it transferred 3 brigades to the PLAN Marine Corps, improving the PLANMC's power projection capability.
The PLA Navy's total warship numbers remain unchanged from last year, but has up to 10 Type 052D destroyers under construction. It's also building both Type 054A and 054B frigates, as well as two types of LHAs (the 075 and 076).
The report highlights the PRC's double standard on military operations in EEZs - how the PRC interferes with operation in its EEZ, but feels free to operate in other nations'.
Same as last year, the report predicts a PLAN battle force of 395 ships in 2025 (a 25-ship jump in 1 year?) and 430 in 2030.
Here's how that hull count compares to the numbers predicted in the FY25 USN shipbuilding plan:
This year's report has more details on the under-construction Type 076 LHA, confirming hybrid electric propulsion and electric catapults for operating large UAVs for strike and ISR missions.
In this year's report, each service gets a paragraph discussing its readiness. The PLAN's discusses improvements in both surface and submarine force training systems and processes.
For the first time, we get some details on the PLA forces stationed at its base in Djibouti: a battalion of about 400 marines.
In the section on PLANMC readiness, the report discussed civil-military integration training, practicing with civilian RO/ROs for both amphibious and non-amphibious operations.
Moving on to the PLAAF, the report discussed the transfer of much of the land-based PLAN aviation force to the PLAAF, allowing the PLAN to focus more on carrier aviation and enabling better air defense coordination.
One change from last year: the report says the PLAAF's tech is rapidly catching up to US standards, where last year's said the PLAAF is catching up to "western air forces". Not sure why the difference, or how much it means - but it was changed.
One detail added to this year's report: the PLAAF's J-16 "4+ gen" fighter inventory: apparently they had 225 in 2023, with more on the way. I'd be interested to know how this compares with other folks' open source estimates.
Similar to the PLAN, the PLAAF appears to be making improvements to its training and exercises, improving its potential real-world combat effectiveness.
In the next installment, we'll start with the PLA Rocket Force.
"Rattner [sic] said Xi Jinping’s goal of having his military ready to carry out a “short, sharp invasion” of Taiwan by 2027 “is not possible right now.”"
I was at this event, and that is not what I recall them saying. What I recall is them saying is... news.usni.org/2024/12/19/chi…
...that invasion was "neither imminent nor inevitable", that the PLA faced obstacles in reaching Xi's 2027 goal, and in terms of a short sharp invasion at acceptable cost, "they're not there today".
But judge for yourself, that portion is around 12:00:
IMO my recollection is consistent with this statement, provided at a separate brief to reporters—and released by DoD.
Again: not imminent or inevitable, Xi remains committed to 2027 goals but corruption could slow them down (i.e., not "not possible" to meet 2027 goals). 🤷♂️
Moving on, here's part 3 of my thoughts on the 2024 China Military Power report. We'll start with the PRC's nuclear forces.
Overall, DoD estimates the PRC has 600+ warheads. Last year's report said 500, with 1000 expected by 2030, so this 20% increase isn't really a surprise. 🤷♂️
We also get news the PLARF is doubling the size of the DF-5 liquid-fueled ICBM silo force.
We also get a new discussion of possible reasons for the massive nuclear expansion: in part due to concerns about US BMD (note: not US nuclear modernization).
While US BMD could have something to do with it, I think there's more to it: Xi has said China will have a "world-class" military, and this is probably part of that.
Also, a robust nuclear force is insurance against a US nuclear response to large-scale PRC conventional strikes.
First, the report provides a section on PLARF force structure, with an estimate ICBM brigades have 6-12 launchers, other brigades 24-48—a detail I don't recall from previous reports.
Also, it details there's probably different C2 for nuclear vs. conventional ops, also new AFAIK.
The report also reveals the DF-21C MRBM is on its way out, with no more dedicated brigades operating it (I assume there are still DF-21D anti-ship brigades?).
1. Everyone involved in reporting this clearly understands that nuclear submarines had not—yet—been built in Wuhan, and that this was a new development: a significant expansion of nuclear submarine production outside of Huludao.
1. cont'd: rumors of a new "auxiliary nuclear powerplant for electricity generation for fitting into conventional submarine designs" (like the subs they've been building at Wuhan) have been circulating for years, so not that surprising of a development.cimsec.org/pla-navys-plan…
2. Everyone also understands the Yangtze is shallow, which is why for years the subs being built there have been taken downriver on barges. The new boat is only ~10% longer than previous classes, nothing like the size of PRC SSNs, so no reason to think it couldn't be so also.
What if I told you that as I type this there was a vessel, associated with the Chinese PLA, that *could* be equipped with many dozens of anti-ship cruise missiles—and was parked less than 4 miles from the bulk of the U.S. Atlantic Fleet.
Well guess what: it's happening—for real.
The vessel in question is a container ship named COSCO Shipping Sakura. It's a massive ship, more than 360m long (~1200 ft), and weighing far more than a U.S. aircraft carrier. Built in 2018, It can carry more than 14000 shipping containers.
The shipyard that built it, Jiangnan Shipyard, in addition to building ships for COSCO (and western, even TAIWANESE companies!) also builds warships for the PLA Navy, including its first full-size aircraft carrier. features.csis.org/china-shadow-w…