James Lindsay, anti-Communist Profile picture
Dec 19 17 tweets 4 min read Read on X
I used to give a three-part definition ofa critical theory, or critical consciousness, so Woke, derived from Max Horkheimer, who created the critical theory:

1) utopian concept of society
2) critical attitude towards everything opposing that concept
3) activist duty for 1 & 2 🧵
The question really is how can we tell "Woke Right" from people who want to save our country. The equally hard question from five years ago was how do we tell "Woke (Left)" from people who just have a socially progressive left agenda? It's hard, but these criteria are key.
1) Holding a utopian standard for society is key to Woke thinking. Woke people "know" how society should be, and everyone who doesn't agree with them is somehow deficient: morally, intellectually, psychologically, etc. No clear utopian vision need be articulated, to be clear.
Wokes rarely have a clear utopian vision except that it will be a world absent all the problems we currently face, and it will be that way because (Woke, superior) people like them hold power and enforce the required standards and "virtues" on everyone, which will make it work.
Secondary to this utopian standard for society under their power are historicist beliefs that construe history as inexorably moving in a particular direction, usually some concept of justice, and enemies of the vision being in the way and holding it back.
Also secondary to this utopian vision is the entitlement relationship to power. The Woke are awake, Erwacht, Elect, and they obviously are therefore natural betters to the sleeping people who labor under false (not-Woke) consciousness, thus they must rule.
Tertiary from there, we see not just an entitlement to power but also a confidence (like the con in con man) that when they, the Woke, hold and enforce their power, we'll be on track to utopia, even if the beginning is rough. They're Woke and ruling, so it'll work out.
Derivative from that is the conspiratorial victimhood mentality that history and its enemies have conspired to keep them, the Woke, away from power because obviously the status quo must maintain itself for the ruling enemy class. It's all a contrivance again the poor Wokes.
2) Downstream from that, therefore, Wokes hold a critical disposition towards everything in society that doesn't move toward their utopian concept for society, in the sense of a ruthless criticism of everything and everyone outside of their political aspirations and vision. Image
Image
That is, Wokes adopt a critical theory of reality, which allows them to identify and call out everything that stands between themselves and power, which is the way they believe their utopian standard will manifest. Again, they don't need to know what utopia looks like for this. Image
Critical theories are wholly negative pursuits that believe themselves to "become positive" by virtue of their purge of un-Woke evils. As Horkheimer had it, they don't need to know what an ideal society looks like, only what it doesn't look like, which they can then criticize.
That means that a trait of Woke thinking is that through enough negative, you will get a positive, but of course only through accepting their critique and their claim on control of those undesired elements that comes with it.
Secondary to this trait of Woke is the friend/enemy distinction in politics. Those who aid the utopian concept and its agents are the good guys, and those who don't are enemies, not just of the cadre, but of the people at large and of history itself, which they alone comprehend.
3) Woke thinking always combines theory and praxis (activism), so there's a requirement to do activism (pursuant to 1 and 2) that moves society toward utopia and away from "enemy" positions. It's not enough to be awake, Wokes must act to direct history in its intended direction.
Combining the corollaries of 1 & 2 with this demand for social and political activism arrives at an entitled attitude where the ends justifying the means comes in. The only Woke ethic is that whatever moves the world towards the Woke standard is ethical; nothing else is.
Thus lying, smearing, character assassination, cancelling, propaganda, and eventually political violence are all on the table for the Woke because all are ethical under any Woke ethics. Limiting principles are lifted from Wokes and applied ruthlessly to enemies.
Downstream from this is the two-tiered society that reads like "for my enemies, the law; for my friends, everything" that we associate with all corrupt regimes. They justify this view through the entitlement complex that is ultimately what it means to be Woke in the first place. Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with James Lindsay, anti-Communist

James Lindsay, anti-Communist Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ConceptualJames

Dec 18
Reading about Mao's Hundred Flowers Campaign and thinking about the Woke Right. I don't know if that's what's going on, but it's definitely plausible. The bad part is that if so, it's even more devious than Mao was. 🧵
Mao launched his infamous Hundred Flowers Campaign in the wake of Khrushchev's secret speech denouncing Stalin in 1956, which triggered a wave of "de-Stalinization" across the Communist world with everyone trying to put distance between themselves and Stalin and his abuses.
Mao based his whole regime on Stalin, was China's Stalin, so to prove distinction he came out with a new free speech policy for the PRC: "Let a hundred flowers bloom; let a hundred schools of thought contend!" He badly miscalculated, though.
Read 15 tweets
Dec 17
In light of recent developments, it's worthwhile to revisit George Soros and his methodologies for social change. He calls the method "reflexivity," and you cannot understand today's psychological manipulation and mass-formation psychosis without it.
newdiscourses.com/2024/04/the-re…
Reflexive pushes take advantage of the gap between perception and reality to drive rapid social change. In practice, the first step is to create a widely believed misperception. This is accomplished through a "reflexive push" in which a desired fallacy is pushed hard all at once.
The goal of a reflexive campaign is to make sure everyone relevant to a subject is suddenly talking about it in almost the same ways all at once, and anyone who isn't participating either doesn't get it or is a problem. This builds consensus on the "fertile fallacy" being pushed.
Read 8 tweets
Dec 17
Many people misunderstand me about what I think the threat of the Red Conservatives ("Woke Right") really is. It's not to seize and claim power, although they'd gladly take it. It's to spark conflict and ultimately scatter the loose coalition that elected Trump and split MAGA.🧵
Understanding my perspective on the Woke Right's purpose requires understanding first that I don't think it's a fully organic movement but instead one that probably mostly started organically and has been co-opted by savvier enemies of America (or was their creation).
What that means is that I think most of the Woke Right (Red Conservatives) are fully earnest people who fully believe they have the post-liberal sociopolitical philosophy necessary to save the West through claiming power at multiple levels, including the political.
Read 24 tweets
Dec 15
Despite the evidences of the last few years, many people remain skeptical of conspiracy theory-sounding explanations for social movements. Like, are they really centrally controlled, or are they organic? Well, let me ask you this: do you believe in venture capitalism?🧵
The venture capitalist model pretty neatly explains how you can have quasi-coordinated social engineering that isn't centrally manufactured. Think of large NGOs and such as operating like venture capitalists for cultural activism and you pretty much have the model.
The NGOs themselves do have agendas and, in some cases, large-scale orchestrated plans, but they aren't manufacturing most of the social movements that advance their goals. They're finding them, marketing them, and pouring gasoline (lots of money) on them.
Read 7 tweets
Dec 15
I'm going to attempt to explain how Woke people (Left and Right) can say Marx got some things right and is still useful even though his specific conclusions were wrong and sound credible. I'm also going to explain why they're dangerously wrong. 🧵 Image
Image
This little sketch is the key to my argument, so let me explain what it is. It's a position together with a heading (think airplanes or sea navigation), or, alternatively, a depiction of position and momentum, not position alone. Understanding that both matter is key here.Image
In the sketch, the dot is position. That's some analysis of where we are. Marx or the Critical Theorists or whatever might have said some true things about where we are/were, which is like getting the dot right, but the heading matters a lot. The arrows are the headings. Image
Read 16 tweets
Dec 13
Wtf is this? Some pompous post-liberal manifesto for the future that fails to understand how we actually got where we are through manipulation and acts of political warfare, is based on "belonging," and looks back to the golden era of the New Deal (and FDR) for its inspiration?!
What amounts to "Conservatives for the New Deal" (big state power) immediately after a bunch of Tech Lords, ESG dudes, and Democrats get invited into the White House after a strong reelection win by Trump? What's going on here?
The problem isn't rampant individualism at all. It's that our governments are violating our inalienable rights by forcing 21st Century Communism on us, spying on us, stealing our data, building a social credit system, and propagandizing us 24/7. Who are these people? Image
Read 21 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(