A 2024 study funded by the U.S. Census Bureau "for research purposes" wanted to test whether lack of "diversity" or "inherent racial preferences" is driving the lack of interracial marriage.
The justification for which is that race-mixing "reduces inequality between racial groups."
It found that increasing exposure to opposite-sex members of different class groups generates a substantial increase in interclass marriage, but increased exposure to other racial groups has "no detectable effect on interracial marriage.
"Residential segregation accounts for nearly half of marital homophily by class, but less than 10% of marital homophily by race."
The disappointment is clear by the final paragraph: "Understanding how these preferences are formed is an important next step for future research."
"Any opinions and conclusions expressed herein are those of the author(s) and do not represent the views of the U.S. Census Bureau."
Why would they distance themselves from the study that they funded? 🤔
Why is the primary concern is with increasing White-Black intermarriage.
You wouldn't expect the U.S. Government to be funding research on how to increase Black-White intermarriage in the most effective way.
Have we not already achieved integration?
So the next step appears to be to directly push race mixing by focusing on preferences themselves.
"We find that reducing residential segregation will not increase rates of interracial marriage on its own."
"A promising next step would be to study more granular data to understand whether increasing other types of exposure will help generate additional marriages."
"Understanding how these preferences are formed is an important next step for future research...will have downstream effects for the next generation of children growing up in these communities."
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Eldridge Cleaver exemplifies this. He admitted to stalking White women, and raping them out of a sense of revenge.
They've been doing this since the earliest days, but when White men lynched them for it, history was rewritten by Marxist intellectuals. (Thread bellow.)
As Jewish author, Kristen Fink, put it in "The Black Penis and the Demoralization of the Western World,":
White men in the South were just "protecting their human chatel." Not from rape, but from the sexual liberation the Black man provides.
Eldridge Cleaver went from raping White women, to being embraced as a success story of Black Conservatism in the 1980s:
"Every time I'm embracing a Black woman, I'm embracing slavery, and when I put my arms around a White woman, well I'm hugging freedom"
-Civil Rights Activist, Eldridge Cleaver
White women aren't just the ultimate prize of revenge, they're also a symbol of "freedom" for these Black men. I wonder who put this idea in their heads.
The rape of White women by Black men is actually liberating and wholesome. Stop being so racist.
89% of the 1.2% of Polish women in mixed marriages, married other Euros.
"Polish women preferred partners from United Kingdom, Germany, Italy and France while Polish men tended to be married to women from Ukraine, Russia and Belarus."
Why do so many non-White men associate blonde women with whores:
How sexual narratives about European women were historically used to exploit them, and how the porn industry, and open border policies, are facilitating the revival of the Islamic slave trade. 🧵
It's no secret that many Muslim men associate blonde White women with whores.
You see this disdain for Blonde White women facilitated by the western porn industry. The most avid consumers of Blacked pornography are men from the third world.
From the Telegraph:
"Male Muslims confirmed that their peers consider White women 'whores,' but associate this most strongly with blonde women.
They associate us with performers they see in pornographic films, and assume this is an accurate portrayal of who we are."