Vatnik Soup Profile picture
Dec 20, 2024 24 tweets 15 min read Read on X
In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll introduce an American radio host and propagandist, Scott Horton (@scotthortonshow). He’s best known for blaming Russia’s genocidal war against Ukraine on the US, and for publishing a 700-page book full of Kremlin propaganda.

1/23 Image
Most of you probably remember Scotty from this recent episode of Piers Morgan Uncensored, in which he was schooled for his revisionist propaganda by Ukrainian volunteer and activist Anastasiya Paraskevova (@UkrainianAna).

2/23
Let’s start with the obvious - Scott Horton is a hardcore Kremlin apologist who sees nothing wrong with what Putin does, but strongly condemns anything that Ukrainians do to defend themselves. For Horton,the enemy is the US and all of its allies. The way this works is that…
3/23
…whenever Scotty talks about a historical event, he somehow flips it so that the fault falls on the US. And he’s been doing this for a LONG time - he’s conducted over 5000 interviews since 2003 for various radio stations, including his own Antiwar Radio.

4/23 Image
Horton is the editorial director of Antiwar . com - a website that claims to be devoted to “non-interventionism”, but is somehow full of rambles from Kremlin apologists. It’s promoted by John Mearsheimer and Roger Waters, and Scott’s predecessor praised Putin as a “patriot”.
5/23 Image
Image
Image
Image
Scotty is part of the US “Kremlintarian movement” and so-called Mises Caucus, a pro-Kremlin group who hijacked the real Libertarians to help with Trump's re-election. He’s referred to as their “foreign policy guy”.

The group’s led by Angela McArdle:


6/23 Image
Image
Image
Image
Horton’s “anti-war” stance seems to be that countries like Russia can invade other sovereign nations, whereas their victims’ allies should not be able to help in any way because that would “provoke” or “escalate”. This crowd sometimes does condemn barbaric murderers like…

7/23 Image
…Putin & Assad, but then comes the “but”: “BUT here’s how it was actually our own fault and Putin HAD to invade Ukraine because they wanted to integrate into EU/NATO and it was the US who meddled in Ukraine’s domestic issues not Putin”, shifting the blame from the Kremlin.

8/23 Image
In this worldview, 1 bag of low-grade cookies and a phone call between 2 Americans somehow constitute a coup and “provoke” (justify?) a genocidal invasion, whereas the arming&training of separatists and dioxin poisoning of the Kremlin’s puppet’s opponent is just “bad sushi”.
9/23 Image
Image
Image
Image
And that’s exactly what Scotty’s new book titled “Provoked: How Washington Started the New Cold War with Russia and the Catastrophe in Ukraine” is all about. He shifts all the blame of the Russo-Ukrainian War on Obama & Biden, and claims that Russia simply “had to invade”.

10/23 Image
Horton falsely claims that the US spent 100 million USD on the “coup” in Ukraine, but never explained why massive, months-long, anti-Yanukovych and pro-EU protests erupted all over Ukraine in freezing winter temperatures, even in Donbas & Crimea.



11/23
On Piers’ show, Scott was trying to be a bit more careful with his words, but with vatnik-friendly Judge Napolitano, he parrots all the classic Kremlin narratives: US sponsored 2014 “Ukraine coup d’État”, the West “wanted the war to happen” and Ukraine is “full of Nazis”.

12/23
According to Scotty, Putin decided to invade Crimea as a reaction to Obama’s “illegal Ukrainian coup of ’14”. He’s also claimed that “Russia took Crimea without firing a single shot” & somehow suggests that this move wasn’t “aggression”. Truly a libertarian, antiwar figure.
13/23 Image
Image
He was one of the speakers & sponsor at the first RATWM “antiwar” event in DC in Feb 2023 (featuring warmongers like Hinkle and Reade). The event demands were a Putin’s wishlist of (among other things) ending aid to Ukraine & disbanding NATO.



14/23 Image
Image
Image
Naturally, suggesting total capitulation of the defender without calling for the aggressor to cease hostilities and remove their army from occupied territory is hardly an “antiwar” stance. It’s actually a sign of support for imperialism and as pro-war as you can get.

15/23 Image
Image
Image
Image
Like a good Kremlin lapdog, Scotty has also been promoting Russia’s new “superweapon” Oreshnik, blaming Joe Biden for “escalating the war” by allowing Ukraine to hit legitimate military targets inside Russia with long-range missiles such as ATACMS.

16/23 Image
Image
Scotty also has a funny way of ignoring all the human rights violations in Russia & he’s for example called Washington Post’s report on torture and persecution of ethnic&sexual minorities “CIA propaganda”. He also has a hard time believing the genocide against Ukrainians.

17/23 Image
Image
Actually, he even had a hard time believing in Russia’s full-scale invasion just a week before it actually happened (a classic among alleged vatnik “experts”). He looks so proud in the video below, when he could say it on live television!

18/23
Image
Image
Image
As is tradition, Horton’s takes on Syria are just as bad as his takes on Ukraine and Russia. He claims that Assad’s sarin attacks against his own people were “hoaxes”, and he’s even suggested that Assad is “probably a better leader” for Syria than Al-Jolani.

19/23 Image
Image
Image
Image
Considering that Horton claims to absolutely despise Nazis, it is strange that he’s decided to cooperate with and befriend one of the US’s biggest Nazi apologists, Darryl Cooper (@martyrmade). Scott and Darryl were at one point even supposed to author “Provoked” together.

20/23 Image
Image
Image
Image
I have a hard time understanding why @piersmorgan has decided to add Horton as a regular panelist, but it probably has something to do with getting better ratings through rage-baiting. I mean, he also platforms vatniks like Sachs, Benny Johnson and George Galloway.

21/23 Image
Image
Image
Interestingly, Scott’s wife Larisa Alexandrovna is a Ukrainian who has a much less glamorous picture of Russia: “Russian occupation is worse than death. Let’s not forget that Russia has starved Ukraine and committed mass genocide on purpose…Nobody wants to live like that.”
22/23
To conclude, Horton is as antiwar as Vladimir Putin, and his only argument is “US bad” with anger issues. For some reason,he’s invited by the MSM to discuss ongoing conflicts, even though he defends authoritarian states like Russia and Assad’s Syria and lacks any expertise.
23/23
The 2nd edition of "Vatnik Soup - The Ultimate Guide to Russian Disinformation" with new soups and analysis will be published in Febuary of 2025!

You can pre-order it now and get some extra goodies:

kleart.eu/webshop/p/vatn…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Vatnik Soup

Vatnik Soup Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @P_Kallioniemi

Feb 5
In this 5th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss something that sounds great in theory, but was completely turned upside-down by the tankie kind of vatnik: anti-imperialism. More consistent anti-imperialists call this the “anti-imperialism of idiots”.
1/5 Image
Image
“Anti-imperialism” was popularized by Lenin, who saw imperialism as the ultimate stage of capitalism. Ironically, the largest empire is now… Putin’s Russia, proud heir to both Lenin’s Soviet Union and to the Tsarist Empire.
2/5 Image
Image
Image
Image
Indeed, Russia is an empire that is still ruled by a de facto all-powerful Tsar, that still proudly flies its imperial flag, that still dreams of expanding its already huge territory through brutal conquest and colonization.
3/5 Image

Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Feb 1
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal.
1/5 Image
Image
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic.
2/5 Image
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not.
3/5 Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 31
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.

Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield.
1/5 Image
Image
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end.
2/5 Image
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5 Image

Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 30
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd:
1/5 Image
Image
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin.
2/5
Image
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite.
3/5
vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.

1/20 Image
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.

2/20 Image
Image
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.

3/20 Image
Read 21 tweets
Jan 28
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.

Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military.
1/5 Image
Image
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield.
2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts.
3/5 Image
Image
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(