Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
_Esc Profile picture
@_Escapekey_
Dec 21, 2024 • 12 tweets • 7 min read • Read on X
Scrolly
Hosted on the WAAS website, it's "human rights and responsibilities".

Article 37 -

'Every person should recognize the responsibilities owed to the community within which the full development of the talents and capacity of the individual is made possible.'

FO, commies. Image
whoops that's article 35 - but check out 34:

'Everyone has an obligation to promote and defend a universal political order, based on the dignity of every man, woman and child.'

FO, commies.

worldacademy.org/files/almaty_2…Image
I wonder why they took this down, and recently, too

is it because of 'interdependence', or 'global ethic', or 'higher loyalty to humanity as a whole'?

web.archive.org/web/2024042019…Image
Image
or how about this one, from 1994

A strong case can be made for the WAAS are a pack of commies.

worldacademy.org/files/Newslett…Image
Image
oh, with bonus mention of 'civil society' and NGOs... Image
oh are they now?

which 'Nobel laureates' are drafting said 'charter of human duties'?

and a General Assembly of NGOs? what a great idea - that'll make it really obvious who's really in charge. Image
19 - A new global ethic: justice for all

'The World Academy of Art and Science, possibly in partnership with The Club of Rome, the World Future Council, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and other select civil society organizations...'

worldacademy.org/files/UCB/Glob…Image
Image
oh I see they seek to create a 'new economy', too

and this is courtesy of the treasurer of WAAS, even

they're a pack of commies.

worldacademy.org/files/june_stg…Image
Image
... as just as they were preparing to launch the scamdemic, too

worldacademy.org/files/global_l…Image
holy moly - look at the list of implementing partners

isn't it interesting how all those organisations were chosen without a shred of a democratic process?

gee, I wonder why that is.

worldacademy.org/files/gl21repo…Image
Image
there they are again -

Inter-Parliamentary Coalition for Global Ethics

just above the IUCN, the IPU, ... Image
need to dedicate more time to them, because... this will be about global governance through global ethic, undoubtedly

ipcge.org/index.htmlImage

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with _Esc

_Esc Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_Escapekey_

_Esc Profile picture
Apr 27
RAND, OECD, IIASA, Macy/Pugwash conferences, Cambridge Apostles, WOMP, technocracy inc/LID, vatican 2, integral humanism (maritain)... I could cover these topics, but I don't see the point because they all just strengthen my case. there are no internal contradictions. Image
i have covered health, environment, finance, governance, systems theory, role of ethics, cultural engineering, aesopian language, global governance, digital twins, digital id, CBDCs, carbon accounting, bogdanov, dug up documents which essentially no-one else has covered... Image
i think, in short, im done because i dont fundamentally see any major developments which even could change the overall arc of my theory. absolutely everything is logically coherent, and there can't really be any reason but one - because it's all true. Image
Read 5 tweets
_Esc Profile picture
Apr 27
There were four separate hearings on this topic. Four. On an allegedly technical issue.

I struggle to find similar examples.

And the ground work was laid over here.

In 1958 they discussed the conceptual aspects, nearly completed it, even.

the call for global data, harmonious standards and so forth came at the 1968 unesco biosphere conference - data, which would lead into the global information database called for shortly before JFKs death

Read 37 tweets
_Esc Profile picture
Apr 26
They wanted to create a National Research Data Processing and Information Retrieval Center

Here's the hearings from 1963. JFK was hesitant about this - LBJ supported it. Image
here

books.google.co.uk/books?id=bGtQA…
you know what's weird. I ask chatgpt for summaries and it answers with some weird, scripted reply which makes no sense in context of my question.

and now it even flat out refuses Image
Read 26 tweets
_Esc Profile picture
Apr 26
You don't say, Grok. Image
HAHAHAHAHA and after accusing it of carrying water for the establishment it suddenly CAN find evidence of my original claim

holy fucking shit this is corrupt Image
calling it out in that regard and it owns up.

this is just so breathtakingly dishonest. the AI called me a 'conspiracy theorist' for stating what's obviously true, and has now done a full reversal and apologised

most people will not challenge it but just accept its word Image
Read 11 tweets
_Esc Profile picture
Apr 26
This document is absolutely chock full of the meticulous input-output analysis I've been documenting as of late.

It began within the DoD (McNamara in 1961), but was begun under LBJ in August, 1965 - and soon began to comprise ALL types of traceable data under OECD. Image
What began with tracing just economic inputs and outputs soon evolved into education, public health, urban services, land-use planning, and - environmentalism.

archive.org/details/Goulds…
And this was then followed by the Moynihan memo of September 17, 1969, which called for NATO to run global surveillance of environment.

Declassified in 2024.

Read 39 tweets
_Esc Profile picture
Apr 24
When the May 23, 1972 US-USSR environmental agreement was signed, the entire intelligence apparatus had already been reoriented to make this convergence possible.

And Robert Amory, Jr, was pivotal in that strategic shift. No wonder Schlesinger tried to protect him.
Amory, essentially, pushed for the capacity for forward prediction - exactly what RAND worked on, and Leontief had (allegedly) fathered starting in 1941.

JFK dismissing him must have been a serious setback.
When LBJ came to power, it signified a marked shift, a significant escalation in the priority of environmental matters (seen through acts and EOs), along with human health - topics which would converge at the 1968 UNESCO Biosphere Conference.
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(