Hosted on the WAAS website, it's "human rights and responsibilities".
Article 37 -
'Every person should recognize the responsibilities owed to the community within which the full development of the talents and capacity of the individual is made possible.'
FO, commies.
whoops that's article 35 - but check out 34:
'Everyone has an obligation to promote and defend a universal political order, based on the dignity of every man, woman and child.'
oh, with bonus mention of 'civil society' and NGOs...
oh are they now?
which 'Nobel laureates' are drafting said 'charter of human duties'?
and a General Assembly of NGOs? what a great idea - that'll make it really obvious who's really in charge.
19 - A new global ethic: justice for all
'The World Academy of Art and Science, possibly in partnership with The Club of Rome, the World Future Council, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and other select civil society organizations...'
I sit on several documents at the moment which... are just unbelievable. Believable, because they tie everything together, but unbelievable, that they were ever allowed published.
What we presently experience is so obviously engineered. All of it.
Here's one - the American Defense knew that the (absurdly biased) 'Nuclear Winter' study was being exploited.
We have a 'consensus national objective' through politicians and elections. What this, essentially, outlines is a 'third way', where 'scientists' control the 'national objective' aka 'common good'.
They're scientific socialists.
hah, this is like the Game B guy saying that it might lead to authoritarianism
Best as I sit and work my way through the Technocracy doc, it suddenly strikes me how they've progressively rolled out their plans for world domination, because this material... essentially reflects the same core ideas as Marx. It's just established differently.
>continues
Socialism is about an organisation
Communism is that, focusing on material aspects
Technocracy adds empirical monitoring and administration
This leads to a purpose - co2 - and the ‘circular economy’
And environmentalism is the embodiment of that
>>yes.
Socialism is an abstract, through Marxism it becomes top down by force, through ethical socialism is becomes bottom-up; ethical socialism through the Fabian society, ethical culture through Felix Adler...
Right, let me connect global governance to the technocracy, then the carbon dioxide obsession and then environmentalism, and then back to finance (which goes back to the central banks).
Most of this I've sourced on substack already.
Global governance links technocracy.
From Technocracy we get to carbon dioxide obsession via Hubbert and Plass/Keeling (with note of Bogdanov and Gaia).
The technocracy and thus co2 obsession takes us to the environmental movement, and from there to the financial system via carbon-backed CBDCs.
This aligns impeccably with:
- Technocracy, Inc (1936)
- International Research Council (ICSU)
- Leo Woolf's International Government
- Carbon emission permit/sequestration backed CBDCs
- The Third Way
- Marx's take on money
To thieve: input
To live: process
To construct: output
To master: feedback
This is about Adaptive Management, with the human being the 'processor', and control through feedback mechanisms - ie Cybernetics or Donella Meadows' Leverage Points