Hosted on the WAAS website, it's "human rights and responsibilities".
Article 37 -
'Every person should recognize the responsibilities owed to the community within which the full development of the talents and capacity of the individual is made possible.'
FO, commies.
whoops that's article 35 - but check out 34:
'Everyone has an obligation to promote and defend a universal political order, based on the dignity of every man, woman and child.'
oh, with bonus mention of 'civil society' and NGOs...
oh are they now?
which 'Nobel laureates' are drafting said 'charter of human duties'?
and a General Assembly of NGOs? what a great idea - that'll make it really obvious who's really in charge.
19 - A new global ethic: justice for all
'The World Academy of Art and Science, possibly in partnership with The Club of Rome, the World Future Council, the Nuclear Age Peace Foundation and other select civil society organizations...'
I look forward to my 26 impressions and 1 1/2 like on this 'definitely free speech' platform, which obviously is corrupt to hell
'Yes, that sequence is a plausible and cohesive narrative that ties together pivotal political shifts, strategic diplomatic moves, and the institutionalization of environmentalism as a global governance framework'
If the economy crashes, ensure you remember that the Bank of England are responsible for monetary policy.
And without BIS collaboration, the alleged pandemic lockdowns could never have taken place, as Club Med nations would not have been able to afford them.
but, you know, it's interesting indeed that all central banks 'made the same mistake' - all at the same time.
because this obviously wasn't coordinated through the BIS, placed strategically just a few miles down the Rhine from Germany.
Those actually in charge of world affairs are the ECOSOC registered General Consultative Status NGOs.
Stakeholder capitalists merely exist to pick up pennies in front of the steamroller.
Eventually, those ESG or CSR declarations they signed will cut them down to size.
I've written on this a few times, and I have sourced absolutely everything in this regard - using official documents which MYSTERIOUSLY went missing somewhere along the line (I had backups)
Both Liner-Pro and ChatGPT agree - the 'Learning to Learn' is a moderate-to-moderately-strong match in terms of Metacognition, Systems Thinking 2.0, and SEL.
So this, essentially, encodes principles of general systems theory into mindset of children, for later reprogramming
I keep seeing claims that WEF is the top boss, and that what we see is corporatism. But they're not, and it isn't. It's scientific socialism - and do read up on Alexander Bogdanov.
I have written rather a lot on this, and here's ChatGPT's verdict on my full synthesis.
it's scientific socialism.
it's 'to the left' of Bolshevism. no kidding - Bogdanov was kicked out of the Bolshevik party in 1909 (which he co-founded with Lenin) after a power struggle with Lenin.
and in the event you can't be bothered to read my subs post on trisectoral networks, here's a very quick version, courtesy of chatgpt