Thanks to your donations we were able to get a PlusLife tester awhile back and it's been a game changer! Finally a test where u can TRUST a negative result! But I've seen people struggle w false positives from air bubbles, so here's a 🧵 w everything u need to know:
For those who don't know, PlusLife is a portable nucleic acid test that is incredibly accurate, on par with some of the best PCR tests. There is a website and app that go with it that enables you to see the raw data from the test instead of just seeing a "positive" or "negative"
This app makes the entire test SO much more accurate and informative. Here's an example of a normal "negative" result from the app. Each test card has 7 chambers and you can see the results of each chamber (aka channels) in the graph below. Notice they're all flat except for 4:
What the graphs are showing is detection of the virus, except for channel 4. Channel 4 is special bc it's the control. That means it's not testing to detect the virus, instead it's detecting a common human gene to make sure the tester is working properly.
So for a normal negative test result, all of the channels should remain flat (meaning SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in any of the chambers on the card), while channel 4 should show a curve like in the image above where the machine is detecting the control gene.
An issue can arise if large air bubbles get into the test card. This is bc the tester uses light to detect the virus. So air bubbles can fuck with this detection. We just had our first air bubble result recently and it looked like this:
While watching this test come in live, I was afraid that channel 5 was detecting a positive at around the 10 and 15 minute marks. But then as you look, the line goes up and then down, and it never goes all the way up again. That's how you know it's an air bubble
This is due to the way the test works. It attempts to replicate pieces of the virus from your swabbed sample over time, which means that over time, the number of virus particles detected should get larger exponentially. Like it shouldn't detect LESS virus at the end of the test
This is bc it's growing the part of the virus it's detecting, so it should always be trending upwards for a true positive result. There might be little individual jiggles which is sometimes due to the power supply and a few other things, but the overall line should trend upwards
If they don't, you most likely have air bubbles. For example, here's what a light positive and a strong positive test result graph looks like. You can see that at least one channel is increasing exponentially over time:
If you see a channel go up and down over time, it's most likely an air bubble. You can also check this with the test card itself. If you look carefully at the card, chambers 1, 4, and 7 are labeled. And if you look at our test card, you can see one of them has a giant air bubble
And seeing as it's just to the right of chamber 4, that means it's chamber 5 that has the giant air bubble, which corresponds precisely with what the graph on the web app was showing. So this is how you double check to make sure it was actually an air bubble and not a positive
You can also see that each chamber has super tiny air bubbles in them. Those are normal and typically fine. The issue is if you get giant air bubbles/pockets in the chambers. Then the test results for that specific chamber will be inconclusive.
Whether you want to test again is up to you, depending on how much accuracy you need. That's partially why there are so many chambers, for a level of redundancy so that you have multiple testing channels in case one is inconclusive.
So, for me personally, I'm usually ok with not retesting if only one channel is inconclusive. But if more than one channel had air bubbles or otherwise returned inconclusive, I'd retest.
And the way you avoid air bubbles is by ensuring you fill the test card up to the line it recommends with your solution. And then make sure to tap it a lot and slightly shake it to ensure all the chambers in the card get filled properly with the solution.
If you want more info about PlusLife, I highly recommend you check out the website , the creators of the web app many of us use for these graphs. You can also email them for discount codes to apply towards the purchase of the PlusLife mini dock and tests!virus.sucks
@Randall87454048 The reason there are multiple chambers is to increase the test accuracy and redundancy, but you don't have to worry about that when doing the test
@Randall87454048 My first order was the device (called the mini dock), a box of ten tests, and some extra swabs
@nickelpin But for me now, it's already changed our lives a lot bc my mom babysits my nephew like once a week. So she was quarantining herself and we'd both mask indoors for two days after she got home. But now? As soon as she gets back we just test and can see right away what the risk is
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I actually hate conspiracy theories bc they're usually poorly researched & rely on domain ignorance more than anything else. This chain of events, however, is so incredibly suspect. Like there's no way a stranger would ID Luigi AND authorities taking it so seriously right away 🧵
You're telling me a stranger ID'd this average Joe from afar who is fully masked and hooded, alerted McDonald's staff, who then contacted police, who then took this tip (out of probably hundreds) super seriously and showed up before he was even done w his fucking hash browns?!!
Nah, the ONLY way this makes sense is with facial ID tech. That kind of flag in their system would allow cops to take this seriously, even if it was just a high probability match, and prioritize showing up super quick to ID the guy before he finished eating and left
I can tell you right now, as a professional dating coach for the past decade, this kind of thinking is why so many people struggle and never get better. And also, it's just objectively false. I was single for the majority of my life until I learned the SKILLS required 🧵
And yes, most of the things holding people back from having a successful and fruitful dating/married life are SKILLS! And, luckily, bc they are skills, they can be LEARNED. Once you've learned all the skills required, there is actually VERY LITTLE luck involved. For example:
I was an undiagnosed autistic person who had never been on a date and never been kissed or had sex well into my mid 20s. Once I learned all the skills I was deficient in, I was able to date over 300 women, and be in 6 LTRs, over the span of like 10-15 years
I love how I've been trying to write a reply to this tweet for a half hour now bc long covid destroyed my ability to read & write. Most days I can't comprehend more than a single tweet worth of information at a time. And hundreds of millions of people have long covid now! 🧵
Reading is no longer going to be an easily accessible hobby for most after MULTIPLE covid infections destroy their brains and ability to focus and comprehend the written word. This is why we've been telling everyone to fucking mask and to mitigate covid spread
Like I am a hyperlexic autistic person! I was reading college texts in elementary school! Before COVID I was reading multiple books every month, have been since I was a fucking child! And now I can barely read anything.
Honestly surprised to see so many anti-porn people giving me shit for saying that the rise in undateable, toxic men is due to the rise of fascism and far right indoctrination among young men and NOT porn. Talk about brain rot lol. Anyways, a🧵 to piss off the haters...
Once my brain is working again, I'll do a research thread with all the data. It's VERY CLEARLY fascism & far right ideology that is rotting men's brains, NOT porn. Like there is so much data showing men are being indoctrinated into this stuff recently at alarming rates,
And that their far right beliefs correlate with all of the toxic bullshit women are complaining about (meanwhile there's little to no correlation with porn). But even without the data, it makes PERFECT sense! As I'll show below:
This is exactly what I want as well. People do best when their romantic relationship is with a PARTNER. The whole conservative notion that women need to be subservient to men is bullshit perpetuated by weak little boys who are afraid of the power of the feminine
For these "men", they are too scared to see women as equals. They are afraid to see the powerful woman within their wives. They NEED women to be subservient bc they are cowards, unable to rise to meet a powerful woman as an equal.
To be in partnership with another person, true partnership, that requires strength, courage, and vulnerability. Qualities these conservative men lack in spades. This is ALSO why they constantly like to cosplay as soldiers, wilderness men, and other traditionally masc roles
So, this video actually explains HOW she didn't notice they were incompatible for three and a half years. The reason is bc she's codependent. Notice how much she's excusing his bad behavior. She's still trying to save him even after he did such a heinous act to her 🧵
I'm a recovering codependent who dated several others. I actually went through a breakup similar to this, where I felt blindsided after thinking we were the perfect couple, no incompatibilities, (funny enough, it was also after three and a half years lol)
When you're in a codependent relationship, it's so hard to see the faults of the other person. You're always trying to save them and make excuses for them. This also makes it hard to see the incompatibilities, bc any that you see you take full responsibility for