Chris Alvino Profile picture
Dec 24, 2024 20 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Thanks to your donations we were able to get a PlusLife tester awhile back and it's been a game changer! Finally a test where u can TRUST a negative result! But I've seen people struggle w false positives from air bubbles, so here's a 🧵 w everything u need to know: Photo of the PlusLife tester, a square white plastic apparatus with a gray front plate and logo, power button, and indicator lights on the front, sitting on a table
For those who don't know, PlusLife is a portable nucleic acid test that is incredibly accurate, on par with some of the best PCR tests. There is a website and app that go with it that enables you to see the raw data from the test instead of just seeing a "positive" or "negative"
This app makes the entire test SO much more accurate and informative. Here's an example of a normal "negative" result from the app. Each test card has 7 chambers and you can see the results of each chamber (aka channels) in the graph below. Notice they're all flat except for 4: Web page showing the results of a PlusLife test. There are 7 multicolored lines. Every line remains flat near the bottom of the graph except for channel 4. You can see a green curve rise above all the other lines. At the top of the page it says "negative" for SARS-CoV-2
What the graphs are showing is detection of the virus, except for channel 4. Channel 4 is special bc it's the control. That means it's not testing to detect the virus, instead it's detecting a common human gene to make sure the tester is working properly.
So for a normal negative test result, all of the channels should remain flat (meaning SARS-CoV-2 was not detected in any of the chambers on the card), while channel 4 should show a curve like in the image above where the machine is detecting the control gene.
An issue can arise if large air bubbles get into the test card. This is bc the tester uses light to detect the virus. So air bubbles can fuck with this detection. We just had our first air bubble result recently and it looked like this: Another web page showing a negative COVID test. All of the lines in the chart are flat except for channel 4 which is showing a typical control curve, and channel 5, which is going up and down several times making a few medium sized hills
While watching this test come in live, I was afraid that channel 5 was detecting a positive at around the 10 and 15 minute marks. But then as you look, the line goes up and then down, and it never goes all the way up again. That's how you know it's an air bubble
This is due to the way the test works. It attempts to replicate pieces of the virus from your swabbed sample over time, which means that over time, the number of virus particles detected should get larger exponentially. Like it shouldn't detect LESS virus at the end of the test
This is bc it's growing the part of the virus it's detecting, so it should always be trending upwards for a true positive result. There might be little individual jiggles which is sometimes due to the power supply and a few other things, but the overall line should trend upwards
If they don't, you most likely have air bubbles. For example, here's what a light positive and a strong positive test result graph looks like. You can see that at least one channel is increasing exponentially over time:
If you see a channel go up and down over time, it's most likely an air bubble. You can also check this with the test card itself. If you look carefully at the card, chambers 1, 4, and 7 are labeled. And if you look at our test card, you can see one of them has a giant air bubble A clear plastic PlusLife testing card. There's a large white circle in the middle that's connected to 7 different smaller circular chambers on the card. Circles 1, 4, and 7 are labeled on the plastic. All of the chambers are full of liquid except for one, which is more than half empty with air and condensation
And seeing as it's just to the right of chamber 4, that means it's chamber 5 that has the giant air bubble, which corresponds precisely with what the graph on the web app was showing. So this is how you double check to make sure it was actually an air bubble and not a positive
You can also see that each chamber has super tiny air bubbles in them. Those are normal and typically fine. The issue is if you get giant air bubbles/pockets in the chambers. Then the test results for that specific chamber will be inconclusive.
Whether you want to test again is up to you, depending on how much accuracy you need. That's partially why there are so many chambers, for a level of redundancy so that you have multiple testing channels in case one is inconclusive.
So, for me personally, I'm usually ok with not retesting if only one channel is inconclusive. But if more than one channel had air bubbles or otherwise returned inconclusive, I'd retest.
And the way you avoid air bubbles is by ensuring you fill the test card up to the line it recommends with your solution. And then make sure to tap it a lot and slightly shake it to ensure all the chambers in the card get filled properly with the solution.
If you want more info about PlusLife, I highly recommend you check out the website , the creators of the web app many of us use for these graphs. You can also email them for discount codes to apply towards the purchase of the PlusLife mini dock and tests!virus.sucks
@Randall87454048 The reason there are multiple chambers is to increase the test accuracy and redundancy, but you don't have to worry about that when doing the test
@Randall87454048 My first order was the device (called the mini dock), a box of ten tests, and some extra swabs
@nickelpin But for me now, it's already changed our lives a lot bc my mom babysits my nephew like once a week. So she was quarantining herself and we'd both mask indoors for two days after she got home. But now? As soon as she gets back we just test and can see right away what the risk is

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chris Alvino

Chris Alvino Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ChrisAlvino

May 7
This, to me, has been the inevitable end game of Western schooling practices, even before genAI was introduced. I've been speaking about this since I was a teenager, and seeing how the current educational systems were hurting my peers
Their emphasis isn't on learning. their primary emphasis is on GPA and job placement. This is why curriculums are overloaded with standardized test subjects and students are bombarded with too much homework
Educators are rarely given the freedom, time, or money they need to fully explore topics their students are interested in, bc everything is in service of standardized tests and job/higher ed placement
Read 12 tweets
May 6
I always forget how judgmental people can be when you practice nontraditional relationships. Whenever one of my dating threads goes viral, I invariably get a ton of backlash for saying I've dated & slept with hundreds of women. Incels say I'm lying, certain feminists
call me a creep or a sex pest. And then I get a bunch of people saying it's bc no one wanted me and clearly I must be a shallow prick. And lots of leftists claim I'm saying this to brag in a disgusting and unethical way. So I'd like to set the record straight once and for all
just to address all the judgmental trolls.

First of all, there are specific reasons I mention that I've dated hundreds of women. The first is to address the claim that people like me (as in morbidly obese, brown/multiracial, autistic) can indeed fuck. We can.
Read 21 tweets
Apr 27
It's so hilarious bc me, a fat brown dude, has dated A LOT of models and athletes over the years. I used to feel incredibly self conscious about it bc these women were fiiiit, and then there was me. I asked a few about it when I was feeling insecure, they all said the same thing
And it's even funnier bc it's the same thing being said by THOUSANDS of women in the replies. The issue isn't that women are lying, it's that men DONT FUCKING LISTEN TO WOMEN, and that, is why they fail
Here is what the women told me when I asked them why they're dating me when they could be dating fellow athletes and models: first, most women find gym bros ANNOYING as hell. They are incredibly judgy (bc they are always judging their own bodies)
Read 21 tweets
Mar 27
People need to understand this. EVERY OTHER MITIGATION against COVID—HEPA filters, nasal sprays, far UVC, K12 lozenges, vaccines, social distancing, etc—all of it is ORDERS OF MAGNITUDES less effective than wearing a fucking respirator. So just wear a respirator mask
And everything else is backup JUST IN CASE the mask fails. The mask should be the priority. This is how my family has stayed COVID free for the majority of this pandemic. We wear respirators (KN95, N95, N99, floMask) whenever we leave the house. That's our number one defense
We also use nasal sprays (Betadine or Xlear) and K12 throat lozenges before we leave for an extra layer of protection in case our masks fail or we need to remove our masks. And at home we have HEPA filters running all the time to clean our air just in case
Read 4 tweets
Feb 6
This is legit the secret of my success. If you don't love women, what even is the fucking point? Was just talking with a client this week who is realizing he's been treating women differently and has only been seeing them for what they can offer instead of as full human beings 🧵
Too many men see women only as objects, or as care takers, or as a means of sexual gratification, which is exactly why they struggle with creating real connection. As my client is just discovering, how can you form genuine, human connections with an object? ... You can't.
This is why the men in the OP thread are struggling—they don't see women as full human beings. Notice ALL the shit the guy is bitching about is just him saying he has to jump through hoops in order to get what he wants (sex, love, etc). His relationships are purely transactional
Read 10 tweets
Feb 2
I've been a dating coach for over a decade, and one of my fortes is breaking down texts for guys so they can understand what they did wrong AND how to fix it (on a fundamental level, not with rote lines). So let's dig into this guy's issues. A 🧵
First, let's start with the context of each of these numbers. From the replies, this dude said he got all the numbers from cold approaching (which is hitting on strangers in public) and has never been on a date with them. Cold approach numbers are often flaky just in general
The reason is the way pickup-style advice teaches men to do cold approach. The emphasis is on getting a certain tangible result (a number, a kiss, an insta-date, etc), instead of on creating genuine human connection. I know lots of guys who focus 100% on getting numbers
Read 25 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(