Trump's H-1B implosion is an object lesson in the sort of soft power few on the Right comprehend. Understanding our role in the incoming administration matters more than the policy fight of the week, because getting this right means shaping all future fights. /1
Here's what did NOT happen: Trump didn't bide his time until he tricked everyone until he could fill up his administration with envious, bitter brownoids, which was his real plan all along. The only sort of person with these reads is a whipped puppy with zero agency or spine. /2
Interpreting every undesirable moment as long-plotted betrayal & complete reversal is a symptom of mental illness. No man who has ever actually had any power or influence in his personal life ever misreads situations so catastrophically wrong. /3
Here's what did happen: Trump has 10,000s of positions to fill in a matter of months. That can only happen by trusting recommendations from men who already have his confidence. And that describes none of us, so obviously we're completely powerless, right? /4
The sequence of events shows that to be nonsense. Trump names some nasty brownoid to some position no one ever heard of. The Right gets pissed and rapidly assembles his inevitable early life: alien striver, mercenary opportunist, viciously tribal, seething resentment of us. /5
The loser read on the situation is to cry we're undone, all is lost! The man with political agency swings into action, just as we did throughout the campaign: by being loud, concise, and unyielding: *We specifically voted against this!* /6
The simple fact is that democracy is mob rule. Our guy won because we shouted down the other guys, and we routed them in public and then at the ballot box. But the one thing that separates Trump from every normal politician is that he genuinely loves the public adulation. /7
It's not simple narcissism, and there's no hidden contempt for those whom he's secretly tricked into liking him. He lives for the roar of the crowd, even when those roars aren't for him personally. That's part of why he's been ringside at prizefights for decades. /8
And in this context of democratic mob rule and Trump closely reading the noise from the crowd, our political agency did not end on November 5th. The political power we have over Trump far surpasses that of his trusted advisers, because we can override them at any time. /9
That is what is happening this week, including for some infernal reason all day Christmas. Somebody Trump trusted said, "hey this smarmy brownoid will be great for this one role." Trump simply said great, next. Then we went to work. We didn't vote for more alien influence. /10
So we started shouting, exactly the same sort of shouting that made Springfield, Ohio's cats international news. With this one specific politician, in this one specific window of history, we actually have the ability to force the issues that matter to us. /11
When someone Trump names turns out to infuriate his base, when we make the stink about it reach all the way to Heaven, he will absolutely relent. He never cared about the brownoid; filling the role was just a checkbox to him. /12
It doesn't matter whom Trump's advisors tell him to put forward for almost anything. When the crowd turns on him, he has no incentive whatsoever to defy us. The easiest thing in the world for a man with his power to say is "Thanks, but we decided to go a different direction." /13
All we have to do is maintain the same unified voice that overnight turned Haitian into a dirty word, despite decades of Hollywood and church gaslighting to the contrary. We voted for the opposite of spiteful, envious brownoids devouring the fat of the land, *our* land. /14
Our power over Trump's trajectory has no expiration date. He's not trying to get reelected, but he still needs us. He needs to hear and feel the roar of the crowd's approval. When we deny him that high, when we make him realize he's caught out alone, pelted with boos, we win. /15
This is the lesson the anti-abortion crowd completely failed to grasp after Trump got Roe overturned for them. They are such irredeemable losers, they kept whining and shouting, when he gave them exactly what they asked for. They lost all influence forever with their betrayal /16
The Right is full of losers too, guys who have only ever gotten kicked & betrayed, to the point they can imagine nothing else. Their reads on these moments are pure poison, because all the want to do is cry about how it's over, we were tricked. They're worthless liabilities. /17
We aren't in the room with Trump making these decisions, but our unified disapproving voices are louder than any whisperer nearest to him. He knows why he's there, and he has no problem saying no to those guys. /18
What Trump cannot bear is hearing us shouting angrily over something he didn't even think mattered much. That is our power. That is our political agency. That has no expiration date. As long as we cheer the good and boo the bad, we can keep him on track. /19
It simply requires a willingness to insist, "what have you done for me today?" No laurels, no credit, just an absolute willingness to appear fickle & a little dangerous. If the Right remains unified like this, we'll extract more from this administration than we could dream. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Since Silicon Valley hiring has everyone’s attention, here’s the experience of someone who was a hiring manager for over a decade during Apple’s meteoric rise 20 years ago. No dirt, big reveals, or criminal conspiracies; just thousands of tech bro resumes later. /1
I managed the team in Software Eng. that kept 3rd party apps working when we shipped new OSes. We worked with QA, but we weren’t QA. I hired mostly new college grads who were engineers, but not to do engineering. We were debugging other people’s code, but without their code. /2
It was a tough hiring profile, finding people who knew computers well enough to be able to intuit & birddog whatever crazy thing an app or the OS was doing that broke it, & then convincing them to join a team where they wouldn’t be writing their own software (except tools). /3
This statement must be opposed by all men, Christian and pagan alike. It is a gross abuse of Scripture & reason, and is a subversive attack on the most core matter of our day. This brief 🧵is just a cursory glance at the most glaring, irredeemable errors contained therein.
The definition & body go out of their way to avoid that Nations are quite literally races, and that the places/jurisdictions God appoints each race are downstream from that. A Nation isn't the happenstance collection of "particular" "people" (another racial term) on a grid square
Confusing the Great Commission with Christian Nationalism conflates the two Kingdoms of Christ. Conquest is the only means by which a Christian Nation could be said to fulfill that. A Nation is a household, writ large. The GC is very explicitly about teaching the moral law.
Will Spencer first DM'd me last December after enjoying the EO episode. We talked on and off intermittently until the beginning of May when he was getting much more into Stone Choir. He had been reading both of us on X for some time. He asked to have us as paywall guests. /1
I had no agenda or goal with him. We were just friends chatting. I knew he was a full-blooded jew, but from what I had seen online, he seemed a genuine Christian who had left that wickedness behind. We discussed WWII frankly (at his prompting) and were in agreement. /2
We talked about deprogramming people who are slaves to the modern lies, and about the demonic nature of The Big Lie. He mentions here that what he really thinks he won't even "say near phones," so you certainly won't find it in his attack episode released today. /3
A long screenshot thread of my cross-examination of Claude to get to what I already knew I'd find when I started, but it was fun getting there.
A brief history of hebrew black magick, and other contributions to Christendom: 1/🧵
This is occultism they picked up 2700 years ago, but its roots are much deeper than that. They simply preserved what everyone else (thankfully) lost. /2
This is pretty much more than I want to know about any of this, but it was necessary to get from thesis to conclusion. /3
The Right is a fractured, schizophrenic, roiling mass of conflicting values & agendas. To the extent that there's any unifying cause it's probably that we've gone too far as a society, & need to roll some number of things back. The conflicts are about which ones & how far.
🧵
Within the Right, many different personalities rise to prominence as impactful "voices" for the rest. Some are fantastic at branding, some are incisive analysts, some are simply astroturfed as part of a non-obvious controlled opposition play, & some are just entertaining posters.
When someone rises to any degree of prominence, there is an unfortunate natural tendency for the rest to think "leader."
Personally I don't look at anyone as a leader. Instead I look at all of them as ammunition factories, producing weapons I can use to my own ends.
Did you know that there's corn liquor in your gas tank because of the riots at the 1968 Democratic National Convention in Chicago?
The modern preëminence of the Iowa Caucuses came from the aftermath, & lead to the disasters we have today. This is how history is really made… 🧵1
Held from August 26-29, 1968, the Chicago DNC convention occurred only months after both MLK and JFK were assassinated. The country had been rocked by race riots and antiwar protests. Things seemed much closer to the cusp of implosion than even today. 🧵2
Unlike the pro forma conventions today, in 1968 even the slates of candidates had not been settled for every delegation until the action began on the floor. Actual decisions on the Convention floor would define the outcome, which made the fighting very real & consequential. 🧵3