Heart of Oak ⚓️ Profile picture
Dec 26, 2024 15 tweets 7 min read Read on X
One of Britain’s Greatest Naval Disasters: The Cadiz Expedition of 1625:
In 1625, Britain suffered one of its greatest naval blunders against Spain when a massive force of 100 ships and 15.000 men attempted to raid Cádiz and seize the Spanish treasure fleet. The campaign required a huge financial investment but ultimately yielded almost nothing in return. The failed expedition caused significant political backlash for King Charles I and his close advisor, the Duke of Buckingham. This episode arguably marked the beginning of the decline for the ill-fated Stuart king, whose popularity plummeted after the disastrous venture to Cádiz.The Defence of Cádiz against the English, by  Francisco de Zurbarán, 1634.
It all began before Charles ascended the throne, while his father, James I—the first king of the House of Stuart—was still in power. After a history marked by strained relations, bloodshed, and political intrigue, England sought to improve its relationship with the dominant superpower of the time: Spain. Religion played a significant role in the ongoing tension between the two kingdoms. Since England's break with Rome, the staunchly Catholic Spaniards had viewed the island nation with disdain.King James I. Portrait attributed to John de Critz, c. 1605
Although King James I was baptized Catholic, he was raised Protestant and understood that the monarchy's strength relied on a strong Anglican Church, and consequently the persecution of Catholics continued. Nevertheless, James I hoped to secure an alliance with Spain by arranging a marriage between his son Charles and the Infanta Maria Anna. The whole marriage deal collapsed, however, and the disillusioned Prince Charles, along with the Duke of Buckingham, now pursued a different course in dealing with Spain: war!Portrait of Charles as Prince of Wales after Daniel Mytens, c. 1623
Charles and Buckingham convinced King James to summon a new Parliament in 1624, which strongly advocated for war with Spain. However, there was a lot of mutual distrust between James and Parliament: James feared they wouldn’t fund the war, while Parliament feared he wouldn’t go through with the plan after the funds had been given. After James died, Charles took over, assuming that Parliament would provide funds if he pursued their war policy, but this assumption proved overly optimistic.Duke of Buckingham, by Rubens.
Eventually Parliament was convinced by the new king and war was declared on Spain. Buckingham, as Lord High Admiral, began preparing the expedition with two main objectives: to capture Spanish treasure ships from the Americas and to attack Spanish towns to disrupt their economy. Print of 17th Century English Parliament
Success was crucial, as this would encourage Parliament to fund other future campaigns of Charles and Buckingham. By October 1625, around 100 ships and 15,000 soldiers and sailors were assembled for the Cádiz expedition, supported by 15 Dutch warships. Image
Some of the Dutch ships remained in the Channel to protect the waters from enemy attack, while others joined the English raid. Sir Edward Cecil, an experienced soldier but inexperienced at sea, was appointed commander—a choice that would later be seen as poor judgment. Dutch Ships in a Calm Sea, by Willem van de Velde the Younger
The fleet set sail from Plymouth on October 6, 1625, but encountered severe storms. Although no ships from the Allied fleet sank, some were forced to turn back. The harsh weather delayed the mission and prevented them from intercepting the Spanish treasure fleet in time. Men-o'-war in a storm, by a follower of Willem van de Velde the Younger
When they finally reached Cádiz, Cecil managed to capture the fort guarding the harbor, but the city itself was more heavily fortified than he had anticipated. Furthermore, miscommunication and hesitation among the English allowed the Spanish ships in Cádiz to escape. It was at this point that the English began to realize how poorly they had prepared for the expedition, lacking sufficient food and water for the troops. Nevertheless, Cecil and his forces pressed on.Attack on Cadiz. Source: thedutchgoldenage.com
The English commander then ordered the capture of Puntal tower, an unnecessary move as the fortification provided no strategic advantage for further efforts against Cádiz. Afterward, the men began looting the surrounding houses and discovered a warehouse full of wine. Most of Cecil’s troops became so drunk that he could no longer control them.Image
To make matters worse, Spanish troops arrived and attacked the intoxicated English soldiers, who stood no chance against their sober opponents. It is said that the English were so drunk they didn't bother using their guns, defending themselves with swords instead. Around 1,000 Englishmen were slaughtered, and the remaining troops fled back to the ships.Image
Facing significant losses, low morale, and no real gains, Cecil made the drastic decision to abandon the siege of Cádiz. He pinned his last hopes on capturing some Spanish treasure ships, but his attempt to intercept the returning galleons from the New World also failed, as the Spanish had been warned of the English presence and took an alternate route.Sir Edward Cecil, the 1st Viscount Wimbledon (Michiel Jansz. van Miereveldt, 1631)
With disease spreading and supplies running low, Cecil called off the mission and returned to England in December 1625. The expedition was a costly failure, yielding little and with the total costs estimated at £250,000. Image
However, the House of Commons was far less forgiving. In the Parliament of 1626, they initiated impeachment proceedings against Buckingham. To avoid a successful impeachment, Charles dissolved Parliament. The king's popularity waned and would continue to decline during a reign marked by poor decisions, ultimately leading to his downfall and execution.

Olivier GoossensKing Charles I of England, by Anthony van Dyck.
If you have enjoyed this short article, please consider supporting the channel by subscribing to my Patreon or by leaving a donation on “Buy Me a Coffee”.
Patreon: patreon.com/c/OlivierGooss…
Buy Me a Coffee: buymeacoffee.com/heartofoak

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Heart of Oak ⚓️

Heart of Oak ⚓️ Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HMWarships

May 17
Crippled but unconquered: this is the story of HMS Belleisle, the only British ship to be completely dismasted at Trafalgar. 👇🧵 Image
(1/8) HMS Belleisle was originally a French third-rate ship of the line (74 guns) of the Téméraire class. The Téméraire-class ships comprised 120 74-gun vessels ordered between 1782 and 1813 for the French Navy and its allied or occupied territories. Although a few were later cancelled, the class remains the most numerous series of capital ships ever built to a single design. The lines of the ship were originally drawn by Jacques-Noël Sané in 1782.The Triomphant, a Téméraire-class ship of the line
(2/8) Named Lion on 23 April 1790, she was constructed at Rochefort between August 1791 and June 1794. Amid the shifting tides of the French Revolution, she was renamed Marat on 28 September 1793—seven months prior to her launch—and subsequently renamed Formidable on 25 May 1795. Scale model of Achille, a typical French seventy-four of the Téméraire class at the beginning of the 19th century.
Read 9 tweets
May 14
On this day in 1741, HMS Wager was wrecked off the coast of Chile. The crew’s tales of survival and betrayal would later become the stuff of legend.
Read more 👇🧵 Image
(1/8) HMS Wager was built around 1734 as an East Indiaman for the East India Company. She was armed with 30 guns and designed to carry large amounts of cargo. She was crewed by 98 men. Image
(2/8) The Admiralty purchased the Wager in 1739 and rated her as a 28-gun sixth-rate frigate. She was assigned to the squadron that would sail to the Pacific under Commodore George Anson, tasked with disrupting Spanish interests in the region. Image
Read 9 tweets
May 13
Between 1896 and 1899, Lord Kitchener’s Anglo-Egyptian army reconquered Sudan from the Mahdist forces. To support the campaign along the Nile, a small flotilla of gunboats was established.
Find out more 👇🧵 Image
(1/11) The Mahdist State was established by the Islamist and nationalist Mahdist movement, led by the charismatic Muhammad al-Mahdi. It overthrew the Egyptian Khedivate in 1884-85—an Ottoman tributary state that had ruled Sudan since 1821 and was, at the time, under strong British influence.1894 map showing the extent of the Mahdist state in Sudan
(2/11) The Mahdist uprising culminated in the dramatic Siege of Khartoum (13 March 1884 – 26 January 1885), which saw the destruction of the entire garrison in the Sudanese capital under the command of Charles Gordon. Portrayal of Gordon's death by George W. Joy
Read 13 tweets
May 7
The Royal Navy’s Longest Battle in History: The Four Days’ Battle, 11-14 June 1666:
(1/14) The year was 1666, and the Second Anglo-Dutch War was in its second year. Between 11 and 14 June (1-4 June O.S.), the southern North Sea became the stage for an epic encounter between two of the greatest naval powers of the time: England and the Dutch Republic. Over four days, a fleet of 60 ships under George Monck clashed with 86 vessels commanded by Michiel de Ruyter, the scourge of Stuart England. Around 7,000 men were killed, wounded, or captured in the aftermath. Over a dozen warships were lost, multiple admirals perished, and one was even taken prisoner. This is the story of the longest battle ever fought by the Royal Navy.The Four Days Battle by Abraham Storck
(2/14) By the time England declared war on the Dutch in March 1665, conflict had already been looming on the horizon for quite some time. The capture of New Amsterdam—renamed New York afterwards—and commercial rivalry had steered England and the Dutch Republic on a collision course. The conflict at sea started out favourably for the English, as they inflicted a defeat on the Dutch fleet off Lowestoft in June 1665. London, for now, controlled the North Sea, but the swift and decisive action by Vice Admiral Cornelis Tromp prevented their defeat from spiralling out of control and halted the English momentum.The Battle of Lowestoft, Adriaen Van Diest
(3/14) In the meantime, the unwavering Dutch continued to expand their fleet, adding a further 16 heavy ships of the line to their ranks. As if the Dutch naval expansion weren’t troubling enough, news arrived that King Louis XIV had decided to side with the Republic in their struggle against the noisy islanders to the north. The prospect of the Dutch and French joining forces at sea frightened London, and it became clear that the Royal Navy had to make a decisive move fast. The Sun King, in fact, had a large fleet under the Duc de Beaufort in the Mediterranean, which could come and reinforce the Republic. King Charles II also received the worrying intelligence that his foes were planning to land troops in Ireland.De Ruyter in 1667, by Ferdinand Bol
Read 14 tweets
May 4
The Tragic Loss of the Amphion, 22 September 1796:

(1/11) Heroic, brilliant, and even fortunate though Captain Sir Edward Pellew was, such attributes could not be said to have attended his younger brother, Israel. Having been posted captain after serving as a volunteer at his brother’s capture of the French frigate Cléopâtre in the early months of the French Revolutionary War in 1793, Israel’s lot had been to hang on to the coat tails of Sir Edward’s fame. By April 1795 this strategy had secured him the command of the crack fifteen-year-old frigate Amphion (32), and following tedious employment off Newfoundland and in the North Sea, he had received the much-coveted orders in September 1796 to join his brother’s elite squadron which was scooping up prize after prize on the French coast.Image
(2/11) On Monday 19 September the Amphion arrived in Plymouth Sound from the North Sea for repairs to her foremast and bowsprit, and to re-victual prior to joining Sir Edward’s squadron. Next morning at 7 a.m. she went up into the Hamoaze, where on the Wednesday she was lashed to a sheer hulk, the Princesa, and a receiving ship, the Yarmouth.Plymouth Sound
(3/11) By the afternoon of Thursday 22nd the defective bowsprit had been removed, a replacement had been fixed in place, and the Amphion was under orders to sail on the next day for her new role with Sir Edward’s squadron. For everyone except the gang aloft working on the rigging, it was time for recreation; while some eighteen men were granted liberty ashore, others were allowed to invite their ‘wives’ and families aboard. These women and children numbered as many as one hundred people in all. Meanwhile, Israel was throwing a dinner for an old friend, Captain William Swaffield of the Overyssel (64), and for his first lieutenant, a gentleman who was due to be superseded by Alexander Wilmot Schomberg, although that officer had not yet arrived to take up the appointment. Meanwhile another officer, Captain Charles Rowley of the Unité(38), had also been due to dine aboard the Amphion that afternoon, but he had been detained by the port admiral, Sir Richard King. The delays would prove fortunate for both Rowley and Schomberg, as the meal was suddenly interrupted in the most dramatic of fashions at 4:15.Amazon-class frigate. NMM
Read 11 tweets
May 1
Crime and Punishment: Maintaining Discipline in the Navy

(1/18) “In this country it is considered useful now and again to shoot an admiral, to encourage the others”
- Voltaire -

The French philosopher Voltaire famously wrote these words when news of Admiral Byng’s execution in 1757 arrived from across the Channel. The event highlighted Britain’s relentless expectations of its naval personnel. Not even a man of aristocratic stock like Byng was spared the ultimate punishment when he failed to fulfill his duty. By the time of Byng’s demise, an ethos of invincibility on the seas had become ingrained in the British spirit. When Vice Admiral Nelson raised the signal “England expects that every man will do his duty” at Trafalgar, he meant that he expected nothing less than absolute victory. Unwavering discipline was considered a central pillar upon which this naval success rested. The downside of such a mentality was that severe punishment awaited those who failed to perform their duty. This article aims to briefly address the topic of discipline and punishment in the Royal Navy during the 18th century.The Execution of Admiral Byng, 14 March 1757, by British School, 18th century. NMM (ID: BHC0380)
(2/18) The 18th century was a harsh society. According to English law, over 200 offenses were punishable by death. Harsh punishment was regarded as the most effective deterrent to crime, often favored over policing. Humanist views—such as those expressed in Thomas More’s Utopia, which emphasized addressing the root causes of societal problems—remained marginal. By 18th-century standards, punishments in the Royal Navy were not as severe as they might seem to us today, but were consistent with the prevailing mentality of the time.A German drawing of the execution of King Charles I, c. 1649. Source: National Portrait Gallery (ID: NPG D1306)
(3/18) The Navy’s disciplinary measures trace their origins to the Articles of War, first adopted by the Republicans in 1652 and later passed on—largely unaltered—to the Restoration Navy in 1661. Interestingly, many of the original articles were directed at captains. This focus can be explained by the politically unstable climate of the time, when the loyalty of aristocratic captains was often uncertain. The possibility of captains holding back in battle for political reasons was a genuine concern. As a result, keeping them in check was considered of the utmost importance.ARTICLES OF WAR and LEGISLATION for COMMAND AND DISCIPLINE OF THE ROYAL NAVY (1661-1884). A Collection of Ten Parliamentary Acts: An Act for the Establishing Articles and Orders for the Regulating and Better Government of His Majesties Navies, Ships of War, and Forces by Sea (1661), plus nine others. Source: abebooks.fr
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(