1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide to Failing to Elect a House Speaker Quickly
The problem has been percolating for a while.
It’s been subterranean. Lurking underneath the surface. Not necessarily perceptible.
Except to those who follow Congress closely.
But the issue gurgled to the top since the House stumbled badly trying to avert a government shutdown last week.
To wit:
Congress spasmed between a staggering, 1,500-page spending bill. Then defeated a narrow, 116-page bill – which President-elect Trump endorsed. Things got worse when the House only commandeered a scant 174 yeas for the Trump-supported bill and 38 Republicans voted nay. Circumstances grew even more dire when the House actually voted to avert a holiday government shutdown – but passed the bill with more Democrats (196) than Republicans (170). 34 GOPers voted nay.
It was long likely that House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., might face a problem winning the Speaker’s gavel immediately when the new Congress convenes at noon et on January 3. Congressional experts knew that Johnson could be in trouble once the contours of the reed-thin House majority came into focus weeks after the November election. This could blossom into a full-blown crisis for Johnson – and House Republicans –when the Speaker’s vote commences a little after 1 pm et next Friday.
2) Johnson emerges bruised from last week’s government funding donnybrook. Anywhere from four to ten Republicans could oppose Johnson in the Speaker’s race.
Here’s the math:
The House clocks in at 434 members with one vacancy. That’s thanks to former Rep. Matt Gaetz, R-Fla. He resigned his position for this Congress a few weeks ago. Even though Gaetz won re-election in November, his resignation letter – read on the floor of the House – signaled he did not plan to serve in the new Congress which begins in January.
This is the breakdown when the Congress starts: 219 Republicans to 214 Democrats.
President-elect Trump’s pick for National Security Advisor, Rep. Michael Waltz, R-Fla., remains in the House for now. So does Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y. Mr. Trump tapped her to serve as U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations. That’s pending Senate confirmation – perhaps in late January or early February. Once Waltz and Stefanik resign, the GOP majority dwindles to 217-214.
But the Speaker’s election on January 3 poses a special challenge. Here’s the bar for Johnson - or any one else: The Speaker of the House must win an outright majority of all Members casting ballots for someone by name. In other words, the person with the most votes does not win. That’s what happened repeatedly to former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., when he routinely outpolled House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries, D-N.Y., for Speaker to begin this Congress in January 2023. But it took days for McCarthy to cross the proper threshold.
More on that in a moment.
3) So let’s crunch the math for Mike Johnson. If there are 219 Republicans and four vote for someone besides him - and all Democrats cast ballots for Jeffries, the tally is 215-214. But there’s no Speaker. No one attained an outright majority of all Members casting ballots for someone by name. 218 is the magic number if all 434 Members vote.
By rule, this paralyzes the House. The House absolutely, unequivocally, cannot do anything until it elects a Speaker. Period.
The House can’t swear-in Members. Technically, they’re still Representatives-elect. Only after the House chooses its Speaker does he or she in turn swear-in the membership.
The House certainly can’t pass legislation. It can’t form committees. It’s frozen in a parliamentary paralysis until it elects a Speaker.
Now, I hope you’re sitting down for the next part.
This also means that the House cannot certify the results of the Electoral College, making President-elect Trump the 47th President of the United States on January 6.
The failure to elect a Speaker compels the House to vote over and over….
And over.. and.. over..
Until it finally taps someone.
McCarthy’s election incinerated 15 ballots over five days two years ago.
The House settled into a Congressional cryogenic freeze for three weeks after Members ousted McCarthy in October of 2023. It burned through two Speaker candidates off the floor - House Majority Leader Steve Scalise, R-La., and House Majority Whip Tom Emmer, R-Minn., - and one candidate on the floor: Rep. Jim Jordan, R-Ohio.
So you see the problem.
4) Consider for a moment that prior to last year, the House never went to a second ballot to select a Speaker since Speaker Frederick Gillett, R-Mass., in 1923.
It took 63 ballots before the House finally settled on Speaker Howell Cobb, D-Ga., in 1849.
But that’s nothing. The longest Speaker’s election consumed two months before the House elected Speaker Nathaniel Banks, R-Mass., in 1856 – on the 133rd ballot.
So anything which elongates this into a collision with January 6th- the statutory day to certify the election results and now one of the most ignominious days in American history – is dangerous.
To be clear: there is no dispute that President-elect Trump won the election. There is no anticipation of a repeat of a riot at the Capitol like four years ago. But a failure to certify the Electoral College on the day it’s supposed to be completed - especially after the 2021 experience - is playing with fire. Such a scenario would again reveal another, never-before-considered vulnerability in the fragile American political system.
5) On January 6, the House and Senate are supposed to meet in a Joint Session of Congress to tabulate and certify the electoral votes. Any disputes over a state’s slate of electoral votes compels the House and Senate to then debate and vote separately on those results. The election is not final until the Joint Session concludes and the Vice President – in this case Vice President Harris in her capacity as President of the Senate – announces a victor.
Congress is not required to certify the Electoral College on the calendar day of January 6. There is actually some leeway to wrap things up. In 2021, the Electoral College wasn’t certified until around 3:52 am et on January 7. It only becomes a major problem if this drags on through noon et on January 20. That’s when the Constitution prescribes that the President-elect take the oath of office.
What happens if the Electoral College isn’t sorted out by January 20? Well, President Biden is done. So he’s gone. The same with Harris. Next in the presidential line of succession is the Speaker of the House. Well, there’s no Speaker. So who becomes President?
6) Well, there is at that moment a President Pro Tempore of the Senate, the most senior member of the majority party. He or she is 4th in line to the Presidency. At this moment, the President Pro Tempore is Sen. Patty Murray, D-Wash. But Republicans claim control of the chamber in early January. And unlike the House if it’s stymied over a Speaker, the Senate is functioning. That means 91-year-old Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, becomes Senate President Tempore. Grassley has served in the Senate since 1981.
If the House is still frittering away time, trying to elect a Speaker on January 20, Grassley likely becomes “Acting President.”
I write “likely” because this gets into some serious, extra-Constitutional turf. These are unprecedented scenarios. Strange lands never visited in the American political experience.
And it all hinges on Mike Johnson – or frankly, someone else – wrapping up the Speaker’s vote with dispatch on January 3. Any interregnum like the past two Speaker’s elections begins establishing challenging historical precedents.
But frankly, it’s unclear if the House can avoid such contretemps.
It’s about the math. And once again, balancing that parliamentary equation is tenuous at best.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide on What Challenges To Expect on Capitol Hill After the Election
Truth be told, just after the election is when the hard stuff begins.
Election day is Tuesday. But in reality, that’s just the beginning of the process. It may take days to sort out who voters chose as President. Control of the House is razor tight. It may boil down to a handful of races decided by a grand total of several thousand votes. So don’t for a moment think we automatically know which party will be in the majority as election officials sort all of that out. There’s a scenario where a thin margin of contested seats in the House could spring several weeks of challenges.
Moreover, Article I, Section 5 of the Constitution dictates that the House and Senate “shall be the Judge of the elections, Returns and Qualifications of its own Members.” And it’s the new House in the new Congress next year which would decide whether or not to seat people if there’s a dispute.
2) Of course, that’s provided the House can elect a Speaker when the new Congress is Constitutionally-mandated to begin on January 3. Don’t forget that House Republicans incinerated a total of 27 days on two separate occasions to elect former House Speaker Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., and current Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La.
We’ll come back to that in a moment.
In the meantime, let’s run through some of the hazards which could unfold after the final ballot is cast.
Let’s start with when we might learn which party controls either the House or Senate.
Election Day fell on November 8 for the 2022 midterms. But it wasn’t clear that Democrats held their Senate majority until late on the evening of November 12 when Sen. Catherine Cortez Masto, D-Nev., retained her seat.
Determining House control took even longer in 2022. Remember that McCarthy touted the possibility that Republicans might marshal as many as 50 seats. Republicans won the House by a thread. But the GOP majority was not clear until November 16.
3) In 2020, most news organizations projected on election night that Democrats would hold the House. But it wasn’t until December that a picture emerged showing how close Democrats came to losing their majority. It took weeks to sort out multiple House contests, decided by very few votes.
Control of the Senate from the 2020 midterms wasn’t even established until 2021. It took until January and a pair of runoffs in Georgia for it to be clear that Democrats tied the Senate – and thus seized the majority thanks to Vice President Harris and her capacity as President of the Senate.
These protracted election determinations are not a biproduct of recent polarization and controversy.
Democrats captured the Senate in the 2006 midterms. But it wasn’t clear until two days after the election once former Sen. Jim Webb, D-Va., defeated former Sen. George Allen, R-Va.
It’s likely we’ll have clarity on the Senate sooner rather than later this year. If Republicans enjoy a big night, who won the Senate could be known election night. That’s especially if the GOP is en route to a 53 or 54 seat majority. But if competitive Senate contests in Ohio, Pennsylvania, Wisconsin, Montana, Michigan, Nevada, Texas and elsewhere are all tight, it may take a few days to determine which party has the majority.
Regardless, the biggest order of business facing the Senate is who emerges as the new Republican leader.
A) Vance on Fox: There's a bucket of money in FEMA that's gone to illegal aliens and that's somehow separate than the bucket of money that should by right go to American citizens. I think that misses the fundamental point that the Biden-Harris administration has turned FEMA effectively into an agency that helps to resettle and helps to deal with illegal immigration that is just fundamentally going to distract focus from their core job of helping American citizens in their time of need...you should have imposed military style command and control. You've got eight different bureaucratic organizations. You've got a lot of different bureaucratic fiefdoms that sometimes delay the provision of necessary resources. You need to empower a military commander on the ground to get helicopters to where they need to go, to get supplies, to where they need to go, to cut through some of the FAA bureaucracy when it comes to, you know, planes and helicopters landing in the right place.
B) Vance: It's like the DMV at industrial scale. And because a lot of folks in North Carolina are suffering unnecessarily. I hope to God you don't have unnecessary loss of life, but I fear that we do. And it all goes back to why do we have a president and a vice president, one of whom is on the beach, the other of whom is participating in fund raisers rather than doing their job. It is incompetence of the highest order.
C) Vance: Kamala Harris has been a complete failure of leadership. Think about this. In 2010, there was a terrible earthquake in Port au Prince, Haiti. The 82nd Airborne was on the ground two days later. There was a disastrous hurricane an hour away from the 82nd Airborne headquarters. It took more than a week for the full deployment to arrive and start helping people out. It's a complete lack of leadership when things like this happen. You need somebody in charge. You need somebody saying we're going to save as many lives as possible. Red tape be damned.
1) Ways/Means Cmte Chair Smith First, Hunter Biden lied about the recipient of a WhatsApp message sent with the apparent intention to threaten a business associate and demand payment. In the message, Hunter Biden twice mentioned he was with his father. In the deposition, Hunter Biden sought to dismiss the message, claiming that he was either 'high or drunk' when he sent it, and in that state, had sent it to the wrong Zhao, and not actually the one affiliated with the Chinese energy company, CEFC. Hunter claimed under oath that the recipient, 'had no understanding or even remotely knew what,...I was even‚...talking about.'
2) Smith: However, phone records in front of the Committee today show Hunter Biden sent the message to the correct Chinese businessman by the name of Raymond Zhao who not only was affiliated with CEFC, but knew exactly what Hunter Biden was talking about.
3) Smith: For several months, the pair messaged back and forth on the same phone numbers, and ultimately an affiliate of CEFC, Raymond Zhao's company, sent $5 million to Hunter Biden and his associates just days after Hunter's threatening message. These documents make clear that Hunter Biden was using his father's name to shake down a Chinese businessman - and it worked. And when confronted by Congressional investigators about it, he lied.
1) The Hitchhiker’s Guide To How Democrats Support for Johnson Could Backfire On the Speaker
An astonishing email just hit inboxes around Capitol Hill from the House Democratic leadership team of House Minority Leader Hakeem Jeffries (D-NY), House Minority Whip Katherine Clark (D-MA) and House Democratic Caucus Chairman Pete Aguilar (D-CA):
“We will vote to table Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene’s Motion to Vacate the Chair. If she invokes the motion, it will not succeed.”
2) So you have DEMOCRATIC leaders telling their rank-and-file members they support short-circuiting an effort to unseat House Speaker Mike Johnson (R-LA).
Here’s why this is a big deal:
It was thought that House Democrats would protect Johnson in some form if Greene were to trigger her resolution. That hasn’t happened yet. But it was believed that a small number of Democrats might vote to table or kill Greene’s motion, thus protecting him. Or, Democrats might just “take a walk” during that vote, diluting the voting pool in the House. That would protect Johnson by having fewer Democrats vote. Thus, Democrats could inoculate Johnson – without ever taking a vote.
3) But it is a MAJOR DEAL when the entire Democratic leadership team and rank-and-file Democrats say they would vote to protect Johnson.
Great for Johnson, right?
Maybe immediately. But there is a BIG downside here.
Such a maneuver could embolden the smaller coterie of Republicans who want to oust Johnson. And even some rank-and-file Republicans could see that Johnson is only in the job because of the Democrats. Thus Johnson is a “Democratic” Speaker. Especially since he largely did the Democrats’ bidding passing the Ukraine aid bill a few weeks ago, avoided multiple government shutdowns and passed nearly every major bill in recent months with lots of Democratic support – often with more Democratic votes than from Republicans.
This might not undercut Johnson now. But it could give those who might want his job – potentially House Majority Leader Steve Scalise (R-LA), House Majority Whip Tom Emmer (R-MN) and House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) – an opportunity to use Democratic support as a wedge and perhaps challenge Johnson for Speaker next year or a leadership post in the new Congress if Republicans lose the majority.
1) User's Manual to how control of the House could flip to the Democrats before the election.
Control of the House has never changed in the middle of a Congress. But if it’s going to happen, the 118th Congress is as ripe for that possibility.
2) House Republicans face chaos in their conference. Members who planned to retire next January are now ditching Capitol Hill early. The House is an acrimonious place with yet another move afoot to dethrone the Speaker.
3) Fox is told that other Republicans are angling to get out as soon as they can. A big payday in the private sector could lure some members to cash in their voting card early.
First, let’s talk about the length of a given “Congress.”
A) From colleague Kelly Phares. There is sparring between Cotton and Tester about who is holding up an agreement to vote on the minibus spending bill.
B) Off the Senate floor, the two men came face to face while speaking to separate groups of reporters. Sen Cotton yelled at Tester over all the reporters: "Why don't you ask Senator Tester why we aren't voting?"
Sen Tester yelled back: "You can ask me anything you want!"
C) Tester then spoke to reporters: "Did Cotton say that they're holding amendments because of Jon Tester? Because if he did, he might be full of something that comes off the back of a cow"