1/ Today's fight shows the coalition between tech and MAGA is uneasy.
MAGA sees HB-1 visas get abused in order to drive down wages and want to end the HB-1 visa.
Tech doesn't want to lose high level talent thinks HB-1 visa's are needed.
Here's how to thread this needle...🧵
2/ For starters, MAGA doesn't trust the government or corporations on immigration
They think open borders people will game the system by handing out HB-1 visa's like candy
This concern must be addressed. To do this, the government must:
A) stop the flood of illegal immigration
3/ B) Create a robust deportation policy, rigorpusly enforced, that deports illegal immigrants (including visa over-stayers, illegal border crossers, fraudsters.....all of them)
When this is done, and is working effectively, then you can address the concerns of tech people...
4/ Tech is concerned about their ability to get programers to compete with China.
They have a point.
China has 1.4 Billion people, America has 334 Million. The sheer size of Chinas population means they can train huge armies of programers that outnumber American programers...
5/ If it's numbers game China wins. The only way the U.S. can compete with China's numbers is by having BETTER programmers
To do that the U.S. will have to recruit world class talent from wherever they can get it, which means accepting a certain number of immigrant programmers
6/ MAGA is concerned that corporations are just importing cheap foreign labor to replace Americams, Tech is concerned about not getting enough programmers.
Here is how we accomodate and address the concerns of both groups:
7/ We must first fix the educstion systems by ripping out all the woke nonsense and DEI requirements. A return to merit based education will produce more (and better) American talent.
Second we must incentivize the scouting of American talent by universities and coporations...
8/ That way bright young American talent can be cultivated from within the United States.
Once this is done tech should be incentivized to innovate it's training programs to increase quality so American talent is trained to the highest standards, producing top tier workers...
9/ This will require a full reform of the svhool system, and the complete and total removal of woke/DEI/Social Justice ideologies from the system and a return to Merit Based education.
If you do this, you can then allow for top tier talent from forgien countries to immigrate...
10/ On the understanding that America has optimized its ability to cultivate talent, and is now taking in extra people as a bonus, they are not replacing americans with foreigners.
The U.S. can get high level talent in *addition* to Americans not by *replacing* Americans.
11/ If this is done properly, the net effect will a large amount of outward migration. That is, the number of people *deported* from America will be greater than the number imported.
The U.S. will deport millions of illegal immigrants and import thousands of legal ones....
12/ That is, many more people will be deported than imported.
If million of low skilled illegals are replaced by thousands of high-skilled immigrants (that adopt thenculture, norms, and expectations of American culture)
Then both MAGA and tech get what they want.
13/ The worst thing that can happen is to have tech and MAGA fight with each other.
Let'a not do that, lets create a policy that gets everyone what they want
14/ Finally, I should note that much tech work gets farmed out overseas because it's cheap to do so.
So cancelling HB1's does not guarantee Americans get tech work because coororations can just contract out workers in other countries to work remotely.
Cancelling HB1's....
15/ Is therefore only useful if you cultivate American talent, and thst means fixing the education system and the incentive structure for hiring workers.
A lot needs to happen, but we *CAN* thread the needle.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Left leaning institutions (universities, think tanks, NGO's, non-profits, consulting firms, and the democratic party) are staffed by woke activists who see woke political goals as moral imperatives, not mere political preferences
2/ According to woke ideology, anyone who in not actively advocating for woke social and political objectives is "complicit" in the systemic oppression of marginalized groups. On this view, a political compromise with people who oppose wokeness is like cutting a deal with Hitler.
3/ The woke have a concept called the "unbearable searchlight of complicity." It's their term for constant, unending, hypervigilant searching for anything complicit with "systems of oppression" (racism, sexism, etc)
It's the conceptual equivalent of an all seeing eye of wokeness
1/ Congress gave The National Endowment for the Arts *207,000,000*, and then told the NEA to fund projects focused on "the history of Systemic Racism"
Let's look at what the NEA did with your money.
A thread🧵
2/ Congress has the power to fund agencies and tell them how to spend their funding, and Congress told the NEA to "Continue prioritizing diversity" and to prioritize increasing diversity among "NEA staff, the National Council of the Arts, Discipline Directors, and Peer Panelists"
3/ In 2021 the NEA said they were "centering equity and justice along the lines of race, ethnicity, gender, disability, religion, gender identity and sexual orientation, geography, poverty, and the infinite ways these intersect in everything we do"
1/ Much of what @GreeneMan6 said in our debate caught me off guard. If I looked unprepared it's cause I was.
For Example, I wasn't ready for claims like:
"The people will have the opinion that the state teaches them, we are talking about how the State will create public opinion"
2/ In the moment, I wasn't prepared for that, but I think I have an answer to that now.
I do no think that State has the ability to reach into the heads of people and re-arrange their thinking. The sort of brainwashing that is implied by his claim simply won't work at scale.
3/ The claim that he has is that the widespread practice of transing kids is due to everyone believing in trans cause of schools is deeply flawed. It was not that most people agree with trans ideology and in fact, trans ideology and queer theory are intensely unpopular...
1/ DEI has taken over The Department of Veteran Affairs.
The VA is using Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion for "hiring and position and talent management," and also created a "Gender-affirming Program with Speech" to help people change sex.
How DEI captured the VA,
A thread🧵
2/ In September 2021 the Department of Veterans Affairs created an Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Action plan Pursuant to E.O. 13985 on racial equity.
This action plan is the Genesis for the adoption of DEI across the entirety of the VA.
3/ According to the Action Plan, the VA created "an 18-member Task Force to elevate and identify strategic opportunities across VA’s vast ecosystem of Inclusion, Diversity, Equity and Access (I-DEA)."
The VA had *18 people* dedicated to creating a plan to DEI implementation.
2/ As "woke" dies, Leftists will abandon the woke "oppressor/oppressed" categories (white vs black, straight vs gay, queer vs normal) and will move back to the old materialist oppressor/oppressed categories (rich vs poor, capitalist vs worker, proletariat vs bourgeois, etc).
3/ This materialist focus will be paired with "sustainability politics" revolving around environmental issues (pollution, climate change, global warming, etc).
So, we will see two "mass line" formations emerging: one focused on class warfare, and one focused on "sustainability.
From 1940-1960 the British tried to teach peasants in Malawi's Shire Valley to farm. When the British taught peasants to use "ridging" to combat soil erosion, they were surprised to find Malawian Farmers saying ridging doesn't work.
2/ But there is a twist...
Because the soil in Malawi's Shire Valley is sandy, the use of Ridging leads to increased soil erosion during the rainy season, while exposing the roots of plants to white ant attacks during the dry season.
In Malawi - ridging doesn't work...
3/ The Malawian Farmers were not able to provide an articulate, clear, rational explanation for they avoided using "ridging"...only that it didn't work and that they had traditional practices that did work.
The British were wrong because they made exactly the following mistake: