🧵We are entering a period of intense debate about what the end state in #Ukraine should be, what kind of peace deal can/cannot be negotiated by the incoming US administration, and what long-term prospects there might be for negotiating a modus vivendi with Putin's Russia. 1/9
BLUF: I don't believe there is a deal Putin will accept that wouldn't be tantamount to his victory. For 3 years the West offered no strategy beyond escalation management. Until real setbacks make him realize he can't win at an acceptable cost to his power base, he won't stop. 2/9
Today Putin might at best agree to a breather (peredishka) to rearm and go at it again to destroy or subjugate independent #Ukraine. It's not (as some believe) about Putin per se, nor that once he passes from the scene, his successor(s) will want to negotiate in good faith. 3/9
The problem of Russia we confront today-what I called elsewhere the "Russian question"-is both historical and systemic. Until Western leaders understand this, we have no realistic prospect of crafting a workable strategy to deal with Russia, either today or in the future. 4/9
Russia is not a nation-state; it's an empire. To put it differently, it's a population consisting of a multitude of nationalities governed by a centrally run repressive state. Top-down pressure is the mode of governance in Russia and expansionism is that state's raison d'être.5/9
Because a unified Russian nation doesn't exist, there is no chance for democracy or any polyarchic system for that matter to take root. The state comprises over 80 sub-entities, including 21 non-Slavic autonomous republics. Ethnic Russians-though the majority-are in decline. 6/9
Western political leaders tend to mirror-image Russia based on our own experience of national consolidation giving rise to democratic government. Our analysts-many who neither speak Russian nor know Russian culture and only see its history as Moscow tells it-often do likewise.7/9
The Russian Federation is a top-down imperialist power, with Putin and his oligarchs sitting astride of the Eurasian land mass of 11 time zones. As of today, the systemic nature of this empire offers no path forward for the West to reach a lasting modus vivendi with Moscow. 8/9
So, in our Russia policy the West must prioritize deterrence and, should it fail, defense. We need our European @NATO allies to rearm at speed and scale. We urgently need political leaders across the West to recognize the reality of what Russia is, not what we wish it to be. 9/9
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵Over Christmas I've been thinking about the reasons why Western societies have forfeited so much of their erstwhile resilience. The problem is not money or technology, for we have them in spades. And yet we seem no longer able to accept that resilience stipulates risk. 1/10
Resilience is not just about plans and provisions. It's at its core about a deeply held conviction that what we represent is worth defending whatever the risk; that should we fail, we'll not give up but persevere to victory. In our relativized West such binaries are no more.2/10
In a nutshell, as I see it, we no longer feel bound by the grand narrative of the Western world. We teach our young men and women in our colleges and universities about all the transgressions of the West, while barely mentioning our great achievements as a civilization. 3/10
🧵This will be brief post, as I watch with painful amazement the gyrations of political elites across Europe-leaders, parliamentarians and analysts-try to position themselves in anticipation of the incoming Trump administration. And the picture is not pretty, I must say. 1/10
The post-Cold War decades have produced zero-risk societies across Europe-great at telling their stories about equality, individual rights and the rule of law, but increasingly bad at living by the code they preach when systemic disruptors put them to the test. Why, I ask? 2/10
Why have European leaders mirror-imaged other powers, assuming that foreign dictators or assorted gangsters were ultimately rational actors like them, and that their rationality aligned with what Europe's societies prize the most, i.e., contented peace, wealth and prosperity.3/10
🧵At a risk of engaging in hyperbole, this is truly an inflection point in European politics. With the vote of no-confidence in the Bundestag coming shortly after the implosion of the French gov't and the UK gov't barely plodding forward, where is Europe's leadership today? 1//10
Never let a crisis go to waste-Washington should remember this old adage. And so should all Europeans who value the transatlantic alliance. It's a time to align US relations with Europe in a way that leverages shared threat perceptions and builds new regional substructures. 2/10
With the second Trump administration coming in, and with the unfolding political realignment across Europe, it is time to revitalize @NATO and reinvest in transatlantic relations so as to carry the US and allied democracies to victory in this round of great power conflict. 3/10
🧵I first visited #Georgia in 1989 during the waning days of the Soviet Union. I came to Tbilisi with a small group of Americans-academics, think tankers and US naval officers. I was impressed by the Georgian people’s love of freedom and their determination to be sovereign. 1/5
Today as I watch the current pro-Moscow’s regime in Tbilisi attempt to extinguish the flame of freedom in Georgia, I have ask this simple question: Where are Western governments while young Georgian men and women risk their lives to defend liberty? What are we prepared to do? 2/5
I’m sick and tired of our rhetoric about democracy and the rule of law while we allow the Russian dictator occupy Georgian and Ukrainian territory, murder civilians and mock the very values we claim to proclaim. The gangster in the Kremlin understands power, nothing else. 3/5
🧵As I follow the ever-more frantic efforts by our political class to explain away the results of the US election, I wonder why some find it so hard to accept that the sovereign has spoken, and that it is incumbent on everyone to understand why and respect the decision. 1/14
I live in DC-a quintessentially "corporate city" when it comes to American politics. Politics is really the only industry here, with its never-ending merry-go-round of who is in and who is out on a given day. This rarified atmospherics at times goes to people's heads. 2/14
And so, the mantra of "we experts know better" radiates from meetings, round tables, think tank events and dinners. But we know better what exactly? For instance, how many experts who go into the Pentagon actually worked with the military, experienced first-hand its culture? 3/14
🧵A few thoughts about the enduring verities of the Darwinian self-help environment academics call-somewhat clumsily-the "international system." First, the key word is "national," for at a time when the threat of war increases, rules recede and national priorities resurface.1/10
The nation-state remains the best form of governance yet invented, for a national community tied together by a shared culture and political institutions is the irreducible foundation for people to govern themselves. Simply put: A nation is the precondition for democracy. 2/10
Today, the relative weakness of the West owes much to the fracturing of its national communities in the wake of 30 years of neoliberal orthodoxy about globalization and corporate transnationalism, plus the normative assertions about the "rules-based international order." 3/10