i think the actual optimal policy is "reform this" but i also understand the willingness of people to throw out the baby with the bathwater because they dont trust any reform to actually be implemented as intended
if you fuck people with a policy after lying about it they're not gonna trust you again and you may be unable to get a sensible compromise position during the backlash
further discussion re: h1b and reported entry level jobs shortages
ok i have a theory of what happened during the awokening
it came to me while i was discussing the religious character of the prohibition on sucker punching ("what's intolerable is not that the punch lands, but that it refuses to acknowledge the altar" spoiler)
male homosocial societies are bound by a number of precepts and principles that guide honorable behavior in a given context. these are separate from "general" religious commandments and from philosophical ethics
these notions of honor do not bind women because women aren't participating in the male status hierarchy competition whose operation the conventions function to govern
look i think the tariffs are retarded but to the extent this is actually evidence of anything its probably evidence *against* SH causing global trade to collapse
dear anon shako's thread on this is great tho and i endorse it. modulo BGG financial accelerator stuff and whatever else people cooked up since the 90s
want to add that this also fails because it doesn't actually match the Ghibli style. in fact, the character design is repellent; this is separate from the subject matter
its actually fairly good as a commitment device binding on future administrations because this decreases the value of illegal immigrants for all subsequent administrations and it removes the "they pay taxes argument"
i think its reasonable to call this a revolution in the sense that trump doesnt adhere to elite norms nor even middle class norms. and its not clodius pretending to be a plebe, its a pleb not even pretending to be a patrician
until the first trump term a surprising amount of the president's ability to influence the country was derived less from his potestas--that is, his formal powers--than from his auctoritas, which was closely tied to his dignitas
I'll pause and wait for you to read the screencaps
im not sure we actually have anyone, anymore, with sufficient dignitas to actually possess or wield the historical presidential auctoritas. we are all lesser men now and all our high institutions have debased themselves