Some of you still don’t get it and are locked in the liberal mind prison where their magic spell words continue to paralyze you from thinking clearly. Allow me to break it down for you simply:
The term "racism" has been weaponized against White people, stripping it of its original meaning. In its contemporary usage, "racism" is essentially synonymous with in-group preference.
Every other race and ethnic group on the planet engages in in-group preference, favoring their own kind in various aspects of life such as employment, neighborhoods, social circles, mate selection, and yes—even the church they attend.
And there is nothing wrong with this, I have no problem with other races having an in-group preference. This was the norm for every racial group for all of human history until about five minutes ago when Whites decided to embrace suicidal levels of altruism and atomized individualism.
My problem is with the double standard.
When Whites exhibit the same in-group preference, they are labeled as "racists” or “White supremacists.” This distortion of the term "racism" is deeply deceptive. It implies that Whites having in-group preference is inherently malicious and irrational, driven solely by a hatred of other races.
This is a gross mischaracterization. In-group preference does not necessitate a venomous animosity towards other races simply because of their ancestry. It is a natural human tendency that has served to maintain the integrity and cohesion of various communities throughout time.
The true significance of in-group preference lies in its role as a mechanism for survival and prosperity. When Whites fail to prioritize their own group interests, they leave themselves vulnerable to displacement, replacement, and eventual destruction at the hands of other groups that have no qualms about pursuing their own self-interests.
It is essential for Whites to recognize and understand the importance of in-group preference, not to foster hate or animosity towards other races, but to ensure the continued survival and flourishing of our people and nations.
We can, should, and have every right to embrace and advocate for our own interests while coexisting peacefully with other groups. This is not a call for hatred or division, but rather a plea for the recognition of the basic human right to self-preservation and the pursuit of a prosperous future for one's own people.
So make the choice, and it is absolutely a binary choice—you can be “racist” or you can be replaced by those who are.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The wailing wall is not from the temple, it’s from a Roman fort. If you believe otherwise then you believe Jesus was a liar and thus not who He said He was.
In 70 AD the Romans under Titus breached Jerusalem after a brutal siege just as Christ had foretold in Matthew 24 and Luke 21. They torched the Temple, melted its gold, and pried apart the stones so completely that “not one stone was left upon another,” fulfilling His precise prophecy and ending the sacrificial system, all within the generation of His warning.
“The Temple Mount, everywhere enveloped in flames, seemed to be boiling over from its base; yet the blood seemed more abundant than the flames and the numbers of the slain greater than those of the slayers. The soldiers climbed over heaps of bodies as they chased the fugitives” (Josephus, The Jewish War)
BREAKING: The UK Government has demanded that Gab submit to their new censorship regime under the UK Online Safety Act, threatening massive fines (18 million euros or 10% of our annual revenue) for not policing speech.
We will not comply. We will not pay one cent. We will defend our UK users' right to speak freely and reject any law that compels censorship. Their letter and the response from our legal team is attached.
To be clear this image obviously isn’t aimed at our patriotic British brothers and sisters, but rather at their tyrannical government. 🙏
The World Jewish Congress just put out a report smearing Gab and demanding that governments, hosting providers, payment processors, and more all go after us for allowing free speech on our platforms: wjc-org-website.s3.amazonaws.com/horizon/assets…
Our of hundreds of millions of posts over a 3 year period they found 2300 posts they didn’t like. They reported them. Gab didn’t remove a single one. Total Gab W.
The greatest irony of Nietzschean ideology is that it does not produce supermen; it produces slaves. Slaves to pleasure, to addiction, to digital surveillance. A society built on his principles does not elevate human potential—it dehumanizes. It turns marriage and family into burdens rather than blessings. It sexualizes children while abandoning the elderly. It sees human limitations not as sacred but as flaws to be engineered away.
This is why Nietzsche’s vision always collapses: it cannot answer the fundamental question of why life is worth living. The plummeting birth rates in secular, Nietzsche-influenced societies are not a coincidence; they are a verdict. When life is reduced to power struggles, when suffering has no redemptive meaning, when morality is a lie—why bring children into such a world?
Where Nietzsche saw weakness in compassion, Christ revealed its strength. Where Nietzsche dismissed humility as servitude, Christianity reveals it as the foundation of wisdom. The Übermensch, that self-made god who bends reality to his will, is ultimately a pale and tragic counterfeit of the true God-Man—Jesus Christ, who emptied Himself, took on flesh, and conquered death not by force, but by love. In the end, Nietzsche’s philosophy destroys itself because it cannot sustain life. It cannot justify why justice should be pursued, why love matters, or why the weak deserve protection rather than elimination.
The most damning critique of Nietzsche’s ideology is not theoretical but existential: it does not inspire life. It leads only to sterility, despair, and the eventual erasure of the very civilization it once sought to liberate. Societies that embrace his “will to power” do not last because they cannot justify the sacrifices necessary to build the future. By contrast, Christianity is fertile. It blesses children, redeems suffering, and calls every life—no matter how “weak” by Nietzschean standards—sacred. The rise of AI does not change this truth; it only makes it more urgent. A Nietzschean society will use AI to escape humanity’s “shameful” limitations—our mortality, our need for one another, our vulnerability. A Christian society will use AI to serve humanity, understanding that our very limitations are where grace abounds the most.
AI should be viewed not as a replacement for human intelligence, but as a tool to amplify our God-given cognitive abilities. Just as a telescope extends our vision without replacing our eyes, AI should enhance our intellectual capabilities without supplanting them. Consider how the early church used the Roman road system - a technological marvel of its time - to spread the Gospel throughout the known world. Similarly, we must learn to harness AI as a tool for kingdom work.
While embracing these new capabilities, we must remember that true wisdom comes from God (James 1:5), and that our ultimate purpose is not to achieve technological supremacy but to know Christ and make Him known.
The danger lies not in the technology itself, but in how we might be tempted to use it - either as an idol that replaces our reliance on God, or as a crutch that weakens our own God-given capabilities.