There is no limit to our electricity bills as new spending on renewables has diminishing impact on emissions intensity. Our bills are going to infinity and beyond. A thread (1/n)
First up, we need to acknowledge that measuring the emissions intensity of electricity generation is an imprecise science. Three different datasets from Ember, DUKES and NESO give different results although have a similar shape. (2/n)
The numbers are also a bit of a con, because they ignore the CO2 emissions from burning trees at places like Drax. If these are added back, assuming similar emissions as for coal, the the picture is less impressive (3/n)
Going back to the NESO data, it is clear that the main driver of reduced emissions intensity (solid orange line) has been the removal of coal from the system (grey area) (4/n)
From a peak in 2012, emissions intensity fell from 519g/kWh in 2012 to 195g/kWh in 2019 as coal generation fell from 137TWh to single digits. Each extra GW of wind and solar capacity led to a reduction in emissions intensity of 11.9g/kWh (5/n)
Since 2019, extra emissions reductions have been hard to come by, with emissions intensity falling to 151g/kWh after an addition of a further 9.2GW of wind and solar capacity. A reduction of just 4.8g/kWh per GW of added capacity (6/n)
This is hardly a surprising result because despite big increases in wind capacity, the minimum generation has hardly changed since 2015. 1 x 0 =0, 10 x 0 = 0 and 100 x 0 = 0 (7/n)
Looking at the dotted lines out to 2030, we first have to make an adjustment to the forecast emissions intensity. NESO and the Government decided to ignore the emissions from waste incineration and combined heat & power plants, another con. (8/n)
Adding that back means that emissions intensity falls from 151g/kWh in 2023 to 51g/kWh in 2030 after an addition of a further 81.8GW of wind and solar. This gives a measly reduction of just 0.8g/kWh per GW of extra capacity (9/n)
If we believe the Government can achieve the big acceleration of wind and solar deployment, NESO estimate it will cost £260-290bn. Assuming 8% cost of capital & 2% operations costs, we can expect our bills to rise by £26-29bn per annum or about £1,000 per household (10/n)
The diminishing returns on extra wind and solar capacity means that to achieve the truly "zero-carbon electricity" promised in their manifesto, Labour will send our electricity bills to infinity and beyond. (11/n)
If you enjoyed this thread please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article here (12/12):
None of the catastrophic climate predictions have come to pass. Emperor Ed Miliband has been left alone, shivering half-naked on the rapidly shrinking net zero iceberg. Time to follow the science and ditch Net Zero. A thread (1/n)
The Climate Change Act contains important safeguards that allow for emissions reduction targets and carbon budgets to be altered if The Science™ changes (2/n)
The Inconvenient Truth is that none of the catastrophic predictions about climate change have come to pass. Manhattan & the Maldives are still above water; the Arctic ice has stopped shrinking (3/n)
Gas prices are down, but the energy price cap has gone up. Why are our energy bills going ever higher? A thread (1/n)
For context, we had the highest industrial electricity prices and second highest domestic prices in 2024 (source IEA/DESNZ) (2/n)
UK gas prices are are competitive compared to the EU, so the price of gas cannot explain why our electricity prices are so high. But European gas prices are much higher than US & Canada (3/n)
Arla has ended the Bovaer trial in the UK, just after massive problems appeared in Denmark. But what bovine stupidity led to Bovaer being introduced in the first place? A thread (1/n)
Bovaer is a product of the Net Zero cult that has seen UK FIRES call for beef and lamb to eliminated by 2050. Of course they want to reduce methane emissions as well as CO2 (2/n)
The CCC have been less draconian. They want meat consumption to fall 35% by 2050 compared to 2019 and a 38% cut in the number of cattle and sheep, despite acknowledging methane emissions are already 62% lower than 1990 levels (4/n)
Rising consumer energy debt coupled with suppliers not conforming with new capital adequacy rules shows that Ofgem is asleep at the wheel. New thread (1/n)
Consumer energy debt is rising. The amount outstanding for people under formal repayment arrangements rose to a record £1.1bn in 2Q25. Arrears past due for >91 days rose to £3.32bn, giving total debt of £4.43bn (2/n)
This is partially offset by £2.7bn of positive consumer balances, but of course this cannot be used to repay debt from other consumers. Positive balances are on a downwardtrend (3/n)
Both Reform and Tories have committed to getting rid of Net Zero. While these commitments are welcome, ending Net Zero brings some risks that need to be mitigated (1/n)
First up, cutting carbon taxes on gas-fired electricity and ending Renewables Obligation subsidies early will cut revenues for these generators and asset values will collapse (2/n)
This runs the risk of crystallising decommissioning costs. Neither the windfarms, operators or investment vehicles have set aside ring fenced cash to cover the liability. To mitigate this a new Government should ban dividend payments until decomm cash is built up (3/n)
Today is a sad day, but the show must go on. Time to think about the poor bankers if Reform or Tories get in and abandon Renewables Obligations and cut carbon taxes (1/n)
ROCs will cost about £7.8bn this financial year. Onshore and offshore wind are the biggest recipients of ROC subsidies (2/n)
Carbon costs add about £2bn to electricity bills and the cost is rising after Starmer announced we would realign with the EU ETS scheme. Carbon costs make up about a third of wholesale electricity prices (3/n)