David Turver Profile picture
Dec 29, 2024 13 tweets 4 min read Read on X
There is no limit to our electricity bills as new spending on renewables has diminishing impact on emissions intensity. Our bills are going to infinity and beyond. A thread (1/n) Ed Miliband will send our electricity bills to infinity and beyond because adding more wind and solar to the grid is having diminishing impact on emissions intensity
First up, we need to acknowledge that measuring the emissions intensity of electricity generation is an imprecise science. Three different datasets from Ember, DUKES and NESO give different results although have a similar shape. (2/n) UK Electricity Emissions Intensity (gCO2/kWh) from Ember, DUKES and NESO
The numbers are also a bit of a con, because they ignore the CO2 emissions from burning trees at places like Drax. If these are added back, assuming similar emissions as for coal, the the picture is less impressive (3/n) Image
Going back to the NESO data, it is clear that the main driver of reduced emissions intensity (solid orange line) has been the removal of coal from the system (grey area) (4/n) UK electricity generation emissions intensity vs wind and solar capacity and coal generation
From a peak in 2012, emissions intensity fell from 519g/kWh in 2012 to 195g/kWh in 2019 as coal generation fell from 137TWh to single digits. Each extra GW of wind and solar capacity led to a reduction in emissions intensity of 11.9g/kWh (5/n)
Since 2019, extra emissions reductions have been hard to come by, with emissions intensity falling to 151g/kWh after an addition of a further 9.2GW of wind and solar capacity. A reduction of just 4.8g/kWh per GW of added capacity (6/n)
This is hardly a surprising result because despite big increases in wind capacity, the minimum generation has hardly changed since 2015. 1 x 0 =0, 10 x 0 = 0 and 100 x 0 = 0 (7/n) Minimum UK Wind Generation by day (MW) from NESO data
Looking at the dotted lines out to 2030, we first have to make an adjustment to the forecast emissions intensity. NESO and the Government decided to ignore the emissions from waste incineration and combined heat & power plants, another con. (8/n)
Adding that back means that emissions intensity falls from 151g/kWh in 2023 to 51g/kWh in 2030 after an addition of a further 81.8GW of wind and solar. This gives a measly reduction of just 0.8g/kWh per GW of extra capacity (9/n) Image
If we believe the Government can achieve the big acceleration of wind and solar deployment, NESO estimate it will cost £260-290bn. Assuming 8% cost of capital & 2% operations costs, we can expect our bills to rise by £26-29bn per annum or about £1,000 per household (10/n)
The diminishing returns on extra wind and solar capacity means that to achieve the truly "zero-carbon electricity" promised in their manifesto, Labour will send our electricity bills to infinity and beyond. (11/n)
If you enjoyed this thread please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article here (12/12):

davidturver.substack.com/p/to-infinity-…Image
Hi @threadreaderapp unroll please.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David Turver

David Turver Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @7Kiwi

Sep 14
By making a dissembling response to Claire Coutinho, the new chair of the CCC has made himself complicit in the Seventh Carbon Budget deceit. A thread 🧵 (1/n) Image
In her letter to the CCC, Coutinho asked why the CCC were using £38/MWh as a cost for offshore wind in 2030 when Ed Miliband is offering >3X that, or £117/MWh in Allocation Round 7. She urged Topping to correct the costings before Parliament votes on CB7 (2/n)
Topping's response was tendentious drivel, insisting that their LCOE calculations are accurate and CfD strike prices didn't reflect actual costs but rather "a policy-determined revenue guarantee" (3/n)
Read 11 tweets
Sep 7
There's a ticking timebomb in UK offshore wind: massive decommissioning costs that aren't properly funded. Like in "The Big Short," a forensic look reveals developers might be ignoring guidelines, potentially leaving taxpayers on the hook. A thread 🧵 (1/18) Offshore wind decommissioning timebomb
The scale is huge. In 2018, BEIS estimated £1.28-3.64bn for 37 wind farms, costs spiking from 2028. Now, with 16GW installed, my analysis shows ~£4.7bn over 10-15 years—at £293m/GW. More farms mean more costs. (2/18) Image
I made an FOI request to Government for the latest decommissioning cost estimates, but they won't release as "too commercially sensitive", but most windfarms show provisions in their accounts (3/18)
Read 19 tweets
Aug 31
The prices that Ed Miliband is offering in the forthcoming AR7 auction for new renewables capacity indicate that he is going to blow the £260-290bn budget for his Clean Power 2030 plan. A thread (1/n) Ed Miliband's figures do not add up and he is going to blow the budget of his CP2030 plan.
In NESO's CP2030 plan, they assumed onshore wind would cost £73/MWh, offshore £83/MWh and solar £71/MWh. This is well below their estimates for gas-fired generation, but gas costs were inflated by ridiculous carbon taxes (2/n) Image
Their prices derived from the AR6 auction, but we know the price for offshore wind was too low because the flagship Hornsea 4 project has already been cancelled by Orsted as uneconomic (3/n)
Read 12 tweets
Aug 28
Yesterday the Ofgem price cap went up, but both electricity and gas prices are down since the last price cap. Miliband & ministers lied and blamed fossil fuels for the rise, so now we're paying a moron premium on our energy bills. A thread 🧵 (1/n) Energy bills moron premium
The price cap went up £35 from £1,720 to £1,755 for dual fuel households paying by direct debit (2/n). Image
Energy Minister Michael Shanks blamed the "fossil fuel penalty" (3/n)
Read 12 tweets
Aug 24
Ed Miliband keeps boasting about creating good jobs in clean renewables and of course, we're supposed to be in the midst of a Green Industrial Revolution. But the truth is, green jobs make us poorer. A thread 🧵 (1/n) Image
The latest data from the ONS shows 690,900 green jobs in total. Of these 45,200 were employed in green charities (think billionaire funded propaganda units) & 19,400 were employed in “managerial activities of government bodies" (including government propaganda units) (2/n)
Jobs in the renewable power sector jumped massively to 42,600. The increase was led by solar power 20,300 jobs. Offshore and onshore wind had 16,400 and 5,900 jobs respectively (3/n) Image
Read 8 tweets
Aug 19
Orsted has shocked the market by announcing a £6.9bn rights issue. But investors are not the only ones feeling the pain of offshore wind. Orsted is leaving investors & consumers twisting in the wind. A thread (1/n) Image
The rights issue announcement sent the share price into a tailspin, closing last week at an all time low, some 85% below the peak in Jan 2021. (2/n) Image
Although the Danish Government has said it will take up its 50.1% share of the rights, other big shareholders like Equinor (10%) have not yet committed and we do not yet know the offer price (3/n)
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(