There is no limit to our electricity bills as new spending on renewables has diminishing impact on emissions intensity. Our bills are going to infinity and beyond. A thread (1/n)
First up, we need to acknowledge that measuring the emissions intensity of electricity generation is an imprecise science. Three different datasets from Ember, DUKES and NESO give different results although have a similar shape. (2/n)
The numbers are also a bit of a con, because they ignore the CO2 emissions from burning trees at places like Drax. If these are added back, assuming similar emissions as for coal, the the picture is less impressive (3/n)
Going back to the NESO data, it is clear that the main driver of reduced emissions intensity (solid orange line) has been the removal of coal from the system (grey area) (4/n)
From a peak in 2012, emissions intensity fell from 519g/kWh in 2012 to 195g/kWh in 2019 as coal generation fell from 137TWh to single digits. Each extra GW of wind and solar capacity led to a reduction in emissions intensity of 11.9g/kWh (5/n)
Since 2019, extra emissions reductions have been hard to come by, with emissions intensity falling to 151g/kWh after an addition of a further 9.2GW of wind and solar capacity. A reduction of just 4.8g/kWh per GW of added capacity (6/n)
This is hardly a surprising result because despite big increases in wind capacity, the minimum generation has hardly changed since 2015. 1 x 0 =0, 10 x 0 = 0 and 100 x 0 = 0 (7/n)
Looking at the dotted lines out to 2030, we first have to make an adjustment to the forecast emissions intensity. NESO and the Government decided to ignore the emissions from waste incineration and combined heat & power plants, another con. (8/n)
Adding that back means that emissions intensity falls from 151g/kWh in 2023 to 51g/kWh in 2030 after an addition of a further 81.8GW of wind and solar. This gives a measly reduction of just 0.8g/kWh per GW of extra capacity (9/n)
If we believe the Government can achieve the big acceleration of wind and solar deployment, NESO estimate it will cost £260-290bn. Assuming 8% cost of capital & 2% operations costs, we can expect our bills to rise by £26-29bn per annum or about £1,000 per household (10/n)
The diminishing returns on extra wind and solar capacity means that to achieve the truly "zero-carbon electricity" promised in their manifesto, Labour will send our electricity bills to infinity and beyond. (11/n)
If you enjoyed this thread please like and share. You can sign up for free to read the full article here (12/12):
Both Reform and Tories have committed to getting rid of Net Zero. While these commitments are welcome, ending Net Zero brings some risks that need to be mitigated (1/n)
First up, cutting carbon taxes on gas-fired electricity and ending Renewables Obligation subsidies early will cut revenues for these generators and asset values will collapse (2/n)
This runs the risk of crystallising decommissioning costs. Neither the windfarms, operators or investment vehicles have set aside ring fenced cash to cover the liability. To mitigate this a new Government should ban dividend payments until decomm cash is built up (3/n)
Today is a sad day, but the show must go on. Time to think about the poor bankers if Reform or Tories get in and abandon Renewables Obligations and cut carbon taxes (1/n)
ROCs will cost about £7.8bn this financial year. Onshore and offshore wind are the biggest recipients of ROC subsidies (2/n)
Carbon costs add about £2bn to electricity bills and the cost is rising after Starmer announced we would realign with the EU ETS scheme. Carbon costs make up about a third of wholesale electricity prices (3/n)
Yesterday, Miliband announced the for the AR7 renewables Contract for Difference (CfD) auction. He's offering £113/MWh for fixed and £271/MWh for floating offshore wind index-linked for 20 years. This will drive up our electricity bills & miss his own CP2030 target. (1/n)
First up he has set the budget for offshore wind at £1,080m, split £900m for fixed-bottom and £180m for floating offshore wind. In essence this means the Government expects this auction to add £1.08bn to our bills, which compares to the £2.4bn total CfD cost in 2024/25 (2/n)
How much capacity will this buy? It's a complex calculation, but if contracts are awarded at the £113/MWh offer price, the auction will deliver a maximum 3GW of fixed bottom offshore wind (3/n)
New research from More In Common shows high energy prices are driving a revolutionary mood. When asked about our institutions, 43% of people can't help thinking "just let them all burn". What is going on. (1/n)
First, there is widespread concern and stress about energy bills across all income groups, even those households earning >£100,000/yr (2/n)
In a superbly ironic twist, nearly three quarters of Labour and Green voters are concerned about high energy bills this winter. Turns out renewables aren't cheap after all (3/n)
In preparation for my appearance at #BattleFest on Saturday, I've written a new article on Why is My Energy Bill So High? A thread 🧵(1/n)
First off, we have the highest industrial electricity prices in the developed world and the second highest domestic prices. Prices like this represent an existential threat to the economy (2/n)
Gas plays a part in setting the wholesale price of electricity, and the cost of gas used in electricity generation in 2024 was about £5.5bn (3/n)
Despite receiving huge subsidies and curtailment payments, yet another wind farm investor is issuing profit warnings. What is going on at Greencoat UK Wind $UKW ? Sunday thread 🧵(1/n)
The UKW share price has been on a downward trend since peaking in September 2022 despite paying large dividends and buying back shares (2/n)
The large dividends can be paid because the windfarms UKW has a stake in have been paid billions in subsidies, over £8.7bn in total, of which UKW will have received a share. They also get paid to turn off when it's too windy - curtailment payments (3/n)