What has always distinguished America as a nation is that it has always worked to reject an ethnonationalist conception of itself, as was encoded in our founding documents. Americans are a people in a place but a people who unite around the idea that ethnos isn't who we are.
America is exceptional. It's the greatest nation in the history of the world. America is exceptional because it has a completely different conception of itself than every other nation on Earth. It is not an ethnonationalist project but one built on self-evident truths.
You can turn to Stalin or Hitler or the 1924 English dictionary or any other sort of source you want and look up "nation" and find that it carries at least ethnonationalist connotations ("a specific people..."), but in so doing you miss America completely.
America in 1776 dared to conceive of itself as a nation that's different than that. It conceived of itself as a people in a place where the people are defined by their commitment to the Cause of Liberty built upon the self-evident, common-sense truths of human existence.
What makes Americans American is that they're American. In other words, Americans accept that if they hold these truths to be self-evident, that they are endowed by their creator (Laws of Nature or Nature's God) with certain unalienable rights, then they're American.
Today, heavy pressure is coming in from the "New Right" or "Dissident Right" or "[Muted Term, aka Ostrich Right]" to reconceive of America as an ethnic project when in fact it was a project built around people escaping the tyranny of ethnic and religious demand.
What makes Americans American is rejecting that in favor not of some "higher" truth but in fact of something much more common-sense and down-to-earth. People who want to take responsibility and govern themselves can live together peacefully and profitably regardless of ethnos.
You might argue that the ethnonationalist wankers have a point here, that what I'm saying demands assimilation. I don't fully disagree. Multiculturalism wasn't just a failed experiment; it was a rebranded Soviet ethnic conflict project called Korenizatsiya in the "Motherland."
Americans have to be American for the American experiment to work. That means they have to set aside their ethnos to some degree, though not entirely, in favor of a wholehearted acceptance of the American belief in a set of self-evidently true ideas about human beings.
Leaning into ethnos and encouraging ethnos versus ethnos cannot improve this situation; it only makes more multiculturalism. When you hear that white people have to incorporate to defend their culture and interests, that's more multiculturalism. The answer is less.
It's time for Americans to remember what it means to be American again. It's time to Make America America Again, and America was never built to be an ethnostate. It was built to unlock the power of freedom for all people who believe in freedom, and that's why it's great.
Definitions of "nation" are fine and technical and whatever, but they also simply miss America and what makes America America in the first place, and what Makes America Great. Nation, in America, is built around its foundational ideas of liberty, equality, and individual rights.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Heard a rumor people at The Blaze might have taken Milo up on his bad information and are planning to publish an "expose" proving Mike O'Fallon and I have ties to the CCP. Let's hope they do. It's all nonsense, will cost them their jobs, and will let Mike tell a fun story.
I don't know what Milo thinks he got, probably some old financial document, but Mike has never been shy about telling people that various CCP-affiliated people used to be his clients until he broke with them in 2013. In fact, it's his main point of credibility.
Mike is a travel agent. He coordinates travel, tourism, events, conferences, and such, and he has done for over 20 years. Until 2013, he had clients in the WEF and CCP set who wanted various things, and Mike worked with them until he realized they were up to big bad things.
I didn't want to do this today, but, let's because it's a thing.
Vance: “One of the things you hear people say sometimes is that America is an idea. America is not just an idea. It is a group of people with a shared history and a common future. It is, in short, a nation.” 🧵
The Woke Right and its adjacencies are pushing what we might refer to as "the national question" pretty hard now, so we had better look into it. They're uprooting American patriotism and replacing it with nationalism, which is tactically a serious error, as I've discussed.
Let's talk about Vance's definition of nation.
Vance: [America] is a group of people with a shared history and a common future. It is, in short, a nation.”
Put differently, "A nation is a historically constituted, stable community of people, formed on the basis of a common language, territory, economic life, and psychological make-up manifested in a common culture."
Over the coming months, we're going to see a concerted effort from the Woke Right to rehabilitate Karl Marx, though not exactly. This has begun already, of course, so I'm not predicting so much as describing a trend in motion. You'll still be shocked by it. 🧵
The Woke Right actually accepts much of Karl Marx's work, particularly what they refer to as his "critiques of liberalism and capitalism," but they "disagree with his conclusions." In other words, they think Marx got the analysis right and that it can be used for different ends.
I insist they don't understand Marx or his critiques, and they share his lust for power (libido dominandi), which is what they actually resonate with. Since Marx's actual arguments are all means to the end of Marxist power, the Woke Right can just insert themselves similarly.
I know it's Christmas Eve and all (Merry Christmas, everybody!!), but it's also a good day to do a thread busting a couple of interrelated postmodernist myths (that is, lies) that tend to confuse people easily: lies about objectivity, rationality, and biases. 🧵
Let's start with postmodernist thinking before we get into the way they leverage this bogus claim:
We all have biases, are subjective, and fail in our reasoning, so there's no such thing as objective truth rationally derived.
Postmodernism is a peculiar worship of power.
The postmodernist belief is anti-realist in that it believes we have no genuine access to reality itself and only have access to our perceptions of reality. It is structuralist (and post-structuralist) in its belief that our perceptions are themselves constructed by power.
Freedom is God's idea, not man's, not the devil's. This is not Christian.
"Tradition and duty" => fascism.
"Identity" [that is sacrificed] => ethnonationalism => fascism.
"Sacrifice the old gods to the new" not "deny God for idols."
Freedom, as God grants it, makes us slaves.
Auron is not pushing Christianity. He's pushing a postmodernist fascist mystical heresy based on Hegel.
I used to give a three-part definition ofa critical theory, or critical consciousness, so Woke, derived from Max Horkheimer, who created the critical theory:
1) utopian concept of society 2) critical attitude towards everything opposing that concept 3) activist duty for 1 & 2 🧵
The question really is how can we tell "Woke Right" from people who want to save our country. The equally hard question from five years ago was how do we tell "Woke (Left)" from people who just have a socially progressive left agenda? It's hard, but these criteria are key.
1) Holding a utopian standard for society is key to Woke thinking. Woke people "know" how society should be, and everyone who doesn't agree with them is somehow deficient: morally, intellectually, psychologically, etc. No clear utopian vision need be articulated, to be clear.