Charlie Peters Profile picture
Jan 1 25 tweets 13 min read Read on X
Britain’s grooming gangs scandal is attracting attention. It’s happened before, but now it seems different.

I’ve dedicated most of my career in journalism to covering it. Because it’s the most appalling atrocity in modern British history.

In this thread, I’ll tell you what I know about the crisis, what I’ve uncovered, and what is yet to be revealed…Image
When did it start?

Reports of gangs of men abusing children via on-street grooming go back as far as the 1970s.

But it first came to major prominence after Labour MP Ann Cryer raised concerns about the targeting of young girls by “Asian men” outside school gates.

It was 2003. She was accused of racism by many in her own party and had to install a panic alarm. Cryer was vilified for trying to support girls facing appalling abuse by predominantly Pakistani men. She was the first to endure this treatment, but by no means the last.Image
Then a year later in 2004 came 'Edge of the City,' a Channel 4 documentary about social workers in Bradford.

Hours before transmission it was yanked from the schedules.

Unite Against Fascism, The 1990 Trust, and the National Assembly Against Racism lobbied Channel 4 to drop it, as did the Chief Constable of West Yorkshire.

The local elections were coming up. And the film captured grooming gangs for the first time. South Asian men abusing teenage white girls. They were worried that the BNP, who were making a lot of noise about the abuse gangs, would profit.

So it was canned. Another opportunity to discuss children as young as 11 being gang raped was missed.
A journalist based in the north was the next to pick up the story.

Andrew Norfolk at The Times had reported on Ann Cryer. But he moved on because he admitted: "I didn’t want the story to be true because it made me deeply uncomfortable."

"The suggestion that men from a minority ethnic background were committing sex crimes against white children was always going to be the far right’s fantasy story come true."

"Liberal angst kicked instinctively into top gear."

But in 2010, something snapped in Norfolk, and he felt like he could no longer ignore it.Image
In 2010 he heard a radio report about a grooming gang in Manchester.

He started going through archives. What he found was a pattern.

Since 1997 there had been 17 cases in 13 towns where a group of men had approached a girl on the street and groomed her.

Of the 56 convicted, 3 were white, 53 were Asian.

50 of those had Muslim names, most were Pakistani.

But when he went to the authorities, they refused to talk.

Barnados, the children’s charity, told staff not to talk to him.

At the time, it seemed like the only prominent people talking about this crisis were right-wing politicians and activists, such as Tommy Robinson's EDL.
The strategy of the groomers was to pose as a friend or a boyfriend. That's why we call them grooming gangs.

Then draw the girl into their social circle, with gifts and attention.

They’d offer them drugs and alcohol. And then they’d abuse them.

Threats were used - against them or their family - to control them.

And then they’d be passed around the whole gang to abuse.Image
What blew this open was the small town of Rotherham, with its decaying steelworks and beautiful medieval chapel.

There Andrew Norfolk met Jayne Senior.

She ran Risky Business, a youth project working with children at risk of exploitation.

More and more of her work had come to involve abused girls.

She was able to introduce Norfolk to victims and their families.

But neither the journalist or the whistleblower expected the scale of the scandal that would emerge.Image
Reports of the abuse in the town went back decades.

The victims who spoke to Norfolk revealed how they’d been horribly abused: the most horrific torture and sexual depravity.

And they also spoke of how the authorities - Rotherham Council and South Yorkshire Police - had failed them.

The stories caused an outcry.

The government stepped in and commissioned social worker Alexis Jay to hold an inquiry.

She found that this wasn’t about a few girls.

She estimated that between 1997 and 2013, 1,400 children had been abused. This was a conservative estimate.

Almost all the victims were white, most of the abusers were Pakistani.

And that's despite them only making up just 5% of the town.
The report was so damning that Rotherham Council was investigated in 2015.

Louise Casey found that the authorities had failed the victims and that the council had covered-up the abuse.

Political correctness was to blame.

But also something more sinister.

Pakistani British councillors had wielded unusual power, and they had used it to head off concerns. People who tried to raise concerns were silenced with bogus accusations of racism.

But even though some people left their jobs, nobody was fired.

The guilty all kept their pensions. Some got jobs with other councils. Some who knew but looked the other way were FINALLY deselected by Labour in 2023 after a series of GB News reports.
There were serious questions about how the crisis had been allowed to go on for so long. One instance has always stuck with me.

In March 2000, a secret deal was cut. It was arranged between a child rapist and police officers.

An abused girl was handed over to the police by her abuser. In return, he was allowed to go free.

Jahanghir Akhtar, who later became deputy head of the council, was accused of facilitating the deal. He denied it.

The abuser was his cousin, Arshid Hussain, a notorious gangster.

Foreign systems of prioritising distant family kinship over justice causing a crisis? In South Yorkshire?

Hassan Ali, the policeman who helped arrange the secret deal, was run over and killed by a car on the day he was told he was under investigation.

With his death, there was no further inquiry.
There was also a Home Office report.

In 2000 a local solicitor worked with Risky Business.

She discovered the scale of the abuse and how much of it revolved around the gangster Arshid Hussain and his brothers.

But when she filed her report she was told it was “unhelpful”.

And when a victim she worked with went to the police, she was texted by her abuser.

He had her sibling. She dropped the complaint.

But who at the police station had told her abuser she was there?
When the solicitor complained, she was told never to refer to 'Asian' men ever again.

She was also booked on a two-day equality and diversity course. You read that right. Raise concerns about minority rapists targeting girls and you'll be sent for ideological re-training.

And then the Risky Business offices were broken into.

There was no sign the doors had been forced.

No sign the filing cabinet was broken into. But her files were missing.

And her password protected computer had been accessed. Documents had been deleted.

The minutes of meetings which hadn’t occurred had been created.

Who was behind the break in? Nobody has ever been arrested for it. It has never been explained.
But the true horror of the grooming gangs scandal is that Rotherham wasn’t the only town.

There was also Rochdale.

A gang of Asian men had abused girls.

They took them to a 'special place' and plied them with alcohol.

Then they were passed around from man to man, like a ball.

There was a list on names on the door of the building where the girls were kept,.

Whenever an abuser went there, they put a tick by their name so they could pay for their rapes at the end of each month.

It was like a paedophile honesty box. The failures in Rochdale were so severe that it took the bravery of whistleblower @MaggieOliverUK to expose the scandal in the town.Image
And then there was Telford.

The Labour council there tried to block an inquiry. 10 men wrote a letter to the Home Secretary saying it wasn't necessary.

Some claimed reports of abuse, uncovered by investigative journalists, had been 'sensationalised', even after what had been revealed in Rotherham and Rochdale.

But when the Crowther report was written, it found there were at least 1,000 victims.

Most of the victims were white, most of the abusers Pakistani.

Only 4.7% of the town was Asian.

The same pattern, the same racial targeting kept coming up, time after time, again and again.
Rotherham, Rochdale and Telford are just a handful of the towns and cities that have endured these abuse gangs.

I've compiled compelling reports and successful prosecutions from across Britain, from Bristol and Oxford right up to Glasgow.

The horrors in each of these towns deserve their own report, their own reckoning, their own righteous response.

And many of the girls were trafficked between towns by their abusers.

When parents tried to intervene, they were often threatened with arrest. I've met parents who were desperate for support from the police, but instead found themselves being penalised when they raised concerns about their children, their little girls, being targeted by rape gangs.Image
The grooming gang story is a stake through the heart of multicultural Britain.

For decades, gangs of largely British Pakistani men deliberately targeted and abused underage white girls.

And the authorities did nothing because they did not want to rock the boat of racial tensions. They literally prioritised community cohesion over the safety and security of women and girls.

In many cases the abuse went beyond rape into sadism. Reading the testimony, attending the trials, speaking to survivors... sometimes, it is truly harrowing. Don't read on if you find this too difficult.

Gang rape, anal pumps, beatings, girls being 'marked' with the initials of their abusers. Broken bottles being shoved into them. Girls being doused with petrol. Stabbings. Thrashings. Fake executions. Real executions. Pure and total depravity.

Often the girls were called 'white whores' and 'white slags.'

I'm convinced that it is the greatest race hate crime in modern Britain.

There is no comparison.

But the authorities don't want to see it that way.

And the people who set our national conversations don't want to see it that way. But it's what the evidence shows.
The state has gone to great lengths to avoid admitting this. After years of pressure, the Home Office was forced to commission a report into grooming gangs.

At first, the civil servants tried to spike it. And when that failed, they botched it.

Rather than use their own trove of data, they relied on a handful of weak studies.

All they wanted was the headline: whites were the most common type of abuser.

Now they could claim there was no racial issue.

But whites made up at least 85% of the population over this period.

And the report found they still made up less than 30% of abusers.

Asians, especially British Pakistanis, were over-represented.

It was a fix. A stitch up. A distraction.Image
Image
More recently, a study found that Pakistanis dominate national grooming gang statistics. By comparing the number of prosecutions to the overall population it showed that 1 in every 2,200 Muslim men over 16 in England and Wales had been prosecuted for this crime from 1997 to 2017.

When it came to Pakistanis it was 1 in 1,700.

In Rochdale, 1 in 280 Muslim males over 16 were prosecuted.

In Telford, it was 1 in 126.

In Rotherham, 1 in 73.

ONE IN SEVENTY-THREE.Image
Image
The same dark forces that want you to not notice this moved fiercely against Andrew Norfolk.

He was accused of being a racist and an Islamophobe.

An unholy alliance of the far-left and Islamic groups hounded him.

It was simple. They would repeat the lie over and over.

And they would hound anyone who disagreed.

They did the same to Sarah Champion, the Labour Rotherham MP who was attacked by the Left when she spoke out against the appalling crisis.

Jack Straw was also accused of racism for referring to Andrew Norfolk's report.

For a while, this campaign of abuse to keep people quiet worked.

The cases kept coming but there was no campaign, nobody to join the dots.

Tommy Robinson was essentially the lone voice, but he was also ignored by the establishment due to widespread controversy.

Nobody had any success trying to bring this issue into the mainstream.
In the winter of 2021 I started a project.

The grooming gangs scandal had always horrified me. But the trail seemed to have gone cold.

And nobody had really brought all the journalism together.

So, with my friend @dampierguy, we put together a few hundred quid, took some time off work and went to Rotherham to start filming.

We had some immense footage, exclusive interviews, and a big vision, even if we were a couple of amateurs. Our project was turned down by almost everyone. Even the right-wing media didn’t want to work with me. Let alone the big broadcasters.

But GB News saw promise. @ColinBrazierTV put me on his programme to discuss my project, and soon after the channel commissioned me to make a documentary.

It was time to reveal Britain’s shame.
The year-long investigation shocked me to my core.

Not just at the scale of the abuse or the way it had been covered up, but at the fact it was still going on.

After all these years, what the victims were telling me was that the abuse hadn’t ended.

In some cases, it was actually getting worse.

And in many cases their rapists had been freed from jail after a few years.

Imagine that - seeing your rapist walking the same streets as you.Image
And some of them were organised.

In some places I was followed.

The streets were hostile.

I'll never forget my first days of investigating and filming in parts of Telford, Rochdale and Glodwick near Oldham. It was a genuinely hostile environment. My small team stood out wherever we went. We were not welcome. We were often speeding out of some places after quickly filming what we needed.

Our questions and our presence was NOT welcome.Image
When we finally broadcast 'Grooming Gangs: Britain's Shame', I was relieved.

It was a big project. And soon after the then-Home Secretary @SuellaBraverman announced a new taskforce to tackle the grooming gangs, our key policy demand in the documentary. It made hundreds of arrests in its first year.

But the battle wasn’t over yet.

I knew there were far more victims out there, whose tales needed to be told.

I knew there were far too many rapists released on our streets.

And I knew the far-left and the Islamists would come for me, of course. They have mostly just accused me of being a racist, the same accusation they deployed on everyone else who raised concerns.

But this attack line just doesn't work anymore. Anyone who wants to call me a racist in response to my reporting can pick a number, get in line, and kiss my arse. I don't care. I've done my homework. Your slander means nothing.
Since the film was released I've continued to champion the cause of the survivors for this nationwide scandal.

There has been bold reporting from some other outlets, but prominent voices and commentators in the mainstream continue to neglect the truth of the crisis. Perhaps they fear the same abusive treatment that Andrew Norfolk, Champion, and others endured.

But it's left me with a LOT of stories to cover.

For GB News, I've exposed councillors who knew about the abuse and did nothing, my reporting has seen a parliamentary candidate be deselected. We've shown that a former councillor who silenced discussions of Pakistani rape gangs later went on to work in DIVERSITY AND INCLUSION in the NHS. And I've revealed several further policing failures in historic and recent cases.

There is a lot more to do.
I know there are still guilty men — in the police and the councils — who still need to face justice.

For example, for police officers in Rotherham, there were 265 allegations of misconduct, with 91 investigations involving 47 officers. Of those, only five suffered any penalties. Nobody was fired. Some of them were senior officers. Many have retired.

That is now my mission: to ensure that nobody involved in the mass rape and cover-up is able to get away with it.

Get involved. Get in touch. Get ready.Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Charlie Peters

Charlie Peters Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CDP1882

Jan 5
EXCLUSIVE: Civil servants delayed compensation plans for grooming gang victims.

Several government sources told @GBNEWS that attempts to raise the issue were “pushed into the long grass” by senior officials Image
Kemi Badenoch told me that payment is ‘the least victims are entitled to’ after delays were exposed.

The govt has been contacted for comment.

gbnews.com/news/grooming-…
Rotherham survivor Elizabeth, not her real name, said: “Once again this shows that we are treated like second-class citizens by the government.

“They don’t pay attention to what we need to finally tackle this national emergency and make sure it never happens again.” Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 5
This conversation sparked by the abuse gangs scandal is spiralling into political gossip.

Let's bring it back to what matters: the survivors and getting the action they need.

So far, the government’s response to the demand for a national public inquiry has been to point to the IICSA report.

Bashing Elon Musk's amplification of calls for a public inquiry, Wes Streeting said that we’ve already had a report into grooming gangs so we don’t need another.

But what did the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse actually find out about grooming gangs?

In this thread I'll go through why many victims and campaigners think the report didn't do enough on the gangs.Image
Published in 2022 after seven years, IICSA had a broad brief, which included all forms of exploitation.

Grooming gangs were lumped in with other abuse networks, while other subjects like online abuse, the Catholic Church, and care homes got their own investigation. Image
The final report mentions Rotherham just once in 400 pages.

It only refers to Rochdale in relation to Cyril Smith, the Lib Dem MP who sexually abused young boys in the town.

Telford isn’t mentioned at all. Image
Read 10 tweets
Jan 4
REVEALED @GBNEWS: Keir Starmer ignored a Rotherham whistleblower's bullying complaint after she exposed child abuse and Labour corruption Image
@GBNEWS GB News has seen correspondence between a whistleblower and Sir Keir's office in 2020, when he was the leader of the opposition.

He was told about Jayne Senior being bullied and facing a witch hunt after she helped to expose the Rotherham atrocity.
@GBNEWS Starmer was told that Senior "consistently faced hostility" by Labour politicians over her efforts.

But we can also reveal that Starmer's office replied: "Unfortunately, we will be unable to facilitate a meeting with Keir Starmer" and directed her to an online complaints form.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 1
Exclusive: Labour has rejected Oldham Council's request for a government inquiry into grooming gangs.

GB News has seen a letter from Safeguarding Minister Jess Phillips urging the council to organise their own inquiry.
Jess Phillips said that she understands "the strength of feeling" but rejected calls for a government-led review.

She also apologised for the delay in responding to two letters from the council's executive.

gbnews.com/news/oldham-gr…
I understand that Oldham Council will now attempt to launch a Telford-style inquiry and that its officers are contact with the people who carried out the town’s inquiry.

But a survivor from the town told me that a government inquiry is the only way to secure proper justice.
Read 4 tweets
Dec 3, 2024
Derek Heggie has pleaded guilty to making racially aggravated comments.

But what did he post?

In videos referring to Muslims, Heggie said "young white girls are being raped by these grooming gangs"

The prosecution said his comments were "inflammatory" Image
Carlisle Crown Court heard that his comments about grooming gangs were made for the "purpose of causing distress or anxiety."

The "grossly offensive comments" could see him imprisoned.

He was remanded into custody by a judge today.

bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…
In 2017, this grooming gang was found guilty Sheffield Crown court.

I have met one of the survivors of their abuse. She was first targeted at 11. Made pregnant at 12.

When these rapists were sentenced, two of them shouted "Allahu Akbar"

Is referring to this case now a crime? Image
Read 5 tweets
Nov 6, 2024
2 months after seeing her abusers jailed, a Rotherham survivor returns to court to see their sentences reduced by years after an error.

At court, the rapists' relatives mock her and allegedly threaten violence.

It sounds like a crazy nightmare, but it all happened this week.
EXCL @GBNEWS: Rotherham survivor in court confrontation after grooming gang rapists have sentences reduced by several years after admin error

gbnews.com/news/rotherham…
@GBNEWS Abid Saddiq was convicted of three counts of rape and one of indecent assault.

Mohammed Siyab was convicted of two counts of rape, one count of sexual intercourse with a girl under 13 and one count of trafficking.

They had 3 yrs and 1 yr taken off their sentences respectively.
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(