The first and most obvious reason is because the police have reported that he died from a GSW to his head 'prior' to the explosion, yet there were no reported gunshots in the 15-20 seconds before the Cybertruck exploded.
Needless to say, it is odd that one would shoot themselves in the head with a 50-caliber Desert Eagle right before blowing themselves up. It simply makes no sense.
I've seen some people saying, "maybe he did not want to burn to death so he shot himself first," but I believe that is silly. Any professional trying to carry out an actual attack would want to ensure their explosion went off without issue. They would not kill themselves before hand and take the chance of wasting the opportunity.
Also, the rifle he supposedly had in the vehicle had no iron sights nor any other optics, which basically makes it worthless for any type of engagement. Another red flag.
The second reason is because he was a highly experienced Special Forces soldier that would not have created such an abomination of an explosive device that was both silly and ineffective.
He was SF for long enough to have used a CARVER matrix and to understand basic explosives. If the intent was political, the intent was missed due to the second-rate explosive he supposedly used.
We are trained in Home Made Explosives (HMEs). He could have gotten everything he needed from a local hardware store to level the entire bottom floor of the Trump hotel. There is simply no way he thought the combustibles he had in the back of that bulletproof truck would have been enough to do any damage to anything.
The third reason is that his Signal safety number changed just before the explosion, and then somehow his photo and safety number changed AFTER the explosion.
Clearly this was manipulated by somebody other than him, as he was deceased and would not have been able to change anything. Find who changed his signal info and you find who shot him in the head. x.com/APhilosophae/s…
The fourth reason is that GBs that knew him are convinced that he could not have done this, nor would have had any reason to do so.
@angertab has also reported that he was approached by someone pretending to be a GB previously on his team, claiming that Matthew was suicidal so that it would be recorded if they reported it.
Again, find who this person is, and you likely find the culprit behind the entire thing. x.com/angertab/statu…
The fifth reason is that he was still Active Duty, had just had a 6 month old baby with his new wife, and had a literal multitude of jobs ahead of him when he retired.
Yes, I understand that sometimes people end their own lives for one reason or another and it does not make sense to us, but all of this coupled with the evidence we have so far makes me believe that he was, indeed, a patsy.
We need to see every single piece of evidence from this investigation and if anything is withheld, then it only further confirms my suspicions that this was a setup to frame one of our best soldiers with a heinous crime.
Also, on a side note, the 50 cal shot to his head ensured that his entire head was little more than splatter, destroying any hope of obtaining and matching dental records in the process.
Tell me how this smells…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Debunking the most common anti-Israel and anti-Jewish lies with facts.
There is no shortage of outrage online about Israel. What there is a shortage of is factual accuracy. Let’s line up the most common claims and knock them down with evidence, a thread:🧵
1. “Israel is committing genocide.”
Genocide is a legal term, not a slogan to be used as a club to bash anyone you disagree with. Under international law, it requires specific intent to destroy a people as such.
No international court has ruled that Israel is committing genocide.
Civilian deaths alone—even at scale—do not meet the legal threshold without demonstrable intent. Israel has repeatedly stated its objective is the destruction of Hamas, not Palestinians, and continues to facilitate humanitarian aid and evacuation warnings during combat operations (despite the lies and obvious attempts of Hamas to stop it).
If Israel intended genocide, Gaza would not still exist after decades of overwhelming military superiority.
(UN Office on Genocide Prevention; International Court of Justice)
2. “Israel kills civilians indiscriminately.”
This is false.
Modern urban warfare against an enemy embedded in civilian infrastructure produces horrific civilian harm.
Which is literally how Hamas operates.
Independent military and humanitarian analysts consistently warn that casualty ratios alone cannot establish indiscriminate intent, especially when combatants do not wear uniforms and operate from homes, schools, and hospitals.
The IDF employs measures uncommon in modern warfare: advance warnings, evacuation corridors, aborted strikes, and precision guided munitions. None of this eliminates civilian death, but it directly contradicts claims of indiscriminate targeting.
(International Committee of the Red Cross; Reuters; U.S. Department of Defense urban warfare analyses)
Most people hear “CAIR” and think: civil rights, anti-Islamophobia, community advocacy.
That’s the branding. The real story is more complicated: volatile finances, foreign funding, Islamist ideological roots, and an internal culture that does not match the press releases.
This thread walks through CAIR’s money, donors, leadership, lawsuits, and long term goals, and why they should worry anyone who cares about the Constitution.
Most people have never heard of the National Security Strategy (NSS), but it quietly shapes almost everything America does overseas. Let's break down Trump's 2025 NSS, a thread: 🧵
By law, every president has to publish an NSS that explains what our goals are, what threats we face, and how we plan to use our power, military, economic, diplomatic, informational, to protect the country.
Think of it as the “playbook” that tells Congress, the Pentagon, the State Department, and our allies: Here’s what we care about and here’s what we’re going to do.
Trump’s new 2025 NSS puts a very different spin on that playbook compared to the last few presidents. It’s openly “America First,” more focused, and much more skeptical of global institutions and vague global causes.
This thread breaks down what’s in it, what’s new, what’s good, and what might be risky; all in plain English that even a progressive can read.
This thread traces the money. It maps the networks (including the link between the S6 and nonprofits). It exposes the doctrine. And it explains the November 18th video by six members of Congress in a way no one else has.
PID is a reasonable certainty that what you’re looking at is a legitimate military target under the Laws of Armed Conflict (LOAC) and the Rules of Engagement (ROE).
No PID = no shot or not clear to engage. Full stop.
PID can come from:
- Visual ID (eyes/optics/UAS feed)
- Sensors (radar, IR, SIGINT)
- Intel correlation (we know Enemy Boat X should be here, now)
- Behavior (hostile act or obvious hostile intent)
The Candace Owens vs. Macron Lawsuit — A Complete Collapse in Real Time, a thread:🧵
If you are wondering why Candace seems to have completely lost her mind, it is because she probably has due to this lawsuit that is meticulous and devastating for her.
If you want to read the full article, check it out here on my Substack: