2024 Dutch version of the famous Danish "It's Complicated" graph. First generation immigrants are net fiscal negatives at all ages - entirely because of "non-western" immigrants. But at least the Netherlands benefits from... there must be something. (new study, short thread)
This is a very familiar map. Bet you could predict almost all of this with national IQ + selection + obvious adjustment for Afrikaners.
Everyone knows "asylum seekers" are absurdly expensive. But even study migration is a net negative at all ages. Student visas often get a free pass in immigration discussions - people just assume they're fine based on half-remembered recollections from college. But they're not.
Fortunately, after expensive Dutch education and cultural assimilation, the second generation is much better.
Just kidding, they're worse everywhere but East Asia. Partly driven by selective remigration: productive people leave, leeches stick to the teat of the Dutch taxpayer.
Highly educated "Africa-Islamic" migrants are a major drain. Even the best educated Indians/LatinX/East Slavs are only breaking even.
None of this is new - that central and northern Europe have the world's worst migrant welfare problem is well-known, in part because their migrants are so relatively dumb. But it's good to get the refresher anyways.
I wonder if the Netherlands has Muslim child rape gangs targeting white girls like England (paid for by the Dutch taxpayer). By default, I would guess yes, but maybe (hopefully) that's a peculiarity of the particularly nasty variety of Pakistani Britain imported for no reason.
Thread with excerpts from "The Communist Conquest of China," a 1952 book by a French intelligence officer. I read this because, after reading several books on the diplomatic/political side of things, I wanted a military history of the Chinese Civil War.
The map as of the end of WWII. Communists had very strong influence in northern China, not much in southern China or Manchuria.
The author identifies the two big CCP advantages as (1) lack of corruption and (2) unity, while the KMT was far more divided, with many disloyal generals.
It was not an "oopsie." There was physically not enough food in Europe and not enough transport to get US food to Europe. This is the single most salient thing about 1945-48 Europe. The delusion that resources are limitless and only denied via malice isn't exclusive to Commies.
Given sharply limited resources, the Allied occupation authorities did not starve Germany, but did put it behind the rest of Europe on the priority list, for obvious reasons.
Yarvin would make a brilliant Stalinist. He's got all the rhetorical flourishes down.
Science requires a good deal of both honesty (most results will not be replicated) and intelligence, and so does not work well outside of the white world. This does not apply to manufacturing or engineering (easily checkable) and will be lost through Asianizing US STEM.
This is also why, even from a disembodied abstract "civilizationist" perspective, the common cope that Western civilization can be dragged into the mud but it will be OK because East Asia will keep the torch alive is wrong.
If the West is fully Brazilified/Lebanonized/Indianized, scientific progress will very nearly stop, though East Asia will still be able to maintain and moderately improve the engineering/manufacturing/physical side of the modern world. Excepting AI or biosingularity, of course.
This terrible historical analogy gets brought up all the time. A couple of thousand world-class geniuses deliberately recruited (/enslaved for Paperclip) is not remotely comparable to "skilled immigration" in the US today, which is millions of mediocrities.
Apollo and the Manhattan Project both happened while the United States was the most closed to immigration it had ever been in history.
Millions of "skilled immigrants" (scare quotes intended, since most just have degrees) from Asia have enormously negative political, genetic, and cultural impacts that a few thousand geniuses do not.
Some excerpts from a 2013 US Govt report entitled "The Strategic Consequences of Chinese Racism."
The Chinese see multiculturalism as a sickness in the American body politic destroying a formerly-strong principally Anglo-Protestant US society. Racism keeps Chinese society strong and united against outsiders.
The report recommends US policymakers emphasize how open America is to immigrants and the many privileges to which nonwhites and women are entitled to attract other countries by appearing more inclusive than China. Why this would be attractive to third parties is left unsaid.
Thread with excerpts from "How the War Was Won". Three basic theses: 1) Air-sea battle was more important than land to WWII, with all combatants except USSR focusing on it... 2) ...because it can interdict production before battle. 3) Eastern front was a sideshow, like China.
Germany, Japan, US, and UK all dedicated 65-80% of their economies to aircraft, ships, and anti-aircraft equipment. Aluminum, crtitical for aircraft production, was thus as or more important than the more famous (Rise and Fall of the Great Powers) steel production.
In 1944, when German production peaked, about half was dedicated to aircraft alone (not counting their weapons and ammunition), and the Germans had more aircraft workers than the US (though they were far less productive thanks to the bombings forcing dispersal).