JUST IN: A "manifesto" was reportedly sent from Trump hotel bomber Matthew Livelsberger to @samosaur.
The alleged manifesto states that he was not under "duress."
In the alleged email, it appears Livelsberger warns Americans about drones. 👀
@samosaur Report via @ShawnRyan762
My view? The document looks like a lot of convenient information that the MIC would like to be spread around. I am unaware of any forensic analysis that would decisively determine the authentication of this email and whether it *truly* came from Livelsberger.
Remember: There are reports about a Signal 'safety' code being switched on Livelsberger's account.
@samosaur See this very good thread that raises a lot of valid questions
@samosaur @ShawnRyan762 Let's see if there is some forensic analysis forthcoming from @ShawnRyan762 and his team to help further establish the document's authenticity
@samosaur @ShawnRyan762 This is his latest episode for reference:
@samosaur Further information on the email per the Shawn Ryan Show:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
• @DOGE posts Congress wants 40% pay increase (it's actually 3.8 percent or $6,600 raise per CRS)
• @ElonMusk amplified claim it wd block J6 committee investigation (article fails to analyze: bill would protect data from investigation into J6 records deletion)
• Musk reposted suggestion the bill would pave way for new D.C. football stadium (it transfers control of site to D.C. govt, which would then develop it)
• Musk reposted @LibsofTik on biolabs, article gives phony "fact check" about bioweapons labs
That's it. The "flood" of misinformation.
We get it. The Hill's reporters are paling around with lawmakers who are p*ssed off that their garbage bills can be dissected on @X.
This is their way of trying to run cover for their spending bill and blame Americans for blowback.
It's a running narrative to serve the purpose of the U.S. government's justification of censorship and shutting down free speech.
@DOGE @elonmusk Let me add that I didn't report any of these claims except the part about the J6 committee (provided below):
10 Most Egregious Things in the Massive 1,547 Page Spending Bill 🧵
1. Global Engagement Center Funding
The Global Engagement Center’s censorship operations are being extended under the NDAA.
It bills itself as a defender against ‘misinformation,’ but engages in speech suppression.
It is being sued by The Federalist and the Daily Wire.
2. Hurricane Relief Attached to CR
The 1,500-page behemoth includes around $100 billion in disaster aid. This is political blackmail.
Rep. Anna Luna complained that the hurricane relief was not in a standalone bill: "We are literally being held hostage with this 'CR.' Why was Helene and Milton funding not a stand alone vote? We can vote on post offices as stand alone votes but not disaster relief?"
As fellow Republican congresswoman Nancy Mace concurred: “They're cramming everything into one giant bill and guilt-trip you if you vote against it. I’m all for hurricane relief, but stop trying to disguise reckless government spending. Call it what it is.”
2. Hurricane Relief Attached to CR
The 1,500-page behemoth includes around $100 billion in disaster aid. This is political blackmail.
Rep. Anna Luna complained that the hurricane relief was not in a standalone bill: "We are literally being held hostage with this 'CR.' Why was Helene and Milton funding not a stand alone vote? We can vote on post offices as stand alone votes but not disaster relief?"
As fellow Republican congresswoman Nancy Mace concurred: “They're cramming everything into one giant bill and guilt-trip you if you vote against it. I’m all for hurricane relief, but stop trying to disguise reckless government spending. Call it what it is.”
This is the single best explanation out there proving J6 was a *TRAP.* 🔥
As conservative talk show host @DBongino explains, along with insight from FBI Director nominee @Kash_Patel, this proves beyond a shadow of the doubt that the Feds were complicit in the J6 “insurrection.”
Transcript of the relevant passage from Dan Bongino’s Rumble podcast is provided below.
BONGINO:
"There were FBI agents in the crowd... I have pictures. There were people in the crowd. So the IG report admits, however, that there were at least FBI assets..."
"And I want to be clear, don't get caught up in the euphemisms game, okay? FBI assets and agents are not the same thing. Michael could be working for the FBI as a paid source, a confidential human source, doesn't mean he's an FBI agent."
"So the FBI is trying to lose people, but I'm telling you both were in the crowd, agents and assets. The report now admits forever, however, that there were FBI sources in the crowd..."
"Now, I want you to watch this. This video from Kash Patel is really important. That's just gonna be the incoming FBI director if the confirmation process continues to go smoothly, which knock on wood, so far has, I'm gonna get presumptuous, but here's the interesting part about this. This is what people like Stuart Thompson in the New York Times will never cover."
"Now that we know there were 20 plus FBI assets in the crowd, some there with the permission of the FBI, that's in the report. I'm telling you there were agents in the crowd, period. The report's bullsh*t. I'm telling you for a fact, these assets take a while to cultivate. They had to be working on this for a long time. Again, I'm giving you an honest take on January 6th, no one else's. What the hell were they doing, these assets that the FBI knew were in the crowd on January 6th? What was their role there? They had to have a job. The FBI positioned them there for a reason. But the report is oddly kind of opaque on that. Are they there to incite a riot?"
"Listen to Kash Patel here on Tim Pool saying exactly this, that this takes a while to cultivate because this story isn't adding up. Check this out."
KASH PATEL:
"What you need to show is whether or not the FBI and government agents were using undercover operatives and informants on the day of January 6th. Because if you can show that, you know they've been at, hang on, but the paperwork shows having run informants, that's a six month buildup, minimum, minimum. It's not like they just dropped him into the Proud Boys and said, hey, don't disrupt, please. Once you prove that, then you defeat the insurrection narrative with the FBI's own documentation. Forget what the videotapes show."
BONGINO:
Yes, the FBI's got documents, folks. When you develop and cultivate and inform it, you typically have to pay them. I did this federal agent work for a decade plus. There's paperwork generated. There's debriefing paperwork generated. What exactly were the informants' mission on January 6th? Why doesn't Stuart Thompson or anyone else seem even a little bit interested in this story? I promise you, if it was a left-wing BLM riot or some co-Intel pro thing, these people be all over the story.
I got more on this, folks, because the legacy media, I'm telling you, man, these guys just don't get it. That's why they're so afraid of Kash going in there. Always measure the response.
If you want the bottom-line takeaway on this, here it is: It is impossible that the Federal Bureau of Investigation had more than twenty undercover informants in the crowd on January 6 without a six-month time investment to cultivate the assets and prepare them for deployment in the January 6 operation.
Why is this significant?
Because, as the new House interim report on January 6 points out, the security was deliberately lax due to a concern for “optics.”
All this while the FBI was placing more than two dozen CHS-operatives in a crowd filled with political extremists who had no other business in Washington D.C. except to start a riot among Trump supporters.
The president’s actual supporters were with President Donald Trump listening to his speech at the Ellipse and were told to “peacefully and patriotically” make their voices heard to support the election objections, which is a constitutional process that Democrats themselves have invoked on three separate occasions since 2000.
As Speaker Nancy Pelosi said, “I’ve been waiting for this.”
But while Pelosi was “waiting” for Donald Trump to go the Capitol, she was refusing to deploy the National Guard — as former Capitol Police Chief Steven Sund had desperately requested three times that she do through House Sergeant at Arms Paul Irving, who resigned one day after the January 6 incident.
All of Washington D.C. knew that there would be a contested election. This was considered to be a probable scenario as early as March 2020 and it was repeatedly wargamed by the Transition Integrity Project.
There is no viable alternative explanation than the federal government allowed the January 6 riot to happen in an effort to deprive Donald Trump of an opportunity to contest the 2020 election, and as a matter of fact, the FBI aided and abetted extremists to be at the Capitol during the election objections.
There are far too many anomalies and deviations from protocol to ignore this unmistakable conclusion. There are the Capitol Police officers holding open doors for rioters. The bizarre treatment of Ray Epps, who is one of the most egregious provocateurs of the event. The Capitol Police “escort” of the Q Anon Shaman to the Senate chamber. There is the J6 pipe bomb threat that took place at the DNC headquarters, which Kamala Harris visited for mysterious reasons. It goes on.
The new revelations that the FBI had dozens of Confidential Human Sources in the crowd proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that the U.S. government was complicit in the January 6 riots.
We still don’t know the extent of that complicity. The DoD IG report is oddly silent about FBI communications with the CHS it was running on January 6.
But there is now a glimmer of hope that the American people will get the truth if Kash Patel is confirmed as FBI Director.