JUST IN: A "manifesto" was reportedly sent from Trump hotel bomber Matthew Livelsberger to @samosaur.
The alleged manifesto states that he was not under "duress."
In the alleged email, it appears Livelsberger warns Americans about drones. 👀
@samosaur Report via @ShawnRyan762
My view? The document looks like a lot of convenient information that the MIC would like to be spread around. I am unaware of any forensic analysis that would decisively determine the authentication of this email and whether it *truly* came from Livelsberger.
Remember: There are reports about a Signal 'safety' code being switched on Livelsberger's account.
@samosaur See this very good thread that raises a lot of valid questions
@samosaur @ShawnRyan762 Let's see if there is some forensic analysis forthcoming from @ShawnRyan762 and his team to help further establish the document's authenticity
@samosaur @ShawnRyan762 This is his latest episode for reference:
@samosaur Further information on the email per the Shawn Ryan Show:
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
"Revolver News is willing to address the matter directly in the following three questions:
- In the year leading up to 1/6 and during 1/6 itself, to what extent were the three primary militia groups (the Oath Keepers, the Proud Boys, and the Three Percenters) that the FBI, DOJ, Pentagon and network news have labeled most responsible for planning and executing a Capitol attack on 1/6 infiltrated by agencies of the federal government, or informants of said agencies?
- Exactly how many federal undercover agents or confidential informants were present at the Capitol or in the Capitol during the infamous “siege” and what roles did they play (merely passive informants or active instigators)?
- Finally, of all of the unindicted co-conspirators referenced in the charging documents of those indicted for crimes on 1/6, how many worked as a confidential informant or as an undercover operative for the federal government (FBI, Army Counterintelligence, etc.)?"
Here is the intellectually dishonest piece in question.
There is no recanting of Piker's NUMEROUS unmistakable calls for violence against people who simply disagree with him about politics. nytimes.com/2025/09/13/opi…
"The United States of America is still reeling from the worst border invasion in its history.”
“This invasion could not have been accomplished without a colossal partnership with the NGO community."
The Biden regime led the biggest human trafficking operation in history.
This was nothing less than a state-led foreign invasion of the United States.
It was absolutely criminal. We are all still waiting for basic accountability.
Video credit: @WallStreetApes
The human misery caused by child trafficking. Thousands of fentanyl deaths. Drug cartels taking over entire neighborhoods. Foreign nationals from enemy regimes pouring across our border.
A nightmare for national security. All of it was known "collateral damage" to the Biden regime.
The human suffering went ignored because the only thing the Democrats care about is political power. Monstrous.
Here are the names of journalists assessed as laundering classified information in the Russia Hoax.
The New York Times. Washington Post. The Wall Street Journal.
All had reporters who appear to have participated in recycling the Democratic Party's talking points based on faulty and misleading intel dumps.
This is not "journalism." This is being an accomplice to state propaganda.
These "journalists" are partly responsible for dividing the nation for years and seeking to overturn the will of the people as determined by a free and fair election.
This is Russia Hoax ground zero. And it was all part of an operation to carry out a "coup" against a duly elected president.
The New York Times piece was particularly egregious in rehashing a "scoop" on Carter Page and repeating baseless innuendo about Roger Stone.
This publication won "Pulitzers" for its "journalism."
This is nothing less than state propaganda. It isn't "reporting."
"Page has publicly said that he was a source for the CIA, which would provide an innocent explanation for his Russian contacts."
You might recall that Clinesmith lied about this subject.
No, he did not go to jail. Judge Boasberg, who was on the FISA court, and approved illegal renewals, thought 'no harm, no foul.'