They are trying to cancel Notch and Minecraft 2 all over again, including using AI run accounts to do it.
I dissect the playbook here and how they go after targets.
This post went viral attracting the creator of Minecraft through distortion, false implications and outright lies.
I've seen these tactics before, they've been used to try to cancel myself, and I can't stand to see it being used against Notch just because he is making Minecraft 2.
A thread🧵 (cont')
The first attack is to falsely correlate Notch's sale of the company with some bad event.
This is untrue, as Notch corrected himself.
He is no longer with Minecraft not because of "bad rerasons" but because he sold it...for 2.1B (Billion) dollars in 2014. This is a great success story and has zero to do with any controversies or "bad things" as the attacker is trying to imply here.
In fact, at the time, the mainstream press wasn't busy cancelling him and held him up as the success he is, giving him full credit and lauding how he awarded staff with huge bonuses at the time of the sale.
This is what I call a timeline fallacy. Notch was cancelled later in 2019, many years afterwards. But when doing a timeline fallacy, what they do is to imply causation even when the dates are flipped or do not support the argument. They try to imply a later event is what drove some earlier event to make it seem like a bad thing.
(con't) 🧵
The attacker then uses the JK Rowling attack against Notch.
They made up broad claims about your thoughts, positions and character, wildly misrepresenting your stance, by claiming you "said things" that you actually didn't, never posting the original tweets.
Here the poster is claiming that Notch posted transphobic and racist "shit" but never cites the actual posts. The JK Rowling attack is where you claim someone said X and Y or believes Z, but never cite the actual text, often wildly taking things out of context, or blowing them up out of proportion, or "mind reading" the author.
Well I was there on X when he made them and this is out of line.
Notch has never been against people being trans. What he was against was the persecution and control of everyone else that the trans and woke movements were doing. You can decide for yourself:
- Notch, like Rowling, stated "No, they feel like are" in response to a post that said "trans women are women."
- Notch called feminism a "social disease" during the GG1 days.
- The big one, the one that got him cancelled? He posted "It's okay to be white."
After he tweeted it's okay to be white, the cancellation crowd swooped in and Microsoft caved. They removed him from the title screen, and snubbed him by not inviting him to the 10th anniversary celebration. This was at the height of cancel culture in 2019.
Polygon, and the mainstream media, including Variety, repeated the attack, once again telling you what they thought he said, vs what he *actually* said.
(con't)
Here is the other attack vector, commonly used. I call it the "Reddit Runover"
The Reddit Runover is when you use a (usually anonymous) Reddit post as a source of truth because it is written by "someone in the know" and often written as a 1st person account of being wronged, wrapped in a lot of emotional language to garner sympathy.
This single post is then used by attackers over and over to spread a non-factual editorial and represent it as a factual truth because "this account on reddit said so."
But they do more...(con't)
When they attack you, and you are as accomplished as Notch, they rapidly try to erase and downplay your contribution and your work.
Ridiculous as it is, they are trying to claim that Notch didn't do much "development" on Minecraft, and that all the success of Minecraft is due to Microsoft taking over and having to "fix everything."
I've seen several posts like the one below that echo this attack vector. The reddit post in the prior tweet makes similar claims.
But, there is a big twist, a new cancellation technique for 2025...
The poster below is AI.
They are using AI driven accounts to amplify and attack Notch. I believe this is being used very widely, and for quite some time. If you see a ton of accounts critical of one person, you might very well be looking at AI.
Below you can see the AI replying to a "correction" and triggering it's default response.
I believe we are seeing the tip of the iceberg, and that there are MANY AI accounts on X and other social media, being used to try to sway public opinion or in outright attack-bot-networks against individuals.
(con't)
Notch is hated by wokies because he supports everyone's right to exist, on an equal footing, free of attacks, racism and persecution.
This is at odds with the radical left, who wants total control and ability to persecute anyone not outright supporting their politics and agendas. They want to be in control, in power, and to eliminate all other viewpoints.
This is the reason he is targeted so much. And when the extreme left has you in their sights, they will go through any length to try to destroy you.
This is why they come after me with such extremes. And if this is happening in video games, imagine how dirty it gets in politics or civilization at large.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Here are the 5 times Bungie has had to apologize for stealing art for their games. 🧵
Bungie is having a hard time. Marathon art theft is confirmed and they are trying to make it right.
It can happen, contractors or rogue artists on a deadline can cross the line under pressure.
But when the same problem happens 5 times in a row, it might be time to admit there is a deeper problem at the studio and gamers and artists patience is rightfully stretched thin.
(con't)
In 2021, Bungie had to apologize for using fan art of Xiva in a trailer for Destiny 2: The Witch Queen.
Original art by @relay314
(con't)
@relay314 In 2023, Bungie had to apologize for a vendor using fan art in Destiny 2's Lightfall cutscene.
The 1st weekend results are in, and Clair Obscur Expedition 33 has pretty much demolished AAA with a peak of 121,422.
This puts AAA games in the entire industry to shame and shows that something is very very wrong in the industry.
They key takeaways for me are (con't)🧵
AAA game teams are vastly bloated with hundreds of devs and dismissing returns for team size.
The entire Expedition team was 30 people.
The larger the team, the higher overhead in communication and co-ordination costs, and you also lose VISION as devs are just cogs by that point and passion plummets. (con't)
You do not need to have China labor costs to be competitive.
What you need are smaller teams who are very talented and skilled.
The rumor is that the game was VERY cost efficient. I'm hearing some crazy numbers like just 5.5M to make.
I suspect the number is closer to 15-30M, but this would still be astounding compared to the 300-500M AAA games are spending these days.
X is pretty good for gaming news, but could be better. Instead of starting a new website for gaming news, it would be cool to be able to build a hub on X.
One feature that would be neat is if you could create a "landing page" for your account that let you tile and arrange your current X posts and articles, almost like a front-page.
I think this would be useful for getting the top stories you cover on X and establishing your profile brand at the top.
The best trust is your own eyes. That's why video is the number one way that people form their opinions on games. They want to be able to see the gameplay and judge for themselves, rather than have it filtered by an article.
Even if there is commentary, people can see the game and tell if they agree or disagree with it.
(con't)
The other thing that needs to happen is the removal of access journalism. Game companies offer too many perks, favors and early access to a carefully chose group of streamers and youtubers.
An incentive structure would have to be in place to encourage free and honest speech about games without threat of publisher reprisal by cutting off access.
A modest plan to preserve the purity of Warhammer 40k.
I know many 40k fans are disheartened and angered by the gaslighting female Custodes debacle, and now there is more and more pressure to make 40k female Space Marines and Emperor knows what else.
Games Workshop continues to entertain the destruction of their lore and their game to satisfy the mythical, non-existent “modern audience” while spurning and even disparaging their core tabletop audience, who buys thousands of dollars worth of minis, codexes and supplements, by calling them all sorts of nasty names.
I also know that you love the hobby and many are loath to abandon it or are unable to resist the plastic crack to do anything like a full boycott (I’m there with you, but I have a technique).
You don’t have to.
For over a year, we’ve run a successful campaign in video games to push back against the mind virus ruining our hobbies.
We did it by voting with our wallets and being very vocal. Now, giant companies like Ubisoft are on the edge of folding, and medium and small publishers are embracing gamer feedback and sentiment. You can do this too, and you don’t need to swear off 40k to do it. You just need the mantra “underperform expectations.”
A short thread 🧵
Games Workshop is a public company. They are very sensitive to their stock price and investors sentiment.
They are also expected to deliver results quarter after quarter, year after year. If a single quarter shows a decline, it’s a big headache for management.
You must rally and time your activities to these quarters, which often have major releases to try to “goose the numbers” and show demand, which increases the stock price. It’s like when rent is due at the end of the month, except on a stock basis.
(Con’t)
GW will issue “stock guidance” which is their prediction of sales and how well they will do based off sales predictions.
If they fail to meet their guidance, the stock market punishes them heavily.
This is why you don’t need an absolute boycott to win. You just need them to “underperform expectations.”
This is exactly what happened with Star Wars Outlaws and Dragon Age Veilguard. They still sold over a million copies, but they missed internal targets. For a public company, underperforming, even while selling well, is enough to cause and emergency panic with shareholders.
I received exclusive information from someone who has completed the game which clears up many rumors.
(Note, game director Daniel Vavra JUST posted clarification, he is 100% telling it to you straight)
According to this player, who wants to clear the air so the game can succeed, this is the exact content of the game’s main storyline (not all side quests completed):
A thread (con't)
- Yes, Henry can romance other characters in the game.
- Henry can romance another male, however, this is not forced upon the player in any way.
- Similar to how Bioware did romance checks, you must a) Initiate the dialog and b) pass around 5 dialog choice romance checks without missing one in order to unlock this romantic partner. You have to go out of your way to do this and do it over the course of half the game.
- The dialog options for the male romance are treated very secretive, VERY taboo and in line with the historical times.
- The romance scene is extremely brief, and entirely skippable. 5 seconds of kissing total and 5 seconds of them on the bed naked: “No one is hanging dong and they are just on top of each other kissing. The other cutscenes with Henry and women are much more vulgar haha.”
Mouthwashing. The popular indie psychological horror game, is embroiled in controversy. A summary of what happened and how Asmongold triggered one of the devs who went off on a rant about how the "anti-wokes" have found the game and are not welcome to play.
Mouthwashing is a short but well received indie game that went viral.
Everything was going great until some very sensitive people started to harass artists for making fan drawings of one of the characters, Anna.
They were upset her breasts were drawn larger, or put into more revealing clothing.
The harassment got so bad that one artist was forced to apologize. It was the usual twitter mob that goes after artists whenever they do a fanart "wrong."
(con't) 🧵
Source: Art by SpoiledMuffin, Rakusakugk, and USA.
One artist was bullied so hard that they felt forced to apologize to the trolls.
It was then that the developers took a great stand and condemned the harassment.
The fervor died down, but was brought to light again by @Asmongold, who made a video praising the developer response.
This, it turns out, did not sit well with one of the developers of the game.
(con't)
It was then that @siarate, one of the game's sound designers and composers, went off on how the anti-woke crowd had found the game, and that this was making him "sick to his stomach."
He blasted Asmongold, but also, earlier, had made a tweet about myself and how I was "not welcome at the table." (I had never commented on the game at the time).
When confronted, he doubled down, saying that Asmongold's comments meant "anti-woke means anti-gay and anti-me as a dev" and that he does not want Asmongold playing because it was "making me feel like absolute sh*t".