1/10 Why russia is losing the war it started and why it will only cease its actions when confronted with strength
2/10 russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine has proven to be a failure thus far. Nearly three years into the conflict, russia has suffered over 700,000 casualties and continues to fight on its own soil in Kursk, all while failing to achieve its original strategic goals.
3/10 By the end of March 2022, russia had occupied approximately 30% of Ukraine, but after nearly three years of fighting, it now controls only about 20%. Despite mobilizing and receiving significant support from its allies, russia is experiencing failure.
4/10 At the beginning of the full-scale invasion, Ukraine held control of 23 regional capitals and cities with special status. russia currently occupies none of these, signifying a strategic failure.
5/10 russia's economy is overheating, leading to a key interest rate increase to 21%. The inflation is primarily driven by labor shortages, heightened public spending, and sanctions. The economy is unlikely to stabilize unless the war ends or is significantly scaled back.
6/10 russia is losing equipment at a much faster rate than it can produce, relying on its dwindling Soviet-era stockpiles to replace most of its losses. These stocks are running low, and production is unlikely to increase sufficiently in time to make up for the shortfall.
7/10 russia has also experienced a coup attempt during the war, revealing that many russians are unwilling to defend the current regime. Prigozhin was able to seize Rostov, a city with a population of one million, without encountering any resistance.
8/10 Putin currently believes russia's situation will improve, giving him no reason to end the war. The only way to compel him to stop is to convince him that continuing the conflict will worsen russia's future.
9/10 russia will only end the war when faced with genuine strength. Ukraine's allies must show patience and commit to increased military aid, threatening prolonged support if russia continues, to enhance the chances of achieving peace.
10/10 Source:
ISW
The Economist - russia’s vast stocks of Soviet-era weaponry are running out
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/11 Why is Elon Musk pushing for civil war in the US and Europe?
This thread breaks down how Musk is using his platform, wealth, and influence to amplify far-right movements, incite political violence, and undermine democracy—across continents
2/11 Elon Musk is pushing for civil war in the West.
He’s not just amplifying far-right voices—he’s actively inciting political violence.
And he’s doing it with the power of X, his wealth, and global influence.
This is not just reckless. He’s out of control and dangerous
3/11 Musk openly supports far-right movements, including the most unhinged ones.
He praises nationalist leaders and criminals, boosts far-right parties in Europe, and appears alongside extremists like Tommy Robinson.
His rhetoric is increasingly militant and conspiratorial
1/5 Elon Musk has a clear civil war fetish and is recklessly exploiting Charlie Kirk’s assassination to incite political violence before the motives are even known.
He’s openly calling for violence against Democrats and must be held accountable
2/5 Before a suspect was identified and with no known motive, Musk blamed Democrats, spread false claims, and fueled conspiracy theories.
While Democrat leaders condemned the killing, Musk escalated division and refused to call for calm
3/5 Musk also amplified far-right voices in the UK, engaging with Tommy Robinson and his supporters, a figure too extreme even for Reform UK.
He pushed coup talk and inflammatory rhetoric, using Kirk’s murder as an excuse, while the killer's motives remain unknown
It exists on both sides — and it should never be accepted. But let’s be honest: calling it a “leftist problem” is dishonest.
The data shows it’s overwhelmingly a right-wing issue.
Let’s look at the facts👇
2/6 Between 1990 and 2024:
🔹 Right-wing extremists responsible for ~85% of ideological killings (523 deaths)
🔹 Left-wing: ~15% (78 deaths)
🔹 From 2022–2024: 100% of extremist murders were committed by right-wing actors
Sources: CSIS, ADL, ECDB, Reuters
Ask Grok!
3/6 Real cases of violence against Democrats:
• Hortman murdered by man with a hit list of Democrats
• Pelosi’s husband attacked
• Trump supporter attempted to assassinate Gov. Shapiro
• Men convicted for trying to kidnap Gov. Whitmer
• Trump’s shooter? Registered Republican
1/5 No matter what you think of Charlie Kirk—political violence is never acceptable.
His assassination is a tragedy that will make the world worse.
It will deepen polarization, empower authoritarians like Trump, and fuel a dangerous cycle of retaliation
2/5 Trump, MAGA influencers, and even Elon Musk are already exploiting Kirk’s murder for political gain.
They’re using it to justify crackdowns, demonize opponents, and push the US further down an authoritarian path.
They are horrible people—just like Kirk was too
3/5 Kirk built his career on division, disinformation, and incitement. He called dissenters enemies, glorified guns, justified gun violence, and supported russia’s annexation of Ukraine. He spread lies to defend Putin and attack Ukraine.