Fascinating details about Assad’s last days in this interview with Assad’s media “tsar”, his media chief and close aide.
Thread 1/x
Assad in Moscow had to wait two days to meet Putin. On the day of the meeting, his appointment was moved three times. The Russians asked for only Assad and his escort, Brigadier General Muhsin Mohammed. The meeting lasted for one hour.
News of the meeting was leaked on Russia-linked Telegram channels, but Putin sent an aide to Assad at his residence at the Four Seasons to tell him personally (after a day’s delay, and despite protocols) that Putin preferred not to issue official statements about the meeting.
Assad thought Putin probably had his personal reasons not to issue an official statement about the meeting.
The Russian plane took them back to Syria on Saturday at 8 p.m. (Nov 30).
The fall of Aleppo was “very shocking” for Assad. Before Aleppo, the development seemed serious but not too alarming. He had zero expectation such a thing would happen. The army was not mentally or logistically ready to fight. Russia was at the peak of its distraction in Ukraine.
In the months before the Aleppo operation, the visibility and presence of Shia militias in Syria had been reduced, as Hezbollah received heavy blows in Lebanon. Syria was closely watched by Israel.
“The Iranian side was also feeling a degree of disappointment, seeing rapprochement between Syria and Arab countries at the expense of its relationship with Iran. Hezbollah had also received its heaviest blow since its establishment.”
Upon his return from Moscow, Assad met with the political council (the foreign minister & his deputy, the Vice President & Assad’s aide Buthaina Shaaban). They asked him about the meeting with Putin.
Assad told them that Putin rang the Russian army chief of staff in front of him and asked him to do everything to facilitate Iran’s air bridge into Syria.
Assad had a very specific request from Putin: to personally ensure safety for Iranian military support in Syria, including air supplies. Russia was not in a position to get involved. Iran too.
The Iranians told Assad they did not receive signals or assurances from Russia that it was safe for them to fly to Hmeimim through Iraq. Assad then checked with Moscow, but he got no response.
The Iranians told the Syrians a plane moved nonetheless from Tehran to Syria through Iraq, but were warned by the U.S. that the plane would be shot down if it continued on its way. (News reports at the time indicated that the U.S. struck Shia militias in Syria near the border.)
“In the mind of the Syrian army, the war had been behind it. Psychologically, the military felt that the fighting didn’t produce a national value. What is the point of rebooting the war again after 2020?”
“All the conditions were suitable for the operation. The Russians, to them, thought their mission was completed in Syria, outside the Syrian equation.”
Assad wanted Iran to reach out to Turkey, and the Iranians did, but they didn’t throw their full weight behind it. He said the Iranians were not as optimistic as they had been in previous situations to enter the war.
On Thursday, December 6, Turkey told Iran that the time for mediation was over. It was over.
Why did Assad refuse to meet Erdogan? He says: The main reason was Assad’s firm belief that meeting Erdogan would involve making political concessions rather than restoring ties.
Assad thought he had achieved victory on the ground and was unwilling to offer political concessions. Erdogan was also unwilling to give back territory under his control.
In the summer, Assad had two meetings with the Russians and the Iranians. The Russians spent half of their meeting talking to Assad about the necessity of meeting Erdogan. To wiggle out of it, Assad insisted on a “deposit” similar to Israeli “Rabin deposit" to his father Hafez..
To wiggle out of it, Assad insisted on a “deposit” similar to the “Rabin deposit,” which would involve a Turkish commitment, even if not enforced now, to withdraw from Syria.
The Russians then offered a meeting at the level of foreign ministers. Assad insisted on having only security meetings, usually held privately in Kasab, Syria. Russia was not happy about it. Iran also proposed the same, to no avail.
Assad realized he was in trouble when Putin would not pick up his calls from Tuesday to Thursday (three days before his departure from Syria). At one point, Assad was told Putin was traveling (in Belarus) and wouldn’t be able to take the call.
On Thursday, Assad prepared a 400-word speech to be delivered on television. The speech had several sections: the 1st warning about dividing Syria, the 2nd attacking Turkey & its dishonesty, the 3rd urging Arab support for Syrian unity & finally urging Syrians to fight.
Assad, he says, always wrote his speeches. He said this speech was different -- it oozed nervousness and anxiety in its prose and content. It was reflective of his state of mind. He said he was personally surprised by the speech.
The plan to give a speech was delayed for a day and then another day. On Saturday, Assad told him he no longer planned to give the speech. After Homs, it became clear. After that, the army was dropping its arms. Assad had little doubt at that point.
Saturday evening was the last time the media office spoke with Assad. Assad spoke about a military meeting at Hmeimim air base between the Russians and the Syrians.
At around 2:15 a.m., his special secretary told Kamel that he (the secretary) would depart (but he wouldn’t say where) because Assad had left. Earlier, at midnight, the Russian military attaché had met Assad to secure his departure.
The 1.5hr interview with Kamel Saqr here
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“Top secret and urgent” classified documents found after Assad’s fall provide interesting insights about the “mechanism” overseen by Russia to manage Israeli-Syrian-Iranian dynamics, and Israeli military actions against Iranian & Hezbollah buildup.
Details in this thread
For years, Russia mediated a process designed to allow Assad’s military to function while limiting Iran & Hezbollah's ability to expand militarily in Syria. This mechanism required Israel to avoid certain strikes if these limitations were enforced.
The mechanism's goal: Prevent Iranian or Hezbollah weapon transfers & military build-ups while allowing Syrian army to address its "needs".
This changed after Assad’s regime collapse, when Israel launched a campaign to wipe out all Syrian army sites & weapons in the past 48hrs.
A lot of confusion & misreporting about the Kurds and opposition forces in northern Syria. Rebels faced no resistance from the regime but hit a brick wall with Kurdish-dominated areas.
Details in this thread 1/x
They’ve been avoiding direct conflict, trying to broker a peaceful deal for Kurdish fighters to leave Aleppo.
This deal now seems to have taken place, and the rebels say Kurdish fighters started evacuating the city toward Manbij and eastern Syria.
2/x
Tal Rifaat was the hardest battle for rebels in northern Aleppo countryside. The same goes for neighborhoods controlled by the YPG. Rebels now claim they’re nearing a deal for only armed Kurdish fighters to leave toward SDF-controlled Eastern Syria.
Folks, there is misreporting on Qatar’s decision to expel Hamas.
Reuters’ reporting is the most accurate — and logical — so far.
Context in following tweets:
Reuters reports it as an ultimatum, Doha warning it’ll pull out of Gaza ceasefire mediations until Hamas & Israel “demonstrate a sincere willingness to return to the negotiating table”.
Not just expulsion, because the US asked it to expel Hamas.
>>>
This is still in the unofficial leaking territory. Reuters also cites officials as saying the office "no longer serves its purpose", which requires more detail but seems to be a separate issue beyond mediation.
As always, Syria is the most important "non-important" story in the Middle East -- the story that doesn't seem to matter, but ends up being a key piece of the puzzle.
A short #thread
Two stories that begin to demonstrate how Syria is central:
For months, actually, the chatter in Syria & elsewhere is that the Israeli attacks against Iran were enabled by collaborators from within the Syrian regime.
Even the “car crash” of a top Assad aide in July was interpreted in this context.
When Iran’s Gen. Qassem Soleimani was assassinated in 2020, there was intense debate over whether his killing would set back Iran’s proxy warfare in the Middle East. It took years for us to see the effects of it, and few today dispute that the vacuum he left remains unfilled. 👇
Some believed his killing won’t matter significantly, because he’d already built a well-oiled machine.
But even for sympathizers his absence has been felt on multiple key occasions. In Iraq and Syria, there are numerous examples where the machine has been degraded both tactically and strategically. Something acknowledged by insiders or people close to their circles.
I haven’t seen such relentless interrogation of Palestinian leadership before, esp. in Arabic.
On Saudi Arabia’s main TV channel, Hamas leader is clearly startled by the intensity of the questions & responses to his answers.
Crucial points in next tweets
One of the most significant ones to Hamas leader by the Saudi TV interviewer is why Hamas expects Arab countries to back them up when Hamas hadn’t consulted them before carrying out an operation akin to declaration of war.
‘You didn’t consult even fellow Palestinians.’
Hamas leader gets visibly angry when she asks him if he would condemn Israeli civilian killings.