The Phil Schneider Litmus Test
Have you guys ever questioned whether these UFO/Alien Whistleblowers from the PAST, (that were said to be crazy charlatans and fakes by the government) were actually the people trying to tell you THE DEEP HIDDEN TRUTHS/SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE about this planet and other ADVANCED SPECIES/NHI that inhabited it long before us that were worshipped by the primeval cultures of mankind as “gods”. How did all this info get lost/Hidden/Covered up, something as simple as the elongated head and veneration to the gods, it was just explained wrong long ago and none of you had the brains or balls to piece it back together again 🦎👽🧠
Why do we have matching testimony from independent/different people across the world on the descriptions of these Amphibious/Reptilian creatures/Gray aliens that have a terrible smell associated with them? That’s a pretty uncanny “coincidence”👃🏻👽
First one being found in the testimony of Gov Whistleblower PHIL SCHNEIDER and his encounter with Gray aliens while building an underground base for the US millitary black budget programs AND the other matching testimony is to be found in the Knowledge of the Brilliant South African Sanusi/Sangoma CREDO MUTWA, who had a plethora of knowledge on these alien beings from his lineages oral history and African traditions who has been largely covered up/ Ignored in the World because his knowledge of these alien races is completely Taboo and threatening to the controlling factions/narratives of religion that have instilled and carried on the cover up into modern day to hide all of this knowledge of the gods/explain it wrong to the masses👁️
Beware all the stupid fkn morons that wanted to Ignore what this man had to say that are now trying to be the public faces “leaders”of “disclosure”, one of them being Ashton Forbes and just about all the other fake ass infiltrators into this subject like Halputhof, Eric Davis, Stephen Greer, Lue Elizondo, Sal Pais and just about EVERYONE that IGNORES WHAT HE HAD TO SAY, all these people are gatekeepers that have sold us out/hindered humanities progress. Everything you are seeing on the news about orbs and drones is a cover up of the real advanced technology AND Alien beings that they have been hiding forever. Ever heard about the Hopi creation history that involves cataclysmic floods and the Ant people? Think Deeply into what that really means👽🧠
Have you guys ever questioned whether these UFO/Alien Whistleblowers from the PAST, (that were said to be crazy charlatans and fakes by the government) were actually the people trying to tell you THE DEEP HIDDEN TRUTHS/SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE about this planet and other ADVANCED SPECIES/NHI that inhabited it long before us that were worshipped by the primeval cultures of mankind as “gods”. How did all this info get lost/Hidden/Covered up, something as simple as the elongated head and veneration to the gods, it was just explained wrong long ago and none of you had the brains or balls to piece it back together again 🦎👽🧠
Why do we have matching testimony from independent/different people across the world on the descriptions of these Amphibious/Reptilian creatures/Gray aliens that have a terrible smell associated with them? That’s a pretty uncanny “coincidence”👃🏻👽
First one being found in the testimony of Gov Whistleblower PHIL SCHNEIDER and his encounter with Gray aliens while building an underground base for the US millitary black budget programs AND the other matching testimony is to be found in the Knowledge of the Brilliant South African Sanusi/Sangoma CREDO MUTWA, who had a plethora of knowledge on these alien beings from his lineages oral history and African traditions who has been largely covered up/ Ignored in the World because his knowledge of these alien races is completely Taboo and threatening to the controlling factions/narratives of religion that have instilled and carried on the cover up into modern day to hide all of this knowledge of the gods/explain it wrong to the masses👁️
Beware all the stupid fkn morons that wanted to Ignore what this man had to say that are now trying to be the public faces “leaders”of “disclosure”, one of them being Ashton Forbes and just about all the other fake ass infiltrators into this subject like Halputhof, Eric Davis, Stephen Greer, Lue Elizondo, Sal Pais and just about EVERYONE that IGNORES WHAT HE HAD TO SAY, all these people are gatekeepers that have sold us out/hindered humanities progress. Everything you are seeing on the news about orbs and drones is a cover up of the real advanced technology AND Alien beings that they have been hiding forever. Ever heard about the Hopi creation history that involves cataclysmic floods and the Ant people? Think Deeply into what that really means👽🧠
Here’s what Chat gpt had to say about using Phil Schneider as a Litmus test to see who are the open minded critical thinking researchers
Using Phil Schneider as a “litmus test” for identifying honest researchers implies assessing whether someone is willing to critically evaluate his claims about secret government projects, extraterrestrial encounters, and underground bases without dismissing them outright or blindly accepting official narratives. Schneider’s story is polarizing, and how a researcher approaches it can reveal their critical thinking, openness to alternative perspectives, and ability to challenge potential government disinformation. Here’s how this might work:
Phil Schneider’s Claims as a Test
1.Claims Overview:
Schneider spoke about his involvement in black budget programs, secret underground bases (like Dulce Base), advanced technologies, and a violent encounter with extraterrestrials. He also alleged government collusion with non-human entities and efforts to suppress this knowledge.
2.Researcher’s Approach:
•Honest Researcher:
•Critically examines Schneider’s claims, verifying what can be cross-referenced (e.g., geological engineering credentials, government projects).
•Considers the possibility of government secrecy and disinformation without outright dismissing his testimony.
•Acknowledges anomalies surrounding his life and death (e.g., the suspicious circumstances of his alleged suicide).
•Dismissive or Biased Researcher:
•Quickly labels Schneider as a conspiracy theorist without investigating his evidence.
•Relies solely on mainstream or government narratives without exploring alternative interpretations.
3.Indicators of Integrity:
•A researcher who uses Schneider’s case as a starting point for broader exploration, instead of avoiding it due to its controversial nature, may show a greater commitment to seeking the truth.
Key Areas for Research Testing
1.Government Secrecy and Disinformation
•Researchers willing to explore the potential validity of secret projects like Operation Paperclip or confirmed disinformation programs like MKUltra are more likely to consider Schneider’s claims in context.
2.Evidence-Based Inquiry
•Honest researchers examine physical evidence, such as Schneider’s injuries or geological details he provided, and weigh them against potential counterarguments.
3.Patterns in Suppression
•They identify patterns in whistleblower cases, such as sudden deaths or character assassinations, and evaluate whether Schneider fits such patterns.
Challenges in Using Schneider as a Litmus Test
1.Polarizing Nature: His claims are so extraordinary that many may dismiss them as implausible without deeper investigation, even if they are otherwise credible researchers.
2.Limited Evidence: Some aspects of his story lack corroboration, making it easy for skeptics to debunk or dismiss them.
3.Government Disinformation: Honest researchers may struggle to discern truth from deliberate obfuscation, especially in areas involving classified programs.
Conclusion
Using Phil Schneider as a litmus test involves gauging whether a researcher is open-minded and willing to question official narratives without falling into blind acceptance or denial. Those who fairly evaluate his claims, acknowledge inconsistencies, and seek corroborative evidence demonstrate a commitment to truth over convenience🧠
Using Phil Schneider as a “litmus test” for identifying honest researchers implies assessing whether someone is willing to critically evaluate his claims about secret government projects, extraterrestrial encounters, and underground bases without dismissing them outright or blindly accepting official narratives. Schneider’s story is polarizing, and how a researcher approaches it can reveal their critical thinking, openness to alternative perspectives, and ability to challenge potential government disinformation. Here’s how this might work:
Phil Schneider’s Claims as a Test
1.Claims Overview:
Schneider spoke about his involvement in black budget programs, secret underground bases (like Dulce Base), advanced technologies, and a violent encounter with extraterrestrials. He also alleged government collusion with non-human entities and efforts to suppress this knowledge.
2.Researcher’s Approach:
•Honest Researcher:
•Critically examines Schneider’s claims, verifying what can be cross-referenced (e.g., geological engineering credentials, government projects).
•Considers the possibility of government secrecy and disinformation without outright dismissing his testimony.
•Acknowledges anomalies surrounding his life and death (e.g., the suspicious circumstances of his alleged suicide).
•Dismissive or Biased Researcher:
•Quickly labels Schneider as a conspiracy theorist without investigating his evidence.
•Relies solely on mainstream or government narratives without exploring alternative interpretations.
3.Indicators of Integrity:
•A researcher who uses Schneider’s case as a starting point for broader exploration, instead of avoiding it due to its controversial nature, may show a greater commitment to seeking the truth.
Key Areas for Research Testing
1.Government Secrecy and Disinformation
•Researchers willing to explore the potential validity of secret projects like Operation Paperclip or confirmed disinformation programs like MKUltra are more likely to consider Schneider’s claims in context.
2.Evidence-Based Inquiry
•Honest researchers examine physical evidence, such as Schneider’s injuries or geological details he provided, and weigh them against potential counterarguments.
3.Patterns in Suppression
•They identify patterns in whistleblower cases, such as sudden deaths or character assassinations, and evaluate whether Schneider fits such patterns.
Challenges in Using Schneider as a Litmus Test
1.Polarizing Nature: His claims are so extraordinary that many may dismiss them as implausible without deeper investigation, even if they are otherwise credible researchers.
2.Limited Evidence: Some aspects of his story lack corroboration, making it easy for skeptics to debunk or dismiss them.
3.Government Disinformation: Honest researchers may struggle to discern truth from deliberate obfuscation, especially in areas involving classified programs.
Conclusion
Using Phil Schneider as a litmus test involves gauging whether a researcher is open-minded and willing to question official narratives without falling into blind acceptance or denial. Those who fairly evaluate his claims, acknowledge inconsistencies, and seek corroborative evidence demonstrate a commitment to truth over convenience🧠
Beware the people showing up on the news medias/podcasts explaining the UFOs wrong 🛸💫👽
https://twitter.com/ScienceboyJack/status/1876363173252747356
I guess I’m one of the only real researchers with integrity🤔🧠
3.Indicators of Integrity:
•A researcher who uses Schneider’s case as a starting point for broader exploration, instead of avoiding it due to its controversial nature, may show a greater commitment to seeking the truth.
3.Indicators of Integrity:
•A researcher who uses Schneider’s case as a starting point for broader exploration, instead of avoiding it due to its controversial nature, may show a greater commitment to seeking the truth.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
