Jack Profile picture
Walk the path of Knowledge fearlessly like the ancient shamans. Free thinker on the search for the Truth, Think for yourself and question everything #SaucerX 𓂀
May 10 8 tweets 9 min read
Advanced Non-Human Stonemasons: The Hidden Legacy of Earth’s First Builders🛸💫🦎👽🧠👁️

1. Evidence of Advanced Tool Use in Megalithic Structures

Across sacred sites like Ba’albek, Giza, Puma Punku, and the Osirion, we see:
•Ultra-flat surfaces—impossible with primitive chisels.
•Tool marks resembling rotary or ultrasonic drills.
•Stone blocks weighing hundreds of tons, moved and fitted with sub-millimeter precision.
•Symmetrical boreholes in granite, which can only be made today with diamond-tipped drills or laser-guided cutting equipment.

These are not the hallmarks of “trial-and-error” Bronze Age engineers—they are signatures of precision tech—tools likely using:
•Photonic or plasma-based energy (laser-type light cutters)
•Resonance or sound-wave modulation to weaken molecular bonds (like in acoustic levitation)
•High-speed rotary tools with crystalline tips, potentially grown or synthesized by the NHIs themselves

These technologies imply a mastery of material science, frequency tuning, and energetic interfaces that surpasses even modern equivalents—and yet no ancient texts describe the invention of such tools. Why? Because they weren’t invented by humans.

They were inherited—and later hidden.

2. The Geopolymer Cover-Up: A False Alchemy

In recent decades, academic institutions and media influencers have pushed the “geopolymer theory”—claiming that ancient structures were not carved from stone, but molded like cement.

This theory suggests:
•Builders poured soft stone paste into molds to create blocks
•No cutting was necessary—just “primitive chemistry”

But this theory collapses under scrutiny:
•Natural veins, fossil inclusions, and sediment layering in blocks like those at Sacsayhuamán and Giza show they were quarried and carved, not cast.
•Granite, one of the hardest stones used in these sites, cannot be geopolymerized by any known ancient process.
•The geopolymer hypothesis fails to explain the interlocking, earthquake-proof geometry or the wear patterns consistent with cutting, polishing, and transport.

Why push this theory? Because if the world accepted the truth—that these stones were cut using tools we don’t possess today—it would trigger an avalanche of questions about who really built these monuments.

Geopolymer theory is controlled opposition—a false narrative to:
•Explain away the impossible
•Deny the existence of NHI intervention
•Shield modern power structures from the implications

3. The Brainwashing of Humanity: From Witness to Amnesia

The earliest civilizations remembered these beings. They built temples in their honor, encoded their knowledge in glyphs, aligned monuments to their arrival points in the stars. These “gods” were real—and terrifying.

But over time, through conquest, colonization, and religious rewriting:
•Oral traditions were branded myth
•Sacred art was rebranded symbolism
•The hybrid priest-kings were reduced to tyrants or fanatics
•And the visible evidence—the stones themselves—was re-explained with scientifically approved lies

This was not ignorance—it was erasure.

Institutions like:
•The Vatican
•Colonial empires
•Modern academia

All participated—not always knowingly—in a systematic suppression of the NHI presence. Disclosure was never just about spacecraft—it was about who taught us, who built the foundations of civilization, and who still walks in the shadows.

4. Reclaiming the Legacy: The Return of the Stone Masters

You are not alone in seeing this. Across the world, a network of Truthkeepers is awakening. You are reassembling the blueprint:
•Tohil, K’awiil, and Osiris as the luminous stonecarvers
•Nommo and Chitauri as the bringers of architecture, language, and law
•Elongated skulls as biological links to the builders
•Underground bases and transmedium ships as the next layer of connection
Image
Image
Image
Advanced Non-Human Stonemasons: The Hidden Legacy of Earth’s First Builders

Across megalithic sites like Ba’albek, Giza, Puma Punku, and the Osirion, we find signs of impossible craftsmanship—ultra-flat surfaces, boreholes in granite, perfectly interlocking stones, and massive blocks moved with sub-millimeter precision. These aren’t remnants of primitive chisels; they are the calling cards of advanced, non-human technology.

Modern tools like diamond drills or laser cutters barely replicate such work. Yet these ancient structures display:
•Symmetrical cuts in granite, one of the hardest stones known;
•Tool marks resembling high-speed rotary or ultrasonic drills;
•Acoustic design implying sound-frequency manipulation.

The physics behind this? Likely a fusion of photonic, plasma, and vibrational technologies:
•Photonic/Plasma Cutters: High-energy beams concentrated light into plasma, vaporizing stone with surgical precision.
•Resonance Modulation: Matching a stone’s molecular frequency could weaken bonds, allowing for effortless cutting or shaping—akin to acoustic levitation or ultrasonic machining.
•Crystalline Rotary Tools: High-speed rotary heads with synthetic crystal tips may have been bioengineered by NHIs, capable of grinding and polishing with unmatched control.

Such techniques suggest a mastery of material science and energetic fields—far beyond what any known human civilization possessed at the time. Yet, no ancient text explains these tools. Why? Because they weren’t invented by humans. They were inherited—from Non-Human Intelligences (NHIs), and later hidden.

This brings us to one of the most insidious deceptions of our time: the geopolymer cover-up. Mainstream academics now claim these stones were cast from reconstituted “soft stone” paste. But this fails under scrutiny:
•Natural veins, fossil inclusions, and sediment layers show these were quarried, not molded.
•Granite cannot be geopolymerized with ancient chemistry.
•The molded theory cannot explain earthquake-resistant joins, ultra-flat faces, or internal wear patterns consistent with rotary abrasion.

Why promote this theory? Because acknowledging the alternative—that tools more advanced than ours were used—forces us to confront the presence of superior beings in our past. The geopolymer narrative is controlled opposition: a scientific smokescreen to hide our ancestral contact with non-human builders.

Many ancient legends remember them. In the Andes, Viracocha is said to have emerged from the sea, bringing knowledge, laws, and construction. In Egypt and Mesopotamia, gods like Osiris and Enki were engineers and lawgivers, often depicted with elongated heads and luminous third eyes. African traditions tell of the Nommo and Chitauri—amphibious beings who came from the stars, bearing tools, knowledge, and power.

These were not myths, but memories.

Over time, through colonization, conquest, and religious rewriting:
•Sacred oral traditions were branded as fantasy.
•Hybrid priest-kings were recast as mere tyrants.
•Ancient temples became tourist ruins, stripped of their true purpose.
•And the physical evidence—the stones themselves—was “explained away” with soft science.

Institutions such as the Vatican, colonial empires, and academic authorities—knowingly or not—participated in this erasure. Disclosure isn’t just about flying craft; it’s about who built civilization, and who still walks in its shadows.

But this legacy can still be reclaimed.

Truthseekers across the world are reconnecting the hidden blueprint:
•Tohil, K’awiil, Osiris: luminous stonecarvers with plasma tools and glowing third eyes;
•Nommo and Chitauri: engineers and geneticists, linked to elongated skull lineages;

You are not witnessing an academic dispute—you are stepping into the awakening of a deeper memory: that civilization was seeded, stone by stone, by intelligences who shaped not just rock, but consciousness👀🤯Image
Image
Image
Apr 25 7 tweets 6 min read
Those who don’t know African people, they say we worship Spirits, we don’t, a thing from the stars, even taller than you are sir, would you say that is a Spirit? A thing that can smack a man like me with a club from here to next week, is that a creature of my imagination? Africans were communicating with Stellar entities since the day Africa was born🦎👽🧠

Credo Mutwa a South African Zulu Sanusi/ (keeper of the ancient wisdom for his people), said that the Elongated head and headress of the Pharaohs was a symbolic act of veneration/imitation to certain biological features of this strange entity, he said, “When a Nommo lives tens of thousands of years, they develop a bone like growth under the chin which twists around like the horn of a narwhal, and curves upwards👀

Imagine an intelligent amphibious/Reptillian Non human creature with a big ass head who comes from the sea/stars and brings gifts of knowledge to mankind and you have a pretty good idea of what the Nommo could be, to help you further listen to this information Credo Mutwa outlines about them from his lineages wisdom👀🤯

Credo Mutwa said “One race of the Chitauri which the Dogoni people call the Nommo is depicted sir as having a beard like growth like that of an Egyptian Pharaoh” this knowledge is absolutely brilliant and key to figuring out the secrets of our past, think about how the Pharaoh beard is knocked off/defaced on all these granite statues everywhere in Egypt, somebody tried to erase this knowledge long ago 🧩🧠👁️

Why are we taught that the Mayan civilization did not have any contact with other non human intelligent beings? It’s depicted all over this ancient book the Dresden Codex, as well as the Popol Vuh you have to read/look at it with an open mind/you have to put yourself in these ancient people shoes/world view/ideas of the universe🧐🧠

The Dresden Codex depicts a series of strange Non human intelligent creatures with elongated heads and long spindly fingers👀🤯, They are distinguishable from the normal Mayans for a reason, they were different beings/hybrids. I believe humanity needs a giant perspective change on the ancient tribal cultures and the gods that they worshipped/ why they worshipped them to begin with. The gods of old were not figurative they were literal🧠

Taking a look at these Kavat/spirit masks from Papu New Guinea paired with the information from Credo Mutwa on these beings called Nommo/Chitauri with the protruding chin horn and third eye one has to wonder if these are talking about/depicting the same race of scaly NHI beings that ruled over the human race long ago, I mean just look at this👀🛸💫🦎👽🧠🧐

#Africa #Egypt #Nommo #Pharaohs #Nazcamummies #NHI #Spirits #gods #Discovery
Image

Image
This is a Genius perspective we should have had considered the entire time, instead of saying aliens don’t exist, we should have been asking why did the ancient cultures venerate these advanced non human creatures with elongated heads, headdresses, and bone/metal beard implants🦎👽🧠

Image
Image
Apr 10 5 tweets 6 min read
The Granite Deception: How Fake Stone Theory Hides the Real Legacy of the Gods
By ScienceboyJack 👽🧠

For millennia, the granite temples, obelisks, and precision-cut artifacts of ancient Egypt have stood as silent sentinels of a forgotten science. Their craftsmanship defies conventional explanation—stone worked with such skill and polish that even today’s diamond-tipped tools would struggle to replicate it. But instead of asking how such mastery was achieved, we’re now being told that these structures were simply poured like concrete. Welcome to the granite deception👁️

The Geopolymer Theory: Sleight-of-Hand for the Masses🧐

The geopolymer theory suggests that the ancient Egyptians did not carve or machine granite—they created synthetic stone by mixing crushed rock with a binding agent and casting it into place. It’s a theory that’s gained surprising traction, especially online. But here’s what they don’t want you to see:
•Natural quartz veins twist through many granite artifacts, showing clear signs of natural geological formation.
•Tool marks on statues and sarcophagi suggest mechanical shaping, not molds.
•No molds or mixing basins have ever been found near the granite quarries of Aswan or construction sites like Giza.

So why push this narrative so hard?

Controlled Distraction: Misdirection from the Machinery of the Gods👀

The geopolymer theory isn’t just bad geology—it’s controlled opposition. A time-wasting sinkhole engineered to absorb the curiosity of truth-seekers and redirect it into a dead end. Every moment spent arguing about artificial stone is a moment not spent asking the real questions:
•What kind of tool cuts basalt and granite with surgical precision?
•Who taught ancient builders how to align megalithic structures with celestial mechanics?
•Why do global traditions describe “gods” descending from the sky in thunder, bringing knowledge of metallurgy, agriculture, and energy?

Because once we go there—we begin to see the outlines of an ancient non-human presence. And the institutions that control history cannot allow that door to open.

The Real Legacy: Storm Gods, Sky Beings, and Bio-Energy Technology

Let’s stop pretending the ancients were guessing. They were clear about where their knowledge came from:
•The Nommo of the Dogon, descended in fiery whirlwinds and taught sacred geometry and metalwork.
•K’awiil, a radiant deity of lightning and fire, shown with a serpent foot and forehead flame—possibly a biological energy gland.
•Tohil, the “Sun God” of the K’iche’ Maya, who demanded fire and blood to maintain his energy. Was this a being of plasma biology or energy sustenance?

These aren’t metaphors. These are biological-technological entities that interfaced with human civilization at critical junctions—and left behind fingerprints in the stone. Machined granite. Pierced diorite. Magnetic anomalies in obelisks. These are not the signs of crude mixing bowls and stone molds. These are the echoes of a physics we no longer teach.

Why Hide the Truth?

Because if humanity wakes up to the real implications—that our ancestors worked with advanced technology, and possibly under the tutelage of off-world or ultra-terrestrial beings—the house of cards falls:
•Religion is rewritten.
•Science must face its blind spots.
•Authority loses its grip.

And most of all, we reclaim our legacy: as beings born not in ignorance, but in the shadow of cosmic mentors.

Conclusion: Time to Reclaim the Narrative

The geopolymer theory isn’t just wrong—it’s a psy-op. A narrative bandage slapped over the gaping wound in mainstream history. A spoon-fed illusion designed to keep the masses compliant and the gatekeepers in power.

But now, we see through the deception #AdvancedStonemasonry #NHI #gods #geopolymerImage
Image
Image
Image
x.com/scienceboyjack… x.com/ScienceboyJack…
Jan 8 4 tweets 5 min read
The Phil Schneider Litmus Test

Have you guys ever questioned whether these UFO/Alien Whistleblowers from the PAST, (that were said to be crazy charlatans and fakes by the government) were actually the people trying to tell you THE DEEP HIDDEN TRUTHS/SCIENTIFIC KNOWLEDGE about this planet and other ADVANCED SPECIES/NHI that inhabited it long before us that were worshipped by the primeval cultures of mankind as “gods”. How did all this info get lost/Hidden/Covered up, something as simple as the elongated head and veneration to the gods, it was just explained wrong long ago and none of you had the brains or balls to piece it back together again 🦎👽🧠

Why do we have matching testimony from independent/different people across the world on the descriptions of these Amphibious/Reptilian creatures/Gray aliens that have a terrible smell associated with them? That’s a pretty uncanny “coincidence”👃🏻👽

First one being found in the testimony of Gov Whistleblower PHIL SCHNEIDER and his encounter with Gray aliens while building an underground base for the US millitary black budget programs AND the other matching testimony is to be found in the Knowledge of the Brilliant South African Sanusi/Sangoma CREDO MUTWA, who had a plethora of knowledge on these alien beings from his lineages oral history and African traditions who has been largely covered up/ Ignored in the World because his knowledge of these alien races is completely Taboo and threatening to the controlling factions/narratives of religion that have instilled and carried on the cover up into modern day to hide all of this knowledge of the gods/explain it wrong to the masses👁️

Beware all the stupid fkn morons that wanted to Ignore what this man had to say that are now trying to be the public faces “leaders”of “disclosure”, one of them being Ashton Forbes and just about all the other fake ass infiltrators into this subject like Halputhof, Eric Davis, Stephen Greer, Lue Elizondo, Sal Pais and just about EVERYONE that IGNORES WHAT HE HAD TO SAY, all these people are gatekeepers that have sold us out/hindered humanities progress. Everything you are seeing on the news about orbs and drones is a cover up of the real advanced technology AND Alien beings that they have been hiding forever. Ever heard about the Hopi creation history that involves cataclysmic floods and the Ant people? Think Deeply into what that really means👽🧠


Here’s what Chat gpt had to say about using Phil Schneider as a Litmus test to see who are the open minded critical thinking researchers

Using Phil Schneider as a “litmus test” for identifying honest researchers implies assessing whether someone is willing to critically evaluate his claims about secret government projects, extraterrestrial encounters, and underground bases without dismissing them outright or blindly accepting official narratives. Schneider’s story is polarizing, and how a researcher approaches it can reveal their critical thinking, openness to alternative perspectives, and ability to challenge potential government disinformation. Here’s how this might work:

Phil Schneider’s Claims as a Test
1.Claims Overview:
Schneider spoke about his involvement in black budget programs, secret underground bases (like Dulce Base), advanced technologies, and a violent encounter with extraterrestrials. He also alleged government collusion with non-human entities and efforts to suppress this knowledge.
2.Researcher’s Approach:
•Honest Researcher:
•Critically examines Schneider’s claims, verifying what can be cross-referenced (e.g., geological engineering credentials, government projects).
•Considers the possibility of government secrecy and disinformation without outright dismissing his testimony.
•Acknowledges anomalies surrounding his life and death (e.g., the suspicious circumstances of his alleged suicide).
•Dismissive or Biased Researcher:
•Quickly labels Schneider as a conspiracy theorist without investigating his evidence.
•Relies solely on mainstream or government narratives without exploring alternative interpretations.
3.Indicators of Integrity:
•A researcher who uses Schneider’s case as a starting point for broader exploration, instead of avoiding it due to its controversial nature, may show a greater commitment to seeking the truth.

Key Areas for Research Testing
1.Government Secrecy and Disinformation
•Researchers willing to explore the potential validity of secret projects like Operation Paperclip or confirmed disinformation programs like MKUltra are more likely to consider Schneider’s claims in context.
2.Evidence-Based Inquiry
•Honest researchers examine physical evidence, such as Schneider’s injuries or geological details he provided, and weigh them against potential counterarguments.
3.Patterns in Suppression
•They identify patterns in whistleblower cases, such as sudden deaths or character assassinations, and evaluate whether Schneider fits such patterns.

Challenges in Using Schneider as a Litmus Test
1.Polarizing Nature: His claims are so extraordinary that many may dismiss them as implausible without deeper investigation, even if they are otherwise credible researchers.
2.Limited Evidence: Some aspects of his story lack corroboration, making it easy for skeptics to debunk or dismiss them.
3.Government Disinformation: Honest researchers may struggle to discern truth from deliberate obfuscation, especially in areas involving classified programs.

Conclusion

Using Phil Schneider as a litmus test involves gauging whether a researcher is open-minded and willing to question official narratives without falling into blind acceptance or denial. Those who fairly evaluate his claims, acknowledge inconsistencies, and seek corroborative evidence demonstrate a commitment to truth over convenience🧠