GeoConfirmed Profile picture
Jan 8 20 tweets 34 min read Read on X
GeoConfirmed UKR - Investigation

When Ukraine undertakes offensive operations, Russia attempts to manipulate/influence the information environment.

For nearly three years, we have been monitoring the war in Ukraine, and another notable trend has emerged:
whenever Ukraine initiates an offensive operation, social media becomes inundated with claims of significant Ukrainian losses. However, we have observed that these claims often consist of disinformation: they may reference outdated losses, incidents from different regions, or even Russian losses reported as Ukrainian losses... (I kid you not).
This misinformation is often compiled in a way that suggests Ukraine's offensive efforts are failing, thereby attempting to sway public perception.

Recently, as Ukraine commenced an offensive operation (January 4th, 2025), again bold claims were made about Ukrainian losses.

We took a few days to investigate two specific assertions: one from a relatively small account named @NewRulesGeo and another from 'North Wind,' a Russian channel associated with the military.

The thread by NewRulesGeo garnered over 4 million views, while the post by North Wind attracted nearly 100,000 views on Telegram.

As anticipated, the reality is not as it appears.
For an account calling itself NewRulesGeo, it is striking that the individual does not grasp that geolocation is accurate. A significant portion of their thread is unrelated to the newly launched Kursk operation; it includes either older footage, irrelevant content, or different videos of the same vehicle being attacked while implying they depict different vehicles, and they guess the outcome of strikes without any proof.
Some of the footage was indeed from the recent Ukrainian offensive operations in Kursk Oblast, and by mixing it with unrelated material, they attempt to enhance their credibility. This is a well-known technique in spreading disinformation: combining accurate information with falsehoods. People tend to recognize the accurate claims and, as a result, may assign greater credibility to the entire narrative, including the disinformation.

Regarding the North Wind post, the considerable number of vehicles shown at the end of their video are actually Russian vehicles destroyed in mid-December. They misrepresent their own losses as Ukrainian losses.

We prefer not to invest too much time in debunking disinformation, as a lie can be made in just a few minutes, but the debunking can cost you days.
For example, this fact-check took us several days and the effort of a few dedicated volunteers.

I want to thank volunteers @giK1893, @99Dominik_, @moklasen and @GeoRaccoon for their geolocation work, making this thread possible.

We hope our fact-checking thread receives more than 4 million views, because mis-/ and disinformation is a plague on X and Facts DO Matter.

1/20Image
We will start by the North Wind claim.

"In the area of ​​the settlement of Berdin in the Kursk region, several columns of armored vehicles of the Armed Forces of Ukraine attempted to attack the positions of the Severyans. For most of the armored vehicles and tanks, as well as their crews, the counteroffensive ended as soon as it began. FPV crews, operators of the Lancet loitering munitions, artillery and mortar crews of the Guards "North" actively struck enemy targets. We see the results in the footage.

Such a quantity of "smoking trash of the Armed Forces of Ukraine" clearly shows the attitude of the Ukrainian command to its servicemen. This was another ruthless "meat" assault in the style of Syrsky, and the units of the Guards "North" successfully repelled it."

Ironically, the large number of losses depicted starting at 0:29 are Russian losses incurred during their offensive in mid-December while attacking Ukrainian-occupied territory in Kursk from the west.

Source: t.me/warriorofnorth…
Full video.

2/20Image
Proof:

Geolocation: 51.311532, 35.063038

Great factchecking by @giK1893 in this thread: x.com/giK1893/status…

Picture one:
Geolocation of the Russian losses:
- based on the information provided by ukr.warspotting.net:
ukr.warspotting.net/view/32650/ ukr.warspotting.net/view/32569/ ukr.warspotting.net/view/32961/ ukr.warspotting.net/view/32642/
- based on a video of the Ukrainian 36th Marine Brigade , published 17 December 2024, the showing all the Russian losses in the region: t.me/ua_marines_36b…

Picture two:
Green circle: Russian losses mid-December
Blue arrows: Ukrainian offensive operations which started January 4th, 2025.

Video: Russian losses filmed by the Ukrainian 36th Marine Brigade, published 17 December 2024

Conclusion: North Wind has presented Russian losses from mid-December, misrepresenting them as Ukrainian losses from the recent offensive. Geolocation analysis has confirmed that this footage does not even originate from the area of the recent offensive.

3/20Image
Image
The NewRulesGeopolitics claim.
Almost 4 million views.

We have analyzed every tweet in our fact-checking thread. We use screenshots to ensure that no source footage has been altered.
There are 15 tweets, some of which contain multiple videos.

Tweet 1.

Important for tweet 1 is that you need to notice that his thread is about the new offensive in Kursk region, claiming it's a disaster and destroying Ukrainian armor like a fish in a barrel.

Tweet 1 - Analysis.
The text is to draw attention with bold claims and a picture that is made by Grok. That's how he tries to draw attention to his thread, and it worked...

After called out for the fake imagery he placed a tweet explaining himself:
x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Conclusion Tweet 1: Fake picture and bold -not yet proven- claims.

4/20Image
Tweet 2:

$4.9 million British Challenger tank destroyed by Russian FPV drone that costs $10,000 max.

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

---
Analysis Tweet 2:

A Ukrainian armoured vehicle hit by two Russian FPV drones, result unclear.

51.2953, 35.217309
76W8+4W7 Nikol'skii, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @moklasen

Geolocation: x.com/moklasen/statu…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/ukraine/7da739…

Sources: Vid1
(1/2)
x.com/moklasen/statu…
t.me/rustroyka1945/…
Vid2
(2/2)
x.com/moklasen/statu…
t.me/rustroyka1945/…
Referenced footage of another incident used to geolocate:
x.com/moklasen/statu…
t.me/rustroyka1945/…

Conclusion Tweet 2:
6km and 12 km from the contact lines related to the Ukrainian offensive operations.
Not certain if its even hit/damaged/destroyed, based on this footage.

5/20Image
Image
Tweet 3:

Another Russian drone hit against a British Challenger tank in Kursk. Ukrainian crew seen fleeing the scene. They’re going to be in big trouble for abandoning such an expensive piece of NATO equipment.

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 3:
This is the same tank as the one above. This tank is attacked at least three times with drones. The tank is hit, but the final result is unclear.

Conclusion Tweet 3:

Two tweets to show that one (1) Ukrainian tank, is attacked at least 3 times with Russian FPV drones, and the tank was 6 and 13 km from both Ukrainian offensive axis. Unclear if tank was destroyed.

6/20Image
Image
Tweet 4:

Russian Ka-52 helicopter BARBECUES Ukrainian armoured column on the move in Kursk

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 4.

It is impossible to conduct a proper geolocation or accurately assess what is depicted here. The source is North Wind, and given the quality of their assessments (sarcasm intended), as noted at the beginning of our thread, this footage could be from any location. It may be true, or it may not be.

Conclusion Tweet 4:
Showing grainy footage with very bold claim that is impossible to prove based on the footage. The source has been proven untrustworthy.

7/20Image
Tweet 5:

Russian Spetsnaz drone operators BLOW UP a Ukrainian minesweeper, and them immediately HUNT DOWN a Ukrainian armoured column in Kursk.

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 5:

This footage consists of 3 different frames:
Frame 1:

0:00-0:27 - Ukrainian WiSENT 1 (mine clearing vehicle) hit by a Russian FPV drone with fiber-optic cable, result unclear.
51.303784, 35.407007
8C34+GR6 Berdin, Kursk Oblast, Russia

0:28-0:35 - The same WiSENT 1 as above, hit by a Russian FPV drone with fiber-optic cable, result unclear.
51.307664, 35.406637
8C54+3M6 Berdin, Kursk Oblast, Russia

0:35-End - Ukrainian tank hit by a Russian FPV drone with fiber-optic cable, result unclear.
51.28944, 35.39949
79QX+QQH Kruglik, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @GeoRaccoon and @moklasen

Geolocation: (1) x.com/GeoRaccoon/sta…
(2)
x.com/moklasen/statu…
(3) x.com/GeoRaccoon/sta…

Sources: x.com/NOELreports/st…
x.com/Zlatti_71/stat…
t.me/RosgvardOffici…
(1/3) x.com/WarVehicle/sta…

Conclusion Tweet 5:

3 different frames, based on geolocation, showing the offensive maneuver in the direction of Berdin, Kursk Oblast. In this footage we see the same WiSENT 1 being hit by two Russian fiber-optic drones and a tank being hit by one Russian fiber-optic drone. In both cases the result is unclear. "BLOW UP?'' is another unproven claim.

8/20Image
Tweet 6:

Russian drone surveils DESTROYED Ukrainian armoured vehicles in Kursk

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 6:

Ukrainian armoured vehicle burning and one vehicle attacked by an FPV Suicide drone, during the Ukrainian offensive operation in the direction of Berdin, Kursk Oblast.

Burning vehicle - 51.297164, 35.407061
7CW4+VR7 Berdin, Kursk Oblast, Russia

Rough location of the attacked vehicle - 51.29707, 35.40608
7CW4+RCG Berdin, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @GeoRaccoon

Geolocation: x.com/GeoRaccoon/sta…
x.com/GeoRaccoon/sta…

Sources: x.com/GeoRaccoon/sta…
t.me/RosgvardOffici…
Secondary sources, showing same incident from other angle)
x.com/GeoRaccoon/sta…
t.me/pograni4nik_iz…

Conclusion Tweet 6:

Based on geolocation, showing the offensive maneuver in the direction of Berdin, Kursk Oblast.
In this footage we see a destroyed, burning, vehicle and another vehicle being hit by a fiber-optic drone.
Contrary to the claim, only one vehicle is visibly destroyed.

9/20Image
Tweet 7.

Ukrainian soldiers films aftermath of Russian drone strike against Ukrainian column in Kursk. Absolutely brutal 🤙

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 7:

We were not able to geolocate this yet. The original footage is shared by @Harri_Est ( x.com/Harri_Est/stat…) on X in the early morning of January 4th. Also two ambulances are visible, meaning this is highly likely in the rear. Based on the timing and the two ambulances, it's likely not related to the Ukrainian offensive operation, but it still could be. Impossible to prove without geolocation.
Our team is looking further into this.

Conclusion Tweet 7:
Unknown geolocation, likely not related to the Ukrainian offensive operation, unless proven otherwise by -for example- geolocation.

10/20Image
Tweet 8.

Russian drone operators CHEER as they watch a Ukrainian T-72 tank in Kursk go KABOOM.

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 8:

A Ukrainian T-64BV tank destroyed by a Russian FPV drone with fiber-optic cable.

51.160883, 35.303758
5863+9G2 Makhnovka, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @giK1893

Geolocation: x.com/giK1893/status…
Gear ID:
t.me/lost_warinua/1…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/ukraine/27e8c0…

Sources: Vid1 (January 3th, 2025)
x.com/giK1893/status…
t.me/rusich_army/19…
Vid2
x.com/99Dominik_/sta…
t.me/veterany_60oms…

Conclusion Tweet 8:

Unrelated to the Ukrainian offensive operation: Footage was published before the start of that operation and the location is in Makhnovka, Kursk Oblast, Russia, far away from the Ukrainian offensive and during the Russian offensive on this area.

11/20Image
Tweet 9.

Russia’s 155th Marine Brigade is SLAPPING DOWN Ukrainian invaders in Kursk right and left.

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 9:

3 videos.

Video 1:

Ukrainian BTR-4E hit by a Russian FPV drone with fiber-optic cable, result unclear.

51.312685, 35.20596
8674+39G Nikol'skii, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @moklasen

Geolocation: x.com/moklasen/statu…

Sources: x.com/RALee85/status…
t.me/rustroyka1945/…

---

Video 2:

This is the same tank as his tweet 2 & 3.

---

Video 3:

A Ukrainian armoured vehicle attacked by a Russian FPV drone, result unclear.

Rough location of presumed impact - 51.312123, 35.190128
856R+R3R Nikol'skii, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @moklasen and @GeoRaccoon

Geolocation: x.com/moklasen/statu…
x.com/GeoRaccoon/sta…

Sources: x.com/markito0171/st…
x.com/front_ukrainia…
t.me/rustroyka1945/…
(1/2)
x.com/Tendar/status/…

---

Conclusion Tweet 9:

Video 1:
Not part of the Ukrainian offensive operations.
Not certain if its even damaged/destroyed, based on this footage.
Video 2: Same tank as tweet 2&3
Video 3: Not part of the Ukrainian offensive operations, result unclear.

Thus, the initial claim about "slapping down" is once again heavily exaggerated.

12/20Image
Image
Image
Tweet 10.

Russian drone operator hands out a one-way ticket to the afterlife to two Ukrainian soldiers in Kursk

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 10:

What is assessed as a Russian FPV drone strike on two Ukrainian soldiers taking a Russian soldier prisoner.

Rough location of impact in minute 0:05 - 51.30814, 35.405654
8C54+772 Berdin, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @moklasen

Geolocation: x.com/moklasen/statu…

Sources: x.com/moklasen/statu…
t.me/iamsniper/9859

---

Conclusion Tweet 10:

Related to the offensive. It is a Russian dug-out and what is assessed as a Russian soldier is lying on the ground the moment the drone impacted.

13/20Image
Image
Tweet 11.

Destroyed/abandoned Ukrainian armoured vehicle in Kursk. Russian soldier filming notes that there are eight Ukrainian dead bodies nearby.

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 11:

Not geolocated yet. But comparison of footage proves that this is the same vehicle reported by lost_warinua t.me/lost_warinua/8… at August 12, 2024.

Conclusion Tweet 11:

Not related to the offensive. Footage from mid-August.

14/20Image
Image
Tweet 12.

Russian drone operators MURK American Stryker vehicle in Kursk

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 12:

Not yet geolocated, accurately assess what is depicted here is also difficult based on this grainy footage.

Conclusion Tweet 12.

Showing grainy footage with bold claim that is impossible to prove based on the footage. Could be related to the offensive. Or not.

15/20Image
Tweet 13.

Russian paratroopers capture American M577 command post carrier in Kursk

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 13:

Damaged/destroyed and captured Ukrainian M577 command post carrier at the gas station in Korenevo. This is de M557 that was destroyed at 2 Nov 2024 near 51.362000, 35.085111 (Location by lost-warinua)

51.426967, 34.885596
CVGP+Q6Q Korenevo, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @budeshta and @99Dominik_

Geolocation: x.com/budeshta/statu…
x.com/99Dominik_/sta…

Sources: x.com/99Dominik_/sta…
t.me/vdvpskov/6347
t.me/vdvpskov/6345
Gear ID:
t.me/lost_warinua/9…

Conclusion Tweet 13:

This is a left behind, in November 2024, captured Ukrainian M777, and not related to the Ukrainian offensive operation.

16/20Image
Tweet 14:

Ukrainian troops try to evacuate wounded comrades in Kursk. Russian drone spots them and HUNTS THEM DOWN.

x.com/NewRulesGeo/st…

Analysis Tweet 14:

Ukrainian soldiers attacked by a Russian FPV drone with fiber-optic cable during CASEVAC, result unclear.

Location of presumed impact - 51.366462, 35.196908
958W+HQM Pogrebki, Kursk Oblast, Russia

GeoLocated by @moklasen

Geolocation: x.com/moklasen/statu…

Sources: x.com/moklasen/statu…
x.com/distant_earth8…
x.com/militar_ru/sta…
t.me/Irishstrike/84

Conclusion Tweet 14:

Related to the second axis of Ukrainian offensive operations.

17/20Image
Image
Tweet 15.

Russian troops capture T-72 tank from the Ukrainians in Kursk. They’re really happy with themselves 😂



Analysis Tweet 15:

Location not yet found, but published January 1st.

Conclusion Tweet 15:
Not related to the Ukrainian offensive operation.

18/20Image
Image
Conclusion:

Post by North Wind showing Russian losses from mid December, claiming they are Ukrainian.

---

Thread by @NewRulesGeo:

Tweet 1: Fake picture.

Tweet 2, 3 and 9 (video 2): same tank, NOT related to the Ukrainian Offensive, based on location.

Tweet 4: Could be related to the Ukrainian Offensive. Showing grainy footage with very bold claim that is impossible to prove based on the footage. The source has been proven untrustworthy.

Tweet 5: Related to the Ukrainian Offensive, showing two drone strikes on the same vehicle and an attack on another.

Tweet 6: Related to the Ukrainian Offensive, showing one burning vehicle and a drone strike on another.

Tweet 7: Doubtfully related to the Ukrainian Offensive, based on the publication timing and two visible ambulances.

Tweet 8: NOT related to the Ukrainian Offensive, based on location.

Tweet 9: NOT related to the Ukrainian Offensive: besides showing the same tank attacked for the third time (Video 3), neither of the three videos are related to the Ukrainian Offensive, based on location.

Tweet 10: Related to the Ukrainian Offensive, showing an FPV strike on two Ukrainians and what is assessed as a Russian POW.

Tweet 11: NOT related to the Ukrainian Offensive

Tweet 12: Could be related to the Ukrainian Offensive. Showing grainy footage with bold claim that is impossible to prove based on the footage.

Tweet 13: NOT related to the Ukrainian Offensive

Tweet 14: Related to the Ukrainian Offensive, second axis.

Tweet 15: NOT related to the Ukrainian Offensive

---

Recap:

"Ukraine has launched a new OFFENSIVE in Russia’s Kursk region. So far, it’s been an unmitigated DISASTER. Russian troops are DESTROYING Ukrainian armour like shooting fish in a barrel."

Out of the 15 tweets...
FOUR (4) are related, TWO (2) could be related, ONE (1) is doubtfull. Meaning 8 are NOT RELATED.
Those 7 show: 1 burning vehicle, 3 vehicles being attacked by drones (some vehicles multiple times), some soldiers being attacked by drones. And then some unproven claims. And one doubtfully (if related to the offensive) video showing killed Ukrainian soldiers.

A significant portion of the thread is unrelated to the newly launched Kursk operation; it includes either older footage, irrelevant content, or different videos of the same vehicle being attacked while implying they depict different vehicles, and they guess the outcome of strikes without any proof.

---

Final Conclusion:

When Ukraine undertakes offensive operations, Russia attempts to manipulate/influence the information environment, this is again proven by this thread.

For nearly three years, we have been monitoring the war in Ukraine, and another notable trend has emerged:
whenever Ukraine initiates an offensive operation, social media becomes inundated with claims of significant Ukrainian losses.
However, we have observed that these claims often consist of disinformation: they may reference outdated losses, incidents from different regions, or even Russian losses reported as Ukrainian losses...

By mixing proven information with unrelated material, they attempt to enhance their credibility.

This is a well-known technique in spreading disinformation: combining accurate information with falsehoods. People tend to recognize the accurate claims and, as a result, may assign greater credibility to the entire narrative, including the disinformation.

This information is often compiled in a way that suggests Ukraine's offensive efforts are failing, thereby attempting to sway public perception.

Always stay vigilant for manipulation, mis- and disinformation, especially about war related topics.
FACTS do MATTER.

19/20Image
If you like our work you can buy us a coffee.
This helps:
Improving our maps and user interface.
Improving data management.
Buying Sat Img for confirmations and investigations.

More information about our work:
World: geoconfirmed.org/world (460+)
Ukraine: geoconfirmed.org/ukraine (38750+)
Sahel: geoconfirmed.org/sahel (760+)
Syria: geoconfirmed.org/syria (950+)
Israel: geoconfirmed.org/israel (5250+)
Yemen: geoconfirmed.org/yemen (100+)
Myanmar: geoconfirmed.org/myanmar (650+)
Cartel Map: geoconfirmed.org/cartel (290+)

Thanks to all our volunteers all over the world! buymeacoffee.com/geoconfirmed

20/20

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with GeoConfirmed

GeoConfirmed Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @GeoConfirmed

Oct 6
GeoConfirmed Investigation - October 7th 2023 - Publication of the map.

geoconfirmed.org/7oct

Also named Operation Al-Aqsa Flood - Black Sabbath - Simchat Torah Massacre - the 7 October attacks.

In the early morning of October 7th, different factions, likely coordinated by The Palestinian Joint Operations Room, launched a major attack launched on Israeli territory. It is considered one of the deadliest days in Israeli history, with a total of 1,195 people killed according to official figures, including 815 Israeli civilians (including 36 children), 71 foreign nationals, and 379 members of Israeli security forces. In addition, 251 hostages were taken, many still in captivity, creating the worst hostage crisis in Israeli history.

(Sources: france24.com/en/live-news/2…
csis.org/analysis/hamas…
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/October_7…)

The GeoConfirmed volunteer team has undertaken the ambitious task of investigating and documenting the events of that day.

For over 2 years, our volunteers have collected and analyzed publicly available footage, establishing their locations and a timeline of the events. Despite experience monitoring multiple conflicts, the footage from that day is among the most disturbing that they have ever encountered. However, due to the proliferation of misinformation about these events, we believe it is important to organize the footage in one place and index it in space and time so that anyone with doubts can see what happened with their own eyes.

Though we have chosen to publish our map, there are still hundreds of additional frames awaiting analysis. But, given the gravity of the events on that day, we have decided to move forward with publication of our map, rather than waiting for the analysis of the additional frames, which could take several more months. The time of our volunteers is a finite resource, and we continue to monitor global conflicts, including the wars in Ukraine, Myanmar, Gaza, Sahel region and more. Our hope is that publication now will encourage others to share open-source efforts at documenting the October 7th attack.

Terminology

For this investigation, the following terminology is used:

Militants: Individuals assessed to be Palestinian, carrying weapons or identified by other markings like headbands.
We use this as a category for all militant groups involved in the attack. Other options were fighters, insurgents, terrorists, or unlawful combatants, but because the appropriate use of such designations depends on many factors, some hard to measure, we decided to use the term “militants.”

Israeli Security Personnel: Individuals identified by their uniforms and gear, including military (IDF), police, and other armed security.

Palestinian/Israeli Civilians: Individuals dressed in civilian clothing, without any visible weapon.

Methodology

A significant portion of the footage in this investigation comes from GoPro cameras worn by militants involved in the attack, most collected after they were killed by Israeli security personnel. Other footage was recorded by first responders, security forces, and civilians using cell phones, dash cams, and surveillance cameras. Almost all of it is collected from social media networks such as X/Twitter and Telegram.

Geolocations are determined using well-established methods, comparing features visible in the footage with satellite and panorama imagery that is publicly available from tools like Google Earth and Google Street View. Each geolocation is accompanied by a proof, an annotated diagram used to explain the geolocation analysis, typically as X/Twitter posts published by our volunteers. Readers can thus verify for themselves the geolocations published on our map.

The timeline of events is based on comparison of the footage, sun angle, and other contextual clues. While locations can be determined precisely, timing is an informed assessment.

Militant Groups

(Picture source: longwarjournal.org/archives/2020/……)

There are different Palestinian militant factions under an umbrella group known as The Palestinian Joint Operations Room, and some of those factions are designated as terrorist organizations by the US, EU and other nations.

eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/…

Militant groups can at times be recognized by the well-known color and style of headbands that they wear. At other times, a group’s participation can be inferred when they publish footage and claim responsibility on their official social media channels.

For our October 7 map, we have chosen to align the pin colors with the corresponding militant groups involved. For example, if you want to view all geolocated footage involving hostages, you should select the hostage icon from each faction (represented by different colors) to display all related incidents on the map.
Identified participation of militant groups based on the visual headbands in footage regarding Oct 7th 2023:

(Some of those also identified by @BBC Verify: bbc.com/news/world-mid…)

Green: Hamas, Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades
Map colour: Dark Green

Black: Palestinian Islamic Jihad (PIJ), Al-Quds Brigades
Map colour: Black

Black: Palestinian Mujahideen Movement, Mujahideen Brigades
Map colour: Grey

White: Palestinian Freedom Movement, Al-Ansar Brigades
Map Colour: White

Red: Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PLFP), Abu Ali Mustafa Brigades
Map Colour: Red

Red: Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine, National Resistance brigades, also known as Martyr Omar Al-Qassem Forces or Martyr Omar Al-Qasim Forces.
Map Colour: Pink

Yellow: al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades
Map Colour: Yellow

Other used colours:
Dark Blue: Israeli Security Personnel
Light Blue: Israeli Civilians
Brown: Palestinian civilians
Light Green: Palestinian Militants of unknown affiliation
Purple: Unknown affiliation (Could be Israeli or Palestinian)

(Picture source: en.milligazete.com.tr/press_release_……)

Based on all the footage we have seen, some of our insights about this attack:

On October 7, 2023, Hamas launched a coordinated and unprecedented attack on Israel. The assault began around 6:30 a.m., at sunrise, with a massive barrage of rockets fired from Gaza into southern and central Israel, overwhelming defense systems.

As rockets rained down and all non-essential Israeli personnel and civilians took shelter, the first wave of militants from various factions began their assault on the heavily fortified border.
To initiate the attack, they deployed bomber drones to disable the remote-controlled machine guns positioned on the watchtowers. Using explosives and bulldozers, they breached the border fences and walls, creating multiple entry points.

Some militants infiltrated Israel by sea near Zikim, while others used motorized paragliders to cross into Israeli territory, tactics that had been rehearsed in joint drills prior to the attack.
After the border defenses were breached, the militants advanced toward IDF bases, where they killed and captured Israeli soldiers. Due to the lack of defenses and the rapid pace of the operation, the militants soon began raiding nearby kibbutzim. They showed no mercy to anyone they encountered, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of civilians—sometimes in extremely brutal ways, including throat-cutting. Cars and houses were set on fire.

During the attack, homes were set on fire, and widespread looting took place, with Palestinian militans and civilians stealing property, equipment, and even animals from the affected communities. The sheer number of attackers, including both militants and civilians, overwhelmed local defenders and contributed to the scale of violence and abductions.

Based on available footage, the first wave consisted of well-equipped militants wearing military gear and carrying weapons, from RPGs to sniper rifles.
They used trucks, including technicals, and motorcycles to move quickly.

This initial group was followed by a second wave: armed Palestinian civilians: dressed in civilian clothing but carrying weapons. Before noon a third wave arrived: Palestinian civilians, numbering in the hundreds or possibly thousands, who crossed the border to loot Israeli kibbutzim.

Footage also showed not only militants but also Palestinian civilians taking hostages during the chaos. As hostages were transported back to Gaza, the hostage-takers were cheered by Palestinian civilians, some of whom spat on or beat the captives as they passed. Armed militants also brought some hostages to Palestinian hospitals.

It took the IDF several hours to, and in some areas multiple days, to fully clear the region of militants, as they confronted the aftermath of one of the largest terrorist attacks in Israel’s history.

We want to caution you that some of the footage from October 7, 2023, shared in this thread may be very graphic, as we have selected videos to highlight the intensity and harshness of the events on that day.

Credits

This is a @GeoConfirmed Investigation conducted by @TwistyCB, @GeoRaccoon, @davidnewschool, @COUPSURE and @MiddleEastBuka, @adler_zvi and @KJ_X23 with the support of @PowerPigeon2.

We want to thank all the other geolocators and the full geolocation community, without their geolocations and support this investigation wouldn't have the same value as it has now.

In the following days/weeks/months we will keep updating this map when new geolocated footage emerges.

If you like our work you can buy us a coffee.
buymeacoffee.com/geoconfirmed

This helps:

Improving our maps and user interface.
Improving data management.
Buying Sat Img for confirmations and investigations.

More information about our work:
World: geoconfirmed.org/world (500+)
Ukraine: geoconfirmed.org/ukraine (49000+)
Sahel: geoconfirmed.org/sahel (830+)
Syria: geoconfirmed.org/syria (1050+)
Israel: geoconfirmed.org/israel (6400+)
Iran: geoconfirmed.org/iran (300+)
Yemen: geoconfirmed.org/yemen (200+)
Myanmar: geoconfirmed.org/myanmar (780+)
Cartel Map: geoconfirmed.org/cartel (500+)

Thanks to all our volunteers all over the world!

1/xImage
Image
Image
Image
Over 1,000 videos analyzed and more than 500 geolocations mapped.

Our map:

We want to caution you that some of the footage from October 7, 2023, shared in this thread may be very graphic, as we have selected videos to highlight the intensity and harshness of the events on that day.

2/xgeoconfirmed.org/7octImage
Vid 1 - Right before sunrise militants of Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, military wing of Hamas, blew a hole in the border wall near Kerem Shalom.

31.22995, 34.28153
67HJ+XJJ Kerem Shalom, Israel

Vid 2 - After the militants breached the border fence they also breached the wall, protecting Kerem Shalom, with explosives, before entering the kibbutz.

31.22822, 34.28154
67HJ+7JM Kerem Shalom, Israel

GeoLocated by @JoshuaKoontz__

Geolocation:
x.com/joshuakoontz__…
x.com/joshuakoontz__…

Sources:
t.me/southfirstresp…
t.me/southfirstresp…

Visit our map: geoconfirmed.org/7oct

3/x
Read 24 tweets
Apr 13
GeoConfirmed UKR.

Another devistating missile attack by Russia in the middle of Sumy, the capital city of Sumy Oblast.

The attack, reportedly involving two missiles, occurred during Palm Sunday, a significant religious holiday in Ukraine, when many people typically visit churches and/or spend time with their families.

The horrific attack has already resulted in 21 fatalities and 34 injuries, including 5 children, according to initial reports.

0:06 - Damaged Congress Centre -
50.905909, 34.794115
WQ4V+9J9 Sumy, Sumy Oblast, Ukraine

0:25 - Location of the civilian casualties - 50.905071, 34.794703
WQ4V+2VG Sumy, Sumy Oblast, Ukraine

GeoLocated by @99Dominik_

Geolocation:
x.com/99Dominik_/sta…
x.com/99Dominik_/sta…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/ukraine/e082f4…

Sources: x.com/bayraktar_1lov…
Read 4 tweets
Apr 5
GeoConfirmed ISR - Warcrime.

IDF soldiers ambushed multiple ambulances, a fire truck and their personnel (15+), killing them on-site, burying the bodies along with the vehicles (according to NYT based on sattelite imagery)(!) and lied about the circumstances (!). It took 5 more days before IDF allowed safe passage to search for the missing first responders. (!)

A spokesperson for the IDF, Lt. Col. Nadav Shoshani (@LTC_Shoshani), issued a statement on March 31, now demonstrated to be FALSE by emerging evidence, asserting

"Uncoordinated vehicles were identified advancing suspiciously toward IDF troops without headlights or emergency signals."

The footage provides conclusive proof that:
The ambulances and fire truck were unmistakably operating as emergency vehicles, with their lights activated, and the personnel were wearing their reflective gear.

(Statement by IDF spokeperson
x.com/LTC_Shoshani/s…)

This incident has been described as one of the most severe potential war crimes attributed to the IDF.

Reportedly it represented the single deadliest attack on Red Cross and Red Crescent Society workers anywhere in the world since 2017.

Eventually, rescue teams uncovered the ambulances and the remains of 14 paramedics and 1 UN employee who had been reported missing. 1 is reportedly still missing.

More information:

nytimes.com/2025/04/04/wor…

31.323398, 34.243681
8G3P86FV+9F

GeoLocated by @AbuLocation

Geolocation:
x.com/AbuLocation/st…
x.com/AbuLocation/st… x.com/AbuLocation/st… x.com/AbuLocation/st…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/israel/b7b2c58…

Sources: Vid1
x.com/PalestineRCS/s…
Vid2
x.com/EyeonPalestine… Vid3 x.com/AbuLocation/st…
Vid 4 x.com/UNOCHA/status/… (Pic) t.me/dcdgaza/8998 x.com/AbuLocation/st… (Statement 1) x.com/PalestineRCS/s… (Statement 2) x.com/ifrc/status/19…
Read 7 tweets
Feb 20
GeoConfirmed UKR - Misinformation by President Trump.

While we typically refrain from political commentary, President Donald Trump's recent statement regarding the war in Ukraine is so egregious that we feel compelled to respond.

Several claims made by President Trump have already been debunked. We've included responses from Grok AI for each claim, demonstrating that even Grok refutes the misinformation spread by the president.

In this thread, we will provide geolocated footage as a reminder to everyone that Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, marking the beginning of this war.

1)

The United States has not spent $350 billion on this war, nor has it outspent Europe by $200 billion. In fact, European contributions have surpassed those of the US. Moreover, a significant portion of the American military aid (around 90% !) is spend in the US, reinvesting in the US economy.

statista.com/statistics/149…

eeas.europa.eu/delegations/un…

ifw-kiel.de/publications/n…

csis.org/analysis/where…

(Grok: x.com/i/grok/share/9…)

2)

President Zelensky did not claim that half the American money sent to Ukraine is "missing". He stated that half of the promised funds had not been received, which is a crucial distinction.

csis.org/analysis/where…

politifact.com/factchecks/202…

edition.cnn.com/2025/02/19/pol…

(Grok: x.com/i/grok/share/x…)

3)

Ukrainian constitution prohibits elections during wartime, a measure designed to protect the democratic process from foreign interference, particularly given Russia's known capabilities in this area...

foreignpolicy.com/2023/07/11/ukr…

edition.cnn.com/2024/03/30/eur…

united24media.com/war-in-ukraine…

(Grok: x.com/i/grok/share/i…)

4)

President Zelensky is not a dictator, as evidenced by Ukraine's constitutional framework and his commitment to holding elections once hostilities cease. In contrast, it's worth noting that President Putin consistently wins elections in Russia with implausibly high percentages of votes, with opposition that 'falls out of windows", is poisened or jailed, raising questions about the true nature of Russia's electoral process.

europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document…

oscepa.org/en/news-a-medi…

osce.usmission.gov/on-the-russian…

japantimes.co.jp/news/2024/03/1…

bbc.com/news/world-eur…

(Grok: x.com/i/grok/share/a…)

5)

President Zelensky has a approval rate above 50% and not 4%. 4% is Russian disinformation.

edition.cnn.com/2025/02/19/pol…

kiis.com.ua/?lang=eng&cat=…

euronews.com/2025/02/19/zel…

abcnews.go.com/International/…

(Grok: x.com/i/grok/share/I…)

6)

There was no NATO expansion to the East, as NATO itself cannot expand. Instead, democratic countries independently decide whether they want to become members of the alliance. The process of joining NATO is voluntary and involves multiple steps, including meeting specific requirements and completing a formal application process.

The fact that many of Russia's former neighbors have chosen to seek NATO membership speaks volumes about their perception of Russia and their desire for collective security.

The decision of these nations to pursue NATO membership reflects their sovereign right to determine their own foreign policy and security arrangements. It also indicates a preference for the stability and security guarantees that NATO membership offers, rather than remaining under Russian influence.

Regarding the famous 'promise':
Article 103 of the UN Charter establishes a clear hierarchy in international law. It states that obligations under the UN Charter prevail over obligations under any other international agreement in case of conflict. This supremacy extends beyond just treaties, as it is generally understood to also apply to customary international law.
The hierarchy can be summarized as follows:

1) UN Charter obligations
2) Other treaties and customary international law
3) Non-treaty international texts
4) Political promises or commitments
5) Historical claims

Russia's invasion of Ukraine clearly violates fundamental principles of the UN Charter, including the prohibition on the use of force against the territorial integrity of another state. Any attempts to justify this action based on lower-ranking considerations like political promises or historical claims are legally irrelevant.

euvsdisinfo.eu/report/there-i…

nato.int/cps/ra/natohq/…

iir.cz/lies-provocati…

(Grok: x.com/i/grok/share/f… and x.com/i/grok/share/N… and x.com/i/grok/share/N…)

8)

Who initiated this nearly three-year-long war? RUSSIA.

As a platform that has analyzed over 50,000 frames/videos related to the conflict, we will remind the president ,with geolocated footage, who started this war: RUSSIA.

Russia invaded Ukraine on February 24, 2022, despite repeatedly denying any plans for invasion in the preceding days.

x.com/Mike_Pence/sta…

edition.cnn.com/2025/02/19/pol…

(Grok: x.com/i/grok/share/m…)

---

24 FEB 2022 - Russian tanks crossing the border from Belarus into Ukraine in Senkivka.

52.106063, 31.780644
4Q4J+C7C Sen'kivka, Chernihiv Oblast, Ukraine

Sources: x.com/conflicts/stat…

1/11
24 FEB 2022 - Dozens of attack helikopters flying towards Antonov International Airport near Kiyv.

50.596695, 30.500903
HGW2+M9C Vyshhorod, Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine

GeoLocated by @AugustGraham

Geolocation: x.com/augustgraham/s…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/ukraine/0215e3…

Sources: x.com/ralee85/status…

2/11
24 FEB 2022 - About 30 Russian helicopters engaged in attacking Antonov International Airport (Hostomel)

50.583768, 30.254727
H7M3+GV5 Hostomel', Kyiv Oblast, Ukraine

GeoLocated by @Cen4infoRes

Geolocation: x.com/cen4infores/st…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/ukraine/593743…

Sources: x.com/deanobeano1/st…

3/11
Read 11 tweets
Oct 10, 2024
GeoConfirmed Investigation - Thread 3 - October 7th 2023.

Thread 3 - 'Nahal Oz' area.

This thread contains footage of the Nahal Oz area.

At least four different factions participated in the assault on the military base near Nahal Oz and the kibbutz itself:

a) Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, military wing of Hamas.
b) Al-Quds Brigades, military wing of the Palestinian Islamic Jihad.
c) Al-Aqsa Martyrs' Brigades.
d) Palestinian Freedom Movement, Al-Ansar Brigades

---

If any new geolocated footage related to this topic becomes available in the future, it will be added at the end of this thread.

---

If you like our work you can buy us a coffee (buymeacoffee.com/geoconfirmed)
By doing so, you are enabling us to enhance our website and servers, and allowing us to buy satellite imagery for our investigations.

1/XImage
GeoConfirmed 7OCT23.

At sunrise, a large convoy of Palestinian militants, over 30, drive towards Israel in jeeps and with motorcycles. They drive in the direction of Nahal Oz, whilst outgoing rocket fire can be heard and seen.

31.490668, 34.481061
8G3PFFRJ+7C

GeoLocated by @TwistyCB

Geolocation: x.com/TwistyCB/statu…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/7oct/bcfff4a5-…

Sources:
t.me/PalpostN/222948 t.me/asmailpress/76… t.me/newss/140688 x.com/TwistyCB/statu…

2/X
GeoConfirmed 7OCT23.

Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades, military wing of Hamas drone bombing a remote machine gun on a tower near Kfar Aza, Israel

31.498647, 34.514034
FGX7+FJ3 Kfar Aza, Israel

GeoLocated by @0Khit, @GeoRaccoon, @PowerPigeon2 and @PeterLu37121201

Geolocation: x.com/geoconfirmed/s… x.com/0khit/status/1… x.com/georaccoon/sta…
x.com/powerpigeon2/s…
x.com/peterlu3712120…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/7oct/effb2319-…

Sources: x.com/warmonitors/st…
x.com/manniefabian/s…
x.com/war_noir/statu…

3/X
Read 31 tweets
Oct 7, 2024
GeoConfirmed Investigation - Thread 2 - October 7th 2023.

Thread 2 - Zikim area.

This thread contains footage of the Zikim area, highlighting three events:

1) Destruction of Remote-Controlled Weapon Systems
Israeli guard towers along the fence were equipped with remotely controlled weapon systems. These systems were neutralized at the onset of the attack using grenades dropped from drones.
This tactic mirrors the widespread use of drone-dropped munitions observed in the ongoing conflict between Ukraine and Russia.

2) Coastal Infiltration
Militants also employed boats to infiltrate the area via the coastline.

3) Civilian Casualties
The attack resulted in civilian casualties, including teenagers, who were killed at close range.

---

If any new geolocated footage related to this topic becomes available in the future, it will be added at the end of this thread.

---

If you like our work you can buy us a coffee (buymeacoffee.com/geoconfirmed) By doing so, you are enabling us to enhance our website and servers, and allowing us to buy satellite imagery for our investigations.

1/XImage
October 7th 2023.

Smoke emanating from two locations near the Shikma Reservoir, Israel filmed by a Hamas drone.

Point of View - 31.58415, 34.501819
Smoke 1: around 31.595433, 34.493592
Smoke 2: around 31.594119, 34.497942

8G3PHGM2+MP

GeoLocated by @JoshuaKoontz__

Geolocation: x.com/joshuakoontz__…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/7oct/d28d1b4e-…

Sources: t.me/qassambrigades… x.com/TwistyCB/statu…

2/X
October 7th 2023.

A drone by the Izz ad-Din al-Qassam Brigades (Hamas) drops a grenade on a Israeli M2 HMG tower.

31.586644, 34.505412
HGP4+M53 Zikim, Israel

GeoLocated by @EjShahid and @JoshuaKoontz__

Geolocation: x.com/ejshahid/statu…
x.com/joshuakoontz__…

Location: geoconfirmed.org/7oct/cc0ca1c5-…

Sources:
x.com/warmonitors/st…
(longer version) t.me/qassambrigades…

3/X
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(