this is among the more novelly-misogynistic things i have encountered.
i'm not sure i understand it, but it might be explained as a failure mode of third wave feminism's insistence on gender flattening
allow me to explain
in this interaction:
* nicole expresses frustration with a physical danger she's exposed to as a mother with children in tow
* @IanMacAllen responds with aggressive hostility, telling her to harden the fuck up
what an odd thing to say! why is it odd?
@IanMacAllen fairly generally, men do not admonish women for "weakness." it simply isn't done, even if it might be warranted.
"don't be a little bitch" is the sort of thing that you might earnestly say to _another man_ to exhort him to meet some masculine obligation: it is male homosocial
@IanMacAllen aggravating this breach of protocol is expressing the sentiment in a circumstance where a woman's physical fear is completely justified and where her children are at risk, raising it from "bizarre" to the level of "utterly deranged"
@IanMacAllen now I am going to speculate about ian's person. this is unfortunately rude, but he's been rude; and the speculation is relevant
our subject
* identifies as a "shitlib"
* frankly doesn't vibe confidently masculine
* "food and culture. graphic designer. storyteller" this is a Type
@IanMacAllen my hypothesis follows.
1. ian never became comfortable with normal adult masculine norms for behavior, and has had little occasion to
his career as a "writer, critic, and graphic designer" in NYC puts him in circles that are uniformly heterosocial-leaning-female-dominant
@IanMacAllen breaking for a bit because my 3yo is dragging me up to dinner
@IanMacAllen 2. ian determined that nicole was outgroup coded on the basis of her complaining about insane homeless people, a "shitlib" sacred class
this was an act of blasphemy, justifying and even demanding aggression
@IanMacAllen 3. misogynistic political animosity is common but you usually see it expressed in more direct terms like "i hope you get raped"
"you're too weak to fight a homeless man while protecting your children" is what needs explaining
@IanMacAllen 4. "women can do anything men can do and are exactly the same" is a kind of central dogma of the third wave feminism that was popular when ian was coming of age
you're not supposed to _actually_ believe that literally ofc. but one could imagine certain kinds of ppl missing that
@IanMacAllen so basically, ian gets mad online at a nice lady. he doesn't understand you, a grown man, are not supposed to get into who's-physically-tougher status competitions with women and that doing so is a sign of mental illness actually
@IanMacAllen "besides, women can do anything men can do. and *I* wouldnt have trouble beating up an insane dude in an elevator while protecting my kid.
pussy. lmao"
am i missing something here 🤔
maybe this is a rube goldberg machine explanation for an interaction that's actually very simple. but my theory of mind is just seizing up
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
the only way that you get "infinite job creation" in a reasonable time frame is if the demand for technical workers is "perfectly elastic" which. look. you can make that argument if you like but markets like that tend to involve low skill labor easily substituted with machines
i realize im partly relitigating the mariel boatlift discourse (summary attached)
and frankly my response to "convoluted econometrics used to find some insanely counterintuitive result that just happens to support the author's politics" is always "naw"
personally i think "good race relations" are "preserved" by "hanging people who commit heinous crimes independent of race." but i realize im old fashioned about these things
i realize this is old news and its resurgence is probably an op, i don't care, i'm glad everyone is apparently finally hearing about this and i'm happy to talk about it as a favor to pals in britain who will go to jail if they have the temerity to complain themselves