In today’s Vatnik Soup, I’ll discuss the absolute state of X in January 2025. Since its acquisition by Elon Musk, this platform has rapidly transformed into his personal political tool and a breeding ground for hate speech and disinformation.
1/22
Not everyone is following this shitshow as closely as I am, so I thought it would be good to write a summary of all the changes that have happened on this forum and outside of it. These changes have drastically changed how the platform operates and who gets “a voice” here.
2/22
Elon’s team has been tweaking the algorithm many times after the takeover. One of these tweaks happened already around Nov 2022, when the platform heavily suppressed the visibility of pro-Ukraine accounts. This change was then noticed & reported by many pro-Ukraine accounts.
3/22
Under the former ownership, repeated ToS violations resulted in permanent suspensions. However, since Elon promised a “free speech” platform, he now minimizes the visibility of accounts he disfavors instead.
4/22
Recently, there was a heated debate about (primarily Indian) visa workers coming to the US. Elon passionately defended the visa program, which many viewed as contradicting the “America First” ideology popular among the MAGA crowd.
Elon has since deleted most of these posts.
5/22
Many users and groups, like @lauraloomer and @DrLoupis, criticized the program and Musk. Elon retaliated by removing their verification, which caused these accounts to lose ad share revenue and experience a significant drop in visibility on X.
6/22
Additionally, a white nationalist trolling group called the Groypers was suspended, allegedly for criticizing Musk’s businesses. Musk later stated, “My tolerance for subtards is limited,” suggesting further actions may follow.
7/22
Recently, Musk has interfered in European politics, promoting Reform UK, a right-wing, pro-Kremlin, populist party led by Nigel Farage. He also defended Tommy Robinson, a hooligan and career criminal who spread false information about a Syrian boy.
8/22
After Farage refused to support Robinson, Musk called for a leadership change in Reform UK. This was echoed by his bootlicker @stillgray, who had previously praised Farage. Musk also granted Reform UK the gray checkmark reserved for government entities, while neglecting…
9/22
…to give it to major UK parties like @UKLabour and @Conservatives. According to the Financial Times, Musk has even “discussed with allies how Sir Keir Starmer could be removed as UK prime minister before the next general election.”
10/22
Musk’s primary attack against the Starmer government has involved the Rotherham grooming scandal, in which Muslim gangs groomed and raped young girls.
At the same time, Musk has defended Andrew Tate, a Muslim groomer and an alleged sex trafficker and rapist.
11/22
Musk was also enraged over sentencing of a Brit who was jailed for 7½ years for encouraging mobs to attack mosques and for carrying a knife.
For some reason, he had no comment over the death penalty of Saudi activist or 35-year sentence of Saudi woman for tweeting.
12/22
Reform UK isn’t the only pro-Kremlin party Musk supports in Europe. Recently, he began advertising AfD, a far-right German party with ties to the Kremlin and Russian intelligence. On Jan 9, 2025, Musk will host a Spaces event with the party’s leader, @Alice_Weidel.
13/22
At the same time, Musk is bending the knee to the leaders of Saudi Arabia, Turkey, India and recently Brazil. As a matter of fact, Musk's X has complied to more government requests to take down content than Twitter ever did.
14/22
Musk recently announced that in the near future there will be an algorithm update, and that the platform will prioritize “positive” and “informative" content. The goal of this change is probably to bury any kind of criticism towards Musk and the Trump administration,…
15/22
…and feed the users memes, AI slop and gossip instead. Naturally, this doesn’t affect him or his allies, as due to their massive network and everyone seeing Elon’s posts their messaging is always prioritized and promoted on the platform.
16/22
It’s evident that X is no longer a level playing field. It’s controlled by a power-hungry oligarch who prioritizes the interests of a small group of allies and political actors aligned with his worldview.
17/22
To protect “free speech”, Musk changed the ToS so that X users can only file lawsuits against the platform in a federal district in North Texas. This is called “forum shopping”, or the practice of filing suits in a venue more likely to provide a favorable outcome.
18/22
Looking back, it’s clear that Musk’s purchase of X was not a business move but a media takeover. While X may continue losing money, Musk’s businesses will benefit from tax cuts and deals under the Trump administration.
19/22
When forming authoritarian governments, one of the first things to do is to take over the media. With Zuck also removing the guardrails, we will see the rise of the “wild west” social media platforms, where almost anything goes. This is highly beneficial for Trump.
20/22
Elon’s takeover of X is not about “free speech”, but about controlling the information flow & serving the interests of a small, extremely wealthy elite group. In recent years, these oligarchs have only become richer while the regular folk are struggling to buy basic goods.
21/22
As now-banned @JSweetLI aptly said: “The power they [Elon and Zuck] have is far beyond that of a publisher. Using the TV analogy, they don’t merely own the airwaves—they control them, exerting more influence over content than TV stations.
It’s a dictatorial power.”
22/22
You can now pre-order the 2nd edition of my book! This updated version, featuring pre-order extras, will be released at the end of February 2025.
In this 5th Debunk of the Day, we’ll discuss something that sounds great in theory, but was completely turned upside-down by the tankie kind of vatnik: anti-imperialism. More consistent anti-imperialists call this the “anti-imperialism of idiots”. 1/5
“Anti-imperialism” was popularized by Lenin, who saw imperialism as the ultimate stage of capitalism. Ironically, the largest empire is now… Putin’s Russia, proud heir to both Lenin’s Soviet Union and to the Tsarist Empire. 2/5
Indeed, Russia is an empire that is still ruled by a de facto all-powerful Tsar, that still proudly flies its imperial flag, that still dreams of expanding its already huge territory through brutal conquest and colonization. 3/5
In this 4th Debunk of the Day, we’ll refute an absolute classic of vatnik BS, the crown jewel of peak dishonesty: whataboutism.
Now, not everything that looks like whataboutism is wrong. Seeking consistency or comparing actions or responses is normal. 1/5
But when someone pulls some completely unrelated event, that happened to completely different people, a long time ago, in a galaxy far, far away, you know what you’re dealing with: a crass denial of the problem at hand, a bad-faith attempt to derail the topic. 2/5
Logic or chronology plays no role here, nor your opinion on these other topics. You could be the staunchest critic or supporter of these other actions thrown into the discussion, it doesn’t matter. It is irrelevant whether these other things are true or not, or bad or not. 3/5
In this 3rd Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “ending” the war by surrendering or ceding territory.
Nearing four years of the 2-day “special military operation”, Russia is desperate to obtain through other means what they failed to conquer on the battlefield. 1/5
An endless army of vatniks therefore tries to demoralize both Ukrainians and supporters.
They sound noble: “anti-war” or concerned about the fate of Ukraine’s civilians, soldiers and cities. They claim that if we just stop fighting or helping, this horror would magically end. 2/5
What they never mention is… WHO started the war, WHO murders Ukrainians, WHO destroys Ukrainian cities: the same monsters they suggest Ukrainians be at the mercy of. Surrendering wouldn’t end the atrocities of the occupation, it would enable them. Surrendering wouldn’t even…3/5
In today’s Debunk of the Day (2), we’ll look at… nuclear blackmail. Vatniks love using Russia’s nuclear threats as a reason for surrendering or for not lifting a finger to help Ukraine: “see, they have nukes, we have to give them whatever they want”.
The argument is absurd: 1/5
Nuclear deterrence has been a reality for decades. Both the US and Russia have lost wars without resorting to nukes. We are not submitting to the whims of Pakistan or North Korea either. For vatniks, it’s just an insidious way of siding with Putin. 2/5
We can’t just give in to the Kremlin’s nuclear blackmail, to the threats their officials and propagandists make five times a day to scare us into letting them have something they know perfectly well is not theirs, with no limit to their appetite. 3/5 vatniksoup.com/en/nuclear-thr…
In today’s Vatnik Soup, we introduce a Ukrainian “scholar” and social media activist, Marta Havryshko (@HavryshkoMarta). She’s best known for spreading anti-Ukraine and pro-Kremlin narratives online, along with a habit of spotting neo-Nazis everywhere in Ukraine.
1/20
Marta hails from Ukraine, where she studied history at Ivan Franko National University of Lviv. She received her PhD in history in 2010. Her academic work focused on gender-based violence and wartime atrocities, including publications on sexual crimes in occupied Ukraine.
2/20
She is currently working as a visiting Assistant Professor at the Strassler Center for Holocaust & Genocide Studies at Clark University in the US. According to the center’s website, Marta teaches courses on antisemitism, racism, and gender-based violence in armed conflicts.
In today’s (first) Debunk of the Day, we’ll talk about… “realistic expectations”.
Russia has the GDP of Italy. NATO — which Russia claims to be fighting — has 20 times their GDP, and a much stronger and more modern military. 1/5
Russia’s full scale invasion was supposed to take 2 days, but we’re nearing 4 years. They’ve lost a million men. Their economy is in shambles.
And yet we're letting them set their red lines instead of massive sanctions, strong support for Ukraine, and an immediate sky shield. 2/5
Russia thought their war was “realistic” because we’d let them get away with it. It wouldn’t be “realistic” to invade a European nation and redraw borders by force if the West had a strong and united response.
What’s “realistic” is what public opinion tolerates and accepts. 3/5