John Ʌ Konrad V Profile picture
Jan 9 9 tweets 5 min read Read on X
She is a 20 year USCG Veteran and should understand the importance of marine pumping to refill fire department water supplies.

This topic is a MAJOR pet peeve of mine.

Let’s explore how California and Hawaii have utterly failed to use the natural resource we have: salt water. 🧵
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain And if you love fireboats consider visiting or donating to the preservation of the greatest fireboat ever built.

FDNY’s Fire Fighter

americasfireboat.org
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain Or go read @stevenujifusa fantastic book about the man who built her:

amazon.com/dp/1451645090/…
UPDATE:

Many are sending me this article about the problems using salt water in fire mains

It’s true, there are negative impacts but

1) the primary problem noted in the article is danger to the environment

- fish being pulled up in intakes: well there are mitigations to this, pumps don’t like fish which is why we have intake strainers. It’s not a big problem

-salt residue on the forest floor. While I’m not a biologist, animals love and need and have the ability to process salt

2) it is bad for equipment

It’s true firefighting equipment doesn’t like salt water.

Ok but

-equipment can and should be fresh water flushed afterwards.

-it’s an emergency. Equipment is damaged in emergencies

3) it’s not practical to store

As I said in my thread this is true BUT you can put partially desalinated brackish water in aquifers that can naturally filter/absorb the salt

4) There are other solutions I didn’t mention like having a large oil tanker on standby but filled with fresh water instead of oil

This solution would be incredibly expensive BUT the Navy already has a few empty tankers on standby in case of war. Why not keep them filled with fresh water?

5) As mentioned we have already used massive amounts of salt water for operations like 9/11 in the past. Read the after-action reports… there are ways to mitigate the consequences

BOTTOM LINE

The bottom line is Amuse is correct, salt water comes with problems BUT this is a massive emergency.

It’s impossible to solve time critical emergencies without trade offs.
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain @stevenujifusa I keep hearing that salt residue will “destroy” the coastal habitat.

Really? Then how have coastal habitats recovered after tsunamis and 100-year floods?

And if saltwater is so damaging, why is it fine for planes to dump it on wildfires but not fireboats? Make it make sense. x.com/txaggie93/stat…
@Micky_Finn @Sigdrifr @FDNY Chat GPT thinks it could pump 1-3 miles up hill and much more with booster pimps Image
Image
UPDATE 2: Fireboats and hills – can they push water uphill to put out the Pacific Palisades fire? Let’s settle this.

First, a common misconception: marine pumps struggle to pull water uphill, which is why they’re placed below the waterline. But pushing water? That’s a whole different ball game.

Let’s talk about the FDNY’s Three Forty Three, designed to pump water to the top of NYC skyscrapers.
•The 343’s pumps deliver 200 psi, equating to roughly 500 feet of vertical lift—enough for some lower elevations in the Pacific Palisades. But with many areas climbing beyond 1,000 feet, you’d need relay pumps to go higher.
•The Navy has diesel-powered salvage pumps ready to deploy in emergencies, and the SEABEES in Port Hueneme, CA, likely have equipment on hand to help stage those uphill pushes.

Then there’s friction loss:
•With 5-inch large-diameter hose, you lose 15-20 psi per 1,000 feet of hose at high flow rates. Over a mile, pressure drops significantly unless you stage relay pumps along the way.
•Larger hoses reduce friction, but they’re heavier, and gravity pulls on the water weight inside the hose, further complicating uphill pumping.

So, under optimal conditions—large hoses, relay pumps, and minimal elevation gain—the 343 could push water 1-3 miles inland, with elevations staying under 500 feet. Beyond that, logistics and physics become limiting factors.

Still, if you can get water tanks a few miles inland and 500 feet up, that’s often enough for local pumper trucks to do the rest.

Caveat: It’s easy to pick apart my math because there are too many variables to account for in a single X post—terrain, hose setup, flow rates, etc. But this is the general idea.

For a deeper dive, plenty of books and manuals out there can help crunch the exact numbers. And let’s not forget—some of the brightest fluid dynamics scientists at CALTECH are just down the road. I’m sure they’d love the challenge.

(Or just ask AI to come up with a few options based on LAFD and Navy equipment )
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain @stevenujifusa Some more context from maritime historian and firefighter Sal Mercogliano 👇
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain @stevenujifusa We found video of FDNY’s massive fireboat 343 pumping saltwater into city fire mains

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Ʌ Konrad V

John Ʌ Konrad V Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @johnkonrad

Jul 7
USCG hero Scott Ruskan saved 165 lives this week.

But few realize the Rescue Swimmer program that made this possible was born from tragedy, made possible by three men history has forgot.
🧵

In 1983, the WWII-era cargo ship Marine Electric sank in freezing Atlantic waters.

Of the 34 men aboard, 31 died—many seen clinging to wreckage, slowly succumbing to hypothermia as Coast Guard helicopters circled above.

They could see the men.
But they had no one trained to jump in.Image
There were no rescue swimmers.
No cold-water suits.
No personal locator beacons.
No way to retrieve the drowning crew

That night exposed the worst kind of failure:

A USCG regulatory system that let an unseaworthy ship sail, then couldn’t save her crew.
Read 16 tweets
May 18
The real mystery with the Mexican Navy tall ship ARM Cuauhtémoc isn’t what went wrong, we know the engine was likely stuck in reverse.

It’s why the tugboat wasn’t tied up.

I spoke with a New York Harbor pilot and a tug captain near the scene.

Here’s what we know 🧵👇
This is important because the ship only has a small 1,125 horespower Auxiliary engine installed.

The Tugboat Charles D. McAllister is 58 years old but was repowered in 2007 with two CAT 3512 engines with 2,800 horespower.

mcallistertowing.com/our-fleet/char…
The tugboat should have been able to overpower Cuauhtémoc’s engine—even with wind and current pulling the tall ship under the bridge.

The problem?

It wasn’t tied up.

Without a line, the tug could only push across the current not pull the ship against it. Huge difference.
Read 27 tweets
May 18
Here’s my thread on what we know so far. For notes I have been a competitive sailor and I am licensed to captain ships of any size but I have not sailed tall ships. 🧵
First of all this photo confirms there were Mexican Navy’s Cadets on the highest yardarms.

The incident happened at 8:30PM with current traveling upriver.

Currents aren’t strong but it’s only 1.5 hours after low tide so they were still building and hadn’t reached maximum which happens approximately 3 hours after low tide.

Average maximum current at the bridge is usually 2-3 knots.

What can you tell me about the current in the east river at nine pm may 17th based on this dataImage
But the wind was also blowing about 10 knots from the southwest to the northeast

So it would have contributed to pushing the ship into the bridge Image
Read 22 tweets
Apr 18
Nothing in my 18 years since founding gCaptain has caused more panic than @USTradeRep’s recent proposal to charge companies that own Chinese ships $1 million per port call in the US.

USTR held hearings on the fees and today issued major modifications. 🧵
The biggest problem was the original port fees proposed by Trump late February was there were ship size and type agnostic.

All Chinese built ships would be charged $1.5 million per port and $1 million for any ship owned by a company that operates chinese built ships.
This was ok for a very large containership with 17,000 boxes that could absorb the fee

But it would have been devastating for a bulker that only carries low value cement.
Read 11 tweets
Mar 10
When something goes wrong, the experts say, “Wait for the report.”

Let’s be real—you won’t remember or care in a year but… this is a teaching moment.

So here’s a 🧵 on possible causes: 👇
First we have to define what type of incident it is.

We say incident instead of accident because we can’t rule out foul play.

This is also not a collision. It’s an Allision. A collision is between two moving objects, an allision is 1 moving and 1 fixed

gcaptain.com/maritime-word-…
Words are important because liability will be in the tens of millions.

Next we have to determine who’s at fault. Unfortunately for the 🇺🇸 at anchor admiralty law always finds BOTH vessels at fault.

Is this fair? No. But the ocean isn’t fair
Read 18 tweets
Feb 23
This post is going viral, and I’m getting a lot of questions about whether a Marine could be appointed as the next Chief of Naval Operations (CNO) and who’s actually in the running.

Could a Marine Be the Next CNO?

Here’s a 🧵 on who it might be
General Heckl would be a great choice but a marine is highly unlikely. The CNO has always been a Navy admiral. General Karsten Heckl is retired—he could technically be called up, but it’s a long shot.

While predicting the next CNO is tricky, here are the names that keep coming up among insiders—ranked by likelihood.
Established Three and Four-Star Contenders

If Trump wants a quick, low-drama senate confirmation, expect @PeteHegseth to go for a Vice Admiral or Admiral who has already been through the Senate Armed Service Committee wringer.
Read 24 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(