She is a 20 year USCG Veteran and should understand the importance of marine pumping to refill fire department water supplies.
This topic is a MAJOR pet peeve of mine.
Let’s explore how California and Hawaii have utterly failed to use the natural resource we have: salt water. 🧵
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain And if you love fireboats consider visiting or donating to the preservation of the greatest fireboat ever built.
Many are sending me this article about the problems using salt water in fire mains
It’s true, there are negative impacts but
1) the primary problem noted in the article is danger to the environment
- fish being pulled up in intakes: well there are mitigations to this, pumps don’t like fish which is why we have intake strainers. It’s not a big problem
-salt residue on the forest floor. While I’m not a biologist, animals love and need and have the ability to process salt
2) it is bad for equipment
It’s true firefighting equipment doesn’t like salt water.
Ok but
-equipment can and should be fresh water flushed afterwards.
-it’s an emergency. Equipment is damaged in emergencies
3) it’s not practical to store
As I said in my thread this is true BUT you can put partially desalinated brackish water in aquifers that can naturally filter/absorb the salt
4) There are other solutions I didn’t mention like having a large oil tanker on standby but filled with fresh water instead of oil
This solution would be incredibly expensive BUT the Navy already has a few empty tankers on standby in case of war. Why not keep them filled with fresh water?
5) As mentioned we have already used massive amounts of salt water for operations like 9/11 in the past. Read the after-action reports… there are ways to mitigate the consequences
BOTTOM LINE
The bottom line is Amuse is correct, salt water comes with problems BUT this is a massive emergency.
It’s impossible to solve time critical emergencies without trade offs.
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain @stevenujifusa I keep hearing that salt residue will “destroy” the coastal habitat.
Really? Then how have coastal habitats recovered after tsunamis and 100-year floods?
And if saltwater is so damaging, why is it fine for planes to dump it on wildfires but not fireboats? Make it make sense. x.com/txaggie93/stat…
@Micky_Finn @Sigdrifr @FDNY Chat GPT thinks it could pump 1-3 miles up hill and much more with booster pimps
UPDATE 2: Fireboats and hills – can they push water uphill to put out the Pacific Palisades fire? Let’s settle this.
First, a common misconception: marine pumps struggle to pull water uphill, which is why they’re placed below the waterline. But pushing water? That’s a whole different ball game.
Let’s talk about the FDNY’s Three Forty Three, designed to pump water to the top of NYC skyscrapers.
•The 343’s pumps deliver 200 psi, equating to roughly 500 feet of vertical lift—enough for some lower elevations in the Pacific Palisades. But with many areas climbing beyond 1,000 feet, you’d need relay pumps to go higher.
•The Navy has diesel-powered salvage pumps ready to deploy in emergencies, and the SEABEES in Port Hueneme, CA, likely have equipment on hand to help stage those uphill pushes.
Then there’s friction loss:
•With 5-inch large-diameter hose, you lose 15-20 psi per 1,000 feet of hose at high flow rates. Over a mile, pressure drops significantly unless you stage relay pumps along the way.
•Larger hoses reduce friction, but they’re heavier, and gravity pulls on the water weight inside the hose, further complicating uphill pumping.
So, under optimal conditions—large hoses, relay pumps, and minimal elevation gain—the 343 could push water 1-3 miles inland, with elevations staying under 500 feet. Beyond that, logistics and physics become limiting factors.
Still, if you can get water tanks a few miles inland and 500 feet up, that’s often enough for local pumper trucks to do the rest.
Caveat: It’s easy to pick apart my math because there are too many variables to account for in a single X post—terrain, hose setup, flow rates, etc. But this is the general idea.
For a deeper dive, plenty of books and manuals out there can help crunch the exact numbers. And let’s not forget—some of the brightest fluid dynamics scientists at CALTECH are just down the road. I’m sure they’d love the challenge.
(Or just ask AI to come up with a few options based on LAFD and Navy equipment )
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain @stevenujifusa Some more context from maritime historian and firefighter Sal Mercogliano 👇
@FDNY @EsperDoD @CalPoly @threadreaderapp @gCaptain @stevenujifusa We found video of FDNY’s massive fireboat 343 pumping saltwater into city fire mains
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
For my entire life, I’ve picked candidates based on rational thinking, but this time I’m going with emotion—“my gut.” One emotion specifically is driving my vote: anger
Biden’s “trash” comment has a deeper meaning, it wasn’t a simple mistake and let me explain why.
There has never been a more emotionally charged election in my lifetime. Sometimes the hope, indignation, incredulity, excitement, shame, frustration, and concern feel like they’re tearing me apart.
It’s tearing some of you apart too, and that’s okay. Emotional response is okay… if it’s authentic.
It’s ok to feel all types of emotion, except one.
We live in a culture that tries to remove emotion from the human experience. This isn’t healthy. You should feel empowered to feel every emotion against the opposition EXCEPT anger.
Anger is dangerous and unauthentic.
John A. Konrad III, my grandpa, had a great Irish-German anger problem. Stories of his rages were legendary, and my dad and uncle suffered the wrath. Not entirely his fault—I blame the PTSD from many bombing runs over Nazi Germany.
John A. Konrad IV, my dad, also had bouts of anger. Less severe, but more imposing because he was 6’2” and 275 lbs of pure muscle. BIG Jack. A Vietnam vet and Bronx firefighter, he could channel the early stages of anger into a stare that would quiet a room and make grown men shake. Unfortunately, I occasionally got to see him past the “in control” phase. It wasn’t pretty.
When you experience rage as a kid, you become very attuned to emerging anger. When you’re the child of a hardened vet who can turn on and off that anger at will, you become very attuned to authentic anger, both controlled and uncontrolled.
I am an expert in very few things, but anger is one of them.
I say this because I’ve been retweeting a lot of posts by angry people lately, and almost all are Democrats. The comments I get are “that’s not anger, that’s passion,” or “she has good reasons for being angry,” or “you’re wrong, John.”
I know anger, and I’m seeing it in abundance today—and the vast majority is on the left.
And my experience comes not just from living with anger but from going out of my way to read and learn about anger.
Why? Because I did not want to pass it on to my son and daughter.
Anger is toxic like no other emotion.
What have I learned from a lifetime studying anger? Lots, but the breakthrough came on a trip to California when I met Marshall Rosenberg, the father of Nonviolent Communication. He taught me an important lesson: all anger derives from misplaced judgment.
Let me repeat: all anger derives from misplaced judgment.
We are angry because we think we know what the other side is thinking. We think we know why they are voting for Kamala or Trump. We think they see the same rational information and pick the idiotic, selfish, or, worse, malevolent choice.
Why I mentioned Grandpa was because I never once witnessed anger in his voice. He was the kindest, most gentle man in my life. I certainly believed the stories of his rages, but I never experienced them.
Why?
Today, I broke down in tears, and the reason dawned on me. Why are so many poor fathers wonderful grandparents?
What happened is my son went to college a few months back, and my wife has been bugging me to disassemble his bed so we can turn his room into an office.
Simple task, but as I was halfway through, something dawned on me. He had slept in this bed his entire life. 18 wonderful years. And now it was going away.
I cried like a baby. Just me. Nobody around to witness it.
What got me was how unexpected it was. One minute I’m listening to music with tools, the next I’m paralyzed with emotion.
The smaller but important lesson here is that time moves quickly, and we should not allow anger to rule any of it. Grandpas have a perspective on time—they understand this. 1/4
But what grandpas (most at least—some men never learn this) know is how impossible it is to understand yourself. I’ve been living in this body for 47 years, and I did not expect to cry today. Yet here we are.
Grandpas understand what dads do not: that their lack of self-understanding is often the cause of kids’ misbehavior.
Kids do not understand their personal behavior or inner rationality. They are kids, learning. This is often what sends parents into rage.
“Why did you do that absolutely idiotic thing, Jimmy?”
Jimmy tells you the reason, and you don’t believe him. You think he’s lying. The thing is, HE IS LYING, but not to you—to himself.
Jimmy doesn’t know why he did it, just like I didn’t realize I was going to cry today. 2/4
All anger derives from misplaced judgment.
There are two ways to eliminate anger:
1.Work to understand the perspectives of the other side.
Now, this doesn’t mean you have to agree with them. Many things the left (and some on the right) say fill me with frustration, fear, and other strong emotions.
But these emotions are natural. They are non-judgmental. They are healthy, whereas anger is not.
2.Forgive. Understand the lesson I learned today, the lesson Grandpa Jack learned without realizing it: that people are complicated, make mistakes, and have different perspectives.
99.9% of people on the right are not “voting for a Nazi,” and 99.9% of people on the left are not “voting for a communist.” They don’t see it like that.
Assuming they “know Trump is a felon” is false. We know the legal definition, but we have doubts about the DA’s methods.
But that’s why so many on the left are angry. They think they know exactly why people are voting for Trump. The fact is, they don’t know.
And why is that anger less prominent on the right? Because the right understands the influence of the education system and media. They know why people vote for Kamala. They are frustrated, fearful, and a host of other emotions, but they aren’t angry because they know there are many reasons why you won’t vote for Trump.
That’s why so many Republicans roll their eyes while Democrats get triggered.
The world is complicated, and the years Grandpa lived calmed down his anger because he realized he didn’t even know his own motivations, let alone someone else’s.
All anger derives from misplaced judgment.
And that’s why I can’t get over Biden’s rage and comments about Trump supporters being trash. It’s easy to say the ‘trash’ comment was a mistake, but it wasn’t. It wasn’t because it came from a place of anger, which is judgmental. 3/4
Up until 14:09 on Tuesday all my reliable sources were telling me the ILA was digging in for a long fight
@typesfast - who has the best ocean data in the world - was the first to make bold counter call “with 80% probably it will be over by Tuesday”
His company @flexport has some of the best experts in the business and can see in realtime if ships are diverting or not. That combined with smart staff who understand history, political and economic issues is likely what drove the prediction
Ryan also didn’t hesitate to collect information directly from experts.
The person with the best trucking data (trucks need to start diverting too) is @FreightAlley and he echoed Ryan’s optimism yesterday.
Yesterday afternoon @mercoglianos started warning us at @gCaptain to be ready
Biden then made a statement of support of the union and @SecretaryPete applied pressure on USMX at 8PM. DC was finally waking up
Yesterday afternoon I received information from a source that Daggett was getting death threats and public sentiment was against him. Some of his advisers were suggesting he sit down for a deal
Later I got confirmation from another source along the same lines.
There were two problems with the information that prevented me from making a prediction:
1) other sources were adamant the ILA would not budge on automation
2) we got a statement from ILA confirming that Daggett was thrown by the backlash but it said he was a combat veteran and a fighter who wouldn’t back down
This morning more sources confirmed that DC was waking up and ILA was breaking due to the backlash
@mercoglianos got solid information a deal would be made
I published the article on @gCaptain “TikTok Fury and Death Threats: Will ILA Union Boss Daggett Fold or Double Down?”
I also talked to a source in the Trump camp who assured me DJT had deep knowledge of the issues from his time as a NYC real estate developer and was working the problem. No details how but told to watch for something thst would “move the needle”
Talked to @mercoglianos again and he was confident a deal was coming soon
Around lunch I finally got a hold of a Democrat source who said “it close but there’s a sticking point” I assumed it was automation but they would confirm
At 12:52 @GovRonDeSantis called the national guard to take over the ports in FL
Had a long conversation with Sal @mercoglianos @MikeSchuler around lunch and confidence it would end was high but nobody was sure exactly when
I disappeared into meetings for the rest of the afternoon.
I was hesitant to make a call because numerous sources said the ILA was still dug in over automation.
17:18 Sal calls it outscooping everyone
@MikeSchuler gets it up on @gCaptain just after it becomes official /1
So, what exactly happened?
It’s hard to say for sure, but I’m confident the ILA expected public support—and the backlash flipped the script.
The rest is just my informed speculation:
Biden did a good job threading the needle with by supporting the union but applying gentle pressure behind the scene.
@SecretaryPete helped by finally stepping in.
A source close to Trump told me his NYC real estate meant he understand the dynamics well. While it’s unclear if he directed DeSantis, he likely gave at least tacit approval for calling in the National Guard.
Sources told me the deal was nearly done, but no one was sure if it would take hours or days. DeSantis’ move likely sealed the deal, removing any lingering doubt.
Both Trump and Kamala did the country a favor by not turning this into a political fight. Trump had more to gain but also more risk—if the strike dragged on, he could’ve picked up populist support, but Kamala might’ve taken full credit if a deal was struck right before the election.
Kamala stayed quiet, but with Marty Walsh as a close adviser, a union pro, she likely knew more than she let on.
I think all parties made fairly smart moves and I am very glad nobody leveraged this hard for political gain!
That’s a win for the entire nation!!
All this plus a very civil and smart VP debate gives me renewed hope for our future.
/2
All my best sources on the inside as well as my extremely smart friends - @typesfast @FreightAlley @mercoglianos @MikeSchuler - gave clear warnings
Do I regret not breaking the news early?
Not at all!
What made me hesitate most was the automation issue and that has NOT been settled.
All we got was an agreement on pay and broad strokes for a temporary return to work until that great prize fight is announced
I think this was smart for the ILA. It:
1) Lets public outrage settle
2) lets them regroup and rethink strategy
3) shows they are reasonable
4) likely gives them some political credits with both parties
5) lets them lock in much higher paying
USMX wins because there was the ability for ILA and Biden to hammer home the fact that ship owners sre far wealthier than Daggett
/3
Craig has an excellent post on the ILA, but what’s missing is a deep dive into the organization they’re negotiating with: USMX
If the ILA is “bad”, USMX is possibly worse
Who are they and why?
USMX (United States Maritime Alliance) represents shipping companies, port operators, and other maritime players along the U.S. East and Gulf coasts. Their role? To negotiate labor contracts and operational policies with dockworker unions like the ILA, ensuring smooth port operations.
But here’s where it gets tricky: despite its American identity, USMX is heavily influenced by foreign interests, including massive overseas corporations like the China-controlled COSCO Shipping.
Although USMX is supposed to represent U.S. interests, foreign-controlled companies within the alliance have significant sway over key decisions. Why? These large companies, with deeper pockets and bigger fleets, control more resources, giving them outsized influence in decision-making. Here’s how they wield their power:
1.Board Representation: Foreign shipping giants often hold significant seats on USMX’s board, shaping agendas and steering decisions.
2.Economic Clout: The financial contributions of the largest foreign ship owners give them more say in how resources are allocated within the alliance, often to suit their own interests.
3.Committees and Expertise: Employees from these companies often lead technical committees, giving them control over critical policy recommendations.
4.Strategic Coalitions: These companies form alliances with other members to drive consensus on issues that benefit them, amplifying their collective influence.
5.Information Access: With access to greater data and resources, they can craft well-founded proposals that steer USMX’s strategy.
So, while USMX negotiates with American dockworkers, foreign ship owners shape these labor negotiation policies.
When USMX prioritizes keeping trade flowing by catering to foreign interests, the U.S. risks losing control over its own critical shipping infrastructure, raising concerns for national security and long-term economic stability. /1
That maybe ok when we are talking about a NATO ally like the Danish company @Maersk or the French @cmacgm
But China’s CCP controlled @COSCOSHIPPING has a board seat too?
How Could China Exert Influence on USMX Decisions?
1.Economic Leverage: China, as a major global trading partner, wields substantial influence by controlling the flow of goods. By offering increased cargo traffic or threatening to divert shipping routes to other countries, they can pressure USMX into making decisions that favor their interests. A promise of more business can entice USMX to align with China’s trade preferences, while the threat of reduced cargo could financially strain U.S. ports.
2.Influence Operations: Behind-the-scenes lobbying is another tactic. China can engage intermediaries or businesspeople with connections to both Chinese interests and USMX, subtly encouraging policies that align with Chinese objectives. These indirect methods create the appearance of a fair negotiation, while steering decisions toward outcomes beneficial to China’s shipping dominance.
Chain Dependence: Many U.S. industries rely heavily on Chinese manufacturing. China could highlight this dependency, reminding USMX that disruptions in their trade relationship could severely impact the supply chain. This indirect pressure encourages USMX to adopt policies that prioritize maintaining smooth trade with China, even if it compromises broader U.S. interests.
4.Leveraging International Regulations: China also works through international bodies like the International Maritime Organization (IMO) to shape global shipping standards. By pushing for regulations that align with its own shipping practices, China can exert influence on USMX to adopt similar policies. These standards may be presented as neutral but are often designed to favor Chinese shipping interests, creating further leverage in global trade negotiations.
While these tactics are subtle, they exemplify the complex web of economic and political influence in international trade, demonstrating how a foreign power like China can quietly shape U.S. maritime policies through economic and regulatory pressure.
How China Influence could hypothetically Impact USMX’s Broader Role in U.S. National Security:
1. Strategic Supply Chain Control: By shaping USMX decisions, China can indirectly influence the U.S.’s broader supply chain infrastructure. This extends beyond port operations to critical sectors like technology and defense, where the U.S. is reliant on components manufactured in or routed through China. If USMX aligns too closely with foreign interests, this could create vulnerabilities in supply chains crucial for national security.
2. Erosion of U.S. Port Independence: Foreign influence, especially from China, can gradually undermine U.S. port autonomy. If foreign-owned companies and their allies within USMX push for policies that favor their interests, U.S. ports might become increasingly reliant on foreign directives for trade decisions. This compromises U.S. control over its own shipping networks, potentially jeopardizing both economic and strategic independence.
3. Global Geopolitical Leverage: U.S. ports are integral to the country’s global trade power. However, by subtly influencing USMX, China can limit the U.S.’s ability to exert its geopolitical influence via trade. This could extend to controlling key shipping routes or encouraging trade agreements that sideline U.S. interests in favor of Chinese dominance in the Pacific and beyond. This creates long-term strategic risks for the U.S. in maintaining its global maritime leadership.
4. Leverage over terminals and dockworkers could become a real-time throttle on the economy
By allowing foreign entities like China to indirectly shape policy within USMX, the U.S. risks losing not just economic control over its ports, but also strategic positioning in the ever-competitive global maritime landscape. /4
The International Longshoreman Union was founded in 1892 but by the end of World War 2 it was a hotbed of organized crime, communist sympathy and corruption.
How did they clean up their act? (or did they?)
And how did Harold Dagget become a star?
A 🧵
There had always been pilferage and corruption at the docks. This is because cargo was carried on stick ships and laoded onto ships by hand.
IT was just too easy to break open a wooden box in the hold of a ship and steal high value cargo. Or you could "accidently" drop a box and claim damage.
But in 1948 the investigative journalist Malcolm Johnson published a 24-part series in the New York Sun detailing the festering underside of the city’s port and it got people's attention spawning congressional hearings as well as the hit 1954 film On the Waterfront.