Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
@ProfMJCleveland
Jan 9 • 3 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Trump's attorneys argument Smith & DOJ violated Cannon's order by conveying information to Congress concerning its view on final report. 1/
2/ Asks for them to be held in contempt if returned to Cannon. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/3 DOJ is trying to speed the case up by created self-imposed deadline of 1/10. No reason court cannot address the issues more soberly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jan 14
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: And Trump is back in the fight filing supplement asking Judge Cannon to maintain the status quote & hear his Motion on Friday. 1/ Image
Image
2/ Full Motion: Image
Image
Image
Image
3/ Highlighting a few points: Trump's legal team nails DOJ for its efforts to negatively impact Trump who is soon to be commander in chief. Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jan 13
🚨🚨🚨: BREAKING. New order in Cannon case. Image
2/ Enjoins release of Vol. II but NOT Vol. I. No mention of Clark or other interests. Will she enter a second order soon? @JeffClarkUS and @HarryMacD might not want to risk & immediately file complaint w/ TRO to stop Vol. I especially given Arizona.
@JeffClarkUS @HarryMacD 3/3 Could be Cannon is doing these things separately and will soon rule on Clark's request for administrative stay to enjoin release of Vol. I.
Read 4 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jan 13
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Co-Defendants' in Trump's classified document case just filed reply brief in support of injunction. 🧵1/
2/ Link: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Reply Brief opens by stressing how DOJ is putting politics over process--here due process. What's the big rush to release report before Court can hear argument? One thing only: Trump is inaugurated. That's not a reason much less a good reason. Image
Read 10 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jan 13
THREADETTE: During tonight's Space hosted by @McAdooGordon with @shipwreckedcrew & @KingMakerFT Leslie highlighted something I had missed: While I believed Judge Cannon had not ruled on Defendants' Motion for an Injunction, believing instead she entered temporary injunction 1/
2/ to keep report from being released pending resolution of everything & in deference to what 11th Cir. might say. Well, as Leslie pointed out, Cannon expressly stated that Defendants' Motion for Injunction remained pending, here. Note docket 679 was the emergency Motion. Image
3/ Because that Motion remains pending, that DOJ appealed from temporary injunction does not deprive Cannon of jurisdiction to decide whether to grant the injunction. DOJ argued its emergency appeal took jurisdiction away from Cannon--it didn't.
Read 6 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jan 12
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING (cont.): As I reported last night, in response to inquiry, attorney for @JeffClarkUS, Harry MacDougald, @HarryMacD, stated he had filed a Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief in Judge Cannon's D.Ct., & proposed Amicus Brief. This is HUGE. 🧵1/
2/ Even more-so because DOJ this morning filed response stating nothing in Vol. I of Special Counsel report has anything to do w/ Trump's 2 co-defendants in classified document case. Here is link to full filing which I bought & recapped so all have access storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Because Clark is not party to case, filing must be made to the clerk & not on docket & clerk must then place on docket, so Clark's filings are not yet docketed on case, but should be soon. Reason this is key is b/c DOJ has said it won't release Vol. II publicly, just Vol. I.
Read 35 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Jan 12
🔥🔥🔥BREAKING: Huge news re case re release of Special Counsel report case. In response to my inquiry, attorney for @JeffClarkUS informed me that he has filed with clerk Motion for Leave to File Amicus Brief. 🧵1/
2/ As backdrop: You cannot file on a docket if not a party, so you have to provide to clerk who then does the filing. So, not publicly up yet, but I have reviewed and it is 🔥🔥🔥. Several points:
3/ In amicus brief, Clark's attorney, Harry Macdougald, notes that it appears that no one has yet informed Court (Judge Cannon), of "extreme and unlawful prejudice" that would ensue to Clark and "other individuals."Image
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(