Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

You can paste full URL like: https://x.com/threadreaderapp/status/1644127596119195649
or just the ID like: 1644127596119195649

How to get URL link on X (Twitter) App

  1. On the Twitter thread, click on or icon on the bottom
  2. Click again on or Share Via icon
  3. Click on Copy Link to Tweet
  4. Paste it above and click "Unroll Thread"!
  5. More info at Twitter Help
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
@ProfMJCleveland
Jan 9 • 3 tweets • 1 min read • Read on X
🚨🚨🚨BREAKING: Trump's attorneys argument Smith & DOJ violated Cannon's order by conveying information to Congress concerning its view on final report. 1/
2/ Asks for them to be held in contempt if returned to Cannon. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/3 DOJ is trying to speed the case up by created self-imposed deadline of 1/10. No reason court cannot address the issues more soberly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Margot Cleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ProfMJCleveland

Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Apr 14
THREADETTE: Just tonight I caught another nuance I missed in SCOTUS's Garcia order--something Trump Administration is hitting hard. SCOTUS didn't say clarify what "effectuate" means! SCOTUS said "clarify" "directive." 1/ Image
2/ Now, Judge Xinis is reading "directive" as "effectuate," but Trump Administration has better argument that "directive" is the injunction because the entire injunction should be giving due regard to Trump's Article II authority over foreign affairs.
3/ And because the Court said "the rest of the order remains in effect but requires clarification on remand." What requires clarification? THE ORDER. Not the word "effectuate," although meaning of that term is unclear.
Read 9 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Apr 13
🚨BOOM: Trump files second document in Garcia case opposing Garcia's various requests in his Motion for Additional Relief. 1/
2/ Link: Comments to follow. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Trump Administration begins noting that Court invited the Motion Garcia filed for "additional relief," and that the relief sought seeks to micromanage diplomatic relations...It does. Image
Read 20 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Apr 13
Well that was anti-climatic: 1/ Image
2/ But Declaration adds some other details Court pretends don't exist such as: Image
Image
3/ Full Declaration: storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
Read 6 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Apr 12
🚨🚨🚨Two new filings in Garcia case (El Salvadorian improperly removed to El Salvador). First, Garcia's attorneys followed district court's lead to file a Motion for Supplemental relief. That Motion asks Court to enter an order requiring 3 things: 1/ Image
2/ Full Motion here. Motion opens by saying that because Trump said if SCOTUS ordered him to bring someone back he would, but that ignores reality that Trump doesn't control El Salvador. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ Specifics of what Garcia requests go to my earlier THREAD that the improper removal isn't an olly olly oxen free. The wrongful removal does not entitle Garcia to parole in U.S. Image
Read 9 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Apr 12
THREADETTE: So, more I think about it, the more I think improper removal of El Salvador national lacks judicial remedy. Now that would be "conscience shocking" if mistake happened to U.S. citizen. BUT mistake re Garcia is different because: 1/
2/ a) He is illegal alien; b) who had due process and was found (1) removable, (2) not entitled to asylum & (3) not entitled to protection under CAT (Convention Against Terrorism); (4) sole reason he couldn't be removed to El Salvador no longer exists; (5) he is El Salvadorian.
3/ Add to that, had Trump Administration not made error in sending him to El Salvador, he would still be removed from U.S. and possibly still to El Salvador. Yes, yes, yes, it was a mistake, but that doesn't mean court can create a fix because El Salvador HAS an interest
Read 7 tweets
Margot Cleveland Profile picture
Apr 11
🔥Yesterday a federal court denied an injunction to delay DHS's requirement that aliens (including) illegals register, holding plaintiffs lack standing. I'm surprise there are no other cases challenging these regs even though STATUTE requires registration. 1/
2/ Here's entire decision which is worth a read to understand how the administrative state runs the government often in violation of Congress's commands. storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.usco…
3/ More broadly, the order summarizes the registration process and illustrations how Trump Administration is fighting illegal immigration: If they don't register, they commit a crime; if they commit a crime an investigation can be launched to obtain info from IRS to locate.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

Send Email!

:(