Chad Crowley Profile picture
Jan 9 9 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1/ Let’s talk about collapse. Fires rage in Los Angeles, and no one can put them out—a clear symbol of a civilization unable to solve even its most basic problems. Joseph A. Tainter's "The Collapse of Complex Societies" provides a framework to understand why this happens.
2/ Civilizational collapse is no relic of the past or mere curiosity for court historians, whose interests often veer into the irrelevant and removed from the pressing realities of today. Collapse is a recurring phenomenon, an inevitable stage in the life cycle of societies. As the West faces internal fractures and accelerating decline, it is imperative to understand the forces that have undone great civilizations before us.

In "The Collapse of Complex Societies," Joseph A. Tainter provides a framework for analyzing this decline. As an anthropologist, his approach stands apart from the abstractions of historians. Tainter reveals that complexity—vital for societal advancement, particularly in an increasingly globalized and technologized world—carries within it the seeds of its own destruction. Societies that grow increasingly complex invest more in solving problems through administrative, technological, and bureaucratic means, yet these solutions yield diminishing returns. Over time, the cost of maintaining the system outweighs its benefits, creating a tipping point where collapse becomes not just possible but the rational culmination of a managed decline.

The West today is approaching this threshold. Institutions designed to safeguard stability and progress have become engines of inefficiency, consuming resources to sustain themselves while delivering little value. More troubling, however, is the ideological rot at their core.Image
3/ Tainter’s analysis exposes how societies fail when they lose the ability to reconcile complexity with functionality, but the West’s decline is accelerated by its fixation on utopian ideals divorced from reality. Chief among these is the obsession with absolute equality, which manifests in policies that undermine competence, cohesion, and trust.

Modern institutions prioritize demographic representation over merit, subordinating excellence to ideological conformity. Programs like affirmative action and quotas enforce a belief that all outcomes must be leveled, regardless of skill or capability. The result is a system that sacrifices institutional effectiveness on the altar of symbolic progress. Fields demanding expertise—medicine, engineering, national defense—are increasingly populated by individuals chosen for reasons other than their merit. This erosion of standards not only weakens critical sectors but also breeds resentment, as citizens see fairness and competence replaced by ideological orthodoxy.

Such policies are not about solving problems but about enforcing control. Utopian ideals of absolute equality have become tools of an increasingly dysfunctional elite, wielded to maintain their own power while deflecting attention from systemic failures. These initiatives serve as a façade, masking the inability—or refusal—to confront the real issues undermining society’s foundations.Image
4/ Demographic transformation further accelerates collapse, creating divisions that a complex society cannot sustain. Unlike historical collapses where population shifts were often imposed largely by external forces, the West’s demographic replacement is deliberate—an ideological project rooted in utopian fantasies of global equity.

Mass immigration, lauded as an economic and moral imperative beyond reproach, serves as a tool to obscure systemic failures and pacify growing discontent. Rather than addressing the festering rot in infrastructure, education, or governance, elites import new populations under the guise of "growth." This transformation fractures the cultural and ethnic unity that once underpinned Western nations, replacing shared identity with competing allegiances. Instead of cohesive societies, we witness the rise of competing enclaves, driven by BIPOC identity politics, fracturing unity as they battle for resources and power.

This demographic shift is not incidental—it is weaponized. By replacing founding populations, elites create a population easier to control, one less connected to the traditions, history, and identity of the nations they inhabit. This strategy ensures that the institutions of power remain insulated from dissent, as the newly imported underclass relies on those same elites for survival. It is a cynical manipulation that trades long-term stability for short-term dominance.
5/ Tainter’s insight that collapse unfolds as a slow unraveling, rather than a sudden event, is painfully relevant. The West’s decline is marked by missed opportunities for reform and an unwillingness to address the structural contradictions tearing it apart. Leaders blind themselves with ideological dogmas, pouring resources into symbolic gestures while neglecting the decay of physical infrastructure, economic stability, and social trust.

Crumbling roads, failing schools, and soaring debt are treated as secondary concerns to the pursuit of utopian ideals. Instead of confronting these failures, Western elites double down on globalist ambitions—remaking the world in their image through international economic policies, climate agendas, and mass migration. These distractions allow them to avoid responsibility for internal decay while perpetuating the illusion of progress.

Yet this house of cards cannot hold. As systems grow more unwieldy and populations more divided, the West’s ability to withstand external shocks or internal crises diminishes. Tainter’s warning is clear: societies that refuse to adapt to reality are doomed to collapse under the weight of their own contradictions.
6/ History offers no guarantees, only lessons. The West’s trajectory mirrors the failures of past civilizations, but its ideological rigidity and demographic engineering make its decline uniquely self-inflicted. Tainter’s work is not merely a study of the past but a mirror for our present condition—a reminder that complexity, unchecked by reality, leads inevitably to destruction.

Survival demands rejecting the utopian fantasies of universal equality and globalism that have hollowed out the West’s foundations. It requires a return to the enduring truths of identity, merit, and the natural order—principles that once defined the strength of Western civilization. Without this course correction, the West is destined to join the annals of civilizations that fell, not to external enemies, but to our own hubristic desire to ignore reality.
7/ An Addendum (As I often provide for clarification)

This essay was a brief exploration of Joseph Tainter's "The Collapse of Complex Societies," alongside my analysis of the reigning liberal-humanist ideology in the West, its role in demographic transformation, and how these dynamics contribute to systemic fragility. It is not intended to be exhaustive or conclusive.

On X, I often discuss books and ideas that I don’t fully agree with, drawing my own conclusions, as any critical reader should. While I don’t align with every aspect of Tainter’s work, his overriding thesis rings true: complex societies collapse when the costs of maintaining their complexity outpace their ability to solve problems. Given that our world is the most interconnected and technologized in human history, his insights remain strikingly relevant.

It’s worth noting that Tainter wrote this book in 1988, and much of what he foresaw has now become our reality.

In the replies and reposts, most responses fall into one of two camps, either agreeing with the larger point or critiquing it.

For the latter, two recurring misconceptions dominate:

1. The Pilot and the First Tweet

Some are fixated on the helicopter footage, insisting the pilot isn’t to blame. But this entirely misses the point. The video wasn’t about the pilot; it was a visual shorthand, necessary on a platform like X, to draw attention. It represents systemic failure decades in the making—failure rooted in decayed leadership, crumbling infrastructure, and misplaced priorities.

Whether the pilot was doing his best within a broken system or is the product of DEI-driven hiring is ultimately irrelevant. The clip serves as a visceral reminder of what happens when a society’s capacity to maintain basic functionality erodes. It’s not about one individual’s actions but the larger decay that leaves a helicopter missing its mark as an emblem of collapse.

Naturally, the forces of Mother Nature play a role—as they always have and always will. Factors like erratic wind patterns, thermal turbulence, the inherent difficulty of aerial firefighting, etc., all complicate such efforts. Yet the question remains: is a society equipped to adapt and overcome these challenges, or does it succumb to its own self-inflicted fragility, leaving technical obstacles as insurmountable failures rather than manageable hurdles?

2. Policy Mismanagement

The other camp focuses on "policy mismanagement," claiming it as the root cause. This is a classic example of missing the forest for the trees. Tainter’s work isn’t a catalog of policy blunders; it’s a meta-analysis of civilizational collapse, spanning 18 vastly different societies across history. His purpose is to uncover the deeper patterns that arise when societies become too complex to sustain themselves.

Policy mismanagement is not the cause—it’s a symptom. As Tainter demonstrates, collapse occurs when the diminishing returns on complexity lead systems designed to solve problems to become the problems themselves. A society consumed by inefficiency, symbolic gestures, and ideological pretense is incapable of adapting to the practical demands of survival.

Focusing on isolated issues like brush management or fire zone construction obscures the broader reality: a system so unwieldy and preoccupied with maintaining appearances that it can no longer deliver meaningful solutions. The priorities are misplaced, the vision myopic, and the result predictable.

Tainter’s central message is that civilizations do not collapse due to isolated missteps—such as flawed policies, which ultimately reflect the values and priorities of a society and its elites—but because they become trapped by their own complexity, unable to address the fundamental realities needed for their survival.

Our current crises—whether in infrastructure, governance, or demography—are not isolated aberrations or events, they are the symptoms of a system that has prioritized ideological conformity and bureaucratic bloat over competence and survival.

The lesson is clear: without a return to practical, grounded solutions and the political will to confront uncomfortable truths, we risk joining the ranks of civilizations that collapsed under the weight of their own pretenses.Image
Another thread for those inclined:

For those interested, @timdavies_uk has created a fascinating YouTube video based on my Collapse essay. Please check it out!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chad Crowley

Chad Crowley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CCrowley100

Sep 13
1/ No other delusion has been so quickly enthroned as law and creed as transgenderism.

It is not a private sickness to be met with compassion but a public dogma imposed with severity. The mutilation of healthy bodies is paraded as courage, the sterilization of children is praised as liberation, and the corruption of language is enforced as truth.

What was once regarded as disorder is now displayed as identity. What was once concealed in shame is now celebrated openly.

In many districts, schools present fantasy as fact and compel teachers to affirm it. Corporations elevate it in their advertising campaigns and enforce it through internal quotas and mandatory trainings. Governments encode it into civil rights law as if delusion could be legislated into reality.

Those who refuse to comply are punished, stripped of position, or branded with accusations of hatred for speaking the most elementary truths.

The phenomenon reveals more than the suffering of those afflicted. It exposes a civilization that has abandoned the ability to distinguish between compassion and cruelty, between truth and falsehood, between health and mutilation.

What spreads before us is not healing but the enthronement of delusion, not tolerance but the organized machinery of decline.

Let us discuss this insanity.Image
2/ The first evidence of this madness is found in the most basic truths of biology. A man cannot become a woman, nor a woman a man. Chromosomes remain immutable, XY for the male and XX for the female. Hormonal manipulation does not rewrite the code of life, nor can surgery replace the natural form with its opposite.

A mastectomy, the surgical removal of healthy breasts, does not create masculinity but only disfigures a woman. The excision of ovaries halts the natural cycles that regulate fertility and hormonal balance, leaving behind sterility and premature decay.

The mutilation of genitals, whether by constructing a crude imitation of male organs or by fashioning a false cavity in place of the male member, produces wounds that never fully heal and lifelong medical complications. The ingestion of exogenous hormones, designed to mimic secondary sexual traits, may alter voice, skin, or body fat distribution, but only at the cost of liver strain, bone fragility, cardiovascular risk, and permanent dependency upon chemical intervention.

In every case, what is destroyed is real, what is created is counterfeit, and the body is left in a state of ruin. Every cell continues to testify to the sex inscribed at conception, a truth that no scalpel or drug can erase.

The reality is simple: transition is a fraud. It is a counterfeit process that can only destroy, never create. A woman who cuts away her breasts and poisons her body with testosterone does not become a man but only a broken woman. A man who removes his genitals to construct a false organ does not become a woman but only a mutilated man.

What results is not transformation but ruin, and the evidence is written not only on the body but in the permanent sterility, disfigurement, and medical dependence that follow.
3/ The psychological cost of transgenderism is immense. What psychiatry once named gender dysphoria, a disorder marked by distress over one’s sexed body, has been rebranded as identity. The very discipline entrusted with diagnosing illness now denies the name of illness, treating delusion as authenticity and disorder as self-expression.

The individual tormented by gender dysphoria is no longer guided toward reconciliation of body and mind but encouraged to deepen the fracture between them. Instead of searching for the roots of confusion, clinicians prescribe chemicals and surgeries as though disorder could be cut away with a scalpel or silenced with a pill.

The result is predictable. Studies consistently show that depression, anxiety, and suicidal ideation remain at catastrophic levels even after so-called transition. The act of mutilation does not bring peace. It cannot reconcile the body to the mind, nor the mind to reality. The illusion of transformation collapses, leaving only despair.

The truth is that mutilating the body cannot cure the soul. To destroy the organs of fertility, to silence the natural hormonal rhythm, to carve away healthy flesh in pursuit of fantasy, is not treatment but cruelty. What is left behind is not health but trauma, not liberation but dependency.

Instead of restoring order, the medical establishment binds patients to a lifetime of reliance on external intervention. Synthetic hormones must be taken without end, each carrying risks to the liver, bones, and cardiovascular system. Surgeries demand revisions, each one inflicting further damage. Psychological fragility requires perpetual counseling and the constant affirmation of others to prop up the lie.

The patient is converted into a permanent consumer, sustained not by healing but by the profitable maintenance of disorder. Medicine has ceased to cure. It has become an accomplice in ruin, a vast industry that thrives on sickness and perpetuates it under the banner of compassion.Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 11
1/ Weimar Problems Require Weimar Solutions

We have all heard this phrase, yet the chaos and turmoil of our own time now give it a sharper and more unsettling meaning. What once sounded like rhetorical exaggeration has become the daily condition of American life.

Rising crime corrodes the fabric of order, hyper-political partisanship has become a contest of mutual destruction, and White America finds itself increasingly grouped together as the common enemy of every faction. The government, the media, activist lobbies, and minority blocs converge in their hostility, ensuring that the boundary between civic debate and physical violence grows ever thinner. The casual brutality of everyday life now bleeds into the political realm. The horrific murder of Iryna Zarutska aboard a Charlotte light-rail train lays bare the lawlessness that now consumes even mundane public spaces.

In contrast, the assassination of Charlie Kirk, an explicit strike against a public figure, demonstrates that political violence has likewise reentered the sphere of possibility. These events are not isolated anomalies but symptomatic of an urgent, escalating condition. What once seemed unimaginable in a stable Western society is now our reality.

This was the lesson of Weimar: when the state refused to act, chaos spread unchecked, and into that void the Freikorps arose. If America’s leaders remain paralyzed, the same outcome awaits us. And perhaps that is no cause for despair. Better that men step forward to defend what the state will not, than to watch a nation dissolve without resistance.Image
2/ History does not repeat itself in the same form, yet it does return in cycles, presenting the same crises beneath new appearances. The comparison between America and Weimar is therefore not about tracing replicas but about recognizing recurring patterns. The fractures of legitimacy, the collapse of confidence, the descent of politics into open struggle are not unique to Germany after the Great War. They reappear wherever a people, and thus a civilization, has lost faith in its continuity. The names change, the costumes change, but the underlying drama is the same.

The Weimar Republic itself was born out of military defeat and revolutionary upheaval. From its first days it was besieged by violence, and that violence began with the Left. The Spartacist revolt in Berlin, followed by a wave of communist uprisings across German cities, brought chaos to the streets and set the pattern for years of turmoil. The central government stood paralyzed, unwilling to act decisively, unwilling to defend its own people. Out of that paralysis the Freikorps arose, hardened men from the trenches who refused to watch their nation collapse without resistance. They were not an accident of history but its necessity, for when authority abdicates, others must fill the void.Image
3/ Weimar’s disorder was most visible in its streets. The Freikorps, the communists, and the rival paramilitary formations turned the city square into a battlefield where the fate of the Republic was tested day by day. Ernst von Salomon’s “The Outlaws” captures this moment with unflinching clarity. He describes young men shaped by the Great War, unable to return to private life, carrying their struggle into the streets of Berlin and Riga, seeking meaning in combat when the state itself had abandoned them. They were animated by a sense of betrayal, convinced that the government’s compromises amounted to treason, and they saw violence not as an aberration but as a continuation.

America’s disorder wears a different mask, yet it springs from the same soil of disintegration. At present there are no disciplined ranks of veterans or organized formations confronting the crisis. The streets belong instead to violent leftist militants, deranged in their fanaticism and animated with a kind of religious zeal, whose purpose is not debate but suppression, not persuasion but intimidation. Their task is to prevent opponents from assembling at all, to monopolize public space and to enforce their ideology by force. The law does not rise above these conflicts but bends according to which faction holds the stronger grip on the system, just as in Weimar the judiciary swayed between indulgence and repression according to political convenience.Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 7
1/ In his “Politics,” Aristotle warns that extreme democracy collapses into tyranny. Both rest on flattery and rule by the weakest, upheld by women and slaves, while tyranny above all depends on foreigners, since citizens despise it. Image
2/ Women and slaves, he writes, “delight in being flattered.” They welcome rulers who indulge them, where law is lax, discipline is weak, and authority bends to those who by nature should be ruled rather than ruling. Image
3/ This inversion corrupts the city. Those least fit to rule gain power, those most fit are restrained, and public life is governed by sycophancy. Both tyranny and extreme democracy exalt the weak over the strong. Image
Read 6 tweets
Sep 7
1/ Let us discuss Plato’s “Timaeus,” the dialogue in which philosophy first dares to speak of the origin of the cosmos.

Of all the dialogues, the “Timaeus” is at once the most audacious in scope and the most far-reaching in its impact. Composed in the fourth century before Christ, it dares to recount nothing less than the origin of the universe, the constitution of the soul, and the place of man within the whole. Where most dialogues proceed through the familiar contest of questions and answers, this work takes the form of a vast monologue, delivered chiefly by the Pythagorean Timaeus of Locri, whose authority rests upon his knowledge of mathematics, astronomy, and cosmology. The “Timaeus” treats creation not as accident or blind motion but as the product of reason. The universe, Plato tells us, is the handiwork of a divine craftsman, the Demiurge, who looks to the changeless order of the eternal forms and, by imitating them, imposes proportion, harmony, and measure upon primordial chaos. In this act philosophy gives to the West its first systematic cosmology, an account that links the visible order of nature to the invisible order of intellect.

For centuries this was the Platonic dialogue par excellence in the Latin West. Cicero translated a portion in the last years of the Republic, and Calcidius in the fourth century supplied a fuller Latin version that remained for nearly a millennium the only substantial access to Plato available to Christian Europe. It was through this channel that the Church Fathers first encountered Plato, and through it that much of Christian theology absorbed the Platonic division of soul and body, the vision of the cosmos as rationally ordered, and the very notion of creation as a purposive act. Yet the historical weight of its influence must not obscure its radical originality. The “Timaeus” is not revelation but philosophy: an attempt by unaided reason to explain why the world exhibits harmony, why the heavens move with regularity, and why the human soul, though exiled in flesh, still recognizes in that celestial order the pattern of its own lost perfection.

To take up this dialogue with understanding is to step into the very beginning of Western thought. Here we are asked why being is superior to becoming, why the soul must rule over the body, and why intellect, never satisfied with mere appearances, strains toward the eternal forms that give structure to all things. The account offered is neither myth in the simple sense nor science as later ages would define it. Though it speaks of triangles, solids, and elements, and though it recounts the sinking of Atlantis and the succession of cosmic cataclysms, it moves on a higher plane. It is what Plato himself calls a eikôs muthos, a “likely story,” which does not claim absolute certainty but reveals, through reason and image, how the soul may orient itself by the eternal pattern that underlies all change.

The present essay will unfold the “Timaeus” in stages, treating it not as a relic entombed in antiquity but as a living text whose questions still shape the highest aims of philosophy.

Today marks Part I. The course of inquiry will follow the dialogue itself: first the dramatic frame of the discourse, then the distinction between being and becoming, then the vision of the divine craftsman. From there we shall turn to the role of the receptacle, the generation of the world-soul, the constitution of the elements, the nature of time, the relation of intellect and necessity, and finally the account of man as a microcosm within the whole.Image
2/ The “Timaeus” opens as a sequel, carrying forward the conversation of Plato’s most celebrated work, the “Republic.” On the previous day Socrates had described the ideal city, its classes and laws, its guardians and its rulers. Yet he remains unsatisfied. What has been drawn in speech remains fixed, like painted figures that suggest life but lack motion. He therefore asks his companions to animate the city, to set it in action, and to show how it would contend with other states.

The company assembled is carefully chosen. Critias, claiming descent from Solon, recalls the Egyptian priest who told Solon that the Greeks were like children, forgetful of their own antiquity, and who related the tale of Atlantis, the mighty island that once warred with Athens. Hermocrates, the Syracusan general, embodies the statesman’s concern with power and strategy, while Timaeus of Locri represents the philosopher, a man steeped in Pythagorean mysticism, versed in number, harmony, and astronomy. Plato gathers them with deliberate purpose, forming a hierarchy of voices: the politician recalling the lessons of history, the general knowing the nature of conflict, and the philosopher alone capable of speaking of the cosmos.

Even the absence of a fourth guest is meaningful. On the surface it lends the dialogue dramatic realism, as if Plato wished to assure posterity that this was a genuine exchange. More deeply, the triad itself is symbolic: three voices suffice to reflect politics, war, and philosophy, yet their very incompleteness points to the truth that ultimate questions cannot be resolved by the many, but only by the few, and above all by the philosopher, who must bear the greatest burden. It is difficult not to hear in this structure an echo of what Georges Dumézil would later identify as the Indo-European tripartite order of sovereignty, arms, and sacred wisdom, but that is a subject for another section of this essay.

Socrates begins by rehearsing the “Republic” in miniature, repeating its themes so that the new inquiry can build upon them. The cosmos, he implies, is the greatest of all cities, and just as the soul is the microcosm of the city, the city is the microcosm of the universe. The order of man and the order of nature are linked, and philosophy must grasp both if it is to be complete.

It is Critias who first responds, offering the tale of Atlantis as told to Solon by the Egyptian priests. The point, however, is not Atlantis itself but Athens, presented not merely as an ideal city in speech but as a historical reality, noble in its victory over barbaric wealth and hubris. Yet Critias does not continue the tale to its end. He yields the floor to Timaeus, for the story of the cosmos must precede the story of a city. The defeat of Atlantis will belong to another dialogue, the unfinished “Critias.” In the “Timaeus,” the stage is cleared for a higher task: to speak of the beginning of the universe itself.

The dramatic frame is not a mere literary device but shows that politics without cosmology is partial and incomplete. The city must be ordered by the same principles that govern the heavens, and the soul must imitate the harmony of the whole. By setting the scene in this way Plato reminds us that philosophy must not stop with the affairs of men. It must look upward to the order of being itself, for only in the contemplation of that order can the city, the soul, and the world be brought into concord, and it is precisely this order that Plato next sets forth in his distinction between being and becoming.Image
3/ Plato begins his account by drawing the most fundamental division of all, the distinction between being and becoming. He sets forth two orders of reality: that which always is, eternal and changeless, grasped only by nous (intellect); and that which is always in flux, coming-to-be and passing-away, grasped only by aisthēsis (sense perception) and doxa (opinion). This division marks not only two kinds of objects but two ways of knowing and two modes of existence.

Plato illustrates the point with radical clarity: whatever belongs to becoming has no fixed essence. Fire burns, then vanishes; flesh ages, weakens, and dies. What is seen at one moment has altered by the next. To seek permanence in such things is futile. By contrast, the eternal realities, the forms (eidē), never suffer alteration. They are not images taken from the sensible world but the archetypes upon which sensible things are modeled. The form of fire does not flicker or fade, nor does the form of beauty lose its radiance with time. Each form is an abiding standard: invisible, intelligible, self-subsisting, and timeless. These are not abstractions but living models, and it is precisely because they are immutable that they can guide the craftsman in ordering the cosmos.

From this division arises the notion of the eikōs logos, the “likely account.” If the world is a product of becoming, then any discourse about it must share its character. Speech about the cosmos cannot claim finality, for it is about things that alter from moment to moment. Yet it may still be true in the mode of probability, a faithful image that reflects, however imperfectly, the eternal models after which the world is patterned. The “likely account” is thus neither revelation nor fiction but philosophy’s attempt to speak of the temporal in a way that still directs the mind toward what is eternal. It belongs to the same middle realm as myth, which conveys truth through images, and as reasoning, which approaches truth through concepts. The “Timaeus” oscillates between these modes because only by joining them can philosophy bridge the chasm between what always is and what is always becoming.

The implications extend beyond cosmology to the nature of man. The same division runs through us, for the soul partakes of being while the body belongs to becoming. The soul is eternal, rational, and akin to the forms; the body is mortal, mutable, and the source of disorder. This is not a mere figure of speech but a metaphysical reality: the condition of mankind is a perpetual tension between permanence and flux. The philosopher’s task is therefore both ethical and intellectual, to turn the soul toward what truly is and to guard it from sinking into the realm of what merely becomes. To live well is to align oneself with being; to live poorly is to live as though change and decay were the only realities.

For this reason the “Timaeus” insists that the study of the heavens is not idle speculation but a discipline of the soul. The stars and planets move in perfect circles, reflecting the order of eternity within the rhythms of time. To contemplate them is to recall the proper motion of one’s own soul, which embodiment has thrown into disorder. Astronomy, for Plato, is not primarily a technical science but a sacred practice, a way of restoring harmony to the soul by attuning it to the greater harmony of the cosmos. Education, in this vision, is not the accumulation of facts but the recollection of order, a training that lifts the mind from opinion to intellect.

The legacy of this distinction has been immense. It gave the Christian Fathers their conceptual framework for distinguishing the eternal God from the created world. It furnished later philosophers with the categories of substance and accident, essence and phenomenon. Even modern science, though it confines itself to the study of becoming, rests upon Plato’s conviction that beneath flux lies order, and that truth is something stable to be discovered. In the “Timaeus” this conviction receives its first and most daring expression: the visible universe is but a copy, and the eternal archetype is the true reality, a truth revealed through the work of the divine craftsman.Image
Read 4 tweets
Sep 5
1/ In 2011, Patrick Buchanan released Suicide of a Superpower: Will America Survive to 2025? The title was not rhetorical flourish but a forecast of things to come, a warning that the American nation’s unraveling had entered an advanced stage. Now that the year has arrived, his grim prophecy confronts us with full force. What he described as a looming possibility has hardened into a palpable reality that we all see, feel, and experience every day. The passing of White America is no longer a specter on the horizon but a condition of reality unfolding before our very eyes.

Buchanan wrote of a nation that had exchanged demographic homogeneity for balkanization. The old America, rooted in European descent, language, and inherited folkways, was set upon another course by the mid-1960s. Immigration laws were rewritten, cultural norms overturned, and political elites began to preach the virtue of dispossession as if it were a moral necessity. By the twenty-first century, the historic majority was told to welcome its reduction to minority status. Buchanan named this sickness for what it was: ethnomasochism, the strange delight in one’s own eclipse.

When President Bill Clinton addressed the graduates of Portland State University in 1998 and announced that their children would inhabit a nation with no majority people, the students applauded. A generation trained to rejoice in its own erasure gave proof that America was not merely declining by accident but dying by design.Image
2/ At the heart of Buchanan’s warning lies the demographic collapse of the American nation. In the chapters “The End of White America” and “Demographic Winter,” he traces the dual catastrophe of declining White fertility and the relentless surge of non-White immigration. What he foresaw is now evident: replacement is not a theory but a measurable fact. The birthrates of European-descended Americans have fallen below replacement, while the gates have remained open to millions from the global South. The transformation, once projected for mid-century, is already visible in every major city and in much of the countryside besides.

This crisis cannot be explained by modernity alone, for secular and industrial societies in the past continued to grow. The deeper cause lies in a culture that has exalted individualism, consumption, and careerism above continuity and life. A generation that should have raised families instead pursued hedonistic self-fulfillment, leaving the future to the least fit. In White nations, this internal weakness has been coupled with an external policy of engineered replacement. Immigration laws after 1965 deliberately dismantled the ethnic character of the United States, turning homogeneity into a crime and diversity into a civic religion.

The result is a nation increasingly unrecognizable to its founders. Communities that once lived in trust now live in suspicion. Public life, once shaped by a shared European inheritance, is fractured into a contest of groups demanding spoils. The old American center has not merely weakened, it has been dissolved. Buchanan’s prediction has proven correct: a people that abandons its demographic foundations abandons its future.
3/ Buchanan frames the collapse not only in demographic terms but in the decline of faith. He writes of the “Death of Christian America” and the “Crisis of Catholicism,” presenting religion as the cement that once held the culture together. There is truth in this, for the great confessions of the West nurtured fertility, discipline, and duty across generations. Christianity in particular gave form to the moral imagination of Europe, binding families and nations under a shared horizon of meaning, sanctifying both sacrifice and continuity. It taught that life itself was a gift to be received and passed on, not consumed and discarded.

This moral order has now eroded. Where faith once encouraged men and women to build families, raise children, and endure hardship with the promise of transcendence, a new spirit has taken hold that regards such duties as burdens. Religion is not the only bond that can secure a people, but in its absence the void has been filled with something far weaker: a shallow ethic of consumption and comfort. In societies that once raised spires to heaven, the highest ambition is now to accumulate things and pursue fleeting diversions.

The deeper loss, then, is not merely theological but civilizational confidence. A people who once built cathedrals and empires now doubts its own right to exist. The baby booms of postwar America and Germany were not eruptions of sudden piety, but of optimism and national pride. Families multiplied because the future seemed worth building. Today, the absence of both faith and pride leaves the modern West sterile. The decline of religion is thus one symptom among many of a larger retreat: a people unwilling to live for more than itself, and therefore unwilling to live at all.Image
Read 5 tweets
Sep 4
1/ The American nation forgets its founders and calls it progress. Andrew Fraser’s “The WASP Question” is not an elegy but an exploration of decline, revealing how a people traded blood and memory for abstraction and became strangers in the ruins of their own homelands. Image
2/ What became of the founding people of America? Not the mythic immigrant multitude praised in modern textbooks, but the English stock that planted the first parishes, drafted the earliest colonial charters, fought the Indian wars, and declared independence in their own tongue and on their own terms. In “The WASP Question” Andrew Fraser asks with sober clarity why the Anglo-Saxon Protestant, once master of the institutions he created, now moves through their remnants as though he were only a guest.

This is a book about displacement, not merely political or social, but spiritual. It recounts the fall of a people who surrendered their ancestral memory to construct a universal republic, only to find themselves despised by the very order they had summoned into being. “Even in their own eyes,” Fraser observes, “WASPs now constitute little more than a demographic abstraction altogether devoid of the soul and the substance of a serious people.”

The origin of this decline, he argues, lies in the decision to exchange ethno-religious identity for constitutional idealism. The Founders, overwhelmingly Anglo-Protestant, raised up a civic faith in place of the older bond of blood and church. What had once been a concrete and embodied culture was reduced to an abstract doctrine of rights. A people rooted in land, lineage, and liturgy transformed themselves into apostles of a borderless creed. The commonwealth yielded to the marketplace, the Protestant conscience dissolved into global moralism, and the descendants of the founders became strangers to themselves.

Fraser does not call for a shallow political restoration. His horizon is deeper: palingenesis, a rebirth through memory. What he envisions is not the restoration of the American Republic, but the resurrection of the Anglo-Saxon spirit that preceded it, tribal, Christian, and conscious of itself.

This review will unfold in that spirit. It will trace Fraser’s account of WASP decline from the upheavals of the Reformation and the Revolution to the rise of managerial liberalism. It will consider his critique of civic nationalism, his theological reflections, and his call for a new aristocracy of memory. And it will weigh his vision not as lament, but as a possible path toward ancestral return in an age that no longer knows its own face.Image
3/ To understand Fraser’s argument one must look not to 1776, but to the deeper currents of English history: to Alfred, to the Reformation, to the Glorious Revolution. The ethnonym “WASP,” White Anglo-Saxon Protestant, is commonly used as insult or as sociological shorthand. Fraser treats it instead as a historical identity, the product of an ethno-religious order in which blood, law, and faith were fused into a single form. Properly understood, the WASP was not a mere social class but the architect of the Anglo-American commonwealth, a figure whose inheritance has now been abandoned by his descendants.

Fraser argues that the American Republic did not continue this inheritance but ruptured it. The Constitution was not the culmination of English liberty but its substitution. “The Founding Fathers,” he writes, “sacrificed their ancestral identity on the altar of universal principles.” They replaced throne and altar with an abstract contract, imagining themselves no longer as a distinct people but as citizens of a civic church. Their republicanism severed bonds with Old World hierarchy and joined Protestant individualism to Enlightenment egalitarianism. The system that emerged could not long withstand the logic of its own abstractions.

The consequences were decisive. In place of a concrete people, defined by lineage and faith, there arose a universal idea. Fraser calls this a “biocultural revolution,” by which Anglo-Americans dissolved their identity into the abstraction of liberty and equality. In the early colonies, folk, faith, and government still formed a unity. By the close of the nineteenth century, under the pressure of immigration, industrialization, and liberal moralism, that unity had disintegrated. The Constitution had become scripture, the state a surrogate church, and WASPs, once sovereign in their own house, had been reduced to deracinated managers of an empire that no longer spoke in their name.

Fraser traces this transformation without nostalgia. He neither conceals the contradictions of the past nor embellishes it as a golden age. He insists instead on the historical reality of WASP America as a founding ethnos whose institutions bore its mark. From the New England township to the Southern planter aristocracy, from Harvard Yard to the Anglican vestry, the Republic carried the stamp of English Protestant fathers. That stamp is now nearly effaced. What remains is ritual patriotism, corporate nationalism, and a civil religion detached from the people who first gave it meaning.

Here Fraser strikes at the root of civic nationalism. A nation is not a contract but an inheritance. A people who forget themselves cannot be preserved by constitutions or flags. In Fraser’s judgment, the American experiment did not extend Anglo-Saxon civilization. It consigned it to the grave.Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(