Chad Crowley Profile picture
Jan 9 9 tweets 8 min read Read on X
1/ Let’s talk about collapse. Fires rage in Los Angeles, and no one can put them out—a clear symbol of a civilization unable to solve even its most basic problems. Joseph A. Tainter's "The Collapse of Complex Societies" provides a framework to understand why this happens.
2/ Civilizational collapse is no relic of the past or mere curiosity for court historians, whose interests often veer into the irrelevant and removed from the pressing realities of today. Collapse is a recurring phenomenon, an inevitable stage in the life cycle of societies. As the West faces internal fractures and accelerating decline, it is imperative to understand the forces that have undone great civilizations before us.

In "The Collapse of Complex Societies," Joseph A. Tainter provides a framework for analyzing this decline. As an anthropologist, his approach stands apart from the abstractions of historians. Tainter reveals that complexity—vital for societal advancement, particularly in an increasingly globalized and technologized world—carries within it the seeds of its own destruction. Societies that grow increasingly complex invest more in solving problems through administrative, technological, and bureaucratic means, yet these solutions yield diminishing returns. Over time, the cost of maintaining the system outweighs its benefits, creating a tipping point where collapse becomes not just possible but the rational culmination of a managed decline.

The West today is approaching this threshold. Institutions designed to safeguard stability and progress have become engines of inefficiency, consuming resources to sustain themselves while delivering little value. More troubling, however, is the ideological rot at their core.Image
3/ Tainter’s analysis exposes how societies fail when they lose the ability to reconcile complexity with functionality, but the West’s decline is accelerated by its fixation on utopian ideals divorced from reality. Chief among these is the obsession with absolute equality, which manifests in policies that undermine competence, cohesion, and trust.

Modern institutions prioritize demographic representation over merit, subordinating excellence to ideological conformity. Programs like affirmative action and quotas enforce a belief that all outcomes must be leveled, regardless of skill or capability. The result is a system that sacrifices institutional effectiveness on the altar of symbolic progress. Fields demanding expertise—medicine, engineering, national defense—are increasingly populated by individuals chosen for reasons other than their merit. This erosion of standards not only weakens critical sectors but also breeds resentment, as citizens see fairness and competence replaced by ideological orthodoxy.

Such policies are not about solving problems but about enforcing control. Utopian ideals of absolute equality have become tools of an increasingly dysfunctional elite, wielded to maintain their own power while deflecting attention from systemic failures. These initiatives serve as a façade, masking the inability—or refusal—to confront the real issues undermining society’s foundations.Image
4/ Demographic transformation further accelerates collapse, creating divisions that a complex society cannot sustain. Unlike historical collapses where population shifts were often imposed largely by external forces, the West’s demographic replacement is deliberate—an ideological project rooted in utopian fantasies of global equity.

Mass immigration, lauded as an economic and moral imperative beyond reproach, serves as a tool to obscure systemic failures and pacify growing discontent. Rather than addressing the festering rot in infrastructure, education, or governance, elites import new populations under the guise of "growth." This transformation fractures the cultural and ethnic unity that once underpinned Western nations, replacing shared identity with competing allegiances. Instead of cohesive societies, we witness the rise of competing enclaves, driven by BIPOC identity politics, fracturing unity as they battle for resources and power.

This demographic shift is not incidental—it is weaponized. By replacing founding populations, elites create a population easier to control, one less connected to the traditions, history, and identity of the nations they inhabit. This strategy ensures that the institutions of power remain insulated from dissent, as the newly imported underclass relies on those same elites for survival. It is a cynical manipulation that trades long-term stability for short-term dominance.
5/ Tainter’s insight that collapse unfolds as a slow unraveling, rather than a sudden event, is painfully relevant. The West’s decline is marked by missed opportunities for reform and an unwillingness to address the structural contradictions tearing it apart. Leaders blind themselves with ideological dogmas, pouring resources into symbolic gestures while neglecting the decay of physical infrastructure, economic stability, and social trust.

Crumbling roads, failing schools, and soaring debt are treated as secondary concerns to the pursuit of utopian ideals. Instead of confronting these failures, Western elites double down on globalist ambitions—remaking the world in their image through international economic policies, climate agendas, and mass migration. These distractions allow them to avoid responsibility for internal decay while perpetuating the illusion of progress.

Yet this house of cards cannot hold. As systems grow more unwieldy and populations more divided, the West’s ability to withstand external shocks or internal crises diminishes. Tainter’s warning is clear: societies that refuse to adapt to reality are doomed to collapse under the weight of their own contradictions.
6/ History offers no guarantees, only lessons. The West’s trajectory mirrors the failures of past civilizations, but its ideological rigidity and demographic engineering make its decline uniquely self-inflicted. Tainter’s work is not merely a study of the past but a mirror for our present condition—a reminder that complexity, unchecked by reality, leads inevitably to destruction.

Survival demands rejecting the utopian fantasies of universal equality and globalism that have hollowed out the West’s foundations. It requires a return to the enduring truths of identity, merit, and the natural order—principles that once defined the strength of Western civilization. Without this course correction, the West is destined to join the annals of civilizations that fell, not to external enemies, but to our own hubristic desire to ignore reality.
7/ An Addendum (As I often provide for clarification)

This essay was a brief exploration of Joseph Tainter's "The Collapse of Complex Societies," alongside my analysis of the reigning liberal-humanist ideology in the West, its role in demographic transformation, and how these dynamics contribute to systemic fragility. It is not intended to be exhaustive or conclusive.

On X, I often discuss books and ideas that I don’t fully agree with, drawing my own conclusions, as any critical reader should. While I don’t align with every aspect of Tainter’s work, his overriding thesis rings true: complex societies collapse when the costs of maintaining their complexity outpace their ability to solve problems. Given that our world is the most interconnected and technologized in human history, his insights remain strikingly relevant.

It’s worth noting that Tainter wrote this book in 1988, and much of what he foresaw has now become our reality.

In the replies and reposts, most responses fall into one of two camps, either agreeing with the larger point or critiquing it.

For the latter, two recurring misconceptions dominate:

1. The Pilot and the First Tweet

Some are fixated on the helicopter footage, insisting the pilot isn’t to blame. But this entirely misses the point. The video wasn’t about the pilot; it was a visual shorthand, necessary on a platform like X, to draw attention. It represents systemic failure decades in the making—failure rooted in decayed leadership, crumbling infrastructure, and misplaced priorities.

Whether the pilot was doing his best within a broken system or is the product of DEI-driven hiring is ultimately irrelevant. The clip serves as a visceral reminder of what happens when a society’s capacity to maintain basic functionality erodes. It’s not about one individual’s actions but the larger decay that leaves a helicopter missing its mark as an emblem of collapse.

Naturally, the forces of Mother Nature play a role—as they always have and always will. Factors like erratic wind patterns, thermal turbulence, the inherent difficulty of aerial firefighting, etc., all complicate such efforts. Yet the question remains: is a society equipped to adapt and overcome these challenges, or does it succumb to its own self-inflicted fragility, leaving technical obstacles as insurmountable failures rather than manageable hurdles?

2. Policy Mismanagement

The other camp focuses on "policy mismanagement," claiming it as the root cause. This is a classic example of missing the forest for the trees. Tainter’s work isn’t a catalog of policy blunders; it’s a meta-analysis of civilizational collapse, spanning 18 vastly different societies across history. His purpose is to uncover the deeper patterns that arise when societies become too complex to sustain themselves.

Policy mismanagement is not the cause—it’s a symptom. As Tainter demonstrates, collapse occurs when the diminishing returns on complexity lead systems designed to solve problems to become the problems themselves. A society consumed by inefficiency, symbolic gestures, and ideological pretense is incapable of adapting to the practical demands of survival.

Focusing on isolated issues like brush management or fire zone construction obscures the broader reality: a system so unwieldy and preoccupied with maintaining appearances that it can no longer deliver meaningful solutions. The priorities are misplaced, the vision myopic, and the result predictable.

Tainter’s central message is that civilizations do not collapse due to isolated missteps—such as flawed policies, which ultimately reflect the values and priorities of a society and its elites—but because they become trapped by their own complexity, unable to address the fundamental realities needed for their survival.

Our current crises—whether in infrastructure, governance, or demography—are not isolated aberrations or events, they are the symptoms of a system that has prioritized ideological conformity and bureaucratic bloat over competence and survival.

The lesson is clear: without a return to practical, grounded solutions and the political will to confront uncomfortable truths, we risk joining the ranks of civilizations that collapsed under the weight of their own pretenses.Image
Another thread for those inclined:

For those interested, @timdavies_uk has created a fascinating YouTube video based on my Collapse essay. Please check it out!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Chad Crowley

Chad Crowley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @CCrowley100

Jan 28
1/ Letters of Marque Abroad, Posse Comitatus with Territorial Control at Home

America faces a dual-front crisis: cartels destabilizing our border and illegal immigration overwhelming our nation. Senator Mike Lee started the conversation; let’s push it forward!🧵👇Image
2/ What is Posse Comitatus?

Posse comitatus, meaning "power of the county," is a principle rooted in English common law. Historically, it allowed sheriffs to call upon ordinary citizens to assist in tasks like apprehending fugitives or suppressing riots, making it a key mechanism for maintaining public order in times of crisis.

It allows local law enforcement, such as sheriffs, to deputize ordinary citizens to assist in maintaining law and order. This authority remains a vital yet underutilized resource for addressing crises that exceed the capacity of professional law enforcement.Image
3/ Adapting Letters of Marque

Letters of marque are a constitutional tool with untapped potential for today’s challenges. For instance, they could authorize private security firms to intercept cartel shipments or disrupt supply chains abroad, operating under strict U.S. oversight to ensure legality and effectiveness. Rather than simply repeating history, we can modernize this concept to counter cartels abroad by targeting their operations directly with private expertise under U.S. oversight, minimizing risks and maximizing effectiveness.

Senator Mike Lee (@BasedMikeLee) created an excellent thread on this.Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 21
1/ "A people who no longer think about waging war are finished, drained of their substance and worn out from the inside."

Let us discuss why you should read "Prelude to War." 🧵👇
2/ I have frequently discussed the works of Guillaume Faye on X and hold immense respect for him and his contributions to the intellectual and ethnocultural defense of Europeans. His writings are unapologetic, incisive, and relentless in addressing the defining existential crises of our time.

Among his many works, "Prelude to War" stands as an often underappreciated yet exceptional text. It is a direct confrontation with the forces undermining our civilization and a prophetic vision of the struggles we must face to secure our future.

Despite being overshadowed by Faye’s better-known writings, such as "Archeofuturism" or "Why We Fight," this volume deserves recognition as one of his finest. It distills his core ideas with precision and force, emphasizing the martial spirit as essential to the survival of our people. Faye frequently stresses the need for Europeans to reclaim their will to fight, both in thought and action, as the only means of overcoming the myriad of threats that confront us.

More than anything, "Prelude to War" urges us to cast off the complacency of our age and rekindle the ancestral strength and determination that once defined our civilization and its people, preparing ourselves for the inevitable trials of the twenty-first century.Image
3/ The premise of "Prelude to War" is conflict. As Faye correctly reminds us, war, struggle, and confrontation are not aberrations but intrinsic to the human condition. They are the forces that shape history and define civilizations. In this work, Faye presents conflict—whether cultural, demographic, or physical—not as a distant threat but as an unavoidable reality staring the West and its people in the face. Moreover, he convincingly argues that the survival of Europe and the West will depend entirely on how we choose to confront these challenges and prepare for the battles to come. Will we fight, or consign ourselves to oblivion?

More than anything, the book is a scathing critique of a West entrenched in decadence and immobilized by apathy. Through manipulation by corrupt elites and the widespread indifference of the masses, Europeans appear to have intellectually, morally, and physically resigned themselves to accepting decline. Faye warns that by embracing this path of quiet resignation, we risk the destruction of our civilization and the erasure of our people. This danger is heightened in the face of an influx of foreign peoples who have not succumbed to the decline of bourgeois modernity and who are more vigorously asserting themselves in our homelands.

Faye’s message is clear and uncompromising. He calls on all Europeans to accept, face, and ultimately confront the existential threats to our civilization with urgency. He rejects half-measures and urges his readers to acknowledge the necessity of an ethnic struggle for survival. This requires abandoning the moral and cultural decay of modernity, reviving traditional values, and reclaiming the martial spirit that will not only secure the future of our people but also enable us to restore our global hegemony.

"Prelude to War" delves into the transformation of leftist movements into defenders of bourgeois ideology, characterized by the prioritization of comfort, security, and material wealth above all else. Faye rightly critiques their narrow perspective, which focuses exclusively on economic competition while ignoring the cultural and ethnic challenges that are eroding Europe’s future. He argues that this failure to recognize the realities of demographic and cultural displacement has rendered these movements complicit in the ongoing decline.

The book broadens its scope to address the geopolitical realities of the twenty-first century. Faye highlights the growing rivalry between the United States and China, contrasting America’s historical focus on smaller nations with its emerging confrontation with a disciplined and strategically focused China. He emphasizes that Europe cannot depend on outside powers for its survival. Instead, Europeans must secure their own destiny by fostering strength and unity within their borders.

Faye leaves no room for ambiguity. Without decisive action, the trajectory of complacency and surrender will seal the fate of Western civilization. The survival of our people depends on recognizing these challenges and rising to meet them with grim resolve and determination.Image
Read 7 tweets
Jan 20
1/ With Trump’s inauguration behind us, people are discussing America and its future—and that’s important. But let’s focus on what made America great: its founding, legacy, and principles. America was founded by Whites, for Whites. Image
2/ When I say Whites, I am, of course, referring to Europeans. This isn’t an invention of modern identity politics or, more recently, some talking point attributed to the so-called "Woke Right," but a historical reality. Since time immemorial, people have defined part of their identity through what we today call race. While the ancients lacked the modern taxonomical categorizations we use, that doesn’t negate the reality of such distinctions.

Herodotus, the "Father of History," identified a shared "ancestry" as the foundation of what it meant to be a Hellene (i.e., a Greek). He emphasized common blood, language, and worship as the pillars of Greek identity.

The Founding Fathers of America were no different. They understood themselves as part of a shared European lineage, drawing upon the classical traditions of Greece and Rome, the legal frameworks of English common law, and the moral foundation of Christianity. For them, these values, rooted in a specifically European worldview, were the cornerstone of the republic.

Thomas Jefferson famously described the U.S. as an "empire of liberty," but it was an empire designed with a particular population in mind: those descended from Europe.

*For an interesting dive, the image below is of the Jefferson Memorial. Take a moment to search out and read the text inscribed on the monument.Image
3/ This "Eurocentric," yet entirely natural vision of the American polity was codified in law and remained an implicit, and oftentimes explicit, component of America's legal system for hundreds of years.

One of the very first pieces of legislation enacted, the Naturalization Act of 1790, declared that only "free White persons" of "good character" were eligible for citizenship. It’s telling that this "exclusionary" definition remained largely intact until the mid-20th century. When some historians, and most mainstream talking heads, argue this was merely a product of the times, they overlook how deeply this racial framework was embedded in the nation’s legal and cultural identity.

Even as the law evolved, it did so in carefully constrained ways. In 1870, the 14th Amendment extended citizenship to those of African descent, but other racial groups remained excluded for decades. This was no accident. It was a deliberate preservation of the demographic and cultural identity envisioned at America’s founding.

For "ourselves and our posterity," it wasn’t merely a talking point, but a reality enshrined in fact and codified by law.Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 19
1/ Let’s explore Pat Buchanan’s most controversial book! It challenges the conventional historical narratives surrounding WWII while offering a cautionary tale for U.S. foreign policy in the post-Cold War era. 🧵👇 Image
2/ An Introduction

Patrick J. Buchanan’s "Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War" challenges conventional narratives about the origins and consequences of World War II. Written in the shadow of the Iraq War, Buchanan’s book serves as both a provocative reassessment of history and a cautionary tale for contemporary foreign policy. The work explores how a series of missteps and miscalculations by Britain, the world’s dominant power in 1914, culminated in the devastation of Europe, the rise of communism in half the continent, and the collapse of the great Western empires by 1945.

Buchanan himself has described the book as an effort to uncover the "historic blunders" that led to this catastrophic outcome. He identifies eight critical errors that, in his view, transformed local disputes into global conflagrations. Beyond analyzing the past, Buchanan warns against the arrogance and hubris that characterized European leaders before the First World War—traits he sees echoed in post-Cold War American policy. His aim is to urge prudence and restraint, lest the United States follow Britain’s path and overextend itself into decline.

By reevaluating figures like Winston Churchill and events like the Munich Agreement, Buchanan invites readers to question the traditional narrative of World War II as a purely necessary and moral crusade. Instead, he argues that better decisions, rooted in realism rather than moral posturing, might have spared Europe and the world untold suffering.Image
3/ The Munich Agreement

A central theme in "Churchill, Hitler, and the Unnecessary War" is Buchanan's critique of the widely accepted "aggression at Munich" narrative, which has shaped Western foreign policy since World War II. This narrative stems from the 1938 Munich Agreement, where British Prime Minister Neville Chamberlain allowed Adolf Hitler to annex the Sudetenland, a German-speaking region of Czechoslovakia. Although Chamberlain famously proclaimed the agreement had secured "peace for our time," Germany invaded Poland within a year, prompting Britain and France to declare war.

To conventional historians, Munich represents the ultimate failure of appeasement, a lesson that aggression must always be met with force. This belief shaped post-war foreign policy, particularly for the United States, and underpinned interventions in Korea, Vietnam, the Balkans, and Iraq. Buchanan, however, challenges this interpretation, arguing that Munich has been oversimplified into a moral parable that ignores the complexities of the era.

Buchanan contends that Chamberlain’s decision at Munich was not a reckless act of cowardice but a rational effort to avoid another devastating war, only two decades after the Great War. He argues that the agreement reflected Britain’s limited military and political options in 1938, given the lack of public support for war and the absence of reliable allies. Buchanan further suggests that rather than being an unqualified failure, the Munich Agreement delayed the conflict, allowing Britain time to rearm and better prepare for the eventual confrontation with Germany.

The central tragedy, according to Buchanan, was not Munich but Britain’s refusal to adopt a similar pragmatic approach to the German-Polish dispute over Danzig in 1939. By issuing a war guarantee to Poland, Britain made a reckless commitment it was ill-prepared to honor. This guarantee emboldened Poland to resist compromise, ultimately leading to the outbreak of World War II. In Buchanan’s view, Munich’s true lesson is not the danger of appeasement but the importance of avoiding commitments that cannot realistically be upheld—a lesson that modern policymakers would do well to remember.Image
Read 13 tweets
Jan 17
1/ Gregory Clark’s "The Son Also Rises" dismantles myths about social mobility, showing how generational wealth and status persist across centuries. Yet government policies, like mass immigration, disrupt this fragile continuity. What does this mean for the American Dream? 🧵👇
2/ The Decline of the American Dream

America was built on the promise that each generation would surpass the last, inheriting a brighter future shaped by the sacrifices of their parents. This vision, once central to the nation’s identity, has faded. For many, the quality of life has declined, opportunities have shrunk, and even the hope of securing a basic living, let alone owning a home, has become a distant dream.

Gregory Clark’s "The Son Also Rises" examines social mobility, the ability to move between social classes over generations, and highlights the enduring factors that sustain or limit it. At the heart of social mobility is generational capital: the wealth, education, and cultural inheritance passed through families. This continuity provides the foundation for a stable and prosperous society.

Immigration policies are accelerating this unraveling. The influx of foreign workers displaces the hard-earned progress of native families, replacing their sacrifices with a transient workforce that has no connection to the nation’s legacy. These newcomers, whose descendants will shape the electorate of tomorrow, alter the country’s demographic character and redirect the rewards of past generations’ efforts to those who played no part in creating them.

The American Dream, once defined by surpassing the achievements of past generations and preserving the promise of America for future Heritage Americans, has been abandoned. Policies driven by short-term profits and mass labor importation undermine not just the prosperity but the very survival of the nation’s people.

Why does the first post show an illegal driving recklessly and striking another person? Because it reflects the deeper rot within America, a nation sacrificing its future and the well-being of its citizens for fleeting economic gain. It's symbolic.Image
3/ Generational Capital and Its Disruption

A society’s strength depends on its ability to sustain generational capital—the wealth, knowledge, and cultural cohesion passed through families. This inheritance forms the foundation for long-term prosperity. When this continuity is broken, families and communities are left to watch their sacrifices squandered and their futures jeopardized.

Immigration policies have flooded the nation with workers who share no historical or cultural connection to its legacy. These policies undermine native families, redirecting resources and opportunities away from those who built the country. The displacement of generational capital tears apart the bonds that hold a nation together, leaving the average American poorer, more alienated, and increasingly hopeless.

The government exists to protect and uplift its people, not to sacrifice them for economic metrics or fleeting profits. When it abandons this duty, it betrays the very citizens who entrusted it with their future. This is not simply a failure of policy. It is a betrayal of the nation itself.Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 16
1/ In 2017, a laughable "scientific study" was published claiming the bones of a "female Viking warrior" were "confirmed" by genomics. A few bones, some weapons, and a wishful narrative passed off as a historical breakthrough. 🧵👇NO... Image
2/ The study, dubiously titled "A female Viking warrior Confirmed by Genomics," has been paraded around ever since, claiming to prove Viking women warriors existed. The initial buzz was fueled by the dramatic headline, "Viking warrior confirmed by genomics," but how does genetic testing prove warrior status?

The real problem, however, lies in the ideological motives behind the study. It fits perfectly into the modern obsession with rewriting history to fit today’s ideological narratives that contort the past to align with whatever the "current thing" is.

To be deemed respectable in mainstream academia, particularly in the Western world, one must conform to these distortions, unwilling to entertain anything that challenges their rigid, narrow view of reality. A single set of bones is twisted into proof of female warriors being the norm in the Viking world, a textbook case of hasty generalization, turning one instance into an entire historical trend.

But this also assumes that the remains belonged to a female warrior and that this was, in fact, her grave...Image
3/ The study's conclusions, that this individual was a "female Viking warrior," are based on a series of leaps that are nonsensical.

First, the woman was buried with the weapons of war, including a sword, shield, axe, spear, armor-piercing arrows, a battle knife, and two shields. The study claims that these grave goods prove she must have been a warrior, with no other explanation considered.

But assuming that burial with weapons automatically means combat experience, and thus 'warrior status,' is flawed. Weapons and armor in graves can symbolize many things: status, wealth, or even religious or cultural significance, not necessarily that the deceased was directly involved in battle. The study sidesteps this distinction with the very modern girlboss non-sequitur, which essentially amounts to, "If a man were buried with these things, there would be no question of his warrior status."

Then, things get even more ridiculous. The woman was buried with a hnefatafl set, an ancient Viking strategy game, similar to chess, and two horses. The study claims that this game proves she was not only a warrior but a "high-ranking military officer." This conclusion is made with no real evidence.

While it’s true that some Viking graves contain horses, it doesn’t automatically imply the person was a warrior. Horses in graves were often symbols of status, wealth, or even ritual significance. There’s no evidence to suggest the horses were there because she was involved in battle.

And then, the coup de grace. The study uses the absence of physical trauma in her remains to further support their phony "warrior narrative." They argue that the lack of injuries typically associated with combat does not disqualify her as a warrior. But this reasoning is completely backward. Warriors, especially high-ranking ones in pre-modern times, are almost always marked by the physical toll of battle. Fractures, joint stress, and signs of prolonged combat activity are all typical of those who fight in wars.

The fact that this woman shows none of these signs should be a glaring red flag. Instead of critically engaging with this absence, the study uses it as an argument IN FAVOR of her warrior status. This is not just illogical; it is intellectually dishonest.

The conclusion that she was a "warrior," let alone a "high-ranking" one, is unfounded, illogical, and obviously ideologically driven.

We also don't know for certain if this was definitively her burial site...Image
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(