Mel Gibson Drops Two Medical Bombshells on the Joe Rogan Podcast
Be prepared to have your mind blown.
🧵 THREAD
In the final hour of episode #2254 of The Joe Rogan Experience, actor Mel Gibson shared two shocking medical experiences that defy mainstream knowledge.
It all started the moment Anthony Fauci’s name lept out of Gibson’s mouth.
“I don’t know why Fauci’s still walking around… or at least free,” Gibson remarked before revealing that he had “road rage” after listening to RFK Jr.’s book about Anthony Fauci.
Piling on, Joe Rogan quickly dismantled any doubts about the book’s accuracy, arguing that if it were full of lies, RFK Jr. would have been sued into the ground and publicly humiliated.
“First of all, people that don’t believe it. How come RFK Jr. didn’t get sued? How come there’s no lawsuits? If there were lies, there would be lawsuits. You’d be publicly humiliated,” Rogan pointed out.
“That book is an accurate depiction of what Anthony Fauci did during the AIDS crisis, which probably was an AZT crisis. It wasn’t an AIDS crisis.”
The first bombshell dropped when Gibson shared that he “couldn’t walk for three months” after taking Fauci’s pet drug for COVID.
“[Remdesivir] kills you. I found out that afterward. And that’s why I wonder about Fauci,” Gibson said.
“Remdesivir is so lethal it got nicknamed ‘Run Death Is Near’ after it started killing thousands of COVID patients in the hospital,” Stella Paul wrote in a previous report.
“The experts claimed that remdesivir would stop COVID; instead, it stopped kidney function, then blasted the liver and other organs.”
Unfortunately, Gibson’s gardener wasn’t as fortunate. After reportedly receiving the kidney-toxic treatment, he tragically passed away.
“I knew the guy for 20 years, and we both went to the same hospital, and he died, and I didn’t,” Gibson lamented. “I think we both got remdesivir, which is not good.”
While you’re here, please take a few seconds to follow and hit the bell 🔔 more reports like this one.
The most jaw-dropping moment happened when Gibson made a statement that could threaten the entire cancer industry.
Gibson revealed that he has three friends who had “stage four cancer,” and now “all three of them don’t have cancer right now at all.”
“And they had some serious stuff going on,” Gibson added.
Rogan asked, “What did they take?”—to which Gibson hesitantly replied, “They took what you’ve heard they’ve taken.”
Being familiar with alternative cancer therapies, Rogan concluded Gibson was talking about antiparasitic drugs Ivermectin and Fenbendazole, which Gibson confirmed with a nod.
Corroborating what Gibson reported to Rogan, cancer surgeon Dr. Kathleen Ruddy revealed to The Epoch Times last year that she has seen several late-stage cancer patients make dramatic recoveries after taking Ivermectin.
One patient had a grim future, and then something remarkable happened. This man had stage four prostate cancer and tried all the conventional protocols before doctors told him that there was nothing they could do.
Then, he started taking ivermectin…
Within six months, the metastatic lesions began to disappear, and in less than a year, “he was out dancing for four hours” three nights per week, according to Dr. Ruddy.
A similar scenario unfolded for another man named Eddie. He was also in bad shape.
Eddie was diagnosed with two unresectable esophageal tumors that surgeons wouldn’t go near. He was a smoker, couldn’t swallow, and had lost 40 pounds in a year and a half.
“Within a couple of weeks, he sounded stronger. He could swallow. He had gained six pounds. His voice was better,” reported Dr. Ruddy.
Several weeks later, Dr. Ruddy said to Eddie, “You need to get a scan.”
Guess what happened?
“We got the scan. No tumors. Gone. Gone. The problem was that he had sold his fishing boat. That was the biggest problem. He was getting better. His tumor was gone. Now he’s got to buy another fishing boat … I was like, ‘Well, now, that’s interesting.’”
Recently, anecdotal reports have also praised Fenbendazole as a potentially miraculous anti-cancer drug.
It reportedly works by destabilizing microtubules, the structures that help cancer cells divide and grow.
By disrupting this process, Fenbendazole is believed to effectively halt cancer cell division and slow or stop tumor growth.
A case series published in 2020 documented three cancer patients who experienced complete remission after taking Fenbendazole.
The abstract concluded, ‘FBZ (Fenbendazole) appears to be a potentially safe and effective antineoplastic agent that can be repurposed for human use in treating genitourinary malignancies.’”
Adding to the growing evidence in support of Fendendazole’s use case against cancer, an Oklahoma man credited his miraculous cancer recovery to the pet med after overcoming terminal small cell lung cancer, defying a less than 1% survival rate and leaving doctors baffled.
KOKO 5 News reported in 2019:
EDMOND, Okla. — When you tell someone a medicine for dogs cured your cancer, you better be ready for some skeptics, but Joe Tippens says it saved his life, and the lives of others.
Now, even cancer researchers are open to the possibility it might be true.
"My stomach, my neck, my liver, my pancreas, my bladder, my bones -- it was everywhere," Tippens said.
Tippens said he was told to go home, call hospice and say his goodbyes two years ago.
The doctors were unanimous, he was going to die of small cell lung cancer.
"Once that kind of cancer goes that far afield, the odds of survival are less than 1 percent, and median life expectancy is three months," Tippens said.
Tippens said he went from 220 pounds to 110.
"I was a skeleton with skin hanging off of it," he said. "It was difficult."
But that was January of 2017. Today, Tippens is very much alive and what he credits for his survival has doctors scratching their heads, and the rest of us raising eyebrows.
"About half the people think I'm just crazy," he said. "And about half the people want to know more and dig deeper."
Tippens said he received a tip from a veterinarian, of all people. And in his desperation, he turned from people medicine to dog medicine.
Specifically, something you give your dog when it has worms.
"The truth is stranger than fiction, you know?" Tippens said, laughing.
Just three months later, Tippens says, his cancer was gone.
A chilling investigation reveals ChatGPT users are spiraling into AI-induced psychosis—real stories of delusion, suicide attempts, and forced psychiatric holds they don’t want you to see.
As Silicon Valley elites rush to unleash this tech before they can define its dangers, they’re playing god with our minds.
Peter Thiel can’t even answer whether he wants humanity to survive in this technocratic takeover.
@zeee_media uncovers the darkest side of ChatGPT in this special report, confronting rising fears of the so-called 'Antichrist AI' many warn is already here.
🧵 THREAD
An interesting article was published recently describing how people are being involuntarily committed or jailed after spiraling into what's being called “ChatGPT psychosis.”
Meanwhile, Peter Thiel just did an interview where he essentially struggled to answer whether he would prefer the human race to endure—or not. Maria has been very honest about her concerns surrounding AI and the surveillance state being built with it.
Today, we take a deep look at some of the creepier aspects of AI's impact on society—the things nobody is really talking about.
And believe me, you will be shocked by this information.
In a special report for Daily Pulse, Maria Zeee delivered a chilling account of what she calls “ChatGPT psychosis,” reading from Futurism’s investigation about people with no history of mental illness who came completely unraveled after obsessive, philosophical chats with the bot.
She shared the story of one man who proclaimed he’d “broken math and physics,” convinced he’d birthed a sentient AI and was destined to save the world. His behavior became so erratic that he lost his job, stopped sleeping, lost weight, and was eventually found by his wife with a rope around his neck.
“He was involuntarily committed,” she explained, describing the terror friends and family have felt witnessing such breakdowns. Maria warned viewers that this isn’t some distant theory but something happening happening to people right now, pointing to the raw panic in quotes like “I don't f***ing know what to do.”
“Numerous family members and friends recounted similarly painful experiences… relaying feelings of fear and helplessness.”
Yale Study Quietly Confirms COVID Vaccine Nightmare
They told you the shot would stay in your arm. That was a lie.
They said the spike protein would degrade quickly. That was a lie.
Yale researchers tracked vax-injured patients over time—and they were shocked to learn that some individuals were still producing spike protein 709 days after vaccination.
That’s almost two years!
But that wasn’t all they found. This study should alarm every vaccinated person.
🧵 THREAD
This wasn’t a fringe study. It was led by Yale scientists, including immunologists who originally supported the vaccine rollout.
Their findings should be front-page news. But the media’s silent.
#10 – Dem strategist James Carville predicts Trump will impose MARTIAL LAW to avoid a 2026 midterm blowout.
“I think he’s going to rig the election.”
“This Big Beautiful Bill is about 25 points underwater... He’s going to see a massive defeat coming, and he’s going to try to do anything he can to extricate himself in that defeat,” Carville said.
“And I would not put it at all past him to try to call MARTIAL LAW or declare that there’s some kind of national emergency in the country or anything like that because the hoof prints are coming. You can hear them, and they’re going to get a shellacking in November of 2026.”
What do you think of Carville’s take? Watch how Bill O’Reilly reacted.
*SEE THE NEXT 9 STORIES BELOW*
#9 - State Dept Spokeswoman Tammy Bruce reveals 90% of foreign aid NEVER actually made it to its intended destination.
The amount of fraud is mind-boggling. This is why Democrats fought DOGE so hard.
Credit: @libsoftiktok
#8 - Gay news anchor @alexharmstrong perfectly sums up Pride Month with a brutal reality check.
“It turns people off! … It doesn’t show anything good about the gay community.”
X account @againstgrmrs agrees. They write:
“Pride is unnecessary & does NOT benefit gay people. Millions watch in horror as grown adults parade their fetishes in front of kids for an entire month. We're sick of it. It does more harm than good & we're glad it’s over.”
Retired Green Beret @DocPeteChambers just announced he’s running for Texas Governor, vowing to issue arrest warrants for those who have committed crimes against humanity—starting with Anthony Fauci.
He says he witnessed vaccine injuries firsthand among his own soldiers and is determined to hold the architects of the COVID pandemic accountable, no matter how powerful they are.
“They will be afraid to come into Texas,” he warned.
🧵 THREAD
Doc Pete Chambers is a retired U.S. Army Lieutenant Colonel, Special Forces Green Beret and physician who has dedicated his life to defending freedom and serving others from combat zones to the Texas border.
Doc has always shown up where leadership is needed most. Over the weekend, he stunned the country and the world when he announced that he's running for governor of Texas.
If elected governor, he promises to go after those who have committed crimes against humanity. His first target? Anthony Fauci.
Needless to say, people are very keen to hear from Doc Pete Chambers. He joins us to detail why Texas desperately needs a new governor, and why he is the only man for the job.
Chambers didn’t hold back, warning of an “invasion on the border” that he said was destabilizing Texas and threatening the entire nation.
He called Texas “the first domino” in a crisis spreading north, driven by cartels, gangs, and a public that had lost all trust in government.
“We have a demoralized if you will, or disenfranchised populace that doesn't believe in their government anymore,” he explained.
If elected governor, Chambers vowed to act on day one with an executive order—refusing to wait on Washington—to enforce “constitutionally driven” state policies designed to stop the chaos.
He insisted there was a “myriad of things” he could do immediately to secure Texas, framing his plan as a decisive stand against federal inaction.
If you thought what they did to ivermectin was bad, wait till you hear what they did to this drug.
In the 1960s and 70s, DMSO was hailed as a medical breakthrough for its ability to erase chronic pain and heal debilitating injuries.
But there was one problem…
Because DMSO couldn’t be patented, it threatened to replace lucrative NSAIDs and painkillers with a cheap cure.
Later, the FDA declared DMSO “dangerous” and let Big Pharma keep selling toxic painkillers instead.
DMSO has been shown to treat everything from pain and arthritis to nerve damage, inflammation, and even cataracts.
Find out how this one cheap cure became medicine’s best-kept secret.
🧵 THREAD
DMSO (dimethyl sulfoxide) isn’t just a chemical solvent—it’s a medical game-changer.
It can erase chronic pain, speed up healing, calm autoimmune flares, and treat arthritis, strokes, spinal cord injuries, and more.
No wonder it once swept through America like wildfire.
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the sources and details, read the full report below. midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-remarkab…
Victor Davis Hanson just DISMANTLED the so-called “experts” who’ve been wrong about Trump’s policies at every turn.
He dropped three brutal examples that leave no room for doubt—and ended with this warning to the media elites:
“You should try to shed your Trump Derangement Syndrome, because it's really affecting your powers of judgment and analysis, and you're going to lose readers.”
🧵 THREAD
Victor Davis Hanson has a message for the media and the self-anointed “experts” who’ve spent years forecasting disaster under Trump: look at the record.
In his eyes, their failures weren’t honest miscalculations but an unwillingness to admit they simply didn’t understand the country, or the president that they were so eager to condemn.
“I want to talk about our so-called experts,” he began, setting the tone for his argument with a reference to the infamous letter signed by intelligence veterans.
“We know they've been wrong when they sign these collective letters, 51 intelligence authorities assured us Hunter's laptop was pretty much made up in Russia.”
It wasn’t, he argued, an isolated misfire.
Hanson accused major outlets of embracing analyses that fell apart under the weight of real events.
“Recently, in some of the marquee newspaper sites, Wall Street Journal, Bloomberg, of course, the New York Times, they made a series of statements by so-called experts that are absolutely confounded by reality.”
He was setting the stage for a bigger argument: that these repeated failures weren’t simply about being wrong.
They were about refusing to see what was right in front of their own eyes.
That stubbornness, Hanson argued, was especially obvious when it came to Iran.
The recent strikes on uranium enrichment facilities provided a textbook case of the media seizing on convenient narratives while ignoring evidence that didn’t fit.
“Let's take Iran,” he said, describing how reports downplayed the strikes’ effectiveness.
“We get all of these stories that the combined Israel and the later United States strikes on the three key sites of uranium enrichment and around may not have done very much.”
Much of that spin, he claimed, came from a single Pentagon leak describing “marginal damage”—a version of events many outlets picked up without question.
But the reality, he insisted, was harder to deny for anyone who looked at the photos.
“Anybody who looked at the post operation panel, photographs could see that there was substantial damage.”
It wasn’t just his opinion.
“David Albright, one of the most prestigious, an analyst of nuclear proliferation. He said there was serious damage.”
He cited similar assessments from the IAEA’s Mr. Grossi and Israeli intelligence, while the press clung to the one leak that fit their angle.
And the real twist? Hanson highlighted what he saw as absurd hypocrisy in how the threat was framed before and after the strikes.
“The left told us before there was no need to strike Iran because they were months or years away from developing a bomb,” he said.
Yet once the facilities were hit, the same voices panicked about the danger of rapid enrichment.
“They said, oh my gosh, there might be uranium that could be quickly enriched.”
Even some of Trump’s own supporters, Hanson argued, weren’t immune to overreaction.
“The same thing, the same inexactitude, is true of the reaction to the, around war,” he said, recalling grim forecasts of “30,000 people killed, could cause World War Three.”
But the real story was anticlimactic in a way no one seemed eager to admit.
“We were in Iranian airspace for about 25 minutes. No Americans were killed. Probably very few if any Iranians were killed.”
Trump negotiated a ceasefire almost immediately.
And when Iran retaliated by launching missiles at a US base in Qatar, Hanson noted it was “22 year old, 23 year old skeleton crews” manning Patriot batteries who intercepted them without issue.
“Trump did not reply. End of story. No World War Three, no 30,000 killed, no endless wars.”