The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture
Jan 10 13 tweets 7 min read Read on X
Joe Rogan Shuts Down Mark Zuckerberg’s Bogus Claim About COVID

Mark Zuckerberg’s attempt to rebrand himself as a free speech absolutist seemed to be working—until he made this fatal error at the end.

🧵 THREAD Image
Mark Zuckerberg is making some big moves at Meta, and on the surface, it all looks great: elimination of fact-checkers, rollback of DEI initiatives, and less censorship.

Zuckerberg delivered a strong pitch for his renewed enthusiasm for free speech—until he exposed himself at the end.

Episode #2255 of The Joe Rogan Experience started off strong when Zuckerberg declared that modern censorship efforts are driven by ideology rather than a commitment to the truth.

He openly questioned Facebook’s role as the “truth decider” for billions, calling it a dangerous and ideological position to take.

“I kind of think after having gone through that whole exercise it’s something out of 1984, one of these books where it really is a slippery slope,” Zuckerberg said.
The conversation got even more interesting when Zuckerberg threw the Biden administration under the bus, revealing that they pressured his company to censor true information—and even memes—about vaccine safety.

“They pushed us super hard to take down things that were honestly true… they basically pushed us and said anything that says that vaccines might have side effects you basically need to take down,” Zuckerberg explained.
“They want us to take down this meme of Leonardo DiCaprio looking at a TV, talking about how 10 years from now or something, you’re going to see an ad that says, ‘If you took a COVID vaccine, you’re eligible for this kind of payment,’” Zuckerberg continued.

“We just said, ‘No, we’re not going to take down humor and satire. We’re not going to take down things that are true.’”Image
Zuckerberg made the argument that attempts to censor what are called “misinformation” and “hate speech” have gone “too far.”

He referred to Pete Hegseth’s belief that women shouldn’t serve in certain combat roles, explaining that such a statement would be censored under Meta’s old content moderation policies.

“Until we updated our policies, that wouldn’t have been a thing that you could have said on our platforms because it would call for the exclusion of a protected category of people,” Zuckerberg said.

“If it’s okay to say on the floor of Congress, you should probably be able to debate it on social media,” he argued.
As the conversation continued, Zuckerberg even suggested that the Biden administration is guilty of illegal acts to censor speech.

“I don’t think that the pushing for social media companies to censor stuff was legal,” he said.

“Having people in the administration calling up the guys on our team and yelling at them and cursing and threatening repercussions if we don’t take down things that are true is like, it’s pretty bad.”
While you’re here, don’t forget to follow (@VigilantFox) and hit the bell 🔔 for more threads like this one. Image
Bolstering his commitment to free speech even further, Zuckerberg praised UFC president Dana White, suggesting his addition to Meta’s board of directors will be exactly what the company needs to rise up and resist censorship efforts from outside forces.

“He’ [White] has got a strong backbone. And I think part of what the conversation that I had with him around joining our board was, okay, like, we have a lot of governments and folks around the world putting a lot of pressure on our company, and we need some strong people who are going to help advise us on how to handle some of these situations,” Zuckerberg explained.

“I could spend all my time doing that, but I’m not even a politician. I just want to spend my time building things. Right? So, I think Dana’s gonna be great.”
Zuckerberg’s interview was going exceptionally well—he was hitting all the right notes, earning nods of approval from Rogan where it counted most.

But the momentum came to a screeching halt when Zuckerberg made a COVID censorship claim that struck a nerve with @JoeRogan.

While Zuckerberg acknowledged he didn’t agree with the Biden administration’s harsh tactics to push vaccination, he argued that censoring voices and concerns about vaccine safety was done for the purpose of a greater good—suggesting it was free from “personal political gain.”

Rogan, armed with a deep understanding of what actually transpired during COVID, quickly set the record straight and exposed the glaring flaws in Zuckerberg’s claim.

“I still think it’s good for more people to get the vaccine,” Zuckerberg said. “I’m not sure in that case how much of it [censorship] was like a personal political gain that they were going for. I think that they had a kind of goal that they thought was in the interests of the country. And the way they went about it, I think, violated the law.”

“Well, there’s a bunch of problems with that,” Rogan retorted before laying out a quick history of the incentives behind censoring speech about vaccine safety.

“There’s the emergency use authorization that they needed in order to get this pushed through. And you can’t have that without valid therapeutics being available. And so they suppressed valid therapeutics. So they’re suppressing real information that would lead to people being healthy and successful in defeating this disease.

“And they did that so that they could have this one solution. And this was Fauci’s game plan. I mean, this is the movie Dallas Buyers Club. That’s Fauci in that movie. That was with the AIDS crisis. This is the exact same game plan that was played out with the COVID vaccine.

“They pushed one solution, this only one, suppressed all therapeutics through propaganda, through suppressing monoclonal antibodies, like all of it. And that was done, in my opinion, for profit. And they did that because it was extremely profitable. The amount of money that was made was extraordinary during that time,” Rogan explained.
So, what’s really going on with Mark Zuckerberg? Has he truly had a “come to Jesus” moment, recognizing the flaws of his past ways?

Time will tell, but voices like Stephen A. Smith aren’t convinced, suggesting Zuckerberg’s recent moves are more about self-preservation than a genuine commitment to free speech.

“You [Zuckerberg] went about the business of literally limiting conservative voices of vax skeptics along with other people,” Smith rebuked during a recent appearance on NewsNation.

The reason why Zuckerberg is making this free speech stunt now, Smith says, is because he is terrified of getting in Trump’s “path over the next [four] years.”

Smith concluded that Zuckerberg’s actions fall in line with political self-preservation, calling it predictable and calculated.
While it would be wonderful to believe that Zuckerberg is a changed man, one should remain skeptical about his true intentions.

After all, his company was behind some of the worst censorship crimes, like deleting vaccine injury groups when those people needed support from their peers the most.Image
@joerogan But that’s just me. Listen to the full conversation for yourself on @JoeRogan’s YouTube channel.

@joerogan Thanks for reading! If you enjoyed this post, please do me a quick favor and follow this page (@VigilantFox) for more threads like this one.

In other news, Mel Gibson has made some bombshell medical claims. This could threaten the entire cancer industry:

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with The Vigilant Fox 🦊

The Vigilant Fox 🦊 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @VigilantFox

May 7
They said heartburn was because of too much acid.

That lie made Big Pharma billions—and wrecked millions of lives.

Too much acid? Try too little.

And the drugs they’re pushing to “treat” heartburn are actually turning your body into a cash cow.

• 1.8x increased risk of stomach cancer
• 33% greater risk of dementia
• 74% higher risk of severe kidney disease
• 28% more heart attacks
• 77% higher death risk from COVID

These are the risks you take when you take acid blockers like PPIs.

They don’t fix the problem. They just create new ones.

This report exposes Big Pharma’s heartburn scam—and the natural fixes that actually work. 🧵Image
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the eye-opening details on the Great Acid Blocker Scam, read the full 10,000-word article below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/stomach-acid…
Long before COVID came along, four drugs topped nearly every integrative doctor’s “most harmful” list:

• Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs)
• SSRIs (antidepressants)
• Statins (cholesterol drugs)
• NSAIDs (like ibuprofen)

They’re handed out like candy—but these drugs come with huge hidden costs. From nutrient loss to chronic disease, the long-term damage is real.

Where’s the informed consent?Image
Read 28 tweets
May 6
We’re Watching The Art of the Deal Play Out in Real Time

Trump pitched annexing Canada. Carney campaigned against him.

But when the cameras roll inside the Oval Office… something changed.

Trump played the long game.

And Carney? He might have unknowingly walked straight into Trump’s trap.

Let’s roll the clips and break it all down.

🧵 THREADImage
📍Don’t forget to bookmark this post.

Trump just delivered a brilliant dealmaking performance—but almost no one caught what was really going on.

Let’s break it down.
If you’ve read The Art of the Deal, none of this should come as a surprise.

Today’s meeting between President Trump and Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney played out like a live-action masterclass in Trump’s dealmaking philosophy.

From thinking big to pushing relentlessly, the meeting followed the exact playbook Trump laid out in his 1987 bestseller.

Think big.
Be relentless.
Maximize your leverage.
Get the word out.
And when someone treats you unfairly—fight back.Image
Read 11 tweets
May 5
🚨 President Trump and RFK Jr. Just Made History

For the first time ever, a U.S. president has officially terminated government-funded gain-of-function research—the same reckless science that likely sparked the COVID pandemic.

Then RFK Jr. stunned the room with a chilling exposé of government practices that you have to hear to believe.

🧵 THREADImage
📍Don’t forget to bookmark this post.

These aren’t just headlines—they’re the turning points in the battle for America’s health.

Now, let’s roll the clips!
Before he ever stepped into office, RFK Jr. was warning the public about something few dared to touch—gain of function research.

Long before most people had even heard the term, Kennedy was calling out Dr. Anthony Fauci for experimenting on viruses, making them more deadly under the guise of science.

He explained it plainly: scientists were taking wild viruses and making them more contagious, more lethal—then building vaccines to counter the threats they’d just created.

And for what purpose?

“The only real rationale,” Kennedy said, “is to develop bioweapons, and then develop a defense to those bioweapons.”

It wasn’t a fringe theory.

It was happening under Fauci’s watch—and Kennedy revealed that Fauci even got a 68% raise from the military for his role in these new “military responsibilities.”
Read 8 tweets
May 5
The media just took a beating as Trump dropped three truth bombs from the White House.

Even Fox News got shut down after trying to corner him with a question about his viral AI pope photo.

Then ZeroHedge asked a question that no one in the press has dared to touch for years:

Will there be a formal investigation into who blew up the Nord Stream pipeline?

This report reveals two major developments—and Trump’s quiet clue about who he thinks blew it up.

🧵 THREADImage
Before we dive in, do yourself a favor and bookmark this post. 👆

We just got another subtle clue about who blew up Nord Stream, and the pieces are finally starting to fall into place.
What started as a standard White House announcement quickly turned into one of the most revealing Oval Office moments of the year.

Trump was there to declare that Washington, D.C. will host the 2027 NFL Draft. But when reporters started firing off questions, the real fireworks began.

First up: immigration.

A reporter asked Trump about a new program offering undocumented immigrants $1,000 to self-deport. His answer was blunt—and surprisingly layered.

“Yeah, we have millions of people that have come into this country illegally through an administration that didn't know what they were doing. They didn't have a clue. And now we find out officially they didn't, because the president was incompetent. But I could have told you that before.”

He explained the idea behind the plan: offer people money to leave—and if they take the offer and prove to be hard-working, they might be allowed back in the right way.

“But what we thought we'd do is to self-deport where we're going to pay each one a certain amount of money, and we're going to get him a beautiful flight back to where they came from. And they have a period of time.”

“And if they make it, we're going to work with them so that maybe someday, with a little work, they can come back in if they're good people, if they're the kind of people that we want in our company, industrious people that could love our country. And if they're not, they won't. But it will give them a path to becoming, you know, to coming back into the country.”

He made it clear that there would be no second chances for those who ignore the opportunity.

“So we're going to have, self-deportation, where they deport themselves out of our country, and we'll work with them, and we're going to try. And if if we think they're good, they have, you know, the people we want in our country, they're going to come back into our country. We'll give them a little easier route. But if they don't work and if we take them out after the date, then, they're never coming back.”
Read 11 tweets
May 5
For decades, Big Pharma has convinced us that aging bones are a disease.

They gave it a name (osteoporosis).
They built a treatment.
Then they sold it to millions.

It was all built on a lie.

And the cruel irony? The drugs they’re pushing to “fix” osteoporosis are quietly making bones more brittle, not stronger.

In this report, you’ll learn the fatal flaws of modern medicine’s approach to treating osteoporosis—and what makes diagnosing this disease rigged by design.

🧵 THREADImage
The information in this thread comes from the work of medical researcher @MidwesternDoc. For all the eye-opening details on the osteoporosis scam, read the full 8000-word report below.

midwesterndoctor.com/p/the-great-os…
To truly understand modern medicine, you must first see that the industry operates exactly like a sales funnel.

Step 1: Screen everyone.
Step 2: Redefine “normal” so millions are suddenly “sick.”
Step 3: Sell them drugs.
Step 4: Treat the inevitable side effects with more drugs.
Step 5: Repeat.

That’s not healthcare. That’s a really effective business model.Image
Read 26 tweets
May 5
The US government just admitted something shocking.

They KNEW Pfizer’s COVID “vaccine” trials were a complete sham back in 2020.

But they didn’t pursue fraud because exposing it would blow up the very health policy they’re still clinging to today.

This revelation comes from the whistleblower case of Brook Jackson, a former regional director at Ventavia, the company that ran Pfizer’s clinical trials.

In 2021, Jackson filed a lawsuit under the False Claims Act, alleging that Pfizer, Ventavia, and others committed fraud by falsifying data and violating clinical trial protocols.

And now, the government refuses to investigate further—because doing so would expose that they knowingly pushed a harmful product onto the American people.

We’ll show you the court filings with Brook Jackson in this thread. 🧵Image
Before we dive in, please bookmark this post so you can return to these court filings later. 👆

The government just admitted what it knew about the shots—and did nothing anyway. This is how we expose the truth and hold them accountable.
Here’s what @IamBrookJackson witnessed firsthand.

As regional director at Ventavia, the company running Pfizer’s vaccine trial sites, Jackson said the entire operation was riddled with serious violations.

She saw falsified data, trial participants who were unblinded, staff who were poorly trained, and vaccines that were improperly stored.

Worse, she claimed the company FAILED to follow up on adverse events, including serious, potentially life-threatening ones—which recklessly endangered patients and destroyed the integrity of the entire trial.

“We were so inundated with the number of adverse events that we could not keep up,” she said. Pfizer even called asking what the plan was to handle the flood of safety reports.

She said patients weren’t even given full informed consent—her “number one concern.”

Jackson reported these issues to Ventavia. When nothing changed, she went to the FDA.

Six hours later, she was fired. The reason? “I was not a good fit,” she said. “I was not a good fit for reporting fraudulent conduct in a clinical trial.”

Jackson worked at Ventavia for just 18 days but says that’s all it took to get a grasp of the fraud she witnessed.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(