Post

More from @SenseReceptor

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Jan 5

"There's no conclusion except that Pfizer and Moderna were trying to make sure that they would secure what we now have, which is a 13 to 20% drop in live births in North America and Western Europe...." (1/5)

DailyClout CEO, author, and professor Dr. Naomi Wolf (@naomirwolf) describes for Stephanie Locricchio (@StephLocricchio) during a recent Children's Health Defense (@ChildrensHD) interview how "the centerpiece" of the harms that Pfizer's and Moderna's COVID injections cause is "reproductive damage." Wolf, who's edited a book that analyzes the documents related to the outcome of Pfizer's COVID-injection "clinical trial" and post-authorization data in depth, dubbed The Pfizer Papers, notes that "there's no conclusion except that Pfizer and Moderna were trying to make sure that they would secure what we now have, which is a 13 to 20% drop in live births in North America and Western Europe...."

--------------Partial transcription of clip--------------

"I wanna leave your audience knowing is that the centerpiece of the Pfizer documents isn't even all of those hideous problems, deaths, injuries. The centerpiece is reproductive damage. And Pfizer and this injection damages human reproduction in a 360-degree manner. It comes at human reproduction, especially female reproductive health, in multiple ways. And the testing of reproductive damage and the highlighting of reproductive damage and poisoning of babies, nursing from their moms' now poisoned breast milk, is so central in the Pfizer documents that, as we say in the tech world, it's not a bug, it's a feature.

"There's no conclusion except that Pfizer and Moderna were trying to make sure that they would secure what we now have, which is a 13 to 20% drop in live births in North America and Western Europe, especially where most of the damage is targeted. And I guess what I'll just say, you know, brief notes from how does it damage reproduction.

"The lipid nanoparticles, the ingredients bio-distribute throughout the human body in 48 hours, including accumulating in the ovaries if you're a woman. So first injection, some lipid nanoparticles, which are industrial fats, come into your ovaries. Second injection, more. Third injection, first booster, more. And we've seen no mechanism by which these materials leave the ovaries. So you're just literally blocking your ovaries with every injection. Not only that, the lipid nanoparticles traverse the placenta, so babies in utero aren't growing to term. I literally haven't heard of a full term baby since '20 '21 in my immediate circle. They they need to be delivered early because the placentas, you know, can't grow.

"Midwives are independently sending me images of flattened placentas pancaked, you know, unnaturally flattened placentas that are discolored. They can't provide babies with nutrients or oxygen when they're in utero. People, like doctor James Thorp, fetal maternal medicine specialist, are reporting high levels of chromosomal and other abnormalities in babies because lipid nanoparticles get into the babies. The lipid nanoparticles degrade the myelin, I'm sorry, the sheath around the testes in baby boys in utero and degrade the Sertoli cells and Leydig cells that turn on adult masculinity. So we don't even know if these babies are gonna grow up at adolescence and adulthood to be normal men with secondary sex characteristics, broad shoulders, facial hair, the ability to father children.

"There's a section of Pfizer documents that shows an 80% miscarriage rate. There's a section of Pfizer documents that shows that they told vaccinated men not to have intercourse with unvaccinated women. And if they did, to use two reliable forms of contraceptives. So Pfizer, to this day, knows that there's something in the semen of vaccinated men that could be injurious to either women or to a zygote or a fetus, but they're not telling us what they're worried about. But they do define exposure to the vaccine as including sexual intercourse, skin contact, and inhalation, which does confirm a lot of anecdotal concerns people had about shedding.

"There's this report, like a spreadsheet, that was sent in something called the Pregnancy and Lactation Report, on April 20th, 2021 to the White House. And it shows a chart of women damaged menstrually, like 15,000 women bleeding every day, 10,000 women bleeding twice a month, 7,500 women with no periods all at all, meaning no fertility, 10-year-old girls bleeding upon receiving an injection. 85-year-old women bleeding upon receiving an injection. Agonizing cramps, like disabling cramps, hemorrhaging, passing tissue, horrific conditions. And they just, you know, note this, as if this is the deliverable.

"And there's also a chart that shows babies getting very sick from nursing vaccinated moms. This many babies vomited. This many babies had edema, which is swelling of tissue. This many babies...had convulsions. One baby died of convulsions, from nursing a vaccinated mom. You know, these babies have failure to thrive. And they just write up these charts, and they noted that two babies died in utero due to, quote, maternal exposure to the vaccine, end quote.

"And they sent this to the White House and to doctor Walensky, as I mentioned, in April 20th, 2021. Three days later, doctor Walensky gave a press conference from the White House telling the pregnant women of America or the women who wanted to get pregnant or who had gotten pregnant, there's no bad time to get a COVID injection, excuse me, before you get pregnant, during your pregnancy, or after your baby is born. And she had this document in her hand. By the way, three days after we ran that report, she resigned."

(2/5) Note that these results—declining birthrates in the West—are perfectly in line with what the architects of this worldwide crime against humanity outlined in their 1944 "Open Conspiracy" for a "New World Order" game plan document.

Full plan: sensereceptornews.com/?p=13996

"At least 4 billion 'useless eaters' shall be eliminated by the year 2050 by means of limited wars, organized epidemics of fatal rapid-acting diseases and starvation. Energy, food and water shall be kept at subsistence levels for the non-elite, start-ing with the White populations of Western Europe and North America and then spreading to other races. The population of Canada, Western Europe and the United States will be decimated more rapidly than on other continents, until the world's population reaches a manageable level of 1 billion, of which 500 million will consist of Chinese and Japanese races, selected because they are people who have been regimented for centuries and who are accustomed to obeying authority without question."

(3/5) The makers of the COVID jabs can't even feign ignorance re: their effects on reproduction, as evidence that the LNPs collect in the ovaries was in the peer-reviewed literature since at least 2012.

A biodistribution study performed after the jab rollout confirmed this.

Source: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…

Source: pandemictimeline.com/wp-content/upl…

Read 5 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 30, 2024

THE COVID INJECTIONS CAUSE AGGRESSIVE (TURBO) CANCERS EN MASSE: A MEGA-THREAD SHOWCASING THE OVERWHELMING EVIDENCE OF AN UNTHINKABLE HORROR THAT WILL TOUCH US ALL (1/57+)🧵

(Stick this thread on any post with a Community Note saying the injections don’t cause turbo cancers.)

Thread index:

Tweets 1–16: Physicians, Scientists, and Industry Experts—from the U.S., U.K., Canada, Germany, and Sweden—Describe How the COVID Injections Cause Turbo Cancers

The injections—

-Severely degrade the immune system, particularly causing T-cell suppression

-Are adulterated with DNA plasmids, which contain the notorious SV40 promoter sequence, which has not only been associated with oncogenesis, but also binding with P53 a.k.a. “the guardian of the genome”

-Are associated with far more aggressive cancers than what was normal prior to the injections’ rollout

-Are associated with increasing rates of cancers

Tweets 17–23: Anecdotal interviews with people describing aggressive cancers in themselves, their friends, or family members who’ve taken one or more COVID injections.

Tweets 24–39: Evidence in the scientific literature and regulatory documentation that supports the idea that the COVID injections degrade the immune system, are capable of causing aggressive cancers, and contain DNA and SV40 contamination.

Tweets 40–47: A—small—sample of the VAERS reports linking the COVID injections to various types of cancers.

Tweets 48–57: Users on X speak out about themselves, family, or friends who developed an aggressive, often fatal, cancer following receipt of one or more COVID injections.

NOTE: Please add your own COVID injection–related “turbo cancer” story to this thread to bolster the already overwhelming evidence that it is indeed a real phenomenon.

—-----------------------

DR. DAVID RASNICK—“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer is that these [COVID] injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.”

In this first tweet, we start by hearing from cancer and AIDS research titan Dr. David Rasnick, who notes in a 2024 interview with Children’s Health Defense that this phenomenon of “turbo cancers” is new, and is defined by cancers that appear and grow to Stage 3 or Stage 4—i.e. “lethal”—in a matter of months.

Rasnick, who earned a PhD in chemistry from the Georgia Institute of Technology in 1978, has more than 20 years of experience in the pharmaceutical and biotech industries, published numerous scientific papers, and invented novel laboratory techniques, notes that these turbo cancers are also affecting younger people than usual, including people in their 20s.

“When it [the turbo cancer] develops, they get late stage cancer and they’re dead really, really quickly,” Rasnick says. “That is new.”

Furthermore, Rasnick says the only other time these kinds of rapid-growing cancers have been observed was in lab animals that were made to be immune deficient “by design.”

“I’m convinced that the true explanation of what’s behind turbo cancer,” Rasnick says, “is that these [COVID] injections…these mRNA and DNA genetic injections…are devastating the immune system…[and] now we’re seeing a consequence of that devastated immune system.”

Rasnick adds, “Once your immune system is really, really depressed, now these things [cancers] can develop rapidly.” The cancer researcher adds, “We’re basically doing to human beings what we did to laboratory animals: We’re destroying their immune systems to the point where they can’t resist the cancer. And the cancers are now growing like they are in cell culture. They don’t have anything impeding their ability to proliferate.”

(2/57) DR. RYAN COLE — “[These shots]...cause immune suppression. They cause a disruption and dysregulation of your immune system that normally is what would fight cancer.”

In this clip from a 2023 interview with Greg Hunter, Dr. Ryan Cole, a board-certified pathologist and founder of Cole Diagnostics Inc. in Boise, Idaho, says that he saw early warning signs of immune system suppression following the rollout of the COVID injections and warned people that they “suppress the immune system.”

Cole notes that the injections “alter the way your immune system works.” He adds that they “[put] your T cells to sleep” in such a way that they can’t perform their “surveillance” duties “to fight cancer.”

The veteran pathologist adds that he has traveled the world, talking to oncologists, pathologists, family doctors, et al., who say that they’re “seeing cancers…in age groups…never seen before, and it happened after the rollout of the shots.”

Cole adds that insurance datasets and some countries’ disability data confirms the huge uptick in cancers. In the U.K., for example, Cole says that in 2021, there was a 6–7% rise in cancers; in 2022, there was a staggering 35% increase.

“Those are the types of data that we’re seeing that [are] really concerning,” Cole adds.

(3/57) DR. ROGER HODKINSON— “The immune system has been taken off its watch…[there could be] a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.”

In this clip from a 2022 interview with the RAIR Foundation, Dr. Roger Hodkinson, a medical specialist in pathology, a graduate of Cambridge University, and a Fellow at the Royal College of Physicians and Surgeons of Canada (FRCPC), echoes Dr. Ryan Cole’s concerns regarding the COVID injections’ deleterious effects on the immune system.

“One of the primary functions of the immune system is to surveil the entire body, looking for little, tiny cancers that can be knocked off before they get to a size when they produce a lump or a syndrome that kills you…[And] with the [COVID] vaccination, having a profound impact on the vitality of our immune system, the deep concern is that some of these cancers that are being reported, or maybe all of them, are due to immune escape,” Hodkinson says. The pathologist adds, “the immune system has been…taken off its watch…and the cancer has been allowed to proliferate in a way that it would not normally have done.”

Hodkinson goes on to note: “[This] could result in a tsunami of…cancer and other conditions that have been brought on…by this vaccination program.” He adds, “When…something of this magnitude…is not studied, that is cause for enormous concern. Because that is not the way medicine works.”

Read 59 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 20, 2024

Why *21 days* between mRNA jabs? To maximize the probability of anaphylactic reactions!

"The reason the manufacturers wanted the 21 days...is because they wanted to document [the rate of reactions]...They knew they were gonna set off...massive death and injury." (1/4)

Retired pharma R&D executive Sasha Latypova (@sasha_latypova) describes for Iron Will (@IronWillRpt) how the manufacturers of the mRNA COVID injections chose the 21-day-long period between jabs in order to maximize the probability of eliciting anaphylactic reactions in recipients. Citing the work of Nobel Prize winner (and eugenicist) Charles Richet, Latypova notes that this period of time—approximately three weeks—is ideal for causing a severe anaphylactic reaction in a person.

"Charles Richet discovered that interval," Latypova says. "It's not always 21 days, but 21 days happens to be, like, a most likely period of time. But...it's several weeks usually—from first injection to the second injection of the same toxin or protein."

Describing the work of Richet, a French physiologist who won the Nobel Prize in 1913 for his work on what he dubbed "anaphylaxis," Latypova says the following:

"[Richet] did these experiments extensively, and he was injecting different types of toxins and observing [recipients]. So observing when that really severe anaphylaxis [reaction occurs]. [And] he said, first, he would inject some kind of a protein, and then the animal [who received] the first injection may have a mild reaction or not even react at all. So they may have nothing. And then after 21 days, typically, if he injected in some of the animals—but not all, in some, it's usually a percentage, something like 10 to to 15%—some of them would develop extreme severe reactions even to a very, very minute dose of the same protein.

So, like, in the first reaction, it was a larger dose. The second reaction, even a tiny, tiny, minute dose would set off this huge, huge anaphylactic shock or illness, and some of them would die. And this was found with all vaccinations at that time. He also even writes about other attempts at vaccinations, for anthrax in animals. He reported the same issues. So about 10, 15% of them died because of the anaphylactic reactions. He even reported that at the same time, different researchers were attempting this on themselves, and some of them killed themselves, with this method."

Latypova then goes on to describe on oddity with "vaccine" researchers: They don't mind poisoning themselves and their loved ones (sometimes fatally) for their research.

"[With] a lot of these vaccine crazy obsessed scientists, in fact, there are documented examples where they killed their children, grandchildren, and still did not recant and continued to do the same [thing]. Peter Hotez...he poisoned his daughter. She has autism from vaccines, and he's super pro-vax. So that's a very typical attitude amongst these people. They're insane. Unfortunately, they have a lot of power and money, and so they act on their insanity. But we need to understand exactly what's going on here."

Latypova goes on to describe why the mRNA injections are so much more dangerous than traditional "vaccines."

"I'd say they are much more dangerous than traditional vaccines because they also contain all kinds of novel technologies. And, as I said before, the reason the manufacturers want the 21 days between two injections is because they want to document this. And the mRNA platform was new in humans. It wasn't used in humans before. And so...they knew they were gonna set off death and injury, massive death and injury. They knew, absolutely knew. There was no question about it. All they wanted to do is document how much anaphylaxis they're causing...so that then they would, you know, try to dial it back, dilute, do whatever.

So later on, we find that not as many anaphylactic reactions are recorded as the for the initial wave. So they just needed to document how many people are having this reaction. That's all...They knew that this is going to happen."

(2/4) "Through studies involving dogs... Richet demonstrated...[that after] an initial low dose of a substance, a new dose some weeks later could produce a severe reaction."

"In 1913, [Richet] was awarded the Nobel Prize for his researches on anaphylaxis. He invented this word to designate the sensitivity developed by an organism after it had been given a parenteral injection of a colloid or protein substance or a toxin (1902)." (Parenteral drug administration is drug administration by intravenous, intramuscular, or subcutaneous injection.)

Source: nobelprize.org/prizes/medicin…

Source: nobelprize.org/prizes/medicin…

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1676689094397636615

(3/4) To Latypova's final point in the clip, note that she showed us in 2022 that the mRNA jab manufacturers had initially started with far deadlier injections and then, over time, dialed back their deadliness:

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1676689094397636615

Read 4 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 20, 2024

HOW NATO/THE IC CONTROLLED THE GLOBAL COVID RESPONSE. FREAKIN' MIND BLOWING🤯🤯🤯

"The President was absolutely 100% not in charge of anything...the whole response...[was] NATO... Why... NATO?... They treated [COVID] as if it was a bioweapons attack. A global war." (1/5)

Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (@brownstoneinst) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (@Honest_Medicine) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (@KLVeritas) how NATO and the Intelligence Communities from countries like the U.S. were in charge of the global COVID "pandemic" response. Lerman, who has done extensive research into the matter, notes that President Trump was "absolutely 100% not in charge," and says he even pegged Coronavirus Task Force member Deborah Birx as "the [real] problem" because "Birx was representing the national security state within the Trump administration and within the task force."

"The President was absolutely 100% not in charge of anything," Lerman tells Lindley. "As we know, Trump switched from saying 'it [COVID] was nothing' to saying that 'it was terrible,' you know, that we had to lock down. Then a month later, he said, 'We have to stop locking down.' The way he was talking was—or the way he was tweeting was—very interesting because he would tweet things...in all caps, [like] WE MUST OPEN UP. Right?

"[But] he's the President of the United States. You don't have to tweet, 'We must open up.' You tell everybody in your administration, 'We're gonna open up now.' If he can't do that, something's wrong. Right? He was not in charge."

Lerman goes on to say that "in Scott Atlas's book...he wrote about his time on the [COVID] task force, which was not at the beginning, so he wasn't there for the how it started, but he was there in about August [of 2020]. He did say[, however] that when he talked to Trump, Trump said to him, 'We all know who is actually the problem, and it's not Fauci. The problem is Deborah Birx.' [And that was] because Deborah Birx was representing the National Security State within the Trump administration and within the task force."

Lerman goes on to discuss the role that NATO—the intergovernmental military alliance of 30 North American and European countries, established to ensure a collective defense, where an attack on one member is considered an attack on all—played in orchestrating the "pandemic" response.

"How can NATO be responding to a naturally occurring virus? Right? Why...NATO? NATO is a military alliance. The only way I believe they could have invoked NATO is because they treated it [COVID] as if it was a bioweapons attack. [A] global war."

Lerman explains:

"They treated it that way. Whether it was...a lab leak or not, whether it was an engineered virus or not—I believe it was both of those things—but even if you don't believe that, it doesn't matter because that's what they use[d]. They said [that's what it was], and then they use[d] all the laws, all the treaties, all the agreements. There's memoranda of understanding in terms of bioweapons amongst various countries—they can invoke all of that in order to enforce a uniform response. And [that's the] uniform response...I'm now discovering in other European countries. So we now have the Dutch minister of health coming out and saying that we were actually following NATO orders during COVID. She literally said those words. And the intelligence agencies of Holland were in charge of the response. So it was exactly the same."

Furthermore, Lerman says that "we have the German RKI [Robert Koch Institute] leak, which [is] the public health institute, like HHS, that was supposed to be in charge. We also have leaked documents that show that they were also following orders from some NATO connected people, as opposed to public health officials. The public health officials, again, were just sort of the liaison between the national security apparatus and the public."

"And when you asked about the US military," Lerman adds, "[the] military industrial complex, because the U.S. is now the global superpower...in the West and as far as in Europe, and the anglosphere in the Americas, we're it. And so our military industrial complex is the military industrial complex of the West, pretty much. And so we are what fuels NATO. And so we have demilitarized Europe in a sense...so that we could be, you know, the military power in the West."

Lerman goes on to say:

"The COVID response...really crystallized how much the national has now been subsumed into the global governance structures [and] military industrial complex, which is now kind of on a global scale. So it's an interesting paradox for the military industrial complex because what did it used to do? The U.S...the military industrial complex...[used to] gain strength, gain money, gain power by doing regime changes. Which they're still doing. I mean, we see Syria. Right? And we see the Ukraine. They're doing it. But [before,] they had the whole Communist Bloc to justify their existence. Right? We have a threat. It's a mortal threat. It's an existential threat. We don't really have existential threats like that anymore. So they have to define other existential threats.

"So a virus, which we all knew was not a threat to almost anyone, all of the sudden becomes an existential threat because they decide that it is—or they define it as a bioweapon or a bio-terror attack. So actually the solution, which is the existence of this giant global biodefense industrial complex, the solution defines the problem. Like...[the way I] describe it is COVID was gonna happen whether it was SARS CoV-2 or something else. Another virus."

(2/5) Note that what Lerman describes perfectly aligns with what German journalist Paul Schreyer described in his seminal presentation showing how the COVID response had been planned by key globalist players for 20 years.

Link to full presentation: sensereceptornews.com/?p=12976

(3/5) Schreyer notes the exercises began after former Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Colin Powell said in '91: "I'm running out of demons. I’m running out of villains. I'm down to Castro and Kim Il Sung."

The military industrial complex needed a new enemy: a "virus."

Link: cato.org/commentary/res…

Read 5 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 20, 2024

"We are dealing with an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans...the hospitals are killing zones...I can't tell you how many subscribers told me about loved ones...who were literally killed by the hospitals." (1/5)

Investment banker, former HUD official, and founder of the Solari Report (@solari_the) Catherine Austin Fitts describes on a recent episode of the @ChildrensHD series Financial Rebellion how there is "an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans." Fitts notes that she traveled to 26 states in 2024 and had her subscribers tell her about "loved ones...who were literally killed by the hospitals."

"We are dealing with an intentional plan by the hospitals to euthanize Americans," Fitts says. "I just think, you know, that the hospitals are killing zones. People are being intentionally killed. And, you know, we saw that great video from Jacqui Deevoy about how it's happening in the UK[, too]."

Fitts goes on to say:

"But out on the [Children's Health Defense] bus, [you got] stories...about people being killed, and when we were doing our Financial Transaction Freedom Tour—I was in 26 states, you know, driving all over the place. I can't tell you how many subscribers told me about loved ones or, you know, friends and family, who were literally killed by the hospitals. It's frightening."

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1799551323848773818

(2/5) Here's a thread describing how doctors and nurses are slaughtering Americans in the hospitals using the remdesivir+ventilator murder protocol.

Based on death certs, John Beaudoin estimates 500K+ Americans have been killed this way.

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1799551323848773818

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1794587729377825081

(3/5) We also have this terrifying phenomenon (in the U.S. and U.K.!) where unidentified individuals are showing up as supposed medical professionals (sometimes wearing all black) and slaughtering hospital patients with murder protocols:

https://x.com/SenseReceptor/status/1794587729377825081

Read 5 tweets

Sense Receptor

@SenseReceptor

Dec 19, 2024

🔥HYPER-CRUCIAL INSIGHT🔥

"Fauci was not in charge...He was the public relations face of the policy...The government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council...and now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world." (1/5)

Debbie Lerman, a 2023 Brownstone (@brownstoneinst) Fellow and retired science writer, describes for FLCCC (@Honest_Medicine) Senior Fellow Dr. Kat Lindley (@KLVeritas) how former NIAID head Anthony Fauci **was not in any way in charge of COVID policy.** Instead, Lerman notes that the National Security Council was in charge of COVID policy. While Lerman notes that Fauci is indeed "a terrible person" who should be "on trial," she says that "that's [not] where we should be focusing all of our attention."

"The biodefense global public–partnership includes all of the public health agencies and stuff on a national level, but they're not the ones who are in charge," Lerman says. "So they're the ones who are just enacting the policy, and that's where everybody has to be really, really clear: Fauci was not in charge. Please get that out of your mind. We can prosecute him. We can blame him for a lot of things. [But] he didn't make the policy. He didn't come up with the policy, and he didn't enforce the policy. He was the public relations face of the policy. He's a terrible person. [And I] would be happy if he were on trial, but I don't think that's where we should be focusing all of our attention."

Lerman goes on to discuss Deborah Birx, who was also on the COVID "Task Force."

"Deborah Birx...she came [in as] the representative of the national security state...[And] what I discovered through my research is that the government entity that was in charge of the COVID policy was the National Security Council."

"And so I just went where my research took me, and, unfortunately, that's where it took me," Lerman adds. "And so I had to go there. And so the National Security Council is defined as the leaders of the military and intelligence arms of government that are advising the President on national security. That's the definition. Now that was the definition before COVID. They changed it. So you have to look at the Wayback Machine to find that definition."

Lerman goes on to say:

"Now the way they define it is, yes, it's the intelligence and military, but...it's also pandemics, disasters—anything that requires national coordination now is going to be coordinated through the National Security Council. That's scary because...they have expanded the definition of what the National Security Council is supposed to do, and in doing that, they've incorporated public health into what they call a biosecurity framework...[and] the one that they came up with is based on a biodefense response to outbreaks, which is lockdown until vaccine.

"What that was supposed to be for, it was supposed to be for when there was an anthrax attack, let's say, on a subway system in a big city—you could lock down that city, make sure that it didn't spread further, get rushed treatment to the people in the affected area. It would be a very limited geographic and temporal event...So, like, they would rush the countermeasures. They had EUA, which is emergency use authorization, which in that situation was important because you rush the treatment to the people in that area even if you don't know that it's definitely going to be effective. It's such a big emergency, biowarfare, bioterrorism—you gotta rush it to the people. There might be some collateral damage. We're in a military situation here. Right? So in a military situation, collateral damage is a whole different consideration than in a civilian framework of public health.

"So the civilian framework of public health disappeared. It just got swallowed up by the biodefense framework. And now they're applying the biodefense framework to the entire world, which is a utterly and completely counter to medicine science and public health."

(2/5) Indeed, we can look at government documents and see Lerman is correct: it was the National Security Council that was in charge of COVID policy. Fauci and everyone else at HHS were essentially administrators:

(3/5) The National Security Council took a reasonable pandemic response plan—PanCAP—and requested an "updated" plan—PanCAP-A.

PanCAP-A, which set COVID policy for the U.S., *IS NOT A PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DOCUMENT.*

Source for tweets 2/5 & 3/5: fema.gov/sites/default/…

Read 5 tweets

Share this page!

Enter URL or ID to Unroll

Sense Receptor

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

More from @SenseReceptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Sense Receptor

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Send Email!