First, he argues that David Axelrod, who excelled at getting affluent white urbanites to vote for black mayors, brought an advertising mentality to politics. Axelrod’s father was a psychologist…
…and his mother was an ad exec. Axelrod’s innovation was to create ‘permission structures’ - or socialization frameworks - that would lead people to vote against their own interests because they wanted to see themselves as the sort of socially desirable person who would vote…
…for a specific candidate (‘I am a Good Person, not a regressive chud, etc’). This tendency subsequently transformed politics from focusing on material negotiations to generating social status. People were way more enthusiastic about being ‘Obama voters’…
…than anything he promised or ended up doing.
The second assertion, which I’ve heard from Jacob Siegel too and is under appreciated, is that the unified ideological mechanism that includes the media, academia, gov’t, NGOs, and professional elites is best dated…
…back to the Iran deal, years before Trump or COVID. Corporate journalism was already being hollowed out and couldn’t offer the true expertise required to critically scrutinize a complex foreign policy matter like the Iran deal. So the Obama administration was able…
…to astroturf an apparatus of fake expertise and credentialism that served as a feedback loop (Ben Rhodes’ ‘echo chambers’) to validate the administration’s decisions.
Iran deal approbation was consciously engineered by the Obama administration including fiction writer…
…Rhodes, but this complex of institutions, what Wesley Yang calls the Vertically Integrated Messaging Apparatus, was deployed again and again from ‘Russia collusion’ to COVID to Hunter’s laptop to trans woo to the point where it became the reflexive means of ideological and…
…cultural ‘consensus making.’
Samuels views this externalized technological and technocratic apparatus as fundamentally totalitarian in that it creates a simulacrum of public assent that is used to subvert the role actual public opinion played in 20th century American…
…politics.
Samuels also views Trump’s 2024 victory as primarily a defeat of Obama and Obamism, not so much in terms of policy or personality but rather in the systematic dismantling of an entire bureaucratic/ ideological complex that facilitated Obama’s rise,…
…that was his most important instrument during his presidency, and that he still pulled the strings of after he left office. Samuels points out that simultaneous with the smashing of this apparatus, Obama has looked gaunt and sickly, like his life force has been extracted.
…
The big lib project, from Obama on, was to construct a new dispensation that would succeed the cohering but fraying social, military, and cultural experiences of WWII and the Cold War.
Gov’t (the admin state in particular) would partner with NGOs, media, and academia to create…
…a new liberal economic order legitimized by the continuous generation of *Progress* (i.e. institutionally approved identity narcissism and new liberatory adventures) while civil liberties (free speech, privacy, 2A, etc.) were continuously undermined.
The uniparty blob…
…simultaneously shrunk the range of acceptable political discourse by creating ‘consensus’ that an increasing number of high stakes political issues were ‘decided’ and now ‘above politics.’
This paradoxically rose the stakes of politics as opponents of managed democracy…
The answer is that we’re going on a decade now of enforced cultural and academic mediocrity where almost all institutional knowledge production has converged on a narrow set of tedious, preapproved intellectual tropes.
…
…
‘Calling people smelly is ideological and represents a means of social control.’
Yeah, ok brilliant insight.
PhD Smelly herself is incidental - the reason she’s getting attention is that she serves as an avatar for the institutions and social class who churn out the…
…regressive, pseudo ideological bilge that is culturally and academically dominant and so she’s on the receiving end of a lot of displaced anger.
Obviously it’s better to have a coherent politics that focuses on the institutions rather than individual people but…
Just a reminder that ‘the institutions’ supported the sort of dangerous, prohibited GOF that resulted in COVID, killing 10s of millions of people and costing trillions of dollars.
The institutions then locked us in our homes and forced low risk people (including children!) to…
…take an experimental therapeutic as the price of re-entering society.
They also closed schools for years irreparably harming the most vulnerable students who will never make up the lost time.
The institutions think confused tween girls should be injected with Lupron,…
…and they think middle aged men who become sexually aroused by thinking of themselves as women *are women.*
The institutions don’t think you can be trusted with your own mind. They think you need constant ideological surveillance and censorship and they conspired with tech…
Hard not to view events through the lens that empire has turned inward with the federal government playing the role of increasingly paranoid colonial administrators alienated from and hostile to the local population.
Helene cuts a swath through a regressive imperial backwater,…
…and the main concern seems to be that this is an inconvenience that has to somehow be worked into the stage sets of the presidential campaign.
Don’t these people understand there are more important extra territorial matters (Ukraine, the Middle East) that are of…
…priority?
Are they not being impertinent by complaining too loudly? Don’t they know their place? Don’t they know democracy is on the ballot? Don’t they know we’re defending the freedom of Europe? That ‘no human is illegal’ and that the federal disaster response agencies…