An important tactic used by wedge movements, Gramscian infiltrators (long march into the institutions to establish counter-hegemonic control), militant ideologies, and especially WOKE is an old Soviet technique called "Entryism." You'll surely recognize it once described. 🧵
Yes, it really is called "entryism," or "entrism," or "boring from within," which is highly descriptive, and it's being used all around you by militant ideological factions including the Woke (how they took our institutions), Woke Right, and Islamists. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entryism
Entryism is in some sense the art of entering an institution and insinuating yourself as a subversive, disruptor, divider, wedge, or plant in order to eventually transform the institution or group from within and bring it into service for your militant ideological ambitions.
The basic premise of the entryist program is to make entrance then purge "enemies" (the existing membership of the institution and the hegemony or culture they maintain). There are lots of ways to enter, and purges are basically all the same.
I've outlined a five-step process typical of the entrance part of entryism: 1) Demand access 2) Demand accommodation 3) Demand a seat at the table 4) Demand the table 5) Demand control over the institution newdiscourses.com/2024/01/how-th…
After the infiltrators enter into an institution (which can be a vague one, like a diffuse online community or even a "conversation" that's happening), they'll always begin to use divide, conquer, and purge techniques so they can wrest control of whatever they're attacking.
The four primary ways they do this are: 1) Sow internal discord in the target community 2) Introduce polarizing topics on polarizing terms and polarize around them 3) Use any standing they gain to bring in ideological comrades to increase power 4) Use the above to purge enemies.
Sowing internal discord is pretty easy. They get inside an institution and start talking to people, or injecting views into a conversation, usually of the sort that people recognized as being in leadership are somehow faithless, in error, unfair, etc., to generate agitation.
Introducing polarizing activity is probably the most interesting and important of these topics, but it's probably best for another thread. Generally, this will occur after some controversial event happens, and the goal is to create two hardline stances that polarize the target.
For example, you could wait until after a heated (mostly fake) debate about immigration and then introduce the idea that Ronald Reagan, who is an respected avatar of a prevailing political hegemony they want to destroy, supported immigration in bad ways.
The goal is to polarize the group around Reagan and to get at least some of the group to stand for Reagan (old guard to be destroyed) and others to turn against him (new guard who "gets it"). No nuance or complexity will be allowed. That will be made "proof" of being old guard.
The ultimate goals have very little to do with Reagan in this example. The goals are to create conditions for a purge of the existing group in favor of the radical entryists and to undermine the "hegemony" attached to Reagan's legacy, e.g., Shining City on a Hill and anti-Marxism
DEI is a perfect example of an entryist project, by the way. They come in under the guise of doing Civil Rights work to gain access, then manipulate the internal environment to fracture around identity politics construed on Woke (Maoist) terms, then purge "racists" etc.
The idea that radicals seeking to effect an institutional takeover and cultural revolution (that is, Gramscian activists) would use whatever power they have to bring in their friends (while purging enemies) is a no-brainer that requires no explanation.
Under an entryist program, though, like Woke Right, just know this: to hire one of them is to hire ten of them because that's exactly what they're going to do with the power afforded to them by getting inside. They'll bring in their friends. Just like the Woke Left did with DEI.
Finally, though I've already kind of explained it, the entryist radicals will use anything they get to purge their enemies (the legitimate representatives of the institution). All of the above tactics lead up to these last two points, which transform around "personnel is policy."
So-called "old guard" members will be increasingly accused of unrecognizable sins they're expected to atone for while being pressured out. Divisive and salacious narratives will be spun to disgrace them within their own communities. They'll be purged. newdiscourses.com/2024/04/how-ty…
The goal of entryism is to enter and then take over some institution, broadly construed, and to bring it under the control of the radical militant ideology using the entryist tactics. The Woke Left did this to us already. The Woke Right is doing it to us now. Don't let them!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
On a deep level, though not the deepest level, what "Woke" represents is a broken relationship to the two fundamental pillars of civilization, these being truth and justice. Woke always relativizes and localizes both truth and justice within their own twisted worldviews. 🧵
What is truth? Truth is a description of how much fidelity to reality a belief has.
What is justice? Justice is when people get what they deserve and do not get what they do not deserve, both good and bad in both cases.
Civilization depends completely on truth and justice.
Without truth, a society will fall out of step with reality itself, and the price of this error will be presented without any concern for anyone through the basic fact that reality is never wrong and is always undefeated. Civilization cannot be maintained outside of truth.
There's a lot of confusion around Fascism partly because it refers to two different systems, one economic and one sociocultural/political (they obviously can overlap). Economic Fascism is union of state and corporation. The other is a narrowly defined, high-purity "nationalism."
Most of the bugbear of Fascism as a fundamentally evil way to organize and run society refers to the puritanical doctrine of "nationalism," not the economic program that often gets linked to and defined by it, but Economic Fascism is a model of married state-corporate power.
Economic Fascism need not be (ethno)nationalist in the sense of explicitly rewarding only those businesses that support the puritanical doctrine of "nation," but it is broader, including any alignment of corporations to state interests through state mechanisms.
In a manner of speaking, though not literally, every Communist eventually ends up in the gulag he built to imprison and reeducate others.
Why?
It's because every powerful person in a Communist-like regime is vulnerable to baseless accusations of hypocrisy they cannot survive.🧵
In some sense, there are two types of societies: free and tyrannical. There are also two types of tyrannies: those run by warlords and what we might call Virtue Paradigms. While Communists can be as brutal as warlords, they run Virtue Paradigms.
As some will recognize, I'm borrowing from my brilliant, insightful friend @PardyBruce here in characterizing political orders as being based in freedom or virtue. My claim is that all political Virtue Paradigms are intrinsically vulnerable to baseless accusations of hypocrisy.
The key and most important difference between Woke and not-Woke is deeply philosophical. In fact, it's a metaphysical orientation, which is to say a worldview. It's anti-realism (Woke) versus realism (not). That's perception precedes reality versus reality precedes perception.
The Woke worldview is anti-realist. It believes that perception precedes reality. Obviously, few people are fully committed to this position or have a developed awareness of it, but it boils down to that in varying degrees. Believing perception defines reality means Woke.
There's more to it than that, though, because the actual definition of Woke is simple:
Woke means (woke up to) critical consciousness.
A critical consciousness is critical. Critical of what? Power and how it structures perception thus structures reality ("lived reality").
So let's talk a little about the thing we've actually been fighting. If you follow me, you know I put most of it down to Communism (or Bolshevism), but that's an abbreviation for convenience. "Communism" is a 20th-century thing. We're fighting a Communist-Fascist hybrid. 🧵
We'll obviously have to explain what Communism, Fascism, Bolshevism, and Sovietism all are to really understand the thing we're actually up against (and making headway against!), but let's start by pointing out that today's grand global evil is a blend of these things.
Our job today isn't just to stop Communism. It's to stop Communism and Fascism packaged as one, although either aspect of that union can be pushed to the front at any given time, like a one-two punch combination. The WEF and CCP are both Communist-Fascist hybrids on a new model.
What has always distinguished America as a nation is that it has always worked to reject an ethnonationalist conception of itself, as was encoded in our founding documents. Americans are a people in a place but a people who unite around the idea that ethnos isn't who we are.
America is exceptional. It's the greatest nation in the history of the world. America is exceptional because it has a completely different conception of itself than every other nation on Earth. It is not an ethnonationalist project but one built on self-evident truths.
You can turn to Stalin or Hitler or the 1924 English dictionary or any other sort of source you want and look up "nation" and find that it carries at least ethnonationalist connotations ("a specific people..."), but in so doing you miss America completely.