Keep this in the back of your mind when watching markets in the coming days ...
In terms of money:
The 2018 " Campfire" wildfire cost ~$12.5 billion. That was the old wildfire record.
The current wildfires, most often referred to as "Palisades Fires" (even though there are technically five of them), are now estimated (read: educated guesses) to cost $150 to $200 billion. And the fires are still ongoing.
This wildfire is now in the running for the most expensive natural disaster in American History.
So, the financial markets are discussing a POTENTIAL contagion in the Property/Casualty insurance sector and a POTENTIAL extinction-level event for some P&C companies.
The State of California and the City of Los Angeles could face massive clean-up costs, huge subsidies to the affected, and a significant loss of tax revenues in 2025 and beyond. This could lead to significant downgrades of their municipal bonds, POTENTIALLY triggering a contagion in the larger Municipal markets.
---
POTENTIAL means this is all fluid, and these statements make many assumptions.
Nevertheless, this is the discussion all weekend.
I think I need to define financial contagion. I will keep it as simple as possible.
Financial markets are highly interrelated and complicated—so complicated that it is virtually impossible to understand how different markets interact.
In "normal" times, markets make predictable and expected moves based on anticipated events (like an economic release or earnings report). Even though the market may have large moves off these events (like bonds selling off Friday on a strong payroll report), they are anticipated and understood such moves can happen at that time.
So, while these moves impact related markets (stocks sold off on Friday's bond selloff), they are understood and not very stressful for overall financial markets. In other words, these events do not "daisy-chain" down throughout financial markets, hence the term "contagion."
However, a completely unexpected event, called a "black swan" on Wall Street, will it impact related markets in unforeseen ways.
The question is, how do these large unexpected events impact investors and related markets?
So, what do large, unexpected insurance claims, huge uninsured losses, and massive clean-up mean for P&C insurers, CA/LA munis, and other directly related markets? Will significant unexpected moves in these markets force moves and repricing in other indirectly related markets? Does this daisy chain, taking on a life of its own, cause a contagion throughout financial markets?
No one really knows how these things will play out, and markets have many questions and fears and no immediate answers. As is often said, "markets hate uncertainty."
Everyone fears that such events will "break" something in financial markets, producing giant panicky moves and significant losses. This is why talk of contagion demands so much attention.
To follow up on the above, the natural answer is that the Fed will "print" money to cover these losses because this is what they always do.
Bond prices are plunging due to inflation fears. If printing ratchets inflation fears, the Fed's action will drive interest rates even higher, lower stock prices even more, and worsen things.
This is a different cycle—an inflation cycle. One has to be very careful when applying the answers of the disinflation/deflation cycle to an inflation cycle.
Remember when several banks blew up in March 2023, highlighted by Silicon Valley Bank? Not only did the Fed not print, but they kept hiking rates right through it. They correctly understood that massive easing into an inflation concern would just tank markets.
Do we have the same issue today?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The repost below expresses a common belief that risk assets are effective inflation hedges.
History suggests they are not.
This chart shows that the inflation of the 1960s and 1970s wiped out 64% of the after-inflation stock gains by 1982 (meaning inflation beat stocks by 64%). And all inflation-adjusted gains of the previous 27+ years (back to 1954) were gone (meaning inflation beat stocks over the previous 27 years).
It took until 1992, 28 years later, for stocks to finally start beating cumulative inflation since 1966.
2/3
Too many vastly underestimate the devastating impact of inflation.
Since the 2021 peak, when the Fed called inflation"transitory," stocks have only beaten inflation by just 15% (with dividends).
So a 10% to 12% correct and a little bit more inflation and four years of relative purchasing power is gone (meaning you are no better off than four years ago).
3/3
As I argue here, the crypto crowd also forgets inflation when they make their long-term forecasts.
🧵on yields and yield curve
---
The 30-year yield made a new 2024 close high yesterday.
Now, the highest yield since November 2023.
2/6
The 10-year yield is just eight basis points away from a new 2024 high.
Two trading days left this year.
3/6
The 2-year funds spread is the narrowest since March 2023 (bottom panel).
The massive reversal to negative in March 2023 was driven by the string of bank failures highlighted by Silicon Valley Bank. These failures were driven by fear of unrealized bond losses. So, while the Fed subsequently hiked three more times through July 2023, this spread inverting signaled the "end is near" for the rate-hiking cycle.
Now, at just -5 bps, this spread is the narrowest it has been in ~20 months and close to signaling "the end is near," if not already done, on the rate-cutting cycle.
TLT is the iShares 20-Treasury ETF, one of today's largest and most influential bond ETFs.
I've been arguing that the bond market rise in yields as the Fed cutting rates has been a rejection of the easing cycle. The bond market is saying the Fed has the wrong policy.
Monetary easing is not necessary given the strength of the US economy (See Atlanta Fed GDPnow) and the coming "Trump Stimulus. Fed easing is raising inflation expectations and driving yields higher.
Here is a chart of TLT's price (black) and cumulative flows (red).
From the day the Fed started hiking (March 16, 2022) to the November 7, 2024, FOMC meeting (labeled), cumulative inflows were steady, totaling over $55 billion.
A reasonable interpretation is that bond investors agreed with the Fed's policy from March 2022 to November 2024, even if it was hiking, as it was fighting inflation.
However, since the Fed cut again in November, bond investors have reversed and fled the bond market. Almost $10 billion has left TLT.
2/3
The bottom panel is a rolling 30-day flow into TLT. The last 30 days have seen a cumulative outflow of $8.69B, easily the largest 30-day outflow in TLT's history.
Again, this outflow started with the November 7 Fed cut, which I interpret as the market screaming "no" at the Fed about its move.
3/3
The chart below shows TLT's volume since 2023. The blue bars label the six highest-volume days in TLT's history. No volume day was over 80 million before 2023.
Thursday, December 19, was the record volume day at 99 million. This was the day after the Fed cut. The previous record was November 6, the day before the Fed cut on November 7.
The market is focused on the Fed meeting, not payroll or CPI days. Investors believe the Fed is making a mistake by cutting rates when it is not needed.