On a deep level, though not the deepest level, what "Woke" represents is a broken relationship to the two fundamental pillars of civilization, these being truth and justice. Woke always relativizes and localizes both truth and justice within their own twisted worldviews. 🧵
What is truth? Truth is a description of how much fidelity to reality a belief has.
What is justice? Justice is when people get what they deserve and do not get what they do not deserve, both good and bad in both cases.
Civilization depends completely on truth and justice.
Without truth, a society will fall out of step with reality itself, and the price of this error will be presented without any concern for anyone through the basic fact that reality is never wrong and is always undefeated. Civilization cannot be maintained outside of truth.
As the wages of error come in and problems amass, people will want answers. The only answers that can satisfy in the long term are true answers, though lies and errors can suffice in the short term. Without a strong and accurate truth-seeking mechanism, civilization will fall.
Without justice, people will not accept the terms of society and will assert their own terms. Our sense of fairness in all four respects is so deeply ingrained that the human being himself will not accept an unjust society and will revolt. It will not be civilized.
The four respects of justice are:
1) People get approximately the rewards they deserve 2) People do not get rewards they don't deserve 3) People get approximately the punishments they deserve 4) People do not get punishments they don't deserve.
Civilization depends on these.
Woke has a broken relationship with both of these pillars of civilization. Woke, in all its forms, always locates truth in agreement with its views. Woke, in all forms, always locates justice in whatever advances its objectives. Both are therefore localized and subjective.
When you have localized and subjective "truths" and "justice," the only adjudication between them is might, or force. Your group asserts these truths and these ethics of justice, their group asserts others, and the bigger, stronger, badder group asserts them over everyone later.
This introduces a third "leg of the stool" of civilization: power. Power is not a pillar of civilization; it is a prop for civilization, which is balanced upon two pillars: truth and justice. Power fills the gap between the ideal and the real where truth and justice are concerned
The bigger the gap between truth and reality, the bigger the gap between society and justice, the more power is needed, and the more power will be applied to keep the dysfunctional society above the waters of chaos. A semblance of civilization resides above that waterline.
Woke does not have a healthy relationship with truth or justice, and it covets power. It also benefits from degrading the existing society's relationships to truth and justice through means like critical theory (critique) and postmodern deconstruction. Power is its domain.
The Woke relationship to truth is that truth is constructed by the powerful and the powerful should be them because they're Woke. This is a critical postmodern perspective known as "critical constructivism." Adopting this epistemology is having a "critical consciousness," or Woke
The Woke relationship to justice is that justice is asserted by and serves the powerful, and the powerful should be them because they're Woke. This is a self-serving definition of justice sometimes called "social justice," though "liberating/repressive tolerance" also works.
The Woke relationship to truth and justice is therefore a self-dealing, corrupt system that installs a tyranny under their own control, which will eventually be led by a malignant narcissist and/or paranoiac who can manipulate that para-logical, para-moral system for himself.
As truth and justice fall increasingly by the wayside, power necessarily props up society more and more, as civilization tries to hold on and not collapse. This benefits the Woke whose domain is power and its corruptions, and their system becomes totalitarian.
The corrective to Woke is therefore truth and justice. Truth has to be sought, loved, asserted, and defended through rigorous methodologies connected to tangible incentives. Justice has to be applied blindly and fairly with no "social" corruptions.
The corrective to Woke also therefore cannot be an alternative Woke. A corruption of truth cannot be corrected by a different corruption of truth, and a corruption of justice cannot be remedied by a different corruption of justice. These are simple facts, and they are Biblical.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Short term: Agitate and radicalize a segment of MAGA, esp. youth
Mid term: Fracture MAGA around issues and Trump specifically as Trump does Trump instead of WR things
Long term: Seize defeat from the jaws of victory for Left.
In the immediate term, the Woke Right is running a radicalization blitzkrieg attack, pushing issue after issue that draw our young men into greater radicalization, anger, socialist thinking, postmodernist utilitarianism, etc. This is fracturing MAGA and has foreign help.
These issues are meant to balkanize MAGA ideologically and radicalize the segments of MAGA influenced by Woke Right narratives and active measures. MAGA and the MAGA/MAHA/+ broad pro-America coalition will fracture and scatter under these repeated operations and their issues.
An important tactic used by wedge movements, Gramscian infiltrators (long march into the institutions to establish counter-hegemonic control), militant ideologies, and especially WOKE is an old Soviet technique called "Entryism." You'll surely recognize it once described. 🧵
Yes, it really is called "entryism," or "entrism," or "boring from within," which is highly descriptive, and it's being used all around you by militant ideological factions including the Woke (how they took our institutions), Woke Right, and Islamists. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Entryism
Entryism is in some sense the art of entering an institution and insinuating yourself as a subversive, disruptor, divider, wedge, or plant in order to eventually transform the institution or group from within and bring it into service for your militant ideological ambitions.
There's a lot of confusion around Fascism partly because it refers to two different systems, one economic and one sociocultural/political (they obviously can overlap). Economic Fascism is union of state and corporation. The other is a narrowly defined, high-purity "nationalism."
Most of the bugbear of Fascism as a fundamentally evil way to organize and run society refers to the puritanical doctrine of "nationalism," not the economic program that often gets linked to and defined by it, but Economic Fascism is a model of married state-corporate power.
Economic Fascism need not be (ethno)nationalist in the sense of explicitly rewarding only those businesses that support the puritanical doctrine of "nation," but it is broader, including any alignment of corporations to state interests through state mechanisms.
In a manner of speaking, though not literally, every Communist eventually ends up in the gulag he built to imprison and reeducate others.
Why?
It's because every powerful person in a Communist-like regime is vulnerable to baseless accusations of hypocrisy they cannot survive.🧵
In some sense, there are two types of societies: free and tyrannical. There are also two types of tyrannies: those run by warlords and what we might call Virtue Paradigms. While Communists can be as brutal as warlords, they run Virtue Paradigms.
As some will recognize, I'm borrowing from my brilliant, insightful friend @PardyBruce here in characterizing political orders as being based in freedom or virtue. My claim is that all political Virtue Paradigms are intrinsically vulnerable to baseless accusations of hypocrisy.
The key and most important difference between Woke and not-Woke is deeply philosophical. In fact, it's a metaphysical orientation, which is to say a worldview. It's anti-realism (Woke) versus realism (not). That's perception precedes reality versus reality precedes perception.
The Woke worldview is anti-realist. It believes that perception precedes reality. Obviously, few people are fully committed to this position or have a developed awareness of it, but it boils down to that in varying degrees. Believing perception defines reality means Woke.
There's more to it than that, though, because the actual definition of Woke is simple:
Woke means (woke up to) critical consciousness.
A critical consciousness is critical. Critical of what? Power and how it structures perception thus structures reality ("lived reality").
So let's talk a little about the thing we've actually been fighting. If you follow me, you know I put most of it down to Communism (or Bolshevism), but that's an abbreviation for convenience. "Communism" is a 20th-century thing. We're fighting a Communist-Fascist hybrid. 🧵
We'll obviously have to explain what Communism, Fascism, Bolshevism, and Sovietism all are to really understand the thing we're actually up against (and making headway against!), but let's start by pointing out that today's grand global evil is a blend of these things.
Our job today isn't just to stop Communism. It's to stop Communism and Fascism packaged as one, although either aspect of that union can be pushed to the front at any given time, like a one-two punch combination. The WEF and CCP are both Communist-Fascist hybrids on a new model.