Nate Hochman Profile picture
Jan 14 17 tweets 8 min read Read on X
In 1954, 750 Border Patrol agents deported 1.1 million illegals in the space of a few months.

Today, we have 21,000 Border Patrol agents—and far more advanced technology.

Mass deportations are reasonable, necessary and possible. We've done it before—and we can do it again. 🧵 Image
Image
Image
Image
Trump wants the largest deportation force in history. His critics say that's too costly, complicated and cruel.

They're wrong. We should start making that argument now. Support for deportations is at record highs—but once they start, the media is going to try to change that. Image
There are two main categories here: "Returns" and "Removals."

"Returns" are voluntary departures—illegal aliens choosing to leave on their own without a formal deportation order.

"Removals" are what we think of as deportations—compulsory and based on a formal order of removal. Image
Deportations have been climbing for decades.

Barack Obama actually deported a record number of people—more than 3 million. (Although interior removals declined relative to the overall illegal population). He was nicknamed the "deporter in chief" by his left-wing critics. Image
Image
Image
Image
There have been various points in American history—under both Republican and Democrat presidents—where we've mass-mobilized resources to repel a border invasion.

Clinton launched Operation Gatekeeper. Bush and Obama both deployed the National Guard to help apprehend illegals. Image
Image
To be clear, what President Trump is aiming to do is more ambitious.

As of July 2023, an estimated 11.7 million illegal aliens lived in the US. Some estimate it's far more.

To fix this decades-long crisis, Trump will have to deport more than any other president in history. Image
But this, too, has a precedent.

The most successful mass deportation in American history happened in 1954—exactly 70 years ago.

A program known as "Operation Wetback" removed 1.1 million illegal aliens in just a few months.

Here's the kicker: They did it with only 750 agents. Image
In 1954, America faced a crisis similar to ours: 3 million illegal aliens had crossed the border over the past few years.

The farm industry was exploiting the cheap migrant labor to pay half the American wage—and they were paying off local officials to look the other way. Image
Ranchers were paying illegal workers about half the going American wage. Senior US immigration officials "had friends among the ranchers"—so they looked the other way. Border Patrol agents didn't dare make arrests on certain farms, because their bosses had political connections. Image
Powerful politicians like Sen. Lyndon Johnson (D) of Texas were in bed with influential vested interests, such as ranchers and growers, who wanted cheap migrant labor to pick their crops and tend their herds.

From 1944-1954, illegal immigration from Mexico increased 6,000%. Image
Image
President Eisenhower's solution was to go around the establishment. He appointed Gen. Joseph Swing—his old West Point classmate—to head immigration enforcement.

Swing's first move: Transfer corrupt officials away from the border—and replace them with men who would do their job. Image
On June 17, 1954, "Operation Wetback" began. It started in California and Arizona, but by mid-July, it had extended into the rest of the interior.

By the end of July, the 750 agents had caught over 50,000 illegals—and another 488,000 illegals had voluntarily fled the country. Image
Image
Over half a million, in one month—with 750 agents.

In just two years, Border Patrol "had virtually halted illegal immigration across the entire 2,000-mile US-Mexico frontier."

Once "removals" began, "voluntary returns" spiked. Illegal workers saw which way the wind was blowing. Image
Another innovation: They didn't just drop deportees at the border, where they could easily hop back across into America.

They used buses, trains, planes and ships to take them more than 500 miles south into Mexico. Many were met at the border with specially chartered trains. Image
Image
It worked.

By the end of the 1950s, illegal immigration had declined by 95%. In just a few years, America hadn't just deported the surge of illegal immigrants who had entered our country—we had eliminated the problem of illegal immigration altogether. (For at least a time). Image
What this shows is that large-scale mass deportations are not only possible—they become easier as you go. Once you start deporting en masse, many illegals will voluntarily leave the country.

Here's what some Border Patrol veterans of Operation Wetback said in a 2006 interview: Image
To reiterate: This was achieved with 750 agents—1/28th of the Border Patrol force today. With 1950s-era surveillance, apprehension and transportation capabilities.

Mass deportations are not "impossible"—far from it. We have the tools. We just need the political will to use them.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nate Hochman

Nate Hochman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @njhochman

Feb 9
These are Trump's best approval numbers ever. But look at the generational breakdown.

Boomers are 50/50. Millennials are +4.

Gen Z is +10.

I'll keep saying it: Zoomers are going to be the most right-wing generation in recent memory.Image
In some ways, this is the U.S. catching up with something that's happening across the West. One of the fascinating things about right-wing nationalism in Europe is that it's often more popular with young voters. It wasn't 60-something pensioners who were singing "Auslander Raus."
It's true. Gen X was a remarkably healthy, patriotic generation, wedged between two highly dysfunctional ones. In 1984, Reagan overperformed with 18-24 year olds—the first batch of Gen X voters.

The last time the GOP carried that age demo was 1988.
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 30
Whenever Robert E. Lee comes up, liberals suddenly become foaming-at-the-mouth nationalists—raging about “traitors,” “treason,” etc.

The only other time they ever use this language is when they’re talking about Trump. That should tell you a lot about what this is really about.
tapping the @Antweegonus sign: Image
@Antweegonus I wrote about this on the anniversary of the Appomattox last April:

spectator.org/undoing-the-ap…Image
Image
Read 5 tweets
Jan 29
The refugee NGOs are a perfect example of a self-licking ice cream cone:

1) The government gives NGOs money to resettle refugees.

2) The NGOs lobby for more money—and more refugees.

3) Rinse, repeat Image
It's not even particularly clandestine or secretive—a lot of these groups are openly boasting about it.

The USCCB, for example, regularly touts their efforts on their website: Image
Image
Same thing with HIAS—one of the groups whose funding skyrocketed under Biden. (And is actively involved in transporting migrants up from South America into the U.S.)

These guys are in DC, actively advocating for expanding asylum, more refugees, etc:
Image
Image
Read 6 tweets
Jan 28
This is arguably the single most important aspect of Trump's funding freeze.

The immigration crisis isn't an accident. It's a well-oiled system, facilitated by powerful NGOs—and funded by your tax dollars.

By defunding the NGOs, Trump is crippling the entire system. 🧵 Image
Here's what just happened: Last week, President Trump signed an executive order suspending refugee admissions into the U.S.

Then, the State Department went a step further—they issued a "stop-work" order to their NGO "partners," suspending all funding for refugee resettlement. Image
Image
The NGOs were beside themselves. And for good reason—very few of these groups are self-sufficient. Most of them are sustained by the federal tax-dollar gravy train. The immigration crisis is being financed by your government—with your money.

Hence, their outraged statements: Image
Image
Image
Image
Read 19 tweets
Jan 27
For years, we were told that "the internet isn't real life." But in this election, it was. Online influencers, issues and ideas played a major role in the 2024 election—especially on the right.

Today's right is more "online" than the left—and that's part of why it's winning. 🧵 Image
Conservative politics used to take place on the airwaves of Fox and talk radio, in established journals and magazines, think tanks and direct-mail campaigns, etc. Now almost all of that is downstream of the internet. In 2024, the right-wing "lifeworld" is shaped online. Image
It's a trickle-down information economy: Not every Republican voter is active on here. But the people that *they* get their news from are. The talk-show pundits, Fox News scriptwriters, journalists, etc are almost all "very online." This is where the influencers are influenced. Image
Image
Read 22 tweets
Jan 16
In his farewell speech, Joe Biden raged against the "tech-industrial complex."

That "complex" is real. But it's extremely left-wing.

There's a revolving door between Big Tech and the Democratic Party.

They're not just allies—they're often literally run by the same people. 🧵 Image
There are a number of high-profile renegade tech titans (i.e., Elon Musk) who are "on the right." Obviously, that's who Biden was talking about in his speech.

But they're exceptions to the rule. Writ large, the tech industry is an extension of the institutional Left. Image
In the 2020 campaign, for example, employees of Google, Microsoft, Amazon, Apple and Facebook were "the five largest sources of money for Mr. Biden’s campaign and joint fundraising committees among those identifying corporate employers," according to the Wall Street Journal: Image
Image
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(