Maryanne Demasi, PhD Profile picture
Jan 17 6 tweets 3 min read Read on X
PART II: Implications of plasmid DNA fragments in blood products
Blind spots in the oversight of blood products, leaves the public in a dangerous state of speculation.
@Kevin_McKernan @Jikkyleaksblog.maryannedemasi.com/p/part-ii-impl…Image
Gene fragments encoding 'SV40' and 'Kanamycin,' which are specific to the plasmid DNA used in vaccine manufacturing of mRNA vaccines, have been identified in blood samples.

If these genetic sequences can persist in the bloodstream after vaccination, and potentially end up in blood products such as fresh frozen plasma, whole blood, or cryoprecipitate, what risks might they pose to recipients?"
Australian Red Cross says there is no evidence risk to a recipient. But it does not track the COVID-19 vaccination status of donors, nor has it tested for these genetic components of mRNA vaccines in donated blood. @RedCrossAU Image
Dr Richard Davis, former member of the SA Red Cross blood transfusion committee, has questioned the robustness of these assurances.

“If the Red Cross is not documenting the vaccination status of donors, how can it possibly track any harm?”

“Further, the Red Cross should not claim there is no evidence of risk to recipients when such effects may take years to manifest,” he added.Image
As late as September 2022, American @RedCross stated on X, “the COVID-19 vaccine does not enter the bloodstream.”

But findings by Chakraborty, data from biodistribution studies in Japanese regulatory documents, and a study published this month in Nature, all clearly show that the vaccine leaves the injection site and circulates widely throughout the body.Image
“Without data, we are left in a dangerous state of speculation,” Dr Davis said.

For the full story 👇👇 blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/part-ii-impl…Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Maryanne Demasi, PhD

Maryanne Demasi, PhD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @MaryanneDemasi

Oct 23
🧵The Weaponisation of Science
"The scientific process has been hollowed out by financial incentives, regulatory capture, and institutional cowardice."

LINK 👇👇
@MAHA_Action @Holden_Culotta @SecKennedyImage
CENSORSHIP
I first saw this clearly in 2013 while investigating statins. My ABC documentary questioned whether statins were being overprescribed, and it unleashed a media firestorm.

The episode was pulled after industry outrage, and I was publicly attacked. None of the critics engaged with the evidence — they simply sought to silence it.
blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/heart-of-the…Image
LACK OF TRANSPARENCY
The raw data underpinning statin trials are held exclusively by the Oxford-based Cholesterol Treatment Trialists (CTT) & have been released because of a legally binding agreement to block third-party access.
Hence despite millions of people taking statins daily, there has never been an independent verification of the statin trials. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/29353811/Image
Read 11 tweets
Oct 15
🔥Inside the Henry Ford vaccine controversy
The Henry Ford Health study comparing vaccinated and unvaccinated children was never published—until Congress forced it into the open.
Here’s what it found, and why it matters.
LINK below 👇👇

@AaronSiriSG @HenryFordHealth
@MdBreathe @Jikkyleaks @DowdEdward @newstart_2024Image
The lead investigator, Dr Marcus Zervos, is a veteran infectious-disease specialist. During the Covid-19 pandemic, he was a regular on local news programs, promoting vaccination and defending public-health mandates.
His involvement gave the project an establishment credibility rarely seen in vaccine-safety research.Image
Completed in 2020, the study was unpublished until it was introduced into the congressional record on 9 September 2025 during a Senate hearing.
The Henry Ford team found vaccinated children had far higher rates of chronic disease than their unvaccinated peers.
hsgac.senate.gov/wp-content/upl…Image
Read 8 tweets
Oct 5
🚨The HPV vaccine
A Scottish study was billed as ‘proof’ the HPV vaccine can wipe out cervical cancer. But a new analysis of the raw data shows it was nothing more than a statistical illusion.

LINK 👇👇
@RetsefL
@MdBreathe
@Jikkyleaks
@newstart_2024Image
In January 2024, headlines erupted worldwide.
“No cervical cancer cases in HPV-vaccinated women,” declared @BBCNews, hailing a landmark breakthrough from Scotland.
A study in the @JNCI_Now claimed that girls who received the HPV vaccine at age 12 or 13 had not developed a single case of cervical cancer.Image
Two Australian researchers have reanalysed the raw data used in the Scottish study. Most women in the “zero cases” group were still under 25 when the study on HPV vaccine ended.

But cervical cancer is rarely seen in women under 25 (average age of diagnosis is ~50) - it takes decades to develop after infection. So of course there were no cancer cases in that cohort. These women were simply too young. Vaccine or no vaccine, the outcome was entirely predictable. @DrSuzanneH7
Read 5 tweets
Oct 1
🚨The Nature of hypocrisy: pharma-funded journals smearing independent voices
@Nature alleges that I endanger public health, but it is the journal — steeped in pharma money — that ought to be looking inward.

LINK 👇👇

@RetsefL @RWMaloneMD @Jikkyleaks
@TheChiefNerd @DowdEdward @weldeiry
@SciGuardians @Kevin_McKernan @MdBreatheImage
According to the email, I was being lumped into an “anti-vaccine movement,” accused of “endangering public health,” and “profiting from disseminating misinformation.”

No evidence was provided. No articles were cited. No definition of “anti-vaccine” was offered. No complainants were named. Just blanket accusations intended as a character assassination.Image
Conflict of interest at the heart of @Nature
This journal that publishes vaccine research while pocketing revenue from pharmaceutical advertising and sponsored content from vaccine manufacturers.

To then assign an editor to target independent journalists who scrutinise that very industry is a glaring conflict of interest.

On its own website, Nature boasts of partnerships with @JanssenUS, @Merck , @AstraZeneca and others, dressing them up as “pioneering collaborations” to “support science.” It even publishes paid advertising features.Image
Read 8 tweets
Sep 23
🚨Moderna misled ACIP on key safety studies
Biodistribution studies were never done on the Covid mRNA vaccine that people actually received — and when confronted with questions, Moderna lied to CDC’s vaccine advisers.
LINK BELOW 👇👇
@RetsefL @KUPERWASSERLAB @weldeiry @RWMaloneMD @Jikkyleaks @MdBreathe @RobSchneider @Honest_Medicine @DowdEdward
@HHS_JimImage
Last week, two members of ACIP’s Covid vaccine work group, Prof Charlotte Kuperwasser & Prof Wafik El-Deiry, presented evidence @moderna_tx did not use its commercial vaccine for key biodistribution studies. Image
ACIP member, Dr Evelyn Griffin asked @moderna_tx if it used the commercial vaccine for biodistribution testing it submitted to the FDA.

“Is it the exact same mRNA that was used in the vaccination product — that I received, for example?”

“Yes, yes it is,” replied Moderna rep, Dr Darin EdwardsImage
Read 6 tweets
Sep 10
🧵ACIP to probe DNA contamination in Covid-19 vaccines
DNA contamination in Covid vaccines is back in the spotlight, with a peer-reviewed study now before CDC advisers just days ahead of their pivotal vote.
LINK BELOW 👇👇

@SecKennedy @RetsefL @RWMaloneMD @HHS_Jim
@TheChiefNerd @Jikkyleaks @Kevin_McKernan @jimmy_dore @RobSchneiderImage
The Advisory Committee on Immunisation Practices (ACIP) has formed a new Covid vaccine work group, chaired by MIT professor @RetsefL. Its Terms of Reference, published last month, explicitly list “DNA contamination” as an issue to be addressed.
blog.maryannedemasi.com/p/breaking-aci…Image
The development follows the publication of a peer-reviewed study in Autoimmunity by @DJSpeicher, @Kevin_McKernan & @JesslovesMJK, which analysed 32 vials of the more recent XBB.1.5 Moderna and Pfizer vaccines.
tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.10…Image
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(